Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-26T17:54:04.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Types of Body Build and their Relation to Special Aptitudes and Capacities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Alfred A. Mumford
Affiliation:
(Medical Officer, Manchester Grammar School.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In recognition of the need for understanding, and for making proper allowances for differences in body growth and physical development during school life, it has been the custom at the Manchester Grammar School to take annual measurements of standing and sitting height, girth of chest, of upper and lower arm, and also range of vital capacity of all the boys amounting to about 1000 in number, and to compare their physical growth with their school attainments. The measurements are graded for each boy as regards height, weight, chest girth and vital capacity, in order to discover the rate and range of growth in each category, and see how far the growth in one category is commensurate with the growth in another. The grading in each category is expressed in time-increments of six months' growth above or below the normal boy of his age, so that, e.g. a boy who is a year ahead or a year behind the average boy of his age in height is graded + 2 or − 2 in height, and so forth. Similar and separate gradings are used for weight, chest girth and vital capacity. At the time of annual measurement, enquiry is also made into the physical activities in which each boy participates, e.g. the games he plays, his performance in the swimming bath, in the gymnasium, etc.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

References

REFERENCES

Adamt, J. G. (1923). On the differentiation of curricula between the sexes in secondary schools. Report of the Consultative Committee to the Board of Education, App. v. H. M. Stat. Office. 2s. 9d.Google Scholar
Mumfoed, A. A. (1927). Healthy Growth. A Study of the Relation between the Mental and Physical Development of Adolescent Boys in a Public Day School. See chap. x. H. Milford.Google Scholar
Patebson, R. S. (03 1929). Some factors influencing epiphysical growth and union. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., Section of Electro-Therapeutics.Google Scholar
Schiötz, C. (1928). Legemlig utvikling og legemlig ydeevne. Nord. Hygien. Tidsskr.Google Scholar
Schiötz, C. (1929). Massen-Untersuchungen, etc. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Schiötz, C. and Skau, J. (1926). Undersökelser av vekt og höide hos skole lever i de forskjellige ârstider. Nord. Hygien. Tidsskr.Google Scholar