Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:45:28.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Until the demise of the functional field of view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2017

Laurent Itti
Laurent Itti*
Affiliation:
Computer Science Department, Psychology Department and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, HNB-07A, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2520. [email protected]://iLab.usc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hulleman & Olivers (H&O) make a much-needed stride forward for a better understanding of visual search behavior by rejecting theories based on discrete stimulus items. I propose that the framework could be further enhanced by clearly delineating distinct mechanisms for attention guidance, selection, and enhancement during visual search, instead of conflating them into a single functional field of view.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e140
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, A., Meyer, D. E. & Kornblum, S. (1993) Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In: Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience, ed. Meyer, D. E. & Kornblum, S., pp. 183–218. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bichot, N. P., Heard, M. T., DeGennaro, E. M. & Desimone, R. (2015) A source for feature-based attention in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron 88(4):832–44.Google Scholar
Borji, A. & Itti, L. (2013) State-of-the-art in visual attention modeling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 35(1):185–207.Google Scholar
Borji, A., Sihite, D. N. & Itti, L. (2013) Quantitative analysis of human-model agreement in visual saliency modeling: A comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22(1):55–69.Google Scholar
Carrasco, M. (2011) Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research 51:1484–525. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012.Google Scholar
Chun, M. M. & Jiang, Y. (1998) Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 36(1):28–71.Google Scholar
Crick, F. (1984) Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The searchlight hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 81(14):4586–90.Google Scholar
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18(1):193–222.Google Scholar
Driver, J. & Frith, C. (2000) Shifting baselines in attention research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 1(2):147–48.Google Scholar
Ehinger, K. A., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Torralba, A. & Oliva, A. (2009) Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance. Visual Cognition 17(6–7):945–78.Google Scholar
Itti, L. & Borji, A. (2013) Computational models: Bottom-up and top-down aspects. In: The Oxford handbook of attention, ed. Nobre, K. & Kastner, S., pp. 1122–58. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Itti, L. & Koch, C. (2001) Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2(3):194–203.Google Scholar
Kusunoki, M., Gottlieb, J. & Goldberg, M. E. (2000) The lateral intraparietal area as a salience map: The representation of abrupt onset, stimulus motion, and task relevance. Vision Research 40(10):1459–68.Google Scholar
Preston, T. J., Guo, F., Das, K., Giesbrecht, B. & Eckstein, M. P. (2013) Neural representations of contextual guidance in visual search of real-world scenes. Journal of Neuroscience 33(18):7846–55.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. H. & Desimone, R. (1999) The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron 24(1):19–29, 111–25.Google Scholar
Robertson, L. C. (2003) Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4(2):93–102.Google Scholar
Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S. & Henderson, J. M. (2006) Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review. 113(4):766–86.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Meyers, E. M., Bichot, N. P., Serre, T., Poggio, T. A. & Desimone, R. (2011) Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(21):8850–55.Google Scholar