Introduction: Adolescents who present to emergency departments (ED) following intentional injuries present a challenge in terms of ascertaining their intent and risk for future self-injurious or suicidal behaviour. Our ED has seen an 80% increase in visits for mental health issues over the past ten years. As usage of our Emergency Mental Health and Addictions Services (EMHAS) team continues to rise, it is increasingly important to understand the incidence of NSSI among our youth, explore if NSSI is reported at triage and identify characteristics that may distinguish these adolescents from others presenting for mental health assessment. Methods: This is an exploratory research study using retrospective data. Patients who had an Emergency Mental Health Triage (EMHT) form on their health record from an ED visit between June 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018 were eligible. Trained research assistants, using a structured data collection form in REDCap. abstracted data from the EMHT form, the EMHAS Assessment form, the Assessment of Suicide Risk Inventory and our CHIRPP (Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program) database. We calculated kappa values and 95% confidence intervals to describe the extent to which the forms agree with respect to identifying NSSI. We will compare the cohort who reports NSSI with the cohort who does not report NSSI using chi-square statistics depending. We will use descriptive statistics to characterize the NSSI patients. Results: During the one-year study period 955 patients had an EMHT form completed. In preliminary analysis 558 (58.4%) reported a history of NSSI. Patients reported NSSI on both the EMHT form and the EMHAS assessment form 64.7% of the time (kappa 0.56) indicating moderate agreement. In patients with NSSI, 9.5% of patients reported it only at triage and 25.8% of patients reported it only during their EMHAS assessment. Between group comparisons and descriptive analysis is underway. Conclusion: More than half of youth triaged with an emergency mental health complaint in our ED reported a history of NSSI. Screening at triage was moderately effective in identifying adolescents with NSSI compared to an in-depth assessment by the mental health team. Further research is needed to clarify how NSSI relates to risk for suicide.

Introduction: Croup is a common viral upper airway infection in children aged 6 months to 6 years. Although a single dose of dexamethasone decreases return visits, the prescribed dose varies from 0.15mg/kg to 0.6mg/kg. Our objective was to examine the effect of varied dexamethasone dosing on unplanned return ED visits for croup. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of IWK ED patient treatment records from September 1, 2014 – August 31, 2016 of children aged 6 months to 6 years with an ICD-10 discharge diagnosis code of croup. Data were abstracted by trained research assistants using a structured data collection form in REDCap. A sample of 5% of charts had double data abstraction to test for agreement. Our primary outcome was return visits to the ED within 7 days. Secondary outcomes were ED length of stay (LOS), admission to hospital and admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square for between group comparisons. Results: The dataset included 1595 patient visits for croup. Data analysis is in progress. Triage acuity as per CTAS included: resuscitation n = 5; emergent n = 351; urgent n = 558; less urgent n = 605; and, non-urgent n = 2. Most patients had no co-morbid conditions (n = 1548). Dexamethasone dosing varied: 0.15 mg/kg n = 64; 0.3 mg/kg n = 838; and, 0.6 mg/kg n = 493. ED LOS was under 1 hour in 483 patients, 1-3 hours in 805, 3-6 hours in 225 and 6-12 hours in 9 patients. Few patients were admitted to hospital (n = 22) and no patients were admitted to PICU. Within 7 days of the index visit, 78 patients had an unplanned return visit to the ED for croup. Conclusion: The data analysis is in progress. This study will inform our future research on a practice change in our ED to comply with the dose of dexamethasone recommended by the Canadian Pediatric Society for the treatment of croup in 2017.

Introduction: We wished to identify emergency department interventions that lead to improvement in door-to-ECG times for adults presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: Two reviewers searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to April 2018 for studies in adult emergency departments with an identifiable intervention to reduce median door-to-ECG times when compared to the institution's baseline. Quality was assessed using the ‘Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set’ (QI-MQCS) critical appraisal tool. The primary outcome was the absolute median reduction in door-to-ECG times as calculated by the difference between the post-intervention time and pre-intervention time. Results: Two reviewers identified 809 unique articles, yielding 11 before-after quality improvement studies that met eligibility criteria (N = 15,622 patients). The majority of studies (10/11) reported bundled interventions and most (10/11) showed statistical improvement in door-to-ECG times. The most common interventions were: having a dedicated ECG machine and technician in triage (5/11); improved triage education (4/11); improved triage disposition (2/11); and data feedback mechanisms (1/11). Conclusion: There are multiple interventions that show promise for reducing emergency department door-to-ECG times. Effective bundled interventions include having a dedicated ECG technician, triage education and better triage disposition. These changes, bundled together, can help intuitions attain best practice guidelines. Emergency departments must first understand their local context before adopting any single or group of interventions.

Introduction: Access block is a pervasive problem, even during times of minimal boarding in the ED, suggesting suboptimal use of ED stretchers can contribute. A tracking board utility was embedded into the electronic health record in Calgary, AB, allowing MDs and RNs to consider patients who could be relocated from a stretcher to a chair. Objectives of this study were to evaluate the feature's impact on total stretcher time (TST) and ED length of stay (LOS) for patients relocated to a chair. We also sought to identify facilitators and barriers to the tool's use amongst ED MDs and RNs. Methods: A retrospective cohort design was used to compare TST between those where the tool was used and not used amongst patients relocated to a chair between September 1 2017 and August 15 2018. Each use of the location tool was time-stamped in an administrative database. Median TST and ED LOS were compared between patients where the tool was used and not used using a Mann-Whitney U Test. A cross sectional convenience sample survey was used to determine facilitators and barriers to the tool's use amongst ED staff. Response proportions were used to report Likert scale questions; thematic analysis was used to code themes. Results: 194882 patients met inclusion criteria. The tool was used 4301 times, with “Ok for Chairs” selected 3914(2%) times and “Not Ok for Chairs” selected 384(0.2%) times; 54462(30%) patients were moved to a chair without the tool's use. Mean age, sex, mode of arrival and triage scores were similar between both groups. Median (IQR) TST amongst patients moved to a chair via the prompt was shorter than when the prompt was not used [142.7 (100.5) mins vs 152.3 (112.3) mins, p < 0.001], resulting in 37574 mins of saved stretcher time. LOS was similar between both groups (p = 0.22). 125 questionnaires were completed by 90 ED nurses and 35 ED MDs. 95% of staff were aware of the tool and 70% agreed/strongly agreed the tool could improve ED flow; however, 38% reported only “sometimes” using the tool. MDs reported the most common barrier was forgetting to use the tool and lack of perceived action in relocating patients. Commonly reported nursing barriers were lack of chair space and increased workload. Conclusion: Despite minimal use of the tracking board utility, triggering was associated with reduced TST amongst ED patients eventually relocated to a chair. To encourage increased use, future versions should prompt staff to select a location.

Introduction: September 2017 saw the launch of the British Columbia (BC) Emergency Medicine Network (EM Network), an innovative clinical network established to improve emergency care across the province. The intent of the EM Network is to support the delivery of evidence-informed, patient-centered care in all 108 Emergency Departments and Diagnostic & Treatment Centres in BC. After one year, the Network undertook a formative evaluation to guide its growth. Our objective is to describe the evaluation approach and early findings. Methods: The EM Network was evaluated on three levels: member demographics, online engagement and member perceptions of value and progress. For member demographics and online engagement, data were captured from member registration information on the Network's website, Google Analytics and Twitter Analytics. Membership feedback was sought through an online survey using a social network analysis tool, PARTNER (Program to Analyze, Record, and Track Networks to Enhance Relationships), and semi-structured individual interviews. This framework was developed based on literature recommendations in collaboration with Network members, including patient representatives. Results: There are currently 622 EM Network members from an eligible denominator of approximately 1400 physicians (44%). Seventy-three percent of the Emergency Departments and Diagnostic and Treatment Centres in BC currently have Network members, and since launch, the EM Network website has been accessed by 11,154 unique IP addresses. Online discussion forum use is low but growing, and Twitter following is high. There are currently 550 Twitter followers and an average of 27 ‘mentions’ of the Network by Twitter users per month. Member feedback through the survey and individual interviews indicates that the Network is respected and credible, but many remain unaware of its purpose and offerings. Conclusion: Our findings underscore that early evaluation is useful to identify development needs, and for the Network this includes increasing awareness and online dialogue. However, our results must be interpreted cautiously in such a young Network, and thus, we intend to re-evaluate regularly. Specific action recommendations from this baseline evaluation include: increasing face-to-face visits of targeted communities; maintaining or accelerating communication strategies to increase engagement; and providing new techniques that encourage member contributions in order to grow and improve content.

Introduction: Complications in early pregnancy are common and have many physical and emotional consequences. Locally, there is no early pregnancy loss clinic or standardized guide in the emergency department (ED) for referral and follow-up decisions, and both initial management of patients and follow up can be inconsistent. This study aimed to obtain consensus on the best approach to initial work-up, management, and follow up for patients who present to the ED with early pregnancy complications, with the goal of using this consensus to produce a standardized guide for emergency provider use. Methods: A literature review was completed to produce evidence-based recommendations which were used to initiate a modified Delphi consensus process. A survey was distributed, with three rounds completed. Participants included emergency providers, obstetrician-gynecologists, a radiologist, a sample of family medicine physicians including some involved in primary care obstetrics, and nurse practitioners. An obstetric specialist from outside the local region was also involved. Results: Consensus was reached on several key recommendations, however some areas remained without clear accepted best practice. There was consensus that physical components of early pregnancy complications are addressed well, but that we could improve on patient flow and more consistent follow up. Important investigations to be done for patients were identified. The timing of formal ultrasound, necessity and timing of obstetrician consultation, and safety of discharge was addressed for various patient scenarios including stable and unstable patients, with and without adnexal pain, with intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability, and with pregnancy of unknown location. Management of confirmed early pregnancy loss in the ED and family medicine clinics was addressed. Barriers to an early pregnancy loss clinic included lack of funding, space, and staffing as well as lack of resources and uncertain patient volumes. A feasible alternative to an early pregnancy loss clinic was for willing providers to keep appointment times available to facilitate confirmation of follow-up prior to discharge. Other suggested alternatives included an early pregnancy loss clinic, a nurse educator, and having a standardized guideline in the ED. Conclusion: Through a consensus approach, several recommendations were agreed upon for improving care for patients presenting to the ED with early pregnancy complications.

Introduction: Royal College Emergency Medicine (EM) trainees at the University of Ottawa participate in weekly Academic Full Days (AFD) that consist of didactic activities, simulation-based learning, and core content sessions referred to as Core Rounds (CR). Despite CR being intentioned for all EM trainees, an attendance attrition has been noted as trainees progress towards their senior (SR) years (PGY3-5). The objectives of this study were to (1) identify barriers to SR trainee CR attendance and (2) identify areas for CR improvement. Methods: An on-line survey was administered to SR EM trainees (PGY3-5, n = 28) and recent graduates from our program (practice year 1-2, n = 20) to explore perceptions of the value of AFDs, CR attendance barriers, and areas for CR improvement. The survey consisted of 5-point Likert scales and free-text responses. Quantitative responses were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Free-text responses were analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. Each free-text response was reviewed independently by two investigators (JML, MCL) and underwent line-by-line coding. Through joint discussions, the codes from each response were synthesized and themes were identified. Results: Of the 48 trainees and attendings surveyed, 32 responded (response rate 67%). Most respondents (90%) stated they benefited from SR trainee attendance when they were at a junior (JR) level. The majority perceived they benefited less from CR as a SR trainee compared to when they were a JR trainee (85%). Further, 87% responded that CR were not tailored to a SR level, and that they would attend more frequently if sessions were geared to their level (81%). From our thematic analysis, three themes emerged relating to SR trainee absenteeism: 1) CR quality, 2) External Factors (eg. trainee fatigue) and 3) Malalignment with trainees’ own education plan. We also identified three themes relating to areas for CR improvement: 1) CR content, 2) CR format and 3) SR trainee involvement. Conclusion: Respondents indicated a benefit to having SR trainee presence at CR. This study identified barriers to SR resident attendance at CR and areas for improvement. With the transition to competency based medical education it is critical that trainees engage in effective educational experiences, especially as the RCPSC does not mandate AFDs for EM training in this new curriculum. A culture-change initiative and CR reformat is now underway at our institution with planned post-implementation analysis.

Innovation Concept: Ventilator management is an essential skill and a training objective for emergency medicine (EM) specialists in Canada. EM trainees obtain the majority of this training during off-service rotations. Previous attempts to strengthen ventilator knowledge include lectures and simulation – both of which are time and resource intensive. Given the unique features of ventilator management in the ED, we developed an ED-specific ventilator curriculum. The purpose of this study is to 1) identify resident needs regarding ventilator curricula and 2) assess resident response to this pilot curriculum. Methods: A needs-assessment survey administered to RCPSC- and CCFP-EM residents at The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) showed the majority of residents (87%, n = 31 respondents) believe there is a need for more ED-focused ventilator management training, and only 13% felt confident in ventilator management. Ten on-line modules were prepared by an EM-Critical Care attending, and distributed on-line to all EM trainees at TOH (n = 52). Mid- and post-implementation surveys are used to assess residents’ confidence in ventilator management, and perceived usefulness of the curriculum. User feedback from focus groups constitutes part of the curriculum evaluation. Curriculum, Tool or Material: Employing a flipped classroom approach, ten on-line modules were distributed to RCPSC- and CCFP-EM trainees at TOH. Each module requires less than ten minutes to complete and focuses on a single aspect of ventilation. The modules are available for residents to complete at their own pace and convenience. At curriculum completion, an EM-Critical Care attending physician facilitates an interactive session. Conclusion: Mid-implementation survey results demonstrate increased confidence in independently managing ventilated patients in the ED (13% pre- vs. 56% mid-implementation), and an increased perception of having sufficient ventilator training (26% pre- vs. 78% mid-implementation). All respondents felt the modules were of appropriate length, content was easy to follow, and that the modules should be part of the residency curriculum. Our ED-specific online ventilator modules area a viable tool to increase residents’ confidence in ventilator management. This novel curriculum could be adopted by other residency programs and continuing professional development initiatives. Future work will include post-implementation data-gathering, and formal curriculum evaluation.

Introduction: Discomfort exists discussing goals of care with families of children with advanced life-threatening illnesses. There also exists important variability in the management of these patients. This study seeks to explore the perceptions of pediatric specialists involved in the care of children with life-threatening illnesses with regards to goals of care discussions and management during acute unexpected deteriorations. Methods: This single center survey study used 4 scenarios of children presenting to the emergency department with respiratory distress. Scenarios included patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, static encephalopathy, spinal muscular atrophy and refractory leukemia. Questions following each vignette were identical. Physicians from the specialties most involved in these scenarios completed the survey by email or in person. Data analysis used SPSS v.20 (IBM Inc.). Related samples non-parametric tests compared participants’ Likert scale answers. Results: Between May 2015 and May 2016, 60 participants completed the study; 14 were excluded (>60% missing answers). Most (80.4%) participants reported an interest in pediatric palliative care; 71.7% had 0-3 formal trainings. Participants believed goals of care were best discussed before an acute deterioration. Acute deteriorations were not seen as an opportune moment to initiate discussions about goals of care. However, validating these previous wishes was necessary, given that not discussing them was judged unacceptable by the participants. Pediatric specialists were seen as the most suitable teams to initiate these discussions, while the emergency department's role in these discussions was unclear. Several management options were less acceptable for the patient with static encephalopathy. Conclusion: Discussing goals of care during acute illness exacerbation involves many stakeholders, who may not always be available at critical times. Advanced care planning with these families is essential to prepare them for acute health events.

Introduction: La réanimation par circulation extracorporelle (R-CEC) permet potentiellement d'améliorer la survie de patients souffrant d'un arrêt cardiaque extrahospitalier (ACEH) réfractaire aux traitements habituels. Cette technique, se pratiquant généralement en centre hospitalier (CH), doit être réalisée le plus précocement possible. Un transport vers le CH en temps opportun est donc nécessaire. Cette étude vise à décrire la durée nécessaire des manœuvres de réanimation préhospitalières afin d'optimiser le moment du départ vers le CH dans le but d'obtenir un maximum de retour de circulation spontanée (RCS) préhospitalier. Methods: La présente étude de cohorte a été réalisée à partir des bases de données collectées de la Corporation d'Urgences-santé dans la région de Montréal entre 2010 et 2015. Les patients éligibles à une R-CEC selon les critères locaux ont été inclus (<65 ans, rythme initial défibrillable, arrêt témoigné avec réanimation par un témoin). Les patients ayant eu un arrêt devant les paramédics ont été exclus, tout comme ceux avec un RCS avant l'arrivée des services préhospitaliers. Nous avons calculé la sensibilité et la spécificité à différents seuils afin de prédire un RCS préhospitalier et une survie au congé hospitalier. Une courbe ROC a également été construite. Results: Un total de 236 patients (207 hommes et 29 femmes) d'un âge moyen de 52 ans (±10) ont été inclus dans l’étude, parmi lesquels 93 (39%) ont survécu jusqu’à leur congé hospitalier et 136 (58%) ont obtenu un RCS préhospitalier. Le délai moyen avant leur RCS était de 13 minutes (±10). Plus de 50% des survivants avaient eu un RCS moins de 8 minutes après l'initiation des manœuvres de réanimation par les intervenants préhospitaliers, et plus de 90% avant 24 minutes. Plus de 50% de tous les RCS survenaient dans les 10 premières minutes de réanimation et plus de 90% dans les 31 premières minutes. La courbe ROC montrait visuellement que le délai avant le RCS maximisant la sensibilité et la spécificité pour prédire la survie chez ces patients était à 22 minutes (Sensibilité = 90%, spécificité = 78%; aire sous la courbe = 0,89 [intervalle de confiance à 95% 0,84-0,93]). Conclusion: Le départ vers le CH pourrait être considéré pour ces patients entre 8 et 24 minutes après l'initiation des manœuvres. Une période de réanimation de 22 minutes semble être le meilleur compromis à cet égard.

Introduction: Studies suggest that acute pain evolution after an emergency department (ED) visit has been associated with the development of chronic pain. Using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM), we aimed to evaluate if ED discharged patients with similar pain intensity profiles of change over 14 days are associated with chronic pain at 3 months. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of patients aged 18 years or older who visited the ED for an acute pain condition (≤2 weeks) and were discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary in which they listed their daily pain intensity level (0-10 numeric rating scale). Three months post-ED visit, participants were interviewed by phone to report their pain intensity related to the initial pain. Results: A total of 305 patients were retained at 3 months (mean age ± SD: 55 ± 15 years, 49% women). Using GBTM, six distinct pain intensity trajectories were identified during the first 14 days of the acute pain period; two linear one with moderate or severe pain during the follow-up (representing almost 40% of the patients) and four cubic polynomial order trajectories, with mild or no-pain at the end of the 14 days (low final pain). Twelve percent (11.9; ±95%CI: 8.2-15.4) of the patients had chronic pain at 3 months. Controlling for age, sex and types of pain condition, patients with trajectories of moderate or severe pain and those with only severe pain were 5.1 (95%CI: 2.2-11.8) and 8.2 (95%CI: 3.4-20.0) times more likely to develop chronic pain at 3 months, respectively, compared to the low final pain group. Conclusion: Trajectories could be useful to early identification of patients at risk of chronic pain.

Introduction: The objective of the study was to evaluate the acute pain intensity evolution in ED discharged patients using Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM). This method identified patient groups with similar profiles of change over time without assuming the existence of a particular pattern or number of groups. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients aged ≥18 years with an acute pain condition (≤ 2 weeks) and discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary assessing daily pain intensity level (0-10 numeric rating scale) and pain medication use. Results: Among the 372 included patients, six distinct post-ED pain intensity trajectories were identified: two started with severe levels of pain, one remained with severe pain intensity (12.6% of the sample) and the other ended with moderate pain intensity level (26.3%). Two other trajectories had severe initial pain, one decreased to mild pain (21.7%) and the other to no-pain (13.8%). Another trajectory had moderate initial pain which decreased to a mild level (15.9%) and the last one started with mild pain intensity and had no pain at the end of the 14-day (9.7%). The pain trajectory patterns were significantly associated with age, type of painful conditions, pain intensity at ED discharge, and with opioid consumption. Conclusion: Acute pain resolution following an ED visit seems to progress through six different trajectory patterns that are more informative than simple linear models and could be useful to adapt acute pain management in future research.

