Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. BJPsych Advances
  4. Volume 22
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Volume 22 - November 2016

Contents

Page 5 of 5

Commentary

  • How have systematic reviews and meta-analyses benefited psychiatry?: Commentary on… The Usefulness and Interpretation of Systematic Reviews

  • Alex J. Mitchell
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 April 2018, pp. 142-144
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • The article by Smith et al (2016) provides a valuable summary on the usefulness and interpretation of systematic reviews. This commentary adds a discussion of confirmation bias and a summary of some of the most useful influential systematic reviews and meta-analyses in mental health.

Articles

  • Psychiatric expert evidence and the new partial defences of diminished responsibility and loss of control

  • Rajan Nathan, Simon Medland
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, pp. 277-284
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Psychiatric expert witnesses instructed to undertake assessments of defendants charged with murder should be familiar with the partial defences of diminished responsibility and loss of control. The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 enacted major amendments to the partial defence of diminished responsibility and introduced a new defence of loss of control to replace the provocation partial defence. In this article, the changes to the law are described with particular focus on the implications for the psychiatric assessment.

Front matter

  • BJA volume 22 issue 5 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. f1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • BJA volume 22 issue 6 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. b1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Front matter

  • BJA volume 22 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 April 2018, p. f1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • BJA volume 22 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. b1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Front matter

  • BJA volume 22 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. f1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • BJA volume 22 issue 5 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. b1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • BJA volume 22 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 April 2018, p. b1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • BJA volume 22 issue 4 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. b1
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 5 of 5