Article contents
Precocious Archaeology: Susan Sontag and the Criticism of Culture
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 January 2009
Extract
If Susan Sontag is not a writer behind whom a school or substantial following has gathered, this has much to do with the unsystematic nature of her work. Her studies of thought and culture are not the work of a systematic theorist; they are too much involved with personal taste and response, too free-ranging and open-ended to attract disciplined followers. Sontag's writings receive little direct critical attention at present, though she is often quoted on photography or film, or used to support various theses on post-modernism. Her writings reward more rigorous analysis, especially as the work of this American critic would seem to complement and yet significantly depart from the theorizing of more commonly acknowledged European thinkers – structuralist and post-structuralist – with whom she is contemporary.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990
References
1 In interview with Alinder, James, “An Interview with Susan Sontag,” Untitled, 15 (1986), 36.Google Scholar
2 Sontag, Susan, “Preface” to Barthes, Roland, Writing Degree Zero (Boston: Beacon Press, 1970), xi.Google Scholar
3 Sontag, Susan, Styles of Radical Will (New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1987), 75.Google Scholar
4 Sontag, Susan, the “The Salmagundi Interview,” A Susan Sontag Reader, ed. Hardwick, Elizabeth (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983), 346.Google Scholar
5 Rosenberg, Harold, The Tradition of the New (London: Paladin, 1970), 10.Google Scholar
6 Barthes, Roland, Mythologies (New York: Hill and Wang, 1972), 11.Google Scholar
7 Sontag, Susan, On Photography (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979), 19.Google Scholar
8 Sontag, Susan, Against Interpretation (New York: Octagon, 1982), viii.Google Scholar
9 Ibid., 171.
10 On Photography, 32.Google Scholar
11 Against Interpretation, 90.Google Scholar
12 Ibid., 13.
13 Trilling, Lionel, Beyond Culture: Essays on Literature and Learning (New York: Viking Press, 1965), 179.Google Scholar
14 See Foucault, Michel, Madness and Civilisation (New York: Pantheon, 1965).Google Scholar
15 Derrida, Jacques, “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences,” in The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, eds. Macksey, Richard and Donato, Eugenio (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), 252.Google Scholar
16 On Photography, 23.Google Scholar
17 Styles of Radical Will, 91.Google Scholar
18 Burke, Kenneth, “Linguistic Approach to Problems of Education,” Modern Philosophies and Education, ed. Henry, Nelson B. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955), 271.Google Scholar
19 Against Interpretation, 50.Google Scholar
20 Derrida, Jacques, Positions (London, 1981), 41.Google Scholar
21 Against Interpretation, 275–92.Google Scholar
22 Ibid., 290.
23 Ibid., 288.
24 “The Salmagundi Interview,” 340.Google Scholar
20 See Stallybrass, Peter and White, Allon, eds., The Politics and Poetics of Transgression (Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
26 Styles of Will, Radical, 70–71.Google Scholar
27 Foucault, Michel, The Archeology of Knowledge (London: Tavistock, 1972), 130.Google Scholar
28 Sontag, Susan, “On Art and Consciousness,” Performing Arts Journal, 2 (1976), 32.Google Scholar
29 See Derrida, Jacques, Margins of Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 3–27.Google Scholar
30 I follow Catherine Belsey's formulation here in her proposal to study a “politics of meaning.” Belsey has recognized the dangers of relativism and argued the need to “lay claims to specific meanings in the name of politics, not truth.” However, I fail to see how her specific political meanings can be anything other than forms of truth. Belsey, Catherine, “The Politics of Meaning,” in Barker, Francis et al. , eds., Confronting the Crisis (Essex: University of Essex, 1984), 27–29.Google Scholar
31 Williams, Raymond, Politics and Letters (London: New Left Books, 1979), 172.Google Scholar
32 Against Interpretation, 69–70, 80.Google Scholar
33 Against Interpretation, 80.Google Scholar There is a trace of Sontag's distrust of humanist universalism in her comments on Levi-Strauss, as when she comments that “for Levi-Strauss, the logic of mythic thought is fully as rigorous as that of modern science … [he] argues that the activity of the mind in imposing form on content is fundamentally the same for all minds, archaic and modern” (79). Jean Baudrillard is more direct in his charge against Levi-Strauss's work: “this is the extreme of liberal thought and the most beautiful way of preserving the initiative and priority of Western thought within ‘dialogue’ and under the sign of the universality of the human mind (as always for Enlightenment anthropology). Here is the beautiful soul! Is it possible to be more impartial in the sensitive and intellectual knowledge of the other? This harmonious vision of his thought processes renders their confrontation perfectly inoffensive, by denying the difference of the primitives as an element of rupture with and subversion of [our] ‘objectified thought and its understanding.’” Baudrillard, Jean, Mirror of Production (St. Louis: Telos, 1975), 90.Google Scholar
34 Styles of Will, Radical, 271.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 225, 270, 271.
36 Ibid., 263–64; 264.
37 A Susan Sontag Reader, 275, 284, 286.Google Scholar
38 Ibid., 285.
39 Ibid., 268, 282, 284, 286.
40 Ibid., 443.
41 Berman, Art, From the New Critics to Deconstruction: The Reception of Structuralism and Poststructuralism (Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988), 229.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., 5.
43 Against Interpretation, 202.Google Scholar
44 A Susan Sontag Reader, 431.Google Scholar
45 Barthes, Roland, Roland Barthes (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Barthes, Roland, The Pleasure of the Text (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975), 82.Google ScholarBarthes, Roland, S/Z (New York: Hill and Wang, 1974), 11.Google Scholar
47 Barthes, Roland, Critical Essays (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972), 386.Google Scholar
48 Brooks, Peter, “Death Of/As Metaphor,” Partisan Review, 46 (1979), 438.Google Scholar
49 Ibid., 439.
50 On Photography, 156.Google Scholar
51 Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things (London: Tavistock, 1970), 386.Google Scholar
52 Foster, Hal, “The ‘Primitive’ Unconcious,” Recodings: Art, Spectacle, Cultural Politics (Port Townsend, Washington: Bay Press, 1984)Google Scholar. The notion that all sites of otherness are fully colonized by culture has gained much credence amongst critics of postmodernity. See Jameson's, Fredric influential argument, “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,” New Left Review, 146 (07–08, 1984), 53–92.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by