Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T12:03:25.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Representation of Banach Algebras with an Involution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

J. A. Schatz*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1943 Gelfand and Neumark (3) characterized uniformly closed self-adjoint algebras of bounded operators on a Hilbert space as Banach algebras with an involution (a conjugate linear anti-isomorphism of period two) satisfying several additional conditions. The main purpose of this paper is to point out that if we consider algebras of bounded operators on complex Banach spaces more general than Hilbert space, then we can represent a larger class of algebras by essentially the same methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1957

References

1. Arens, R., Representation of *-algebras, Duke Math. J., 14 (1947), 269282.Google Scholar
2. Fukamiya, M., On B*-algebra, Proc. Japan Acad., 27 (1951), 321327.Google Scholar
3. Gelfand, I. and Neumark, M., On the imbedding of normed rings into the ring of operators in Hilbert space, Matematičeskiĭ Sbornik, N.S., 12 (54) (1943), 197217.Google Scholar
4. Hille, E., Functional analysis and semi-groups, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloquium Publications, 31 (New York, 1948).Google Scholar
5. Lax, P. D., Symmetrizable linear transformations, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 7 (1954), 633647.Google Scholar
6. Neumark, M., Rings with involution, Uspehi Matematičeskiĭ Nauk, N.S., 3, 5 (27) (1948), 52145; translated as Amer. Math. Soc. Translation 25 (1950). All specific references are to the translation.Google Scholar
7. Rickart, C. E., The uniqueness of norm problem in Banach algebras, Ann. Math. (2), 51 (1950), 615628.Google Scholar
8. Review of a paper by Fukamiya in Math. Rev. 14 (1953), 884 and 15 (1954), 1139.Google Scholar