Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T03:55:08.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emotional processing in panic disorder and its subtypes: An fMRI study using the emotional faces paradigm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

T. Pattyn*
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute CAPRI, Antwerp, Belgium Antwerp University Hospital, University Department of Psychiatry, Antwerpen, Belgium
L. Schmaal
Affiliation:
VUmc, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
V.D.E. Filip
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute CAPRI, Antwerp, Belgium Antwerp University Hospital, University Department of Psychiatry, Antwerp, Belgium
P. Brenda
Affiliation:
VUmc, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
S. Bernard
Affiliation:
University of Antwerp, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute CAPRI, Antwerp, Belgium Antwerp University Hospital, University Department of Psychiatry, Antwerpen, Belgium
V. Dick
Affiliation:
VUmc, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands VUmc, EMGO Institute of Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The literature on the neurobiology of emotional processing in panic disorder (PD) remains inconsistent. Clinical heterogeneity could be causing this.

Objective

To investigate differences in brain activity between PD and healthy controls using the emotional faces fMRI paradigm.

Aims

To elucidate neurobiological mechanisms underlying emotional processing in PD and previously identified subtypes (Pattyn et al., 2015).

Methods

The main analysis compared the neural processing of different emotional facial expressions from a large group of PD patients (n = 73) versus healthy controls (n = 58) originating from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). A second analysis divided the PD group into the three previously identified subgroups: a cognitive-autonomic (n = 22), an autonomic (n = 16) and an aspecific subgroup (n = 35). The fusiform gyrus, the anterior cingulate cortex and the insula were used in a ROI approach.

Results

Comparing PD patients with healthy controls, a decreased activity on angry faces was observed in the left fusiform gyrus. The subgroup analysis showed more activity in the anterior cingulate cortex on neutral faces in the cognitive-autonomic subgroup versus the autonomic subgroup and a decreased activity in the left fusiform gyrus on angry faces compared to the aspecific subgroup. Less activity was observed in the right insula on neutral faces in the autonomic subgroup versus the aspecific subgroup.

Conclusion

Reduced activity in the left fusiform gyrus was differentiating panic disorder patients from healthy controls. In accordance with clinical subtyping, between-subtype differences are an indication that a phenomenological approach could provide more insight in underlying neurobiological mechanisms in emotional processing in PD.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV351
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.