Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:52:14.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Stuart Mill as Philosopher*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Jan Narveson
Jan Narveson
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This substantial study appears in a series called The Arguments of the Philosophers. If Professor Skorupski's admirable work on Mill is typical, it will be a remarkable series. Both as a work of scholarship and as a contribution to philosophy in its own right, this is an outstanding work, well worth reading by the general philosopher and not just by Mill devotees.

Type
Critical Notices/Études critiques
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , Spring 1993 , pp. 315 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Narveson, Jan, Morality and Utility (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967), pp. 79–81.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., pp. 91–93.

3 See Narveson, Morality and Utility, pp. 161–68, 181–84. Skorupski, however, is more strongly wedded to autonomy than I was, and is clearer about it.

4 Narveson, Jan, The Libertarian Idea (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988), p. 286.Google Scholar