Introduction: EMS time factors such as total prehospital, activation, response, scene and transport intervals have been used as a measure of EMS system quality with the assumption that shorter EMS time factors save lives. The objective was to assess in adults and children accessing ground EMS (population), whether operational time factors (intervention and control) were associated with survival at hospital discharge (outcome). Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched up to January 2015 for articles reporting original data that associated EMS operational time factors and survival. Conference abstracts and non-English language articles were excluded. Two investigators independently assessed the candidate titles, abstracts, and full text with discrepant reviews resolved by consensus. Risk of bias was assessed using GRADE. Results: A total of 10,151 abstracts were screened for potential inclusion, 199 articles were reviewed in full-text, and 73 met inclusion criteria. Amongst included studies, 49 investigated response time, while 24 investigated other time factors. All articles were observational studies. Amongst the 14 (28.6%) studies where response time was the primary analysis, statistically significant associations between shorter response time and increased survival were found in 5 of 7 cardiac arrest, 1 of 5 general EMS population, and 0 of 2 trauma studies. Other time factors were reported in the primary analysis in 10 (41.7%) studies. One study reported shorter combined scene and transport intervals associated with increased survival in acute heart failure patients. Two studies in trauma patients had somewhat conflicting results with one study reporting shorter prehospital interval associated with increased survival whereas the other reported increased survival associated with longer scene and transport intervals. Study design, analysis, and methodological quality were of considerable variability, and thus, meta-analyses were not possible. Conclusion: There is a substantial body of literature describing the association between EMS time factors and survival, but evidence informing these relationships are heterogeneous and complex. Important details such as patient population, EMS system characteristics, and analytical approach must be taken into consideration to appropriately translate these findings to practice. These results will be important for EMS leaders wishing to create evidence-based time policies.

Introduction: The optimal management of emergency department (ED) patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) includes a symptom driven approach with scheduled reassessments using a standardized scoring system (Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised; CIWA-Ar) and treatments according to symptom severity. The subjective nature of the CIWA-Ar, and lack of standardized competency-based education related to alcohol withdrawal results in widely variable treatment. The objective of this study was to perform a summative evaluation of clinical staff during the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) of a simulated patient (SP) with AWS. Methods: The AWS education curriculum was completed by all staff nurses in our ED (mandatory for full-time, optional to part-time staff). It was based on a real clinical scenario depicting moderate alcohol withdrawal and portrayed by a single SP. Prior to the OSCE, participants attended a seminar orienting them to the simulation. Each participant was asked to do a complete assessment of the SP, and graded for completeness on 37 individual components of history/physical exam, including the 10 domains of the CIWA-Ar. Results: 74 participants completed the educational curriculum over 8 weeks. At least 9/10 domains of the CIWA-Ar assessment were completed by 65 (88%) of participants, and 28 (38%) correctly assessed at least 80% of all summative evaluation components. 63 (85%) participants correctly identified the need for treatment of withdrawal symptoms. Only 13 (18%) participant assessments exactly matched our exact target CIWA-Ar score of 15, however 61% were within 2 points on the CIWA-Ar scale. In only 4 (5%) instances would a participant have inappropriately rated AWS severity below the treatment threshold. 62/72 (86%) participants rated the SP tremor as 2-4 (intended tremor =3). Clinical features most often overlooked were history of other addictions (25 participants, 33%) and history of liver disease (15 participants, 20%). Conclusion: The majority of participants in this OSCE correctly assessed the important elements in the assessment of AWS, and diagnosed the SP as having moderate alcohol withdrawal. Thus our educational intervention resulted in 85% of participants properly identifying the severity of AWS, and developing an appropriate treatment strategy. The impact of this curriculum on actual patient treatment requires further evaluation.

Introduction: As experienced in Emergency Departments (EDs) across Canada, Saskatoon EDs have a percentage of patients that leave before being assessed by a physician. This Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) group is well documented and we follow the numbers closely as a marker of quality, what happens after they leave is not well documented. In Saskatoon EDs, if a CTAS 3 patient that has not been assessed by a physician decides to leave the physician working in the ED is notified. The ED physician will: try to talk to the patient and convince them to stay, can assess the patient immediately if required, or discuss other appropriate care options for the patient. In spite of this plan patients with a CTAS score of 3 or higher (more acute) still leave Saskatoon EDs without ever being seen by a physician. Our desire was to follow up with the LWBS patients and try to understand why they left the ED. Methods: Daily records from one of the three EDs in Saskatoon documenting patients with a CTAS of 3 or more acute who left before being seen by a physician were reviewed over an eight-month period. A nurse used a standardized questionnaire to call patients within a few days of their ED visit to ask why they left. If the patients declined to take part in the quality initiative the interaction ended, but if they agreed a series of questions was asked. These included: how long they waited, reasons why they left, if they went somewhere else for care and suggestions for improvement. Descriptive statistics were obtained and analyzed to answer the above questions. Results: We identified 322 LWBS patients in an eight-month time period as CTAS 3 or more acute. We were able to contact 41.6% of patients. The average wait time was 2 hours and 18 minutes. The shortest wait time was 11 minutes, whereas the longest wait time was 8 hours and 39 minutes. It was found that 49.1% of patients went to another health care option (Medi-Clinic or another ED in Saskatoon) within 24hrs of leaving the ED. Long wait times were cited as the number one reason for leaving. Lack of better communication from triage staff regarding wait time expectations was cited as the top response for perceived roadblocks to care. Reducing wait times was cited as the number one improvement needed to increase the likelihood of staying. Conclusion: The Saskatoon ED LWBS patient population reports long wait times as the main reason for leaving. In order to improve the LWBS rates, improving communication and expectations regarding perceived wait times is necessary. The patient perception of the ED experience is largely intertwined with wait times, their initial interaction with triage staff, and how easily they navigate our very busy departments. Therefore, it is vital that we integrate the patient voice in future initiatives geared towards improving health care processes.

Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health concern with complex medico-legal implications and a wide range of morbidity. While the ED is often the primary access point for these patients, IPV is under-recognized. Our objectives were to describe the characteristics of female IPV patients in the ED and determine the assessment and management patterns of physicians at a tertiary care academic ED. Methods: We conducted a health records review of adult (>18years) female patients seen at a tertiary care hospital ED presenting with evidence of IPV from January to September 2016. A combined search strategy of hospital records and Sexual Assault and Partner Abuse Care Program (SAPACP) patient rosters was used to identify study subjects. Data were collected for patient demographic/presenting characteristics, assault characteristics, and patterns of referral, management and patient disposition/discharge. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results: 100 patients met inclusion criteria with; mean age 35.1, female 100.0%, arrival by ambulance 53.0%, and mean CTAS level of 2.4. Abuse screening was completed at triage only 24.0% of the time. Presenting complaints were varied, with the most common being injury or trauma (32.0%). Most patients were only identified from the SAPACP roster. Patients reported strangulation, a strong predictor of future homicide, in 34.0% of cases. Admission to hospital occurred in 7.0% of cases with 19.0% involving specialist consultation and 7.0% leaving against medical advice or without being seen. Legal interactions including police involvement occurred 72.0% of the time and Childrens Aid Society was involved in 26.0% of cases. The final diagnosis was recorded as IPV or equivalent in only 49.0% of cases; the remainder were discharged with a final diagnosis of injury/trauma (26.0%), sexual assault (6.0%), somatic complaint (6.0%), mental health (8.0%), substance use/abuse (3.0%) or other (2.0%). Conclusion: Our study highlights that IPV is a common and heterogeneous entity with a wide spectrum of presentations and morbidity. Strangulation rates were high and are associated with increased risk of homicide. IPV is currently under-recognized and continues to carry stigma as ER physicians only recorded a discharge diagnosis of IPV or equivalent in half of cases. Educational strategies are required to highlight the importance of IPV to ED staff.

Introduction: Introduction: Paramedics frequently make immediate life-altering decisions with minimal clinical information. This applies to their decision to treat an unconscious patient with naloxone when the history of an opioid overdose cannot be readily established. Among patients treated by paramedics with naloxone, our objective was to compare patient demographics, treatment interventions and clinical response between patients with and without a confirmed history of an opioid overdose. Methods: Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study design of consecutive patients treated with naloxone by paramedics between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017. Patients were classified based on whether paramedics did or did not document a history of an opioid overdose. Baseline characteristics, treatment interventions, and response to naloxone were compared between groups. Comparisons were done using a chi-squared or Fishers exact test. Results: Results: We identified 294 patients of whom 113 (38%) did not have a confirmed history of an opioid overdose. The groups were similar in gender, bystander CPR, and bystander administration of naloxone. There were no differences in the presence of pinpoint pupils, initial oxygen saturation, initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), respiratory rate, or time on scene. Both patient groups were managed similarly with respect to route of naloxone administration and the use of a bag valve mask. All patients who were intubated were in the no confirmed history group (n=5; p=.003). Post naloxone there were no differences in last recorded vital signs except the no confirmed history group was less likely to achieve a GCS 10 (57% versus 89%; p<.001). The overall post-naloxone development of agitation (9%) was moderate while the need for physical/chemical restraint (2%) was low with no differences between groups. All patients were transported to the hospital. Conclusion: Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients who received naloxone did not have a confirmed history of an opioid overdose. These patients closely resembled those with a confirmed history with respect to demographics and physical characteristics. The primary difference was a lower proportion of patients with no confirmed history who achieved a post naloxone GCS 10. Despite a moderate development of post naloxone agitation, paramedics were able to manage most of these patients without the use of physical/chemical restraints.

Introduction: Emergency medicine attending physicians perform many essential procedures but some infrequently. Skill proficiency and familiarity declines over time. We intended to identify skills where colleagues felt deficient and create an opportunity to demonstrate and practice in a safe environment. Methods: Sessions began from a review of ultrasound guided central line and pacemaker insertion. Other procedures have been added as a result of critical incidents, needs assessments by attending physicians, acquisition of new technology/equipment and expert consensus. An evaluation and needs assessment is performed after each session to adjust curricula. Results: Since 2011, we have held 2-3 skill sessions per year at the Advanced Trauma Surgical Skills Laboratory at the University of Calgary. Sessions are taught by attending emergency physicians, employ task trainers, simulators, animal and human cadaveric models, ultrasound, and procedural equipment stocked in our local hospitals. We are able to accommodate ~30 participants per session for 3 hours of rotating 7-8 participants through various stations. Every session has been fully attended with a wait list. Physicians register by email with preference given to new participants and those identified during clinical practice review of requiring remediation. Costs of sessions are covered by voluntary contribution to an emergency department physician support fund. Procedures practiced have included airway (basic, adjuncts, bronchoscopy, video laryngoscopy, surgical airway, chest tube), vascular access (ultrasound guided central venous insertion, transvenous pacemaker insertion, nerve blocks, IO insertion), surgical skills (thoracotomy, chest tube, canthotomy, surgical airway) and other percutaneous procedures (paracentesis, thoracentesis, nerve block, lumbar puncture). High fidelity skills videos were created to augment the sessions, available on the department website. Four point scale evaluations from our most recent session yielded 100% excellent rating for overall workshop and relevance to practice. The 6 facilitators performance received 100% excellent or good ratings. Conclusion: We have developed a fun, nonthreatening opportunity for attending physicians to practice infrequent but important ED procedures. The sessions are well received, well attended, foster collegiality, confidence and competence in performance of infrequent ED skills. Our model could be generalized to other centres.

Introduction: Medical education includes a diverse range of topics and disciplines. For junior clinician educators, it may be difficult to get a grasp of pertinent literature. Our study aims to retrospectively identify whether senior clinician educators (SCEs) and junior clinician educators (JCEs) differ in their selection of what they perceive as key medical education articles. Methods: As a part of the Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM) Faculty Incubator program, we developed a series of primer articles for JCEs over the preceding year, designed to enhance their educational growth by identifying and discussing key articles within specific medical education arenas. Each set of articles within the primer series were selected based on data collected from JCEs and SCEs, who ranked the specific articles with respect to their perceived relevancy to the JCEs. ANOVA analysis was performed for each of the nine primer series to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between senior and junior CEs ratings of articles. Results: 216 total articles were evaluated within the nine different primer topics. Through a multilevel regression analysis of the data, no statistically significant difference was found between the rankings of papers by SCEs and JCEs (95%CI: -0.27, 0.40). However, a subgroup analysis of the data found that 3 of the 9 primers showed statistically significant divergence based on seniority (p<0.05). Conclusion: Based on this data, involvement of JCEs in the consensus-building process was important in identifying divergence in views between JCEs and SCEs in one-third of cases. To our knowledge, no other group have compared whether junior and senior clinical educators may have divergent opinions about the relevance of medical education literature. Our findings suggest that it may be important to involve JCEs in selecting articles that are worthwhile for their learning, since SCEs may not fully understand their needs.

Introduction: The diagnostic process is wrought with potential sources of error. Psychologists seek to coach physicians to refine their cognition. Researchers try to create cognitive scaffolds to guide decision-making. Physicians however, are caught in middle between their own daily cognitive processes and these external theories that might influence their behaviour. Few attempts have been made to understand how experienced clinicians integrate guidelines or clinical decision rules (CDRs) into their decision-making. We sought to explore experienced clinicians decision-making via a simulated exercise, to develop a model of how physicians integrate CDRs into their diagnostic thinking. Methods: From July 2015-March 2016, 16 practicing emergency physicians (EPs) were interviewed via a think aloud protocol study. Six cases were constructed and video recorded as prompts to spur the clinicians to think aloud and describe their approach to the cases. Cases were designed to be slightly suggestive for pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis, since these conditions are associated with CDRs. Using a constructivist grounded theory analysis, three investigators independently reviewed the transcripts from the interviews, meeting regularly to discuss emergent themes and subthemes until sufficiency was reached. Disagreements about themes were resolved by discussion and consensus. Results: Our analysis suggests that physicians engage in an iterative process when they are faced with undifferentiated chest pain and leg pain cases. After generating an original differential diagnosis, EPs engage in an iterative diagnostic process. They flip between hypothesis-driven data collection (e.g. history, physical exam, tests) and analysis of this data, and use this process to weigh probabilities of various diagnoses. EPs only apply CDRs once they are sufficiently suspicious of a diagnosis requiring guidance from a CDR and when they experience diagnostic uncertainty or wish to bolster their decision with evidence. Conclusion: EP cognition around diagnosis is a dynamic and iterative process, and may only peripherally integrate relevant CDRs if a threshold level of suspicion is met. Our findings may be useful for improving knowledge translation of CDRs and prevent diagnostic error.

Introduction: Resuscitative clinician-performed transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new ultrasound application, however the optimal teaching methods have not been determined. Previous studies have demonstrated that random practice (RP), which increases the variability of training, may improve learning of procedural skills compared with blocked practice (BP). We compared RP and BP for teaching a resuscitative TEE protocol to emergency medicine residents using a simulator. Methods: We recruited emergency medicine residents with no prior TEE experience from a university-affiliated hospital. Participants completed a questionnaire and baseline skill assessment on a simulator, then were randomized to one of two groups. The BP group completed 10 repetitions of a fixed 5-view TEE sequence with instructor feedback, while the RP group completed 10 different random 5-view TEE sequences with feedback. Participants completed a simulation-based performance assessment immediately, and a transfer test consisting of a simulated patient encounter 1-2 weeks after training. Ultrasound images and transducer motion metrics were captured by the simulator for blinded analysis. Our primary outcome was the percentage of successful views on the transfer test, and secondary outcomes included participants confidence level, image quality, percentage of correct diagnoses, and efficiency of movement. We compared all scores using two-tailed, independent samples t-tests. Results: 22 participants completed the study (11 in the RP group, 11 in the BP group). There were no significant baseline differences between the groups. The BP group had a higher rate of successful views compared with the RP group on the transfer test (92.7% vs 80.9%, p=0.02). While not statistically significant, the BP group had higher image quality on a 5-point scale (3.2 vs 2.9, p=0.09), and fewer probe accelerations (297 vs 403, p=0.09). The groups did not differ in rate of correct diagnoses (77.3% vs 72.7%, p=0.73), confidence level on a 10-point scale (6.2 vs 6.2, p=1.0), or scan time (173 vs 199 seconds, p=0.28). Conclusion: Emergency medicine residents randomized to BP had a higher success rate on a transfer test, compared to RP when learning resuscitative TEE using a simulator. We consider this pilot work that can inform future studies in both simulation and real clinical settings.

Introduction: Background Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) is rapidly becoming the mainstay in clinical care and has the potential to improve provider efficiency and accuracy. However, this hinges on careful planning and implementation. Poorly planned CPOE order sets can lead to undetected errors and waste. In our emergency department (ED), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was bundled into various blood work panels, but had little clinical value. Aim Statement This quality improvement initiative aimed to reduce unnecessary LDH testing in the ED. Methods: Methods A group of ED physicians reviewed CPOE blood work panels and uncoupled LDH in conditions where it was deemed not to provide any clinically useful information. We measured the daily number of LDH tests performed before and after its removal. We tracked the frequency of other serum tests as controls. We also analyzed the number of add-on LDH (i.e. to add LDH to samples already sent to the lab) as a balancing measure, since this can disrupt work flow and delay care. Results: Results Through this intervention, we reduced the number of LDH tests performed by 69%, from an average of 75.1 tests per day to 23.2 (p<0.0005). The baseline controls did not differ after the intervention (e.g. a complete blood count was performed 197.7 and 196.1 times per day pre- and post-intervention, respectively [p=0.7663]). There was less than 1 add-on LDH per day on average. This translates to a cost savings of $33,340.65 at our institution. Conclusion: Conclusions CPOE care templates can be powerful in shaping behaviours and reducing variability. However, close oversight of these panels is necessary to prevent errors and waste.

Introduction: Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) continues to carry a very high mortality rate, with approximately 10% surviving to hospital discharge. In 2015, the American Heart Association release updated guidelines dictating best practices in post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) care, advocating for more liberal utilization of emergent coronary angiography. We sought to determine if the post-ROSC care at our centre during our study period adhered to the previously published (2010) guidelines. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis (Sept. 2011 - June 2015) of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) database, which contains pre-hospital, hospital and outcomes data on adult, EMS-treated, non-traumatic OHCA. Patients under 18 years, with missing age data or with obvious non-cardiac causes of arrest were excluded. Key variables included rates of post-ROSC emergent angiography, survival to hospital discharge and survival to hospital discharge with favourable neurologic outcome (modified Rankin score 2). Results: During the study period, there were a total of 997 OHCA; 86 met exclusion criteria. Of the 911 remaining patients, 557 (61.1%) were transported to a local ED. Of those transported to the ED, 262 (47.0%) achieved sustained ROSC, defined as survival to ED discharge. Of those who achieved sustained ROSC, median age was 65 years (IQR=21.75), 66.8% were male. ECG interpretation data was available on 214 patients, of whom 56 had definite STEMI, and 135 had definite absence of STEMI. 37/56 (66.1%) definite STEMI patients received coronary angiography within 24 hours of presentation, as per AHA guidelines. 58/262 (22.1%) post-ROSC patients overall received coronary angiography within 24 hours of presentation to the ED. Of those 58 patients who received emergent angiography, 38 (65.5%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). No patients received fibrinolysis. Of post-ROSC patients who received emergent coronary angiography, 40/58 (69.0%) survived to hospital discharge and 37/58 (63.8%) survived with good neurologic outcome. In comparison, 55/204 (27.0%) who did not receive emergent angiography survived to hospital discharge and 18.8% survived with good neurologic outcome. Conclusion: Only 22.1% of patients with OHCA, and only 66.1% with ECG-proven STEMI underwent emergent coronary angiography post-ROSC. Further investigation into causes for delay or the withholding of emergent angiography is necessary.

Introduction: Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) continues to carry a very high mortality rate, with approximately 10% surviving to hospital discharge. We sought to determine if outcomes from out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at our centre were consistent with recently published North American outcomes data from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis (Sept 2011 June 2015) of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) database, which contains pre-hospital, in-hospital and outcomes data on adult, EMS-treated, non-traumatic OHCA. Patients under 18 years, with missing age data or with obvious non-cardiac causes of arrest were excluded. Results: During the study period, there were a total of 997 OHCA; 86 met exclusion criteria. Of the 911 remaining patients, 557 (61.1%) were transported to a local ED. 92 (35.1%) were receiving ongoing CPR at the time of their presentation to the ED. Of those transported to the ED, 262 (47.0%) achieved sustained ROSC, defined as survival to ED discharge. A total of 95 patients survived to hospital discharge (36.3% of patients who achieved sustained ROSC, 17.1% of those who were transported to the ED, and 10.4% of the all OHCA). Of those who survived to hospital discharge who had neurologic outcome data, 90.5% had a modified Rankin score of 2. Initial presenting rhythm with EMS was ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia in 233 patients. Of these, 212 (91.0%) were transported to the ED, 134 (57.5%) achieved sustained ROSC, and 71 (30.5%) survived to hospital discharge. 54/60 (90.0%) of those with a documented neurologic exam had a favourable neurologic outcome. Initial presenting rhythm with EMS was PEA or asystole in 636 patients. Of these, 320 (50.3%) were transported to the ED, 115 (18.1%) achieved sustained ROSC, and 17 (2.7%) survived to hospital discharge. 9/10 (90%) of those with a documented neurologic exam had a favourable neurologic outcome. 358 of the arrests were witnessed. Of these, 274 (76.5%) were transported to the ED, 150 (41.9%) achieved sustained ROSC, and 51 (15.9%) survived to hospital discharge. 47/53 (88.7%) of those with a documented neurologic exam had a favourable neurologic outcome. Conclusion: Outcomes from out of hospital cardiac arrest in London, Ontario are comparable to other sites across North America.

Introduction: Online medical education resources are widely used in emergency medicine (EM), but strategies to assess quality remain elusive. We previously derived the Medical Education Translational Resources: Impact and Quality (METRIQ) 8 instrument to evaluate quality in medical education blog posts. Methods: As part of a subsequent validation study (The METRIQ Blog Study), a mixed-methods usability analysis was performed to obtain user feedback on the quality assessment instrument in order to improve its clarity and reliability. Participants in the METRIQ Study were first asked to rate five blog posts using the METRIQ-8 Score. They then evaluated the METRIQ-8 instruments ease of use and likelihood of being recommended to others using a 7-point Likert scale and free text comments. Participants were also asked to flag and comment on items within the score that they felt were unclear. Global usability ratings were summarized using median scores or percent rated unclear. We used ANOVA to test associations between ease of use and demographic factors. A thematic analysis was performed on the comments. Results: 309 EM medical students, residents, and attendings completed the survey. Global ratings were generally very favorable (median 2 [IQR 2-3], with 7 being the lowest score) for ease of use and likelihood of recommendation, and did not vary by participants country of origin, frequency of blog use, or learner level. Participants stated that the score was structured, systematic, and straightforward. They found it useful for junior learners and for guiding blog creation. Four questions in the score (questions 2, 4, 5, and 7) were identified by 10% of subjects to be unclear. Thematic analysis of comments identified suggested four main themes for improving the score: adding clearer definitions with marking rubrics; shortening the 7-point scale; adding items evaluating blog post presentation and utility; and, rephrasing the wording of certain questions for clarity. Conclusion: A mixed methods usability analysis of the METRIQ-8 instrument for assessing blog quality was globally well received by EM medical students, residents, and attendings. Qualitative analyses revealed multiple areas to improve the instruments clarity and usability. The METRIQ score is a promising instrument for evaluating the quality of blogs; further development and testing is needed to improve its utility.

Introduction: Le syndrome aortique aigu (SAA) est une condition rare et généralement mortelle qui demeure difficile à diagnostiquer. Le Score de détection de la dissection aortique (DDA) et le ratio de neutrophiles sur lymphocytes (NL) ont été proposés comme des éléments pouvant contribuer à exclure le diagnostic du SAA. Lobjectif primaire de cette étude est de déterminer la valeur diagnostique (sensibilité et spécificité et rapport de vraisemblance négatif [RV-]) de ces deux éléments de façon indépendante et combinée chez les patients suspectés de SAA au département durgence. Methods: Les patients ayant subi une angiographie par tomodensitométrie (angioCT) à la recherche dune dissection aortique entre 2008 et 2014 à lurgence dun hôpital tertiaire montréalais ont été inclus dans cette étude de cohorte rétrospective. Le score DDA a été établi à partir des dossiers médicaux et le ratio NL calculé à partir de la première formule sanguine prélevée chez ces patients. Pour le score DDA, un score de 1 ou plus et de 2 ou plus ont été évalués comme seuils de positivité. Pour le ratio NL, une valeur de plus de 4,6 a été choisie comme seuil puisquil sagissait du ratio proposé afin de différencier les patients atteints dun SAA de ceux souffrant dun anévrysme chronique. Pour lévaluation de la combinaison des deux tests, afin de maximiser la sensibilité, un score DAA de 1 ou plus ou un ratio NL de plus de 4,6 serait considéré comme positif. Le test de référence pour tous les patients était langiographie par tomodensitométrie. À partir de cela, la sensibilité, la spécificité et le rapport de vraisemblance négatif de chacun de ces tests/combinaison de tests et leurs intervalles de confiance (IC) ont été calculés. Results: Un total de 198 patients (99 hommes et 99 femmes) dun âge moyen de 63 ans (±16) ont été inclus dans létude, parmi lesquels 26 (13%) souffraient dun SAA. Un score DDA de 1 ou plus avait une sensibilité de 84,6% (IC 95% 65,1-95,6), une spécificité de 65,7% (IC 95% 58,1-72,8) et un VR- de 0,23 (IC 95% 0,09-0,58). Un score DDA de 2 ou plus avait une sensibilité de 23,1% (IC 95% 9,0-43,7), une spécificité de 95,3% (IC 95% 91,0-98,0) et un VR- de 0,81 (IC 95% 0,65-1,00). La sensibilité dun ratio NL de plus de 4,6 était de 42,3% (IC 95% 23,4-63,1), la spécificité de 58,7% (IC 95% 51,0-66,3) et le VR- de 0,98 (0,69-1,40). La combinaison du score DDA et du ratio NL avait une sensibilité de 88,5% (IC 95% 69,9-97,6), une spécificité de 38,4% (IC 95% 30,9-46,0) et un VR- de 0,30 (IC 95% 0,10-0,89). Conclusion: Avoir un score de DDA inférieur à 1 diminue significativement les chances davoir un SAA, nélimine pas cette possibilité et ne devrait pas être utilisé, sauf chez les patients ayant une probabilité pré-test déjà très faible. Le ratio NL en utilisant un seuil de 4,6 na aucune utilité diagnostique pour le SAA.

Introduction: TREKK is a national knowledge mobilization network of clinicians, researchers and parents aimed at improving emergency care for children by increasing collaborations between general and pediatric emergency departments (ED). This study aimed to determine patterns of knowledge sharing within the network and identify connections, barriers and opportunities to obtaining pediatric information and training. Methods: Social network analysis (SNA) uses network theory to understand patterns of interaction. Two SNAs were conducted in 2014 and 2015 using an online network survey distributed to 37 general EDs. Data was analyzed using UCI Net and Netdraw to identify connections, knowledge sharing and knowledge brokers within the network. Building on these results, we then conducted 22 semi-structured follow-up interviews (2016) with healthcare professionals (HCPs) at General EDs across Canada, purposefully sampled to include individuals from connected and disconnected sites, as identified in the SNA. Interviews were analyzed by 2 reviewers using content and thematic analysis. Results: SNA data was analyzed for 135 participants across the network. Results from 2014 showed that the network was divided along provincial lines, with most individuals connecting with colleagues within their own institution. Results from 2015 showed more inter-site interconnectivity and a reduction in isolated sites over time from 17 to 3. Interview participants included physicians (59%) and nurses (41%) from 18 general EDs in urban (68%) and rural/remote (32%) Canada. HCPs sought information both formally and informally, by using guidelines, talking to colleagues, and attending pediatric related training sessions. Network structure and processes were felt to increase connections, support practice change, and promote standards of care. Participants identified personal, organizational and system-level barriers to information and skill acquisition, including resources and personal costs, geography, dissemination, and time. Providing easy access to information at the point of care was promoted through enhancing content visibility and by embedding resources into local systems. There remains a need to share successful methods of local dissemination and implementation across the network, and to leverage local professional champions such as clinical nurse liaisons. Conclusion: This study highlights the power of a network to increase connections between HCPs working in general and pediatric EDs. Findings reinforce the critical role of ongoing network evaluation to improve the design and delivery of knowledge mobilization initiatives.

Introduction: Hospital-based gun violence is devastatingly traumatic for everyone present and recent events in Cobourg, Ontario underscore that an active shooter inside the emergency department (ED) is an imminent threat. In June 2016, the Ontario Hospital Association (OHA) added Code Silver to the list of standardized emergency preparedness colour codes and advised member hospitals to develop policies and train staff on how best to respond. Given that EDs are particularly susceptible to opportunistic breach by an active shooter, the impact of a Code Silver on ED functioning and staff members may be particularly acute. We hypothesized that there may not be a simple, one-size-fits-all-hospital-staff solution about how best to prepare EDs to respond to Code Silver. In order to inform and support future staff training initiatives related to Code Silver and other disaster situations in hospitals, we sought to investigate staff perspectives and behaviour related to personal safety at work and, in particular, an active shooter. Methods: We undertook a qualitative interview study of multi-disciplinary ED staff (MDs, RNs, clericals, allied health, administrators) at a single tertiary care centre in Toronto. The primary methods for data collection were in-depth qualitative interviews and focus groups. Participants were recruited using stakeholder and maximum variation sampling strategies. Data collection and analysis were concurrent and standard thematic analysis techniques were employed. Results: Sixteen (16) staff members participated in interviews and 40 participated in small focus group discussions. Data analysis revealed workplace violence and personal health risks have been normalized as expected, acceptable features of everyday life at work in the ED given that patients are perceived to be sick people in need of help that ED staff are trained for and prepared to provide. In contrast, weapons and active shooters challenge the boundaries of professional responsibility and readiness to respond to Code Silver is perceived by staff as a fallacy. Conclusion: Knowledge from this study gives us crucial insight into important areas for targeted training and opportunities for knowledge translation on the topic of implementing Code Silver in EDs across the country. Future interventions must include how to overcome normalization of workplace violence in the ED setting and negotiating competing professional obligations during crisis situations. Attention to these are crucial if we are to truly keep our staff safe during these traumatic events.

Introduction: Most studies evaluating prescription opioid dependence or misuse are retrospective and are based on prescription filling rates from pharmaceutical databases. These studies cannot evaluate if opioids are really consumed nor differentiate if used for a new pain, chronic pain, or for misuse/dependence. The aim of this study was to assess the opioid consumption in emergency department (ED) patients three months after discharge with an opioid prescription. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in the ED of a tertiary care centre with a convenience sample of patients aged 18 years and older, recruited 24/7, who consulted and were discharged for an acute pain condition ( 2 weeks). We excluded patients who: did not speak French or English, were using opioid medication prior to their ED visit, with an ED stay > 48 hours, or suffering from cancer or chronic pain. Three months post-ED visit, participants were contacted by phone for a structured interview on their past two-week opioid use, their reasons for consuming them, and also answered the Rapid Opioid Dependence Screen (RODS) questionnaire. Results: In the 524 participants interviewed at three months (mean age ± SD: 51±16 years, 47% women), 44 (8.4%) patients consumed opioids in the previous two weeks. Among those, 72% consumed opioids for their initial pain, 19% for a new unrelated pain, and 9% for another reason. In this entire cohort, only five patients (1%) tested positive to opioid dependence from the RODS test. The low dependence incidence could be affected by a social desirability bias. Conclusion: This study suggests that opioid use at 3-month, for patients initially treated for acute pain, is associated with opioid dependency in 1% or possible misuse in only 9%. Additional prospective studies using multiple methods to measure opioids consumption, misuse, and dependence are needed.

Introduction: Objective: To identify self-perceived knowledge deficits of paramedics, barriers to training and desired methods of self-directed continuing education. Methods: A written 58 question survey was delivered to all 1262 paramedics under the jurisdiction of a single base-hospital in Ontario, Canada. Respondents were asked to select deficit, no deficit or not applicable from a 37-point, anatomic systems-based list. They were then asked to identify from a 15-point list which educational modalities they would choose to address any knowledge deficits. Finally, they were asked which factors they took into consideration when choosing their self-directed continuing education. Results: Seven hundred forty-six of 1262 paramedics (59.11%) completed the surveys. Of these respondents, 82 (10.99%) were advanced care paramedics, while 664 (89.01%) were primary care paramedics. Of the 645 who responded with their primary geographical setting: 136 (21.09%) listed a primary urban practice, 126 (19.53%) listed a primary rural practice and 287 (44.50%) reported a split urban and rural practice. The most common perceived deficits (respondent number, percentage); were electrolyte disturbance (418, 56.03%), neonatal resuscitation (386, 51.74%), pediatric respiratory disorder (381, 51.07%), arrhythmia (377, 50.53%), and pediatric cardiac arrest (317, 42.49%). The top 5 educational opportunities they were most likely to choose included online module (464, 62.20%), in-class lecture (423, 56.70%), web-based review (403, 54.02%), webinar (301, 40.35%) and peer consult (237, 31.77%). The top 3 barriers to choosing continuing education were work scheduling (479, 64.21%), location/ease of attending (382, 51.21%), and cost (305, 40.88%). Conclusion: Paramedics in this base hospital system identified pediatric critical care situations, electrolyte abnormalities and cardiac arrhythmia as self-perceived deficits. The most commonly selected educational opportunities included online learning, in-person training and peer consult. These preferred modalities are consistent with the identified barriers of work scheduling, ease of attending and cost. Targeted educational needs based assessments can help ensure that appropriate topics are delivered in a fashion that help overcome identified barriers to self-directed learning.

Introduction: In Ontario, Advanced Care Paramedics (ACPs) are required to perform a minimum of 24 educational credits per year of Continuing Medical Education (CME). Of these 24 credits, 12 are chosen by the paramedic, while 12 credits are mandated by the Base Hospital. The combined mandatory and optional CME frame is used so paramedics can target their personal needs appropriately, while ensuring new medical directives and global knowledge deficits identified by Quality Assurance (QA) means can be addressed by the Base Hospital. Objective: To determine if there is a difference between what ACPs identify as their knowledge deficits and what CME they complete. Methods: Methods: Request for participation in a written survey was delivered to all ACPs in an Ontario Base Hospital, prior to the CME cycle for the year. Respondents were asked to identify deficits from a 37-point, organ systems-based list, with free-text option for any deficits not itemized. Following the annual cycle, CME credits were evaluated by the Regional Base Hospital education coordinator, and Base Hospital medical directors for content. The deficits identified prior to the CME cycle were then compared to the CME attended for each respondent. In order to best represent the individual ACP response to their perceived deficits, a percentage of deficits identified and addressed was chosen. Respondents were not aware that their responses would be compared to the credits obtained for the year, to minimize bias in CME selection. Results: Of the 140 ACPs in the region, 42 (30%) completed the survey. From the 37-point list, the median number of perceived deficits identified was 7.00 (IQR 3.00-10.00). The median number of CME events that addressed perceived deficits was 2.00 (IQR 1.00-3.00). The median number of perceived deficits addressed by either paramedic-chosen or mandatory CME were identical at 1.00 (IQR 0.00-2.00). The percentage of perceived deficits identified and addressed via CME was 35.07% (range 0-100%). Paramedic-chosen CME covered 22.48% (range 0-100%) of perceived deficits, while mandatory CME covered 20.14% (range 0-100%) of perceived deficits. Conclusion: In the current system, only 35.07% of perceived deficits were addressed through mandatory and paramedic-chosen CME. Further information regarding barriers to paramedics obtaining CME that meets their perceived deficits needs to be elucidated.

Introduction: Patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF) who do not respond to standard Advanced Cardiac Life Support treatments are deemed to be in refractory VF (rVF). The ideal prehospital treatment for patients with rVF remains unknown. Double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) has been proposed as a viable option for patients in rVF. Although the mechanism by which DSED terminates rVF remains unknown, one theory is that the change in defibrillation vector that occurs may contribute. The objective of this study was to describe clinical outcomes for patients presenting in rVF during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) for those who underwent vector change defibrillation, compared to those who received standard treatment. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of adult (18 years) patients presenting in rVF during OOHCA over 15 months beginning in March 2016. Patients who underwent vector change defibrillation had a change in pad position (anterior-anterior to anterior-posterior) after 3 or more consecutive shocks. Termination of rVF was defined as the absence of VF after a vector change or standard shock during the next rhythm analysis. Results: There were 372 OOHCA, with 25 (6.7%) patients meeting our definition of rVF. Of these, 16 (64.0%) patients (median age 62 years, 81.3% male) had vector change after a median (IQR) of 3 (3.0-4.0) paramedic defibrillation attempts. Median (IQR) time to vector change defibrillation was 8.8 (7.1-11.1) minutes. Eight (50%) patients had termination of rVF after the first vector change shock, 6 (37.5%) had prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 5 (31.3%) patients survived to hospital discharge. Of the 9 rVF patients who did not have vector change, median age was 63 years and 88.9% were male. The median (IQR) number of defibrillations within this group was 5 (4.5-7.0). No patients converted after the 4th defibrillation. Prehospital ROSC was achieved in 3 (33.3%) patients and 5 (55.5%) patients were transported while in rVF . Three patients (33.3%) survived to hospital discharge. Conclusion: This is preliminary evidence that vector change defibrillation in patients with rVF may result in VF termination. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to test whether or not vector change has a role in the termination of rVF.