Introduction: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a chronic relapsing and highly comorbid disease. Patients suffering from AUD are frequently seen in the emergency department (ED) presenting intoxicated or in withdrawal. Brief interactions in the ED are often the only portal of entry to the healthcare system for many of these patients. Oral naltrexone and long acting injectable naltrexone are effective treatment options for AUD associated with decreased cravings, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower cost of healthcare utilization. This study's objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature evaluating initiation of naltrexone in the ED. Methods: Electronic searches of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL were conducted and reference lists were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing initiation of naltrexone in patients (≥18 years) to standard care in the ED were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full text articles for inclusion, assessed quality of the studies, and extracted data. Results: The search strategy yielded 183 potentially relevant citations. After eliminating duplicate citations and studies that did not meet eligibility criteria, 10 articles were retrieved for full text review. There were no published RCTs that examined naltrexone initiation in the ED. There is one ongoing study being conducted in New York, which aims to assess naltrexone initiation in the ED and measure health outcomes and quality of life of study participants, as well as potential healthcare cost savings. Conclusion: The lack of published research in this area demonstrates a significant gap in knowledge. It is clear that well-designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of initiating naltrexone for those with AUD at the ED visit.

Innovation Concept: Competence in procedural skills is vital within the emergency department. Challenging procedures such as cricothyroidotomy are difficult to master as they are rare and hard to train for. Additionally, common procedures such as chest tube insertions require practice to become sufficiently competent. Opportunities to hone these skills are essential in residency training. This project aimed to create instructional video modules for specific emergency medicine (EM) procedures and to gauge its utility as an adjunctive resource for procedural learning in the EM residency curriculum. Methods: Tutorial videos for clamshell thoracotomy, cricothyroidotomy, and chest tube insertion were filmed within a cadaver lab with step-by-step instructions. The footage was edited and overlaid with a prepared audio narration using Camtasia®/Apple® Video Editing software. These videos were embedded within modules that included foundational knowledge relevant to the procedures including anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology. The modules were peer-edited by licensed EM staff physicians and distributed to EM residents and staff physicians for analysis. Qualitative and quantitative analysis relied upon participants’ answers to questions and a Modified Task Value Scale (measures the value of a module for overall learning), respectively. Curriculum, Tool or Material: Ten participants were included in the analysis, including EM residents (n = 6) and staff emergency physicians (n = 4). Qualitative feedback suggested that positive aspects of the modules included visuals, content, narration, and review of anatomy. Negative aspects included the lack of indications for procedures, technical details, real patient examples, and a speed up function. Quantitative feedback resulted in scores of 4 and above out of 5 (1 = lowest value, 5 = highest value) on the Motivated Task Value Scale across all aspects for all the modules. Furthermore, analysis revealed an average score of 3.9/5 for inclination to access more modules such as these, and a score of 4.4/5 for overall perception of the modules. Conclusion: Participants found the video modules valuable to their learning, both qualitatively and quantitatively. This study was limited by a small sample size of modules and a low number of participants. Furthermore, a more detailed analysis with further measures, including self-efficacy and self-confidence, would yield more comprehensive conclusions. However, video modules provide an effective and easily accessible adjunctive tool to acquire skill and confidence with EM procedures, for medical learners and staff physicians.

Introduction: According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, the rate of invasive Group A Streptococcus (iGAS) has more than doubled since it first became a notifiable disease in 2000. Our objectives were to describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics of iGAS in a geographic area that sees a relatively high volume of cases annually. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult and pediatric patients presenting to the Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre Emergency Department from January 2016 to December 2017 with a hospital discharge diagnosis of iGAS infection using ICD-10 codes. Patient demographics, host characteristics, triage vital signs, laboratory values, culture sites, and disposition were analyzed using univariate and bivariate statistics. Results: Forty-five cases of iGAS were identified over 2 years, with a mean age of 45 years (SD 18). The most prevalent associations were male sex (69%), diabetes mellitus (44%), current or previous alcohol abuse (38%), and current or previous intravenous drug use (33%). Prevalence of iGAS was roughly two times the national average in 2016 (11.5 per 100,000) and four times the national average in 2017 (25.5 per 100,000). Mean triage vital signs included a systolic blood pressure of 126 mmHg (SD 24), diastolic blood pressure of 73 mmHg (SD 16), temperature of 37.3°C (SD 1.4), oxygen saturation of 97% (SD 2), heart rate of 113 beats per minute (SD 22), and respiratory rate of 22 breaths per minute (SD 7). Mean laboratory values revealed a white blood cell count of 17,500 cells/μL (SD 9,800) and C-reactive protein of 243 mg/L (SD 144). A higher Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was positively correlated with longer hospital length of stay (r = 0.46, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Despite its morbidity and mortality, iGAS infections often present insidiously with only mild abnormalities in triage vital signs, and require a high index of suspicion by the emergency physician for a prompt diagnosis, particularly in at-risk populations such as patients with diabetes mellitus or those who misuse alcohol or drugs.

Introduction: The goal of palliative care (PC) is to improve quality of life for both patients and families facing a life-limiting illness. Many individuals in need of PC present to the Emergency Department (ED) with symptomatic complaints. Therefore, the ED may be a good place to connect patients with PC teams. Unfortunately, a lack of communication between patients and medical teams may result in admission to hospital even if this no longer aligns with the goals of care. The aims of this study were to identify the proportion of ED patients with unmet PC needs and to determine if access to rapid outpatient PC follow-up could reduce unnecessary admissions. Methods: University Health Network (UHN) is an urban academic centre with EDs at two sites, Toronto General Hospital (TGH) and Toronto Western Hospital (TWH). A consecutively enrolled sample of 417 patients that presented to these EDs between July 1-August 14, 2018 was taken. ED nurses and physicians were asked to complete a content validated PC screening tool on all eligible patients. Patients were eligible for screening if they (1) were >18 years of age, (2) had been designated a level 2-5 according to the Canadian Triage and Acuity Score, and (3) had been triaged to the subacute or acute areas of the department. Results: Across both sites, 45% of patients screened had a life-limiting illness and 30% had unmet PC needs. Among those with unmet PC needs, 79% had no identifiable involvement with a PC team. TWH had fewer patients with a life-limiting illness compared to TGH (31% vs 57%), but higher rates of unmet PC needs (81% vs 59%, confidence interval for the difference: 8%-34%, p = .003) and less PC involvement (6% vs 24%, confidence interval for the difference: 4%-30%, p < .01). 73% of patients at UHN with unmet PC needs were likely to be admitted to hospital. In 14% (n = 17) of these cases, admissions were felt by physicians to have potentially been avoided if rapid PC follow-up was available. Conclusion: A high percentage of patients presenting to the EDs at UHN have life-limiting illnesses with unmet PC needs. A rapid access outpatient PC clinic, available for referral from the ED, may help to both connect patients with the resources they need and avoid admission to hospital.

Introduction: The Community Referral by Emergency Medical Services (CREMS) program was implemented in January 2015 in Southwestern Ontario. The program allows Paramedics interacting with a patient to directly refer those in need of home care support to their local Community Care Access Centre (CCAC) for needs assessment. If indicated, subsequent referrals are made to specific services (e.g. nursing, physiotherapy and geriatrics) by CCAC. Ideally, CREMS connects patients with appropriate, timely care, supporting individual needs. Previous literature has indicated CREMS results in an increase of home care services provided to patients. Methods: The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the impact of the CREMS program on Emergency Department utilization. Data for all CCAC referrals from London-Middlesex EMS was collected for a thirteen month period (February 2015-February 2016). For all patients receiving a new or increased service from CCAC the number of Emergency Department visits 2 years before referral and 2 years after referral were calculated. A related samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was performed to examine the difference in ED visits pre and post referral to CCAC. Results: There were 213 individuals who received a new or increased service during the study timeframe. Median [IQR] patient age was 77 [70-85.5]. 113/213 (53%) of patients were female. The majority of patients 135/213 (63.4%) were a new referral to CCAC. The median [IQR] number of hospital visits before referral was 3 [1-5] and after referral was 2 [0-4]. There was no significant difference in the overall number of ED visits before versus after referral (955 vs 756 visits, p = 0.051). Conclusion: Community based care can improve patient experience and health outcomes. Paramedics are in a unique position to assess patients in their home to determine who might benefit from home care services. CREMS referrals for this patient group showed a trend towards decreased ED visits after referral but the trend was not statistically significant.

Introduction: Cardioactive steroid poisoning occurs worldwide with the use of pharmaceutical digoxin and botanical cardiac glycosides. The wholesale price of the antidote, digoxin immune fab, has increased over 300% from 2010 to 2015. Our objective was to identify gaps in the existing literature with respect to the use of digoxin immune fab in cardioactive steroid toxicity in acute care settings. Methods: We used scoping study methodology, as described by Arksey and O'Malley, to assess the range and scope of empiric research and will report: 1) sources of cardioactive steroid toxicity in acute settings; 2) doses of digoxin immune fab used in treatment; and, 3) intervention outcomes of acute cardioactive steroid toxicity following the administration of digoxin immune fab as first or second-line therapy. We collaborated with a library scientist to devise search strategies for PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Toxnet. We sought unpublished literature through the Canadian Electronic Library, Proquest, and Scopus and searched reference lists of included studies. We hand searched relevant conference proceedings and applicable guidelines. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts using predetermined criteria. Using a structured data abstraction form, two reviewers independently extracted data. All discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Results: Our search strategy yielded 3458 results. After screening titles and abstracts 384 underwent full text screening. We included 147 studies and are currently extracting data from 12 French studies and 135 English studies. To date we have extracted data from 90 case reports and case series. Conclusion: Given concerns over rising costs, our findings will shed light on the extent of the evidence for use of digoxin immune fab in acute care settings.

Introduction: Improving public access and training for epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs) can reduce time to initial treatment in anaphylaxis. Effective use of EAIs by the public requires bystanders to respond in a timely and proficient manner. We wished to examine optimal methods for assessing effective training and skill retention for public use of EAIs, including the use of microskills lists. Methods: In this prospective, stratified randomized study, 154 participants at 15 sites receiving installation of public EAIs were randomized to one of three experimental education interventions: A) didactic poster (POS) teaching; B) poster with video teaching (VID), and C) Poster, video, and simulation training (SIM). Participants were tested by participation in a standardized simulated anaphylaxis scenario at 0-months, immediately following training, and again at follow-up at 3 months. Participants’ responses were videoed and assessed by two blinded raters using microksills checklists. The microskills lists were derived from the best available evidence and interprofessional process mapping using a skills trainer. The interobserver reliability was assessed for each item in a 14 step microskill checklist composed of 3-point and 5-point Likert scale questions around EpiPen use, expressed as Kappa Values. Results: Overall there was poor agreement between the two raters. Being composed or panicked had the highest level of agreement K = 0.7, but a result that did not reach statistical significance (substantial agreement, p = 0.06) calling for EMS support has the second highest level of agreement, K = 0.6 (moderate agreement, p = 0.01), the remainder of the items had very low to moderate agreement with a Kappa value range of -103 to 0.48. Conclusion: Although microskills chesklists have been shown to identify areas where learners and interprofessional teams require deliberate practice, these results support previously published evidence that the use of microskills checklists to assess skills has poor reproducibility. Performance will be further assessed in this study using global rating scales, which have shown higher levels of agreement in other studies.

Introduction: Maintaining competence in high-acuity low-occurrence (HALO) procedures is often difficult due to their infrequent occurrence. While simulation is a valuable tool to hone skills, providing effective simulation-based education (SBE) to learners outside academic centers can be challenging. Utilizing a mobile tele-simulation unit (MTU) with expert instruction from a geographically separated mentor could prove a valuable approach to overcoming barriers in this setting. However, to maximize benefit and buy-in, the training modules developed for this unique delivery method must align with the needs of those practicing in rural settings. Objectives: - To evaluate the procedural skills training needs of emergency medicine (EM) physicians in rural Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) - To inform the development of simulation modules designed for use in a MTU Methods: A web-based needs assessment was distributed to physicians registered with the NL Medical Association, working in rural locations, and having EM listed as their primary specialty. Participants evaluated their comfort, performance frequency and desire to have further training for 12 HALO procedures. Two EM physicians selected these from a broader list of core procedural skill competencies for CCFP-EM residents at Memorial University. Participants were also able to suggest other procedures that might benefit from SBE. Results: The data collection occurred for 8 weeks with a 68% response rate (N = 22). No respondents had formal EM training outside of exposure in family medicine residency. 60% had 10+ years practicing EM. Chest tube insertion (100%), difficult intubation (92.3%) and surgical airway (92.3%) were the procedures that most respondents felt required more SBE. In practice, they most often performed bag-valve ventilation, splint application and procedural sedation (>10 per year). Additional procedures felt to require SBE were central venous line placement and trauma assessment. Opportunities to participate in SBE were limited (66.7%-less than annually). Despite this, most participants agreed SBE would be a significant benefit if accessible (93.3%). The greatest barriers to SBE included lack of equipment, rural location, and time necessary for travel to larger centres. Conclusion: The provision of medical care in rural settings can be particularly challenging when HALO procedures must be performed. Unique delivery methods of SBE targeted to the needs of rural practitioners may help bridge gaps in knowledge and technical skills.