Approaching 2 years into a global pandemic, it is timely to reflect on how COVID-19 has impacted the mental health of the global population. With research continuing apace, a clearer picture should crystallise in time. COVID-19 has undoubtedly had some impact on population mental health, although the severity and duration of this impact remain less clear. The exceptional period of COVID-19 has provided a unique prism through which we can observe and consider societal mental health. This is a momentous time to be involved in mental health research as we strive to understand the mental health needs of the population and advocate for adequate resourcing to deliver quality mental healthcare in the post-pandemic period.

Objective: The Objective of this study was to analyse the characteristics and disabilities of patients becoming new longstay in a Mental Health District, to describe their needs and define the implications for service development. Method: All patients entering into the new longstay category between January 1st 1981 and December 31st 1991 were analysed. New longstay patients were defined as those remaining continuously in hospital for one year or longer. An accumulated inpatient group, still resident in the hospital, was examined using the Community Placement Questionnaire (CPQ), a standardised questionnaire useful for estimating needs for care and accommodation. Results: The analysis revealed a globally disabled patient group, largely intractable to treatment, the majority of whom required care and supervision in the longterm. An estimate of new longstay bed requirements, based on a stay of 1-5 years, was 11.3 per 100,000 for those under 65. The assessment team categorised current inpatients into four groups with regard to placement recommendations. An analysis of the CPQ results supported these recommendations which were: Specialist Unit for chronically disturbed Geriatrics, Geriatric Unit, High Support Staffed Hostel and Medium Support Staffed Hostel. Conclusions: Despite current service practice and community provision new longstay patients continue to accumulate. Given further specialist alternative community structures, it is suggested that these patient's requirements can be met without the need for continued longstay mental hospital beds.

COVID-19 continues to exert unprecedented challenges for society and it is now well recognised that mental health is a key healthcare issue related to the pandemic. The current edition of the Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine focusses on the impact of COVID-19 on mental illness by combining historical review papers, current perspectives and original research. It is important that psychiatrists leading mental health services in Ireland continue to advocate for mental health supports for healthcare workers and their patients, while aiming to deliver services flexibly. As the pandemic evolves, it remains to be seen whether the necessary funding to deliver effective mental healthcare will be allocated to psychiatric services. Ongoing service evaluation and research is needed as the myriad impacts of the pandemic continue to evolve. In a time of severe budgetary constraints, ensuring optimum use of scare resources becomes an imperative.

Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity of the CAMCOG naming subscale to anomia in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients identified as anomic on the Boston Naming Test (BNT); and to compare the sensitivities of BNT, category (semantic) fluency (CF), and episodic memory (Delayed Word Recall, DWR) in detecting AD.

Method: Data from 140 probable AD patients (NINCDS/ADRDA) were analysed. Anomic AD patients were identified (BNT) and the sensitivity to anomia of the CAMCOG naming subscale was calculated. Sensitivity (to AD) and specificity of the BNT, CF and DWR were compared in a subgroup of 60 patients age-matched to controls.

Results: On BNT 81% of ADs were classified as anomic (87% specificity). Of these anomic ADs, 23 scored 6/6 on CAMCOG naming (sensitivity = 80%), and sensitivity fell to 30% using a 5/6 cut-off. Correlation between BNT and CAMCOG naming yielded Kendall's tau = 0.48 (p<0.0001). Compared to age-matched controls BNT correctly classified 70% of ADs and 87% of controls (overall accuracy = 77%). On CF 68% of ADs and 83% of controls were correctly classified (overall accuracy = 72%). BNT and CF were moderately correlated (r = 0.49, p<0.0001). DWR correctly classified 93% ADs and 98% controls (overall accuracy = 95%).

Conclusions: Given its brevity, we recommend the inclusion of a split-half form of the BNT in screening test batteries for the detection of AD. The observed pattern of cognitive impairment is consistent with current models in which semantic memory deficits occur in AD only when the neuropathology extends beyond the entorhinal/hippocampal region to the temporal neocortex.

Objective: To assess the effect of specific psychoeducational sources – support group meetings, lectures and literature – on bipolar disorder patients' knowledge and attitude to their illness. Methods: Eighty bipolar disorder patients attending for a lithium blood test were asked to complete a questionnaire detailing their demographic characteristics, duration of illness, knowledge of manic-depressive illness and their attitude towards their illness and what exposure they had had to relevant support group meetings, lectures and literature on bipolar disorder. Results: The 43 group attenders had a statistically significant higher mean score on the illness and lithium knowledge and the attitude to illness sections of the questionnaire than the 30 patients who did nto attend groups (P<0.001). A multiple regression analysis indicated that, in addition to group attendances, only reading literature contributed significantly to illness knowledge and attitude. Age, sex, duration of illness and socio-economic status did not contribute significantly to these outcome variables. Conclusions: Bipolar disorder patients who attended support group meetings and availed of relevant literature knew more about their illness and lithium therapy and expressed more positive and realistic views about their illness than those who only read literature and attended lectures.

Objectives: Over the past three decades, major changes have taken place internationally in the type of residential accommodation provided for people with intellectual disabilities but these appear to be less evident in Northern Ireland.

Method: A census was undertaken of all persons in any form of residential placement using a range of existing databases to identify the population, with a short questionnaire completed for each resident.

Results: Around 440 persons lived in hospitals and 1,970 in some other form of provision but mostly in large congregated settings such as residential care homes and nursing homes. This was more marked in certain Health and Social Service Boards than in others. Most places are provided by the private sector although voluntary organisations and housing associations now manage around one-third of places. People living in hospitals reportedly had different characteristics to those in all other settings while those in nursing homes tended to require greater personal care. However the characteristics of people living in residential homes, supported living arrangements and village communities were broadly comparable. Around one in 10 persons were deemed to benefit from a move; mostly from residential homes to more independent living arrangements.

Conclusions: Compared to Britain and the Republic of Ireland there is an under-provision of residential placements in Northern Ireland. To date, funding from outside of health and social services has been the main driver for the type of accommodation provided. The implications for future policy and provision are discussed.

The Irish College of Psychiatrists recently reported that “the needs of people with learning disability and offending behaviour pose a huge challenge to service providers. The vulnerability of people with a learning disability who come into contact with the criminal justice system is well described and noted.” The College noted that “the population with learning disability who offend does not easily fit into existing services” and reported that “the majority of service providers strongly supported the urgent development of a forensic learning disability service.”

The challenges presented by individuals with learning disability and offending behaviour are not specific to Ireland or to this period in history. The purpose of the present paper is to explore issues related to learning disability and offending behaviour in 19th- and early 20th-century Ireland.

More specifically, this paper presents original, previously unpublished case material from the archival medical records of the Central Mental Hospital, Dublin in order to illustrate specific aspects of the institutional experience of individuals with learning disability who were charged with offending behaviour in nineteenth-century Ireland.

The Central Mental Hospital, Dublin was established as the Central Criminal Lunatic Asylum in 1845 under the provisions of the Lunatics Asylums (Ireland) Act (1845). Individuals were to be committed to the Central Criminal Lunatic Asylum if they were declared ‘guilty but insane’ at time of trial or offence, or if they developed mental illness and became difficult to manage while in detention elsewhere. The Central Criminal Lunatic Asylum opened its doors to admissions in 1850 and by 1853 there were 69 male and 40 female inpatients.

Recent reports from the Inspector of Mental Health Services have highlighted marked variations in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) prescriptions nationally. This article reviews six international guidelines in order to assess the question of which patients should be referred for ECT treatment and at what stage in their illness. The guidelines display a general consensus in terms of the acutely and severely ill, but differ dramatically in terms of access to ECT outside this category, such as the moderately depressed patient who is treatment resistant but non-psychotic and non-suicidal and who requests ECT due to a previous good response.

The American Psychiatric Association guidelines strongly support the early consideration and use of ECT, highlighting the dangers associated with increased length of illness for individual prognosis. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (UK) guidelines are the strictest, reserving ECT for the severely ill exclusively and only in cases with a demonstrable failure of alternative treatments. This confusion may ultimately need to be addressed by the Mental Health Commission as data relating to variations in practice may result in inappropriate reductions in access to an established treatment.

Objectives: This study assessed patients' views of a methadone programme in a Dublin general practice including the degree to which the patients were ‘involved in decisions about their treatment’.

Method: All patients receiving methadone were asked to participate. A face to face questionnaire, with open and closed questions, was administered. Interviews lasted approximately 30 minutes. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach.

Results: Forty one (87%) of the 47 patients attending the general practice methadone service were interviewed. Of the 39 patients who had used heroin on admission, 69% had stopped and 31% reduced heroin use since starting methadone treatment. A total of 71% reported that the doctor either always involved (59%) or sometimes involved (12%) them in decisions about their treatment. Involvement was interpreted as ‘being listened to’ or ‘having a say’ in deciding methadone dose. Surprisingly those who reported that they were not involved in treatment decisions were more likely to have stopped heroin use (10/11). A significant majority of patients (81%) expressed the desire to stop taking methadone.

Conclusion: Most patients receiving methadone in general practice were listened to and had a say in deciding their methadone dose but did not have an opportunity to engage in more structured or contractual forms of involvement in treatment such as written care plans. In line with a patient centred approach, treatment providers should set their sights beyond the safe delivery of methadone, to provide a service which is centred on patient goals, expectations and choice.

Objectives: To provide a methodology for the examination of costs and clinical outcomes in two distinct care settings for psychiatric patients inpatient and day hospitals. The major emphasis is on the relationship between costs and outcomes in the two care regimes.

Method: The study is a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis. People living in Sector B catchment area in the Mid-Western Health Board who were admitted to inpatient care, or treated as day hospital patients, between June 1st 1994 -February 28th 1995 are eligible for inclusion in the study. Information on resource use and clinical outcome is available for 92 of these patients.

Results: The average weekly cost of care for mentally ill patients in the inpatient setting is over twice the level of the cost of care for people attending the day hospital facility. Pay costs and hotel costs are higher in the inpatient facility. Day hospital care is also more cost-effective than inpatient care, when account is taken of the relationship between cost and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: The study supports the general literature view of the superiority of community care settings for certain categories of mentally ill people. However, the absence of randomisation in the study, incomplete data, and the retrospective nature of the analysis suggests that caution is needed in the interpretation of the results.