Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T20:42:40.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental studies on the comparative infectivity and pathogenicity of Streptococcus suis type 2. I. Porcine and human isolates in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

I. D. Robertson*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
D. K. Blackmore
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
*
* Address for reprints/correspondence: I. D. Robertson, School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Perth, 6150, Western Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Piglets between 1 and 40 days of age were inoculated with varying numbers and with different isolates of Streptococcus suis type 2 by the intranasal, intravenous and subarachnoid routes. Less than 100 organisms of an isolate cultured from apparently normal pigs caused subclinical infection in 1-day-old piglets after intranasal inoculation. This infection was naturally transmitted between litter mates. Intravenous inoculation of a similar isolate in 7-week-old pigs resulted in a sub-clinical bacteraemia in 3 of 8 piglets. One other piglet developed a bacteraemia 7 days after inoculation and concurrently developed signs of lameness and nervous dysfunction. Ten piglets were inoculated by the subarachnoid route with a porcine isolate and two with an isolate from a person with clinical disease. Only the latter two pigs developed the classical signs of nervous disease associated with infection by S. suis type 2. It is concluded that strains of S. suis type 2, of varying pathogenicity for both pigs and man, are endemic in New Zealand. It is suggested that the occurrence of disease is associated with both exposure to a pathogenic strain and other, as yet undetermined, secondary factors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

REFERENCES

1. Anonymous. Report of the Veterinary Investigation Service. Vet Record 1979; 105: 290.Google Scholar
2.Robertson, ID, Blackmore, DK. The prevalence of Streptococcus suis types 1 and 2 in domestic pigs in Australia and New Zealand. Vet Record 1989; 124: 391–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Clifton-Hadley, FA, Alexander, TJL. The carrier site and carrier rate of Streptococcus suis types 2 in pigs. Vet Record 1980; 107: 40–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dickie, AS, Wong, PYN, North, JDK, Robertson, ID. Streptococcus suis bacteraemia. N Z Med J 1987; 100: 677.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Robertson, ID. An indirect fluorescent antibody technique for the detection of Streptococcus suis type 2. N Z J Med Lab Tech 1985; 39: 171–2.Google Scholar
6.Robertson, ID, Blackmore, DK. The detection of pigs carrying Streptococcus suis type 2. N Z Vet J 1987; 35: 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Pento, JT. Measurement of plasma calcitonin in vivo in the pig using a chronically implanted catheter for infusion and blood sampling. J Anim Sci 1974; 39: 885–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Coles, EH. Veterinary clinical pathology, 2nd ed.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1974.Google Scholar
9.Clifton-Hadley, FA, Alexander, TJL. Studies of Streptococcus suis type 2 infection. Pig Vet Soc Proc 1981; 8: 817.Google Scholar
10.Pedersen, KB, Kjems, E, Perch, B, Slot, P. Infection with RS streptococci in pigs. Acta Path Micro Scand Sect B 1981; 89: 161–5.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Clausen, HM. Inaugural dissertation, Tierarztliche Hochschule, Hannover, 1980; p. 95. (Abstracted in Vet Bull 1981; 51: 622).Google Scholar
12.Chau, PY, Huang, CY, Kay, R. Streptococcus suis meningitis. An important underdiagnosed disease in Hong Kong. Med J Aust 1983; 1: 414–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Robertson, ID. PhD thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 1988.Google Scholar
14.Whatson, TS, Bertram, JM. Some observations on mother-infant interactions in the pig (Sus scrofa). Appl Anim Ethol 1982; 9: 253–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Clifton-Hadley, FA, Enright, MR. Factors affecting the survival of Streptococcus suis type 2. Vet Record 1984; 114: 585–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed