Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T13:17:27.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultrasonic scanning for determination of stage of pregnancy in the llama (Lama glama): a critical comparison of calibration techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. R. Iason ,
D. A. Elston  and
D. A. Sim
G. R. Iason
Affiliation:
MaCaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ, UK
D. A. Elston
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural Statistics Service, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ, UK
D. A. Sim
Affiliation:
MaCaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Measurements of foetal head diameter (HD) and trunk diameter (TD) were made using ultrasonic scanning of 11 pregnant llamas (Lama glama). Each llama was scanned fortnightly to obtain measurements of HD and TD from c. 84–271 and 65–168 days since mating respectively. There were approximate linear relationships between TD and days after mating and between HD and the logarithm of days after mating.

Calibration equations for predicting the number of days after mating (d) from foetal measurements constructed using (i) the inverse method in which d is regressed on HD or TD and (ii) the classical method in which HD or TD are regressed on d. These calibration methods were assessed by crossvalidation, treating each animal in turn as the individual for which predictions were required. Analysis of the prediction errors showed bias in the classical method, which consistently underestimated d at low values. A components of variance analysis indicated substantial variation between individuals which must be taken into account in calculating standard errors of prediction (S.E.P.) and confidence intervals. S.E.P. of d from TD can be reduced from 12·5 to 10·4 days by increasing the number of observations on an individual from one to four at fortnightly intervals. For prediction from HD, the equivalent figures are size dependent: examples are from 8·3 to 5·6 days, and from 26 to 18 days, for HDs of 2 and 6 cm respectively. The effect of small positive correlations between residuals of successive fortnightly measurements on the same llamas had a negligible effect on S.E.P.S, increasing them by c. 0·2 days. Ultrasonic scanning is suitable for determination of stage of pregnancy of llamas providing S.E.P.S which are small in relation to their long gestation period (335–360 days).

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 120 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 371 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adam, C. L., Moir, C. E. & Shiach, P. (1989). Plasma progesterone concentrations in pregnant and non-pregnant llamas (Lama glama). Veterinary Record 125, 618–620.Google ScholarPubMed
Bourke, D. (1990). Camelid breeding. In South American Camelids: Proceedings of First Conference of the British Camelids Owners and Breeders Association, pp. 19–26. Midlothian: MLURI.Google Scholar
Crowder, M. J. & Hand, D. J. (1990). Analysis of Repeated Measures. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Dapson, R. W. (1980). Guidelines for statistical usage in age estimation techniques. Journal of Wildlife Management 44, 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, M. E. (1989). Medicine and Surgery of South American Camelids. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. A., Jones, P. W., Polak, J. W. & Tillotson, H. T. (1991). The problem of conversion in method comparison studies. Applied Statistics 40, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llppert, M. (1985). Aspects of feeding the hill ewe during pregnancy. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. J. & Murray, L. (1982 a). Effects of long term undernutrition of the ewe on the growth rates of individual fetuses during late pregnancy. Research in Veterinary Science 32, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, D. J. & Murray, L. (1982 b). Effects on the rate of increase in fetal girth of refeeding ewes after short periods of severe undernutrition during late pregnancy. Research in Veterinary Science 32, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oman, S. D. & Wax, Y. (1984). Estimating foetal age by ultrasound measurements: an example of multivariate calibration. Biometrics 40, 947–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, C. T. & Robbins, B. L. (1979). Fetal and neonatal growth patterns and maternal reproductive effort in ungulates and sub-ungulates. American Naturalist 14, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. L. (1987). Estimation and use of variance components. The Statistician 36, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. (1989). The application of real-time ultrasonic scanning in commercial sheep, goats and cattle production enterprises. In Diagnostic Ultrasound and Animal Reproduction (Eds Taverne, M. & Willemse, A.), pp. 73–88. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. (1990). Fibre production. In South American Camelids: Proceedings of the First Conference of the British Camelids Owners and Breeders Association, pp. 38–42. Midlothian: MLURI.Google Scholar
Shukla, G. K. (1972). On the problem of calibration. Technometrics 14, 547–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 36, 111–133.Google Scholar
Tillman, A. (1978). Twin llamas born alive. Llama Newsletter 1, 3–4.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G. B. (1986). Regression Analysis with Applications. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, I. R., Russel, A. J. F. & Fowler, D. G. (1984). Real-time ultrasonic scanning in the diagnosis of pregnancy and the determination of fetal numbers in sheep. Veterinary Record 115, 140–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, I. R., McKelvey, W. A. C., Busby, S., Sneddon, A. & Hamilton, W. J. (1989). Diagnosis of pregnancy and prediction of fetal age in red deer by real-time ultrasonic scanning. Veterinary Record 124, 395–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I. A., White, I. R., Russel, A. J. F., Whyte, T. K. & McBean, A. J. (1988). Prediction of calving date in beef cows by real-time ultrasonic scanning. Veterinary Record 123, 228–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed