Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:35:26.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The wars of the 21st century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 An exception to this rule is Herberg-Rothe, Andreas, Das Rätsel Clausewitz: Politische Theorie im Widerstreit, Munich, 2001, esp. pp. 98 ff.Google Scholar

2 von Clausewitz, Carl, Vom Kriege, 19th ed., Werner Hahlweg, Bonn, 1980, pp. 212 ff.Google Scholar

3 Of Virilio's extensive works, see especially his essay La vitesse de libération, Paris, 1995.Google Scholar

4 The availability of the atom bomb apart, it is above all the inflated logistical structure of modern armies on which Martin van Creveld, in his much discussed book The Transformation of War, Simon & Schuster Inc., New York, 1991 (published in German under the title, Die Zukunft des Krieges, Munich, 1998Google Scholar), bases his argument that the wars of the future will no longer be waged with conventional armies.

5 For more detail, see Münkler, Herfried, Über den Krieg: Stationer) der Kriegsgeschichte im Spiegel ihrer theoretischen Reflexion, Weilerswist, 2002, pp. 173 ff.Google Scholar

6 Aron, Raymond, Der permanente Krieg, Frankfurt/M., 1953, p. 48.Google Scholar

7 See Münkler, Herfried, Die neuen Kriege, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 2002, p. 175.Google Scholar

8 Klaus-Jürgen Gantzel, for example, has defended the view that, once capitalist society has been adopted on a world scale, war will disappear as a means of acquiring goods and services. Gantzel, Klaus-Jürgen, “Kriegsursachen: Tendenzen und Perspektiven”, Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, Vol. 3, No. 8, 1997, pp. 257266.Google Scholar

9 See Parker, Geoffrey, The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar

10 See Jung, Anne (ed.), Ungeheuerist nurdas Normale: Zur Ökonomie der “neuen” Kriege, medico international, Frankfurt/M., 2002Google Scholar; Berdal, Mats and Malone, David M. (eds), Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder/London, 2000Google Scholar; Jean, François and Rufin, Jean-Christophe (eds), Economie des guerres civiles, Paris, 1996.Google Scholar

11 An exhaustive account of old and new forms of so-called suicide attacks is to be found in Reuter, Christoph, Mein Leben ist eine Waffe: Selbstmordattentäter - Psychogramm eines Phänomens, Munich, 2001.Google Scholar

12 See also Münkler, Herfried and Fischer, Karsten, “‘Nothing to kill or die for…’ — Überlegungen zu einer politischen Theorie des Opfers”, in: Leviathan 28, 2000, Vol. 3, pp. 343362Google Scholar, and Münkler, Herfried, “Terrorismus als Kommunikationsstrategie: Die Botschaft des 11 September”, Internationale Politik 56, 2001, Vol. 12, pp. 1118.Google Scholar

13 This distinction is discussed in detail by Mary Kaldor in Neue und alte Kriege: Organisierte Gewalt im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, Frankfurt/M., 2000.Google Scholar

14 This question is discussed in greater detail in Herfried Münkler, “Die Kriege der Zukunft und die Zukunft der Staaten” in Wolfgang Knöbl/Gunnar Schmidt (eds), Die Gegenwart des Krieges: Staatliche Gewaltin der Moderne, Frankfurt/M., 2000, pp. 5271.Google Scholar

15 For example, Eppler, Erhard, Vom Gewaltmonopol zum Gewaltmarkt: Die Privatisierung und Kommerzialisierung der Gewalt, Frankfurt/M., 2002.Google Scholar