Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T18:40:04.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of number and criteria of young fruits in loco on yieldof mango

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2012

Sakhidin
Affiliation:
Dep. Agrotechnol., Fac. Agric., Jenderal Soedirman Univ., Jl. Dr. Soeparno, Purwokerto 51123, Central Java, Indones. [email protected]
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Affiliation:
Fac. Agric. Grad. School Agric., Kagawa Univ., Miki-cho, Ikenobe 2393, Kagawa-ken, 761-0795, Jpn
Slamet Rohadi Suparto
Affiliation:
Dep. Agrotechnol., Fac. Agric., Jenderal Soedirman Univ., Jl. Dr. Soeparno, Purwokerto 51123, Central Java, Indones. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. The aim of our research was to optimize the number of young mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. ‘Arumanis’) fruits that could be maintained per panicle and to improve the criteria for the selection of fruit to be maintained in loco to allow a high yield to be achieved. Materials and methods. The factors investigated were the number of young fruits maintained per panicle (either 2, 4 or 6), while the criteria of young fruits to be maintained were: the number of biggest fruit, fruits attached at the base of the panicle, and fruits distributed evenly from the base to the top of the panicle. Results. Our study shows that maintaining six young fruits per panicle gave the highest weight of harvested mango fruits per plant (33 kg) and the lowest weight per fruit (466 g). Maintaining the biggest mango fruit on the panicle resulted in the highest weight per fruit (496 g). Conclusion. Increasing the number of young fruits maintained per panicle from 2 to 6 linearly increased the weight of fruits per plant, although it decreased the weight per fruit linearly.

Type
Original article
Copyright
© 2012 Cirad/EDP Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon., Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2010, Statistic Office, Indonesia Office of Statistic, Indonesia, 2010, 629 p.
Sakhidin, Purwoko, B.S., Poerwanto, R., Susanto, S., Yahya, S., Abidin, A.S., Pattern of fruit drop of three varieties of mango, Indones. J. Agron. 32 (2) (2004) 16.Google Scholar
Bonghi, C., Tonutti, P., Ramina, A., Biochemical and molecular aspects of fruitlet abscission, Plant Growth Regul. 31 (2000) 3542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pescie, M.A., Strik, B.C., Thinning before bloom affects fruit size and yield of hardy kiwifruit, HortSci. 39 (6) (2004) 12431245.Google Scholar
Yeshitela, T., Robbertse, P.J., Fivas, J., Effect of fruit thinning on ‘Sensation’ mango (Mangifera indica) trees with respect to fruit quantity, quality, and tree phenology, Exp. Agric. 40 (2004) 433444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A.H., Embree, C.G., Nichols, D.S., Prange, R.K., Harrison, P.A., Delong, J.M., Fruit mass, colour and yield of ‘Honeycrisp’TM apples are influenced by manually-adjusted fruit population and free form, J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 81 (3) (2006) 397401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forshey, C.G., Chemical fruit thinning of apples, N. Y. food life sci. bull. 116 (1986) 17.Google Scholar
Stover, E., Relationship of flowering intensity and cropping in fruit species, HortTechnol. 10 (4) (2010) 729732.Google Scholar
Racsko, J., Crop load, fruit thinning and their effects on fruit quality of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.), J. Agric. Sci. 24 (2006) 2935.Google Scholar
Tahir, F.M., Hamid, K., Studies of physico-chemical changes due to fruit thinning in guava (Psidium guajava L.), Online J. Biol. Sci. 2 (11) (2002) 744745.Google Scholar
Crabtree, S.B., Pomper, K.W., Lowe, J.D., Within-cluster hand-thinning increases fruit weight in North American pawpaw [Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal], J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 64 (4) (2010) 234240.Google Scholar
Stover, E., Fargione, M., Risio, R., Yang, X., Robinson, T., Fruit weight, crop load, and return bloom of ‘Empire’ apple following thinning with 6-benzyladenine and NAA at several phenological stages, HortSci. 36 (6) (2001) 10771081.Google Scholar
Soliman, S.S., Al-Obeed, R.S., Harhash, M.M., Effects of bunch thinning on yield and fruit quality of khalas date palm cultivar, World Appl. Sci. J. 12 (8) (2011) 11871191.Google Scholar
Solomakhin, A.A., Blanke, M.M., Mechanical flower thinning improves the fruit quality of apples, J. Sci. Food Agric. 90 (5) (2010) 735741.Google ScholarPubMed
Taiz L., Zeiger E., Plant Physiology, 4th Edition, Sinauer Assoc. Inc. Publ., Sunderland, Mass., U.S.A., 2006.
Bangerth, F., Abscission and thinning of young fruit and their regulation by plant hormones and bioregulators, Plant Growth Regul. 31 (2000) 4359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuranZuazo, V.H., Pleguezuelo, C.R.R., Tarifa, D.F., Impact of sustained-deficit irrigation on tree growth, mineral nutrition, fruit yield and quality of mango in Spain, Fruits 66 (2011) 257268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar