Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:48:48.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of resistance to bacterial blight of cotton. III. Herbaceum resistance transferred to tetraploid cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. L. Innes
N. L. Innes
Affiliation:
Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Wad Medani, Republic of the Sudan, and Empire Cotton Growing Corporation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While the leaf resistance of many of Knight's B genes in a Sakel background is now much lower than that found in his original studies, that of B9K has remained unimpaired and this gene still segregates as a major gene. It is proposed to ascribe to the weak gene transferred by Knight from Wagad 8 (G. herbaceum) to Sakel the symbol B11, as gene homology tests between this gene and other B genes indicate that is non-homologous with them. The strong effect of environment on the expression of B11 was confirmed and it was noted that in Upland stocks B11 was much more effective than in Sakel, whereas the opposite was true of B9K.

While the leaf resistance of Bm Sakel is high its stem resistance is of a low level and it suggested that leaf, stem and boll resistance may be under the same control in some genetic systems but not in others.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , June 1966 , pp. 433 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, M. H. (1963). J. Agric. Sci. 60, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dark, S. O. S. & Saunders, J. H. (1957). Progr. Rep. Exp. Shis Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp. (Sudan, 1956–57).Google Scholar
Dark, S. O. S. & Saunders, J. H. (1960). Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Or. Corp. (Sudan, 1958–59).Google Scholar
Gunn, R. E. (1961). Emp. Cott. Or. Rev. 38, 284.Google Scholar
Innes, N. L. (1963). Emp. Cott. Or. Rev. 40, 117.Google Scholar
Innes, N. L. (1964). Euphytica, 13, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, N. L. (1965 a). Expl Agric. 1, 189.Google Scholar
Innes, N. L. (1965 b). J. Agric. Sci. 64, 433.Google Scholar
Innes, N. L. (1965 c). Euphytica, 14, 135.Google Scholar
Innes, N. L. (1965 d). Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp. (Sudan, 1964–65).Google Scholar
Knight, R. L. (1944). J. Genet. 46, 1.Google Scholar
Knight, R. L. (1946). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 14, 153.Google Scholar
Knight, R. L. (1957). Plant Protection Conference, London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Knight, R. L. (1963). J. Genet. 58, 328.Google Scholar
Last, F. T. (1958). Ann. appl. Bm. 46, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, F. T. (1959). Ann. appl. Biol. 47, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, F. T. & Dransfield, M. (1959). Emp. Cott. Or. Rev. 36, 196.Google Scholar
Lagiere, R. (1960). La bactériose du cotonnier (Xanthomonas malvacearum (E. F. Sm. Dowson) dans le monde et en République Centrafricaine (Oubangui-Chari). Paris: I.R.C.T.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. H. & Innes, N. L. (1963). Genet. Rea. 4, 382.Google Scholar