Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:54:15.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weighted numbers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2021

Mila Marinova Open the ORCID record for Mila Marinova [Opens in a new window] ,
Marta Fedele  and
Bert Reynvoet Open the ORCID record for Bert Reynvoet [Opens in a new window]
Mila Marinova
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, University of Luxembourg, 4365Esch-Belval, Luxembourg. [email protected] Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven @Kulak, 8500Kortrijk, Belgium Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, 3000Leuven, Belgium. [email protected]@kuleuven.bewww.numcoglableuven.be
Marta Fedele
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven @Kulak, 8500Kortrijk, Belgium Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, 3000Leuven, Belgium. [email protected]@kuleuven.bewww.numcoglableuven.be
Bert Reynvoet
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven @Kulak, 8500Kortrijk, Belgium Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, 3000Leuven, Belgium. [email protected]@kuleuven.bewww.numcoglableuven.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clarke and Beck (C&B) discuss in their sections on congruency and confounds (sects. 3 and 4) literature that has challenged the claim that the approximate number system (ANS) represents numerical content. We argue that the propositions put forward by these studies aren't that far from the indirect model of number perception suggested by C&B.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e196
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burr, D., & Ross, J. (2008). A visual sense of number. Current Biology, 18(6), 425–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebuis, T., Cohen Kadosh, R., & Gevers, W. (2016). Sensory-integration system rather than approximate number system underlies numerosity processing: A critical review. Acta Psychologica, 171, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2011). Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 981–986. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0097-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2012). The interplay between non-symbolic number and its continuous visual properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 642–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberda, J. (2019). Perceptual input is not conceptual content. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 636–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455(7213), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinova, M., Sasanguie, D., & Reynvoet, B. (2021). Numerals do not need numerosities: Robust evidence for distinct numerical representations for symbolic and non-symbolic numbers. Psychological Research, 85(2), 764–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01286-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazza, M., De Feo, V., Panzeri, S., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Learning to focus on number. Cognition, 181, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picon, E., Dramkin, D., & Odic, D. (2019). Visual illusions help reveal the primitives of number perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(10), 1675. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynvoet, B., Ribner, A.D., Elliot, L., Van Steenkiste, M., Sasanguie, D., & Libertus, M. E. (in press). Making sense of the relation between number sense and math. Journal of Numerical Cognition.Google Scholar
Smets, K., Sasanguie, D., Szucs, D., & Reynvoet, B. (2015). The effect of different methods to construct non-symbolic stimuli in numerosity estimation and comparison. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 27(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.996568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rinsveld, A., Wens, V., Guillaume, M., Beuel, A., Gevers, W., De Tiège, X., & Content, A. (2021). Automatic processing of numerosity in human neocortex evidenced by occipital and parietal neuromagnetic responses. Cerebral Cortex Communications, 2(2), tgab028. https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed