Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:33:11.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neither a Liberal — Nor a Feminist?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Rosalind Jones
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , 01 October 1994 , pp. 554 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted in Quails, Barry, The Secular Pilgrims of Victorian Fiction, Cambridge University Press, 1982, p. 187.Google Scholar

2 Letter to Barbara Bodichon, 26 December 1860, in Haight, G. S., Selections from George Eliot’s Utters, New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1985, pp. 253–4.Google Scholar

3 Quails, op. cit.

4 Haight, Gordon S., Georgt Eliot. A Biography, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1985, p. 396.Google Scholar

5 The result was only 73 votes in favour in the House of Commons. ( Ryan, Alan, J. S. Mill, London and Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974, p. 157.Google Scholar).

6 Letters, IV. 468, quoted in G. S. Haight, Biography, ibid., p. 397.

7 ibid., p. 23.

8 Letter to François Albert Durade, 6 December 1859, in Gordon S. Haight, Letters, op. cit., p. 236.

9 Haight, Biography, p.301. Haight says that George Eliot gave no more $5.00 a year to the Comte fund.