Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:18:22.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UNLIKELY BEDFELLOWS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2016

Claire Brighton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Poverty and environmental degradation are two of the gravest issues facing the planet today. The most obvious means of addressing each issue, however, appears ostensibly to undermine the other. While environmental and development strategies are largely associated with the concept of sustainable development that emerged in the 1990s, the debate between these two interests dates back to the 1940s. This article seeks to fill an apparent gap in environmental scholarship by presenting a history of the environmental protection/development relationship. It will argue that, rather than being the product of an organic development process, the concept of sustainable development and the principles underlying it were consciously shaped by a number of international actors with vested interests in their trajectory. Understanding why and how this was permitted is important not only for its capacity to throw light on the past, but also for its ability to assist in understanding and predicting the future.

Keywords

Brundtland ReportFounexgreen economyRio Conference on Environment and DevelopmentStockholm Conference on the Human Environmentsustainable development
Type
Articles
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 209 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This is distinct from the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, which proposes that environmental degradation rises with increasing income per capita. See Dinda, S, ‘Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey’ (2004) 49 Ecological Economics 431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Holdgate, MW et al. ., The World Environment 1972–1982 (Tycooly International Publishing Ltd 1982) 5 Google Scholar.

3 UNGA Res 2398(XXIII), 23rd session (1968) para 4.

4 ECOSOC Res 1346, 45th Session (1968).

5 Letter dated 20 May 1968 from the Permanent Representative of Sweden addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, UNGA 45th Session, UN Doc E/4466/Add.1 (1968).

6 For example, during the ECOSOC meeting where the Swedish proposal was considered, reference was made to reports of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Trade Organization on ‘the environment’, and to an initiative by the Economic Commission for Europe to convene a meeting on ‘problems relating to the environment’: ECOSOC, ‘Activities of United Nations Organisation and Programmes Relevant to the Human Environment: Report of the Secretary General’ (1968) UN Doc E/4553 at [6].

7 See ECOSOC, ‘Report of The Economic and Social Council: 5 August 1967 – 2 August 1968’ (1968) UN GAOR, 23rd Session, Sup No 3 (A/7203) from para 252.

8 Stevenson, A, Oxford Dictionary of English (3rd edn, Oxford University Press  2010) 587 Google Scholar.

9 ibid 1183.

10 Though it was also used by the United Nations Commission on Environment and Development.  The Commission's work is discussed in section IVC ‘Defining Sustainable Development’.

11 GA Res 1710 (1961) 16th Session.

12 GA Res 2029 (1965) 20th Session.

13 Strong, MF, Where on Earth Are We Going (Texere Publishing 2001) 123 Google Scholar.

14 ibid.

15 ibid.

16 ibid.

17 ibid 124.

18 ibid 127, 128.

19 Iglesias, E, ‘Development and the Human Environment: Panel of Experts on Development and Environment Background Paper No 1’ in Strong, Maurice F Papers: 1948–2000, Environmental Science and Public Policy Archives, Harvard College Library, Box 40, Folder 395, 9–10 Google Scholar.

20 Development and Environment: Report and Working Papers of a Panel of Experts Convened by The Secretary-General of The United Nations Conference on The Human Environment (Mouton Publishing 1971) [hereafter: ‘Founex Report’] para 1.4.

21 ibid para 1.5.

22 Iglesias (n 19) 14.

23 P Pant ‘Some Aspects of Environmental Degradation and Its Control in India: Panel of Experts on Development and Environment Background Paper No 3’, in Maurice F Strong Papers (n 19) in Box 40, Folder 395, 6.

24 Founex Report (n 20) para 1.7.

25 ibid, para 1.15. See comments in F Dodds et al., Only One Earth: The Long Road via Rio to Sustainable Development (Routledge 2012) 6.

26 Founex Report (n 20) paras 4.1–4.19; UNCTAD ‘The Implications of Environmental Measures for International Trade and Development’, Background Paper No 5 (4 June 1971) appended to Founex Report (n 20) 198.

27 See Founex Report (n 20) para 1.5.

28 ibid para 1.7.

29 ibid.

30 ‘Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment’ (1972) UN Doc A/CONF.48/14 and Corr.1 [hereafter: Stockholm Report] ch VII, para 13.

31 Holdgate et al., The World Environment 1972–1982 (n 2) 6.

32 Hamer, M, ‘Plot to Undermine Global Pollution Controls Revealed’ New Scientist Online (January 2002)Google Scholar. Following an extensive search at the United Kingdom National Archives, where they were held, it appears that these archives are no longer publicly available.

33 United Kingdom internal memo regarding a meeting of the Group held in Geneva in December 1971: cited in Hamer, ibid.

34 ibid.

35 Holdgate et al., The World Environment 1972–1982 (n 2) 6.

36 Letter from R Arculus, 9 Feb 1971 to Mr Ure, ‘Preparatory Committee for the UN Conference of the Human Environment: Second Session: Geneva – 8 to 19 February 1971’, United Kingdom National Archives, folder FCO 55/670.

37 ‘Note of a Conversation with Ambassador Swartz of Sweden on 8 February 1971, Geneva’ attached to Letter from R Arculus, 9 Feb 1971 to Mr Ure, ‘Preparatory Committee for the UN Conference of the Human Environment: Second Session: Geneva – 8 to 19 February 1971’, United Kingdom National Archives, folder FCO 55/670, documenting ‘Russian views gleaned on his visit to Moscow’.

38 Telegram, Crowe (no initial given) UK Mission to New York, 2 December 1971 to D Williams, ODA, Mrs Halley, Treasury, MW Holdgate, DOE, United Kingdom National Archives, folder FCO 55/674.

39 ‘Note of Conversation with Mr Maurice Strong on 11 February 1971, Geneva’ attached to Letter from R Arculus, 9 Feb 1971 to Mr Ure, ‘Preparatory Committee for the UN Conference of the Human Environment: Second Session: Geneva – 8 to 19 February 1971’, United Kingdom National Archives, Folder FCO 55/670; David Martin memo, ‘International Environmental programmes: Notes on a discussion between Dr WM Holdgate and Dr RWJ Keay’, 1 Feb 1971, Royal Society Archives London, folder ENV/6/I.

40 Letter DM Kitching to Mr Williams and Mr Mathieson (first initials not given), UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 24 September 1971, United Kingdom National Archives, folder FCO55/672.

41 Letter DJ Halley, Treasury to K MacInnes, UN Department, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 2 December 1971, United Kingdom National Archives, folder FCO 55/674.

42 Draft Letter K MacInnes, UN Department, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, to DJ Halley, Treasury (undated), United Kingdom National Archives, folder FCO 55/674.

43 ‘Statement of Ambassador Miguel Ozo Rio De Almeida, on item 97 of the Agenda (United Nations Conference on the Human Environment), 24th Session of the General Assembly Second Committee, 29 November 1971, 12, United Kingdom National Archives, FCO 55/674.

44 Holdgate et al., The World Environment 1972–1982 (n 2) 6.

45 ‘Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment’ in Stockholm Report (n 30) [hereafter: ‘Stockholm Declaration’] Preamble para 6.

46 ibid, Principle 9.

47 ibid, Principle 11.

48 ibid, Principle 4.

49 ibid, Principle 2.

50 ibid, Preamble para 2.

51 ibid, Preamble para 6.

52 ibid, Principle 4.

53 ibid, Preamble para 3.

54 ibid, Preamble para 6.

55 ibid, Preamble para 6.

56 J Tinbergen, Reshaping the International Order – A Report of the Club of Rome (1976) cited in Lozoya, J et al. ., Alternative Views of the New International Economic Order: A Survey and Analysis of Major Academic Reports (Pergamon Press 1979) 10–11 Google Scholar.

57 Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, What Now: Towards Another Development (1975) cited in Lozoya et al. (n 56) 19.

58 GA Res 37/7, 37th Session (1982).

59 A coalition of developing nations, designed to promote its members’ collective interests and provide a centralized joint negotiating capacity in the UN.

60 UNCTAD, ‘Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development’ (1972) UN Doc TD/180 Vol1, para 274.

61 Holdgate et al., The World Environment 1972–1982 (n 2) 7.

62 Sachs, Ignacy, cited in Eco-development: Concepts, Projects, Strategies (Pergamon Press 1984) 25 Google Scholar.

63 See for example ‘Report of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme on the Work of its Third Session: General Debate’ (2 May 1975) available at <http://www.unep.org> at para 66.

64 ‘Memo to UNEP Staff’, Maurice F Strong Papers: 1948–2000 (n 19) in Box 37, folder 370 (emphasis added). See also MF Strong, ‘To Win the Battle for a Quality Environment’ (1976) 3 Catalyst 3 2.

65 Strong, Where on Earth Are We Going? (n 13) 195.

66 GA Res 38/161 (1983) 38th Session (emphasis added).

67 UNEP/GC Res 11/3, 11th Session (1983), referred to in GA Res 38/161 (n 66) para 1.

68 See UNEP Governing Council Reports from its Third, Fourth, Sixth and Seventh sessions (n 63).

69 IUCN, UNEP, WWF, FAO, UNESCO World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development (1980) ISBN 2880321018.

70 ‘Report of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme on the Work of its Eighth Session’ (29 April 1980) <www.unep.org> [UNEP GC 8th Session Report] para 262.

71 Stein, RE and Johnson, BDG, Banking on the Biosphere (Aero Publishing Ltd 1979)Google Scholar. The report is cited in the Strategy, albeit in a different context: World Conservation Strategy (n 69) section 15, para 11, fn 3.

72 Holdgate, M, The Green Web: A Union for World Conservation (Earthscan Publications Ltd 1999) 156 (emphasis added)Google Scholar.

73 Barbara Ward was President of IIED from 1979 and Chairman from 1980.

74 Strong, M, cited in Satterthwaite, D, Barbara Ward and the Origins of Sustainable Development (IIED 2006) 17 Google Scholar; Borowy, I, Defining Sustainable Development for Our Common Future: A History of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission) (Routledge 2014) 3 Google Scholar.

75 Satterthwaite (n 74) 9.

76 R Goodland and G Ledec, ‘Some Principles of Sustainable Development’ cited in Borowy (n 74) 98.

77 Goodland, R and Ledec, G, ‘Neoclassical Economic and Principles of Sustainable Development’ (1987) 38 Ecological Modelling 19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Borowy (n 74) 99.

79 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (Oxford University Press 1987) [hereafter: Brundtland Report] ch 2, para 1.

80 J McNeil, ‘Brundtland Revisited’ at <https:// www.opencanada.org/features/brundtland-revisited/>.

81 Brundtland Report (n 79) ch 2, para 9.

82 ibid, ch 2, para 4.

83 Borowy (n 74) 122–3.

84 MacNeill, ‘Brundtland Revisited’ (n 80).

85 Borowy (n 74) 123.

86 Strong, Where on Earth Are We Going (n 13) 212.

87 Hajost, SA, ‘The Role of the United States’ in Treves, T et al. (eds), The Environment after Rio: International Law and Economics (Kluwer Law International 1994) 17 Google Scholar.

88 See <www.southcentre.int>.

89 South Centre, ‘Environment and Development: Towards a Common Strategy for the South in the UNCED Negotiations and Beyond’ (Geneva 1991) (copy kindly provided to the author by the Centre).

90 ‘Environmental space’ pertains to the environmental fallout required to achieve certain levels of development. The development of the South, the Strategy insisted, ‘can in no way be compromised by the North's pre-emption of the global environmental space’, ibid 4.

91 ibid 7, 9–12.

92 Engfeldt, L, From Stockholm to Johannesburg and Beyond (Government Offices of Sweden 2009) 120 Google Scholar.

93 ibid.

94 ibid 139.

95 ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development adopted by the UNGA on 22 December 1992’ GA Res 47/190, 47th Session (1992) [hereafter: ‘Rio Declaration’].

96 For a more detailed analysis of the Rio Declaration see JE Viñuales (ed), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2015).

97 See the discussion above in section IIIC.1 ‘Striking a balance’.

98 Brundtland Report (n 79) report overview: ‘Our Common Future, From One Earth to One World’ at para 4.

99 UNDP, Human Development Report: 1990 (Oxford University Press 1990) 9 Google ScholarPubMed.

100 United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report: 1991 (Oxford University Press 1991) 1 Google ScholarPubMed.

101 ibid.

102 Rio Declaration (n 95) Principle 5.

103 Brundtland Report (n 79) Annex I, para 1.

104 Rio Declaration (n 95) Principle 3.

105 ibid, Principle 8.

106 Desai, Nitin, cited in Johnson, S, UNEP: The First 40 Years: A Narrative (United Nations Environment Programme 2012) 188–90Google Scholar.

107 ibid.

108 Dodds et al., Only One Earth (n 25) 95.

109 For example, taking the report as a whole and excluding references to conference or report titles, the term ‘environment’ appears only five times, two of which are references to commitments made at previous UN Conferences. ‘Biodiversity’ appears twice. By contrast, the term ‘development’ appears 16 times, including two references to previous commitments and excluding references within the phrase ‘sustainable development’: ‘Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development’, para 11, annexed to: ‘Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development’ (2002) UN Doc A/CONF.199/20 [hereafter: ‘Johannesburg Declaration’]. Word counting is a blunt instrument, however, in this context it is generally indicative of the relative weight placed on each of the two interests.

110 Johannesburg Declaration, ibid, para 5.

111 Pearce, D et al. ., Blueprint for a Green Economy (Earthscan Publications 1997)Google Scholar.

112 UNEP, ‘Global Green New Deal: Policy Brief’ Nairobi, March 2009 <http://www.unep.org/pdf/A_Global_Green_New_Deal_Policy_Brief.pdf> at 1, 3.

113 GA Res 64/236, 64th Session (2009) para 20.

114 ibid (emphasis added).

115 International Institute for Sustainable Development ‘Summary of the first PREPCOM for the UN Conference on Sustainable Development: 17–19 May 2010’ (2012) 27 Earth Negotiations Bulletin 1, 5. See also the comments at 6.

116 This was expressly acknowledged in a UNEP follow-up publication Towards a Green Economy in 2011: UNEP, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication (2011) Foreword.

117 See for example comments in: UNCTAD ‘The Green Economy: Trade and Sustainable Development Implications: Report of the Ad Hoc Expert Meeting’ (2010) UN Doc UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2011/8, 4; see also Summary of the first PREPCOM for the UN Conference on Sustainable Development: 17–19 May 2010 (n 115) at 5–6.

118 ‘Summary of the First Intersessional Meeting for the UN Conference on Sustainable Development: 10–11 January 2011’ (2012) 27 Earth Negotiations Bulletin 2, all at 4.

119 ‘The Future We Want’ in ‘Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development’ (2012) UN Doc A/CONF.216/16, at para 56.

120 Morgera, E and Savaresi, A ‘A Conceptual and Legal Perspective on the Green Economy’ (2013) 22 RECIEL 14, at 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

121 UNGA, ‘Report of the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals Established Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 66/288’ GA68/309 (12 Sept 2014) UN Doc A/RES/68/309.

122 GA Res 70/1, ‘Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’ (2015) 70th Session [hereafter: ‘2030 Agenda’].

123 The Future We Want (n 119) para 246.

124 South Centre, ‘Concept Paper by the South Centre on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)’ (Geneva 2013) available at <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org> at para 14.

125 UNGA, ‘Initial Input of the Secretary-General to the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals’ UN Doc A/67/634, paras 13–17.

126 Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals ‘Co-Chairs’ Summary bullet points from OWG-2’ (New York, 2013) <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1826bullet2.pdf> 1.

127 UN Doc A/67/634 (n 125) para 5.

128 Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals ‘Co-Chairs’ Summary bullet points ‘from OWG-2’ (n 126) 1.

129 Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals ‘Report of the Open Working Group of the General Assembly on Sustainable Development Goals’, UN A/68/970 at 10.

130 2030 Agenda (n 122) para 18.

131 ibid, para 33.

132 UNGA ‘Report of the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals Established Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 66/288’ GA68/309 (12 Sept 2014) UN Doc A/RES/68/309.

133 See United Nations Technical Support Team in support of the General Assembly Open Working Group ‘TST Issues Briefs’ at <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org>. The author understands that the papers titled ‘TST Issues Brief: Macroeconomic policy questions’ and ‘TST Issue Brief: Sustained and Inclusive Economic Growth, Infrastructure Development, and Industrialization’, which mention the green economy, were presented at the fifth session. The green economy is mentioned by other issues briefs included in the compilation, however, it is not clear from the information available at the time of publication at what sessions these were presented.

134 See ‘General Assembly Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals Fifth Session’ (27 November 2013) at 2–4; and ‘Draft Concluding Remarks of Co-Chairs: 5th Session of Open Working Group on SDGs’ (undated)—both available at <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org>.

135 Discussed above in section IVD ‘Rio: A Strategic Turning Point’.

136 Discussed above in section VC ‘Rio+20: A Difficult Sell’.