Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:44:46.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Import Demands For U.S. Fresh Grapefruit: Effect Of U.S. Promotion Programs And Trade Policies Of Importing Nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Stephen Fuller ,
Haruna Bello  and
Oral Capps Jr.
Stephen Fuller
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Haruna Bello
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Oral Capps Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study estimated import demands for U.S. fresh grapefruit in Japan, France, Canada, and the Netherlands. Historically, these nations have imported about 90 percent of U.S. grapefruit exports. Four import demand functions were specified and estimated by joint generalized least squares based on the sample period 19691 to 1988IV. Results show that U.S. FOB price, per capita income of importing countries, exchange rates, price of substitutes, U.S. grapefruit promotion programs, and removal of trade restrictions have had an important effect on U.S. fresh grapefruit exports. Analyses suggest that U.S. producers can effectively promote fresh grapefruit in foreign markets, and that trade concessions have an important influence on grapefruit exports.

Keywords

grapefruitimport demandspromotion programs
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , July 1992 , pp. 251 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, P.D. “The Role of Exchange Rates in Trade Models.” Elasticities in International Agricultural Trade, Carter, C. A. and Gardiner, W.A., Boulder, , eds. Colorado: Westview Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics “Fruit Industry.” Japanese Agricultural Policies: A Time of Change. Policy Monograph No. 3. Melbourne: Globe Press Pty Ltd, 1988.Google Scholar
Aviphant, P., Lee, J., and Seale, J.L.. “Trade Agreements and U.S. Citrus Exports to Japan.” Paper presented at the annual AAEA/WAEA Meetings, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1990.Google Scholar
Binkley, J.K., “The Effect of Variable Correlation on the Efficiency of Seemingly Unrelated Regression in a Two-Equation Model.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 77(1982): 890–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binkley, J.K. “The Relationship Between Elasticity and Least Squares Bias.” Rev. Econ. and Statist, 63(1981): 307–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouldin, L. Written communication, March 13, 1991. Bouldin is the International Marketing Director, Florida Department of Citrus.Google Scholar
Buckley, K. C. The World Market in Fresh Fruit and Vegetables, Wine, and Tropical Beverages. Washington, D.C.: USDA ERS, Commodity Economics Division, September 1990.Google Scholar
Chambers, R.G., and Just, R.E.. “A Critique of Exchange Rate Treatment in Agricultural Trade Models.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 61(1979): 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, S.M., Just, R.E., and Schmitz, A.. “The Impact of Exchange Rates and Other Factors on North American Wheat Export Demand.” Working paper No. 12, Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Gianninni Foundation of Agricultural Economics, University of California, July 1977.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Trade Yearbook, Vol. 42, 1988. Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund. International Financial Statistics Yearbook, various issues.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, H., and Kawada, K.. “Japan,” Fresh Citrus Fruits, Wardowski, W., Nagy, S. and Grierson, W. eds., Westport: Avi Publishing Company, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
Lee, J., and Fairchild, G.F.. “Exchange Rates and Foreign Demand for U.S. Fresh Grrapefruit.” Agribus,: An Inter. J., 4(1988): 261–270.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: Statistics and Information Department, Government of Japan, Statistical Yearbook, various issues, 1969-1989.Google Scholar
Nichols, J.P. Generic Promotion for Agricultural Exports: Effectiveness and Management Issues. Dep. Agr. Econ., Departmental Information Report 90-1, SP-1. Texas A&M University, May 1990.Google Scholar
Pewonski, N. Written communication, October 21, 1991. Pewonski is an International Marketing Specialist, Florida Department of Citrus.Google Scholar
Ruppel, F.J. “Export Sales and Export Shipments of Corn, Wheat and Soybeans: Institutional Relationships and Empirical Estimation.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 1984.Google Scholar
Schuh, G.E. “The Exchange Rate and U.S. Agriculture”, Am. J. Agr. Econ., 56(1974): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R.L. A Survey of Recent U.S. Developments in International Agricultural Trade Models, Bibliographies and Literature of Agriculture Number 21, Washington, D.C.: USDA ERS, 1981.Google Scholar
Thursby, J.G. and Thursby, M.C.. “Elasticities in International Trade: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” Elasticities in International Agricultural Trade, Carter, C.A. and Gardiner, W.H., eds. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, Inc., 1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. Horticultural Products Review, Circular Series, Washington, D.C., May, 1991.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. AgExporter, Vol. 1, No. 6, Washington, D.C., June, 1989.Google Scholar
Ward, R.W., and Tang, J.. “U.S. Grapefruit Exports and Japanese Trade Restrictions.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 10 (1978): 83–88.Google Scholar
Ward, R.W., and Kilmer, R.L.. The Citrus Industry: A Domestic and International Economic Perspective, Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1989.Google Scholar