Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T23:33:17.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family type and fertility in rural India: a critical analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Carol Vlassoff  and
Michael Vlassoff
Carol Vlassoff
Affiliation:
Social Sciences Division, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada
Michael Vlassoff
Affiliation:
Population Division, United Nations, New York, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper, based on data from two independent but concurrent studies, seeks to show that the explanation for the inconclusive results concerning fertility and family type in India lies in the failure of previous researchers to take account of an important intervening variable, the family life cycle. Fertility levels are examined in nuclear and joint families in a village in Western India and changes in relationships at different stages in the family cycle are considered. The most important conclusion is that aggregate level observations which indicate that fertility varies according to family type are misleading. When other relevant factors such as age or stage in the family life cycle are controlled, there is little evidence of any intrinsic connection between fertility and family type.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1983 , pp. 407 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bebarta, P.C. (1977) Family type and fertility in India. Christopher, North Quincy.Google Scholar
Burch, T. & Gendell, M. (1970) Extended family structure and fertility: some conceptual and methodological issues. J. Marr. & Fam. 32, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1976) Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2, 321.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1978) A theory of fertility: from high plateau to destabilization. Popul. Dev. Rev. 4, 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, G.H. (1973) Emerging conjugal role patterns in a joint family system: correlates of social change in Dharwar, India. J. Marr. & Fam. 35, 742.Google Scholar
Dandekar, K. & Bhate, V. (1976) Socioeconomic Change during Three Five Year Plans (Based on a Study of Rural Communities during 1953–1966). Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona.Google Scholar
Davis, K. (1955) Institutional patterns favouring high fertility in underdeveloped areas. Eugen. Q. 2, 33.Google Scholar
Davis, K. & Blake, J. (1956) Social structure and fertility: an analytical framework. Econ. Dev. cult. Change, 4, 211.Google Scholar
Driver, E.D. (1963) Differential Fertility in Central India. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Freedman, R., Takeshita, J.Y. & Sun, T.H. (1964) Fertility and family planning in Taiwan: a case study of demographic transition. Am. J. Sociol. 70, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, W.J. (1963) World Revolution and Family Patterns. Free Press of Glencoe, London.Google Scholar
Gore, M.S. (1965) The traditional Indian family. In: Comparative Family Systems, p. 209. Edited by Nimkoff, M.F.. Houghton Miffin, Boston.Google Scholar
Karim, M.S. (1974) Fertility differentials by family type. Pakistan Dev. Rev. 13, 129.Google Scholar
Lorimer, F. (1954) Culture and Human Fertility UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, K. (1979) Sociology of Fertility: Determinants of Fertility Differentials in South India. Sterling, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Nag, M. (1967) Family type and fertility. In: Proceedings, World Population Conference 1965, Vol. II, p. 160–163. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Orenstein, H. (1966) The Hindu joint family: the norms and the numbers. Pacific Aff. 39, 314.Google Scholar
Palmore, J.A. (1972) Population change, conjugal status and the family. In: Population Aspects of Social Development. Asian Population Studies, Series No. 11 ECAFE, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Prakasl, K. & Malaker, C. (1967) The relationship between family type and fertility. Milbank meml. Fund Q. Bull. 45, 451.Google Scholar
Shah, A.M. (1973) The Household Dimension of the Family in India. Orient Longman, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Stycos, J.M. (1958) Some directions for research on fertility control. Milbank meml. Fund Q. Bull. 36, 126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlassoff, C. (1978) The Significance of Cultural Tradition for Contraceptive Change: a Study of Rural Indian Women. PhD thesis, University of Poona, India.Google Scholar
Vlassoff, C. (1980) Unmarried adolescent females in rural India: a study of the social impact of education. J. Man. & Fam. 42, 427.Google Scholar
Vlassoff, C. (1982) The status of women in rural India: a village study. Social Action, 32, 380.Google Scholar
Vlassoff, M. (1978) Economic Motives and Fertility in an Indian Village. PhD thesis, University of Poona, India.Google Scholar
Vlassoff, M. (1979) Labour demand and economic utility of children: a case study in rural India. Popul. Stud. 33, 415.Google Scholar