Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T08:43:25.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ESTIMATING STAGE SURVIVAL FROM RECRUITMENT AND DENSITY DATA, WITH REFERENCE TO EGG MORTALITY IN THE COLORADO POTATO BEETLE, LEPTINOTARSA DECEMLINEATA (SAY) (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELDIAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R.G. Van Driesche
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA01003
T.S. Bellows Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA92521
D.N. Ferro
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA01003
R. Hazzard
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA01003
A. Maher
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA01003

Abstract

Stage survival is typically calculated from estimates of numbers entering two successive life stages. We present a method that estimates stage survival by reference to the difference between directly measured recruitment to the stage and the estimate of recruitment obtained from Southwood and Jepson’s graphical technique. The method assumes mortality is constant within the stage. The method is applied to two generations (at two sites) of the egg stage of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and the predicted stage survivals are compared, for two generations, with direct field measurements of egg mortality.

Résumé

La survie d’un stade est typiquement calculée à partir d’estimés des nombres entrant dans chacun de deux stades successifs. On présente une méthode d’estimation par référence à la différence entre le recrutement du stade mesuré directement et l’estimé du recrutement obtenu par la méthode graphique de Southwood et Jepson. Cette méthode suppose que la mortalité est constante au cours du stade. On a appliqué la méthode à deux générations (de deux localités) d’oeufs du doryphore de la pomme de terre Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae), et on a comparé les survies prédites pour les deux générations, aux mesures directes de la mortalité des oeufs sur le terrain.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellows, T.S. Jr., and Birley, M.H.. 1981. Estimating developmental and mortality rates and stage recruitment from insect stage frequency data. Res. Popul. Ecol. 23: 232244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellows, T.S. Jr., Ortiz, M., Owens, J.C., and Huddleston, E.W.. 1982. A model for analyzing insect stage-frequency data when mortality varies with time. Res. Popul. Ecol. 24: 142156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellows, T.S. Jr., Van Driesche, R.G., and Elkinton, J.S.. 1989 a. Extensions to Southwood and Jepson's graphical method of estimating numbers entering a stage for calculating losses to parasitism. Res. Popul. Ecol. In press.Google Scholar
Bellows, T.S. Jr., Van Driesche, R.G., and Elkinton, J.S.. 1989 b. Life-tables and parasitism: estimating parameters in joint host-parasitoid systems. In Estimation and Analysis of Insect Populations. Springer Verlag. In Press.Google Scholar
Birley, M.H. 1977. The estimation of insect density and instar survivorship functions from census data. J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 497510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, J.P. 1956. The estimation of the numbers of individuals entering each stage during the development of one generation of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol. 25: 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferro, D.N., Logan, J.A., Voss, R.H., and Elkinton, J.S.. 1985. Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) temperature-dependent growth and feeding rates. Environ. Ent. 14: 343348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, D.G. 1971. Population dynamics of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) in eastern Ontario. III. Major population processes. Can. Ent. 103: 10491061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiritani, K., and Nakasuji, F.. 1967. Estimation of the stage-specific survival rate in the insect population with overlapping stages. Res. Popul. Ecol. 9: 143152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, B.F.J. 1974. Estimation of stage-specific survival rates and other parameters for insect populations developing through several life stages. Oecologia 15: 277285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, B.F.J. 1987. A multiple regression method for analyzing stage-frequency data. Res. Popul. Ecol. 29: 119127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, L., Manly, B.F.J., Lockwood, J., and Logan, J.A.. 1989. Estimation and analysis of insect populations. Springer Verlag. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O.W., and Waloff, N.. 1954. Studies on the biology and population dynamics of British grasshoppers. Anti-Locust Bull. 17: 1182.Google Scholar
Richards, O.W., and Waloff, N.. 1961. A study of a natural population of Phytodecta olivacea (Forster) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Phil. Trans. B 244: 205257.Google Scholar
Sawyer, A.J., and Haynes, D.L.. 1984. On the nature of errors involved in estimating stage-specific survival rates by Southwood's method for a population with overlapping stages. Res. Popul. Ecol. 26: 331351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. 1978. Ecological Methods, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London. 524 pp.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E., and Jepson, W.F.. 1962. Studies on the populations of Oscinella frit L. (Diptera: Chloropidae) in the oat crop. J. Anim. Ecol. 31: 481495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Driesche, R.G. 1988. Survivorship patterns of Pieris rapae (Lep.: Pieridae) larvae in Massachusetts kale with special reference to mortality due to Cotesia glomerata (Hymen.: Braconidae). Bull. ent. Res. 78(3): 397405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Driesche, R.G., and Bellows, T.S. Jr., 1988. Host and parasitoid recruitment for quantifying losses from parasitism, with reference to Pieris rapae and Cotesia glomerata. Ecol. Ent. 13: 215222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar