Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-21T21:45:44.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Woman as Caretaker: An Archetype That Supports Patriarchal Militarism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Laura Duhan Kaplan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Feminist peace theories that find hope for peace in the ideal of the caretaking woman are grounded in patriarchal gender distinctions, fail to challenge adequately the patriarchal dualism that constitutes the self by devaluing the other, and the practice of caretaking about which they speak may be easily co-opted into the service of war. Feminist peace theory should address the devaluation of “others,” in order to undermine this justification and motivation for war.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Peace , Spring 1994 , pp. 123 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brock‐Utne, Brigid. 1985. Educating for peace: A feminist perspective. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1976. Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Cady, Duane. 1991. War, gender, race, and class. Concerned Philosophers for Peace Newsletter 11(2): 4–10.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1974. Family structure and feminine personality. In Woman, culture and society, ed.Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist and Lamphere, Louise. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Duhan [Kaplan], Laura. 1990. Feminism and peace theory: Women as nurturers vs. women as public citizens. In In the interest of peace: A spectrum of philosophical views, ed.Klein, Kenneth and Kunkel, Joseph. Wakefield, N.H.: Longwood Academic.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1985. Reflections on war and political discourse: Realism, just war, and feminism in a nuclear age. Political Theory 13(1): 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcey, Linda. 1994. Women as peacemakers: Contested terrain for feminist peace studes. In In the eye of the storm: Philosophy of peace and regional conflict, ed.Bove, Laurence A. and Kaplan, Laura Duhan. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality: Essays in/eminist theory. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan. 1990. Curves along the road. In Reweaving the world: The emergence of ecofeminism, ed.Diamond, Irene and Orenstein, Gloria Feman. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan. 1992. A chorus of stones: The private Ufe of war. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Johnson, David E. 1994. The concepts of militarism and regional conflicts. In In the eye of the storm: Philosophy of peace and regional conflict, ed.Bove, Laurence A. and Kaplan, Laura Duhan. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Litke, Robert. 1985. Consciousness, gender, and nuclear politics. In Nuclear war: Phib‐ sophical perspectives, ed.Fox, Michael Allen and Groarke, Leo. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miller, Jean Baker. 1976. Towards a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Morriss, James E., and Boyle, Joan M. 1989. Patriarchy, aggression and the politics of war. Paper presented at the Second Annual Meeting of Concerned Philosophers for Peace.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1989. Women and evil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pilardi, Jo‐Ann [Fuchs]. 1983. On the war path and beyond: Hegel, Freud, and feminist theory. Hypatia 1, published as a special issue of Women's Studies International Forum 6(6): 565–72.Google Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 1991. Nature, self and gender: Feminism, environmental philosophy, and the critique of rationalism. Hypatia 6(1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, Betty. 1985. Sexism and the war system. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Smithka, Paula. 1989. Nuclearism and sexism: Overcoming their shared metaphysical basis. In Issues in war and peace: Philosophical perspectives, ed.Kunkel, Joseph and Klein, Kenneth. Wolfeboro, N.H.: Longwood Academic.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Thiede, Barbara, and Duhan [Kaplan], Laura. 1991. Mothers and peace activism: Do women have a special responsibility for making peace? Paper delivered at the Southeastern Women's Studies Association Meeting.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen. 1991. Toward a feminist peace politics. Paper presented at a meeting of Concerned Philosophers for Peace.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. [1984] 1989. A different reality: Feminist ontology. In Women, knowledge and reality: Explorations in femininst philosophy, ed.Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1792] 1990. A vindication oftherights of women. In A Wbllstonecra/t anthology, ed.Todd, Janet. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar