Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:36:10.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gamones and mating types in the genus Blepharisma and their possible taxonomic application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Akio Miyake
Affiliation:
Istituto di Zoologia, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy, and The Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, U.S.A.
Lea K. Bleyman
Affiliation:
Istituto di Zoologia, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy, and The Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, U.S.A.

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mating types I and II of Blepharisma japonicum v. intermedium excrete gamones 1 (blepharmone J) and 2 (blepharismone) respectively. The gamone of one type transforms cells of the other type so that they can conjugate with each other. We found that three other species, B. americanum, B. musculus and B. stoltei, have two types of cells homologous to those in B. japonicum; one (type II) excretes a factor which has the same activity as gamone 2 of B. japonicum, the other (type I) responds to this gamone by cell union. Type I cells of these species also excrete a gamone which induces pairs in type II cells of particular strains. Complementarity for mating is observed in some combinations of the two types.

These results indicate that each of the four species has at least one pair of complementary mating types, I and II, with the gamones of the type II's being the same molecule, blepharismone, while gamones of type I's are species- or syngen-specific blepharmone. These generic and specific gamones can be utilized to clarify existing taxonomic and evolutionary questions in the genus Blepharisma.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

Bleyman, L. K. (1967). Selfing in Paramecium aurelia, syngen 5: Persistent instability of mating type expression. Journal of Experimental Zoology 165, 139146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V. & Miyake, A. (1975). Composition of blepharmone, a conjugation-inducing glycoprotein of the ciliate Blepharisma. FEBS Letters 53, 131134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirshfield, H. I., Isquith, I. R. & Dilorenzo, A. M. (1973). Classification, distribution, and evolution. Chapter 12 in Blepharisma (ed. Giese, A. C.), pp. 304332. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hiwatashi, K. (1969). Paramecium. In Fertilization II (ed. Metz, C. B. and Monroy, A.), pp. 255293. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Honda, H. & Miyake, A. (1975). Taxis to a conjugation-inducing substance in the ciliate Blepharisma. Nature 257, 678680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inaba, F. (1965). Conjugation between two strains of Blepharisma. Journal of Protozoology 12, 146151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, R. F. (1939). Mating types in Euplotes. American Naturalist 73, 5771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, T., Tokoroyama, T., Tsukuda, Y., Koyama, H. & Miyake, A. (1973). Isolation and structure determination of blepharismin, a conjugation initiating gamone in the ciliate Blepharisma. Science 179, 400402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metz, C. B. (1954). Mating substances and the physiology of fertilization in ciliates. In Sex in Microorganisms (ed. Wenrich, D. H.), pp. 284334. American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Miyake, A. (1968). Induction of conjugation by cell-free fluid in the ciliate Blepharisma. Proceedings of the Japan Academy 44, 837841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A. (1974). Cell interaction in conjugation of ciliates. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 64, 4977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A. & Beyer, J. (1973). Cell interaction by means of soluble factors (gamones) in conjugation of Blepharisma intermedium. Experimental Cell Research 76, 1524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A. & Beyer, J. (1974). Blepharmone: A conjugation-inducing glycoprotein in the ciliate Blepharisma. Science 185, 621623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanney, D. L., Caughey, P. A. & Tefankjian, A. (1955). The genetic control of mating type potentialities in Tetrahymena pyriformis. Genetics 40, 668680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, R. B. (1971). Induction of competence for mating in Tetrahymena. Journal of Protozoology 18, 163165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, N., Esposito, F. & Nobili, R. (1975). Conjugation in Oxytricha bifaria: Cell interaction. Journal of Experimental Zoology 192, 343348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonneborn, T. M. (1937). Sex, sex inheritance and sex determination in Paramecium aurelia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 23, 378385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonneborn, T. M. (1947). Recent advances in the genetics of Paramecium and Euplotes. Advances in Genetics 1, 263358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonneborn, T. M. (1957). Breeding systems, reproductive methods, and species problems in Protozoa. In The Species Problem (ed. Mayr, E.), pp. 155324. American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1970). Methods in Paramecium research. In Methods in Cell Physiology, vol. iv (ed. Prescott, D. M.), pp. 241339. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1975). The Paramecium aurelia complex of fourteen sibling species. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 94, 155178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokoroyama, T., Hori, S. & Kubota, T. (1973). Synthesis of blepharismone, a conjugation inducing gamone in ciliate Blepharisma. Proceedings of the Japan Academy 49, 461463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar