Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:41:51.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the early application of nitrogenous fertilizer and of the time of cutting in spring on the yield of rye-grass/white clover swards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. W. Cowling
D. W. Cowling
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In four different years, swards of perennial rye-grass/white clover were treated with nitrogenous fertilizer (0, 30 or 60 lb. N per acre) in mid-February to produce an early growth of grass. The effect of the time of the first cut, taken in March or April, on the annual yield was studied.

2. The total annual yield was reduced when an increasing quantity of grass was removed at the first cut because this interfered with the development of inflorescences and reduced yield at the second cut.

3. Fertilizer treatment increased early growth and advanced by 2-14 days the date in spring at which the yield was adequate for grazing; this improvement improvement was small compared with the extent to which this date was affected by differences in the weather from year to year.

4. The response in total annual yield to N averaged 17.2 and 14.9 lb. of dry matter per lb. N respectively for the 30 and 60 lb. N per acre applications. The highest responses were measured when little or no grass was removed at the first cut. Where a larger crop was removed at the first cut the response to N was reduced; exceptionally it was negative.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , June 1966 , pp. 413 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, H. K., Chard, J.R. A. & Jenkins, D. G. (1961). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 16, 146.Google Scholar
Blackman, G. E. (1936). J. Agric. Sci, 26, 620.Google Scholar
Brougham, R. W. (1958). N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 1, 707.Google Scholar
Cowling, D. W. (1961). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 15, 281.Google Scholar
Cowling, D. W., Green, J. O. & Green, S. M. (1964). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 19, 419.Google Scholar
Cowling, D. W. & Lockyer, D. R. (1965). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 20, 197.Google Scholar
Davies, , William, & Williams, T. E. (1958). Proc. Fert. Soc. (05 1958).Google Scholar
Grassland Research Institute (1961–1964). Exp. Progr. Grassl. Res. Inst., Hurley, nos. 13–16.Google Scholar
Grassland Research Institute (1962–1964). Exp. Progr. Grassl. Res. Inst., Hurley, no. 14, 21; no. 15, 18; no. 16, 24.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. & MacLusky, D. S. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 129.Google Scholar
Jones, Martin G. (1933). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 1, 43.Google Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1959). J. Agric. Sci. 52, 273.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J., Raymond, W. F. & Harris, C. E. (1960). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 15, 174.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 18, 104.Google Scholar
Walker, T. W., Adams, A. F. R. & Orchiston, H. D. (1956). Soil Sci. 18, 339.Google Scholar
Walker, T. W., Orchiston, H. D. & Adams, A. F. R. (1954). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, 249.Google Scholar
Watkin, B. R. (1954). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, 25.Google Scholar
Wolton, Karen M. (1963). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 18, 213.Google Scholar