Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T18:51:21.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DOSAGE RESPONSE OF THE STAGES OF CODLING MOTH, LASPEYRESIA POMONELLA (LEPIDOPTERA: OLETHREUTIDAE), TO FUMIGATION WITH METHYL BROMIDE1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. P. Gaunce
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Summerland, British Columbia V0H 1Z0
H. F. Madsen
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Summerland, British Columbia V0H 1Z0
R. D. McMullen
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Summerland, British Columbia V0H 1Z0
J. W. Hall
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1X2

Abstract

Probit analysis of the dosage response of codling moth stages to methyl bromide indicated that adults were most, and pupae, least susceptible. Eggs were more resistant than cocooned larvae which were more resistant than larvae in fruit. There were no differences in susceptibility of the larval instars to methyl bromide. The rate recommended to kill larvae in fruit (32 g/m3 for 2 h) also killed eggs.

Résumé

L’analyse probit de la réaction de stades de croissance du carpo-capse de la pomme à diverses doses de bromure de méthyle révèle que les adultes sont les plus sensibles et les pupes, les moins sensibles. Les oeufs sont plus résistants que les larves en cocons, lesquelles le sont plus que les larves nues dans les fruits. Les stades larvaires ne montrent aucune différence de sensibilité. La dose recommandée pour tuer les larves dans le fruit (32 g/m3 pendant 2 heures) détruit également les oeufs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthon, E. W., Moffitt, H. R., Couey, H. M., and Smith, L. O.. 1975. Control of codling moth in harvested sweet cherries with methyl bromide and effects upon quality and taste of treated fruit. J. econ. Ent. 68: 524526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthon, E. W., Moffitt, H. R., and Smith, L. O.. 1977. Codling moth: Dosage response of larvae in cherries to methyl bromide fumigation. J. econ. Ent. 70: 381382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, F. E., Proverbs, M. D., and Carty, B. E.. 1969. Artificial diet for mass production of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Can. Ent. 101: 577584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. 1951. Probit Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. V. G., Gaunce, A. P., and Jong, C.. 1974. Control of codling moth larvae in harvested apples by methyl bromide fumigation and cold storage. Can. Ent. 106: 917920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar