Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:54:52.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic revisions to inherent notions may shape improvements in cognitive infrastructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Rose Meleady  and
Richard J. Crisp
Rose Meleady
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.uea.ac.uk/psychology/People/Academic/Rose+Meleady
Richard J. Crisp
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TP, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.shef.ac.uk/psychology/staff/academic/richard_crisp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The proposed inherence heuristic centers on perceivers' failure to systematically consider external, historical factors when explaining observed patterns. We stress that this does not preclude the potential of subsequently encountered information to challenge intuitions. Drawing on models of diversity-defined social cognition, we discuss how an updating mechanism may reciprocally shape the cognitive infrastructure that underlies reliance on heuristic systems.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 495 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bastian, B. & Haslam, N. (2006) Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42:228–35. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003.Google Scholar
Crisp, R. J. & Meleady, R. (2012) Adapting to a multicultural future. Science 336:853–55. doi:10.1126/science.1219009.Google Scholar
Crisp, R. J. & Turner, R. N. (2011) Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social diversity. Psychological Bulletin 137:242–66. doi:10.1037/a0021840.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991) Social cognition, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L. & Ernst, D. (2002) Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? British Journal of Social Psychology 41:87–100. doi:10.1348/014466602165072.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J. & Shah, P. (2011) Short and long term benefits of cognitive training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:10081–86. doi:10.1073/pnas.1103228108.Google Scholar
Keller, J. (2005) In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:686–702. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686.Google Scholar
Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J. & Dweck, C. S. (1998) Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74:1421–36. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421.Google Scholar
Muraven, M., Baumeister, R. & Tice, D. M. (1999) Longitudinal improvement of self-regulation through practice: Building self-control strength through repeated exercise. Journal of Social Psychology 139:446–57. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, M. J. & Eberhardt, J. L. (2008) Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84:1033–47. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1033.Google Scholar
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Corneille, O. & Estrada, C. (2001) The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5:141–55.Google Scholar