Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:58:59.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The estimation of beef carcass composition from subcutaneous fat measurements taken on the intact side using different probing instruments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. P. Chadwick  and
A. J. Kempster
J. P. Chadwick
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, MK2 2EF
A. J. Kempster
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, P.O. Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, MK2 2EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Fat thickness measurements, taken over the M. longissimus between the 6th and 13th ribs by the automatic-recording probes, SFK Meat-Fat probe (MF), Hennessy and Chong Fat Depth Indicator (FDI) and Ulster probe (UP), and a simple ruler probe (RP), were compared with one another and a visual fat score (VSC) in terms of the precision with which carcass lean and subcutaneous fat percentages were predicted. The comparisons were made in four separate trials with RP and VSC common to all of them. A total of 182 carcasses were involved; 130 of these were probed both hot and cold. Comparisons were made among carcasses of the same weight.

VSC was the best single predictor in most circumstances. Fat thickness measurements taken on the cold carcass provided a more precise prediction than those taken on the hot carcass. There was an interaction between the relative precision of the MF and RP probes and the condition of the carcass: the former generally gave the more precise prediction on cold carcasses and the latter on hot carcasses. Measurements taken by FDI tended to be better predictors than those taken by RP on both hot and cold carcasses. The use of two fat thickness measurements gave an improvement in precision over the best individual fat thickness measurements. There was also an improvement in precision in most circumstances when a fat thickness measurement was used in addition to VSC.

There was little indication that specific fat measurements were particularly precise predictors when taken by specific probes, and no fat measurement was consistently the best predictor. A measurement taken 7·5 cm from the dorsal mid line at the 6th rib occurred most commonly in pairs of measurements giving the most precise prediction.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 241 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, J. L., Bass, J. J. & Kirton, A. H. (1982). An evaluation of the fat depth indicator on carcasses of pigs, cattle and sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 42, 127–129.Google Scholar
Chadwick, J. P. & Kempster, A. J. (1979). A comparison of visual fatness assessment and fat measurements taken by probe as predictors of beef carcass composition in commercial classification. Animal Production 28, 456–457 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. & Smith, R. J. (1972). Tissue separation—to assess beef and lamb variation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 1, 113–122.Google Scholar
Jones, S. D. M. & Haworth, C. R. (1982). The measurement of subcutaneous fat thickness in cold beef carcasses with an automatic probe (a note). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 645–648.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Harrington, G. (1982). Carcase Evaluation in Livestock Breeding, Production and Marketing. St Albans: Granada Publishing.Google Scholar
Kutsky, J. A., Murphey, C. E., Smith, C. G., Savell, J. W., Stiffler, D. M. & Terrell, R. N. (1982). Use of the Hennessy and Chong Fat Depth Indicator for predicting fatness of beef carcasses. Journal of Animal Science 55, 565–571.Google Scholar
Meat And Livestock Commission (1974). Standard condition of deadweight purchase for cattle, sheep, pork and cutter pigs. Bletchley, Bucks: Meat and Livestock Commission.Google Scholar
Murphey, C. E., Hallett, D. K., Tyler, W. E. & Pierce, J. C. (1960). Estimating yields of retail cuts from beef carcasses. Presented at the 62nd Meeting of the American Society of Animal Production, Chicago, November 26, 1960.Google Scholar