Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T23:03:42.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ethics of Consent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

John Kleinig
John Kleinig*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We would not be far wide of the mark if we suggested that the prevailing social ideology is structured round the presumption that interpersonal and political relationships ought to be, and for the most part are, based on the mutual consent of the parties involved. Liberal democratic theory has secured for consent a crucial role in the justification of political obligation and authority. In law, the maxim volenti non fit injuria, to the one who consents no wrong is done, constitutes a defence in cases where one person invades the interests of another. In the bioethical field, there is a preoccupation with the formulation of a standard of ‘informed consent’ in patient-doctor and subject-researcher relationships. And in the broader domain of ethical theory there is an influential view that consensual acts do not differ in moral quality from selfregarding behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 8: New Essays in Ethics and Public Policy , 1982 , pp. 91 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Freedman, B., ‘A Moral Theory of Informed Consent,’ The Hastings Center Report, 5:4 (1975) 32–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinig, J.I., ‘Consent as a Defence in Criminal Law,’ Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 65 (1979) 329–46.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H., ‘Obligation and Consent, I, II,’ American Political Science Review, 59 (1965), 990–9,60 (1966) 39-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plamenatz, J.P., Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation2 , (London: Oxford University Press 1968).Google Scholar
Scutt, J.A., ‘Consent versus Submission: Threats and the Element of Fear in Rape,’ University of Western Australia Law Review, 13 (1977) 52–76.Google Scholar
Simmons, A.J., Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1980).Google Scholar
Snare, F., ‘Consent and Conventional Acts in john Locke,’ journal of the History of Philosophie, 13 (1975) 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weale, A., ‘Consent,’ Political Studies, 26 (1978) 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar