Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:36:27.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shamanism and psychosis: Shared mechanisms?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2018

Albert R. Powers III  and
Philip R. Corlett
Albert R. Powers III
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT [email protected]@yale.eduhttp://www.nrtp.yale.edu/residents/albert_powers-1.profilehttp://psychiatry.yale.edu/people/philip_corlett.profile
Philip R. Corlett
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT [email protected]@yale.eduhttp://www.nrtp.yale.edu/residents/albert_powers-1.profilehttp://psychiatry.yale.edu/people/philip_corlett.profile
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individual-specific predispositions may precede the cultural evolution of shamanism and may be linked to it via principles of predictive coding. We have used these principles to identify commonalities between clinical and shaman-like non-clinical voice-hearers. The author may find this approach helpful in relating the experiences of shamans to those of their clients.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, A. (2013) Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and and Brain Sciences 36(3):181–204. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corlett, P. R., Frith, C. D. & Fletcher, P. C. (2009) From drugs to deprivation: A Bayesian framework for understanding models of psychosis. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 206(4):515–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. (2005) A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360(1456):815–36. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. & Frith, C. (2015) A duet for one. Consciousness and Cognition 36:390–405. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. J. (2005) Hallucinations and perceptual inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6):764–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, E. (2008) Non-bizarre delusions as strategic deception. In: Medicine and evolution: Current applications, future prospects, ed. Elton, S. & O'Higgins, P.. Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Powers, A. R. III, Kelley, M. & Corlett, P. R. (2016) Hallucinations as top-down effects on perception. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging 1(5):393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.04.003.Google ScholarPubMed
Powers, A. R. III, Kelley, M. S. & Corlett, P. R. (2017a) Varieties of voice-hearing: Psychics and the psychosis continuum. Schizophrenia Bulletin 43(1):84–98. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powers, A. R., Mathys, C. & Corlett, P. R. (2017b) Pavlovian conditioning-induced hallucinations result from overweighting of perceptual priors. Science 357(6351):596–600. doi:10.1126/science.aan3458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sass, L. A. (1994) Paradoxes of delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the schizophrenic mind. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarz, K. A., Pfister, R. & Buchel, C. (2016) Rethinking explicit expectations: Connecting placebos, social cognition, and contextual perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(6):469–80. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed