Article contents
John Stuart Mill as Philosopher*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Extract
This substantial study appears in a series called The Arguments of the Philosophers. If Professor Skorupski's admirable work on Mill is typical, it will be a remarkable series. Both as a work of scholarship and as a contribution to philosophy in its own right, this is an outstanding work, well worth reading by the general philosopher and not just by Mill devotees.
- Type
- Critical Notices/Études critiques
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , Spring 1993 , pp. 315 - 328
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1993
References
Notes
1 Narveson, Jan, Morality and Utility (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967), pp. 79–81.Google Scholar
2 Ibid., pp. 91–93.
3 See Narveson, Morality and Utility, pp. 161–68, 181–84. Skorupski, however, is more strongly wedded to autonomy than I was, and is clearer about it.
4 Narveson, Jan, The Libertarian Idea (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988), p. 286.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by