To describe antimicrobial resistance before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Dominican Republic.

Retrospective study.

The study included 49 outpatient laboratory sites located in 13 cities nationwide.

Patients seeking ambulatory microbiology testing for urine and bodily fluids

We reviewed antimicrobial susceptibility reports for Escherichia coli isolates from urine and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSAR) from bodily fluids between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, from deidentified susceptibility data extracted from final culture results.

In total, 27,718 urine cultures with E. coli and 2,111 bodily fluid cultures with PSAR were included in the analysis. On average, resistance to ceftriaxone was present in 25.19% of E. coli isolated from urine each year. The carbapenem resistance rates were 0.15% for E. coli and 3.08% for PSAR annually. The average rates of E. coli with phenotypic resistance consistent with possible extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) in urine were 25.63% and 24.75%, respectively, before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The carbapenem resistance rates in urine were 0.11% and 0.20%, respectively, a 200% increase. The average rates of PSAR with carbapenem resistance in bodily fluid were 2.33% and 3.84% before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively, a 130% percent increase.

Resistance to carbapenems in PSAR and E. coli after the COVID-19 pandemic is rising. These resistance patterns suggest that ESBL is common in the Dominican Republic. Carbapenem resistance was uncommon but increased after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Audit and feedback is an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategy, with the potential to also optimize antimicrobial use in non-audited patients. This study aimed to determine whether audit and feedback reduce antimicrobial use in both audited and non-audited patients.

Before-after trial with a 1-year intervention period and 2.5-year historical cohort.

750-bed community hospital in the Netherlands.

All patients admitted to the urology wards during the 3.5-year study period were observed. Patients were classified as using antimicrobials if any antimicrobial was used for therapeutic reasons. Patients using antimicrobials prophylactically were excluded from measurements.

The AMS team provided audit and feedback on antimicrobial use for patients using antimicrobials for 2 days. Retrospectively, antimicrobial use and length of stay (LOS) were compared with the historical cohort.

Audits modified antimicrobial treatment in 52.8% of the cases. De-escalating, stopping, and switching from intravenous to oral treatment accounted for 72% of these modifications. Compared to patients from the cohort, who also used antimicrobials for 2 days, antimicrobial use decreased from 14.21 DDD/patient (95% CI, 13.08–15.34) to 11.45 DDD/patient (95% CI, 8.26–14.64; P = .047) for audited patients. Furthermore, mean LOS decreased from 7.42 days (95% CI, 6.79–8.06) to 6.13 days (95% CI, 5.38–6.89; P = .031). However, looking at all patients admitted to the urology wards, the percentage of patients using antimicrobials and total antimicrobial use remained unchanged.

Audit and feedback reduce antimicrobial use and LOS, but only for audited patients. Positive effects are not automatically transferred to patients for whom no audits have been performed.

To assess the effect of individual compared to clinic-level feedback on guideline-concordant care for 3 acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) among family medicine clinicians caring for pediatric patients.

Cluster randomized controlled trial with a 22-month baseline, 26-month intervention period, and 12-month postintervention period.

In total, 26 family medicine practices (39 clinics) caring for pediatric patients in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina were selected based upon performance on guideline-concordance for 3 ARTIs, stratified by practice size. These were randomly allocated to a control group (17 clinics in 13 practices) or to an intervention group (22 clinics in 13 practices).

All clinicians received an education session and baseline then monthly clinic-level rates for guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs: upper respiratory tract infection (URI), acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS), and acute otitis media (AOM). For the intervention group only, individual clinician performance was provided.

Both intervention and control groups demonstrated improvement from baseline, but the intervention group had significantly greater improvement compared with the control group: URI (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–1.92; P < 0.01); ABS (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11–1.88; P < 0.01); and AOM (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.24–2.03; P < 0.01). The intervention group also showed significantly greater reduction in broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing percentage (BSAP%): odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P < 0.01. During the postintervention year, gains were maintained in the intervention group for each ARTI and for URI and AOM in the control group.

Monthly individual peer feedback is superior to clinic-level only feedback in family medicine clinics for 3 pediatric ARTIs and for BSAP% reduction.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04588376, Improving Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Respiratory Infection by Family Physicians with Peer Comparison.

To evaluate the rate of coinfections and secondary infections seen in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and antimicrobial prescribing patterns.

This single-center, retrospective study included all patients aged ≥18 years admitted with COVID-19 for at least 24 hours to a 280-bed, academic, tertiary-care hospital between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2020. Coinfections, secondary infections, and antimicrobials prescribed for these patients were collected.

In total, 331 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were evaluated. No additional cases were identified in 281 (84.9%) patients, whereas 50 (15.1%) had at least 1 infection. In total, of 50 patients (15.1%) who were diagnosed with coinfection or secondary infection had bacteremia, pneumonia, and/or urinary tract infections. Patients who had positive cultures, who were admitted to the ICU, who required supplemental oxygen, or who were transferred from another hospital for higher level of care were more likely to have infections. The most commonly used antimicrobials were azithromycin (75.2%) and ceftriaxone (64.9%). Antimicrobials were prescribed appropriately for 55% of patients.

Coinfection and secondary infections are common in patients who are critically ill with COVID-19 at hospital admission. Clinicians should consider starting antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients while limiting antimicrobial use in patients who are not critically ill.

To evaluate the impact of the addition of an indication specification requirement to isolated urine-culture ordering on testing utilization.

Retrospective study utilizing interrupted time series analysis with negative binomial regression. The preintervention period was October 1, 2018–November 11, 2019, and the postintervention period was November 12, 2019–October 31, 2020. The primary outcome was isolated culture rate per 1,000 patient days. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of all urine tests ordered as isolated urine culture and culture positivity. An exploratory analysis assessed the appropriateness of selected testing indications.

A 415-bed, urban, academic medical center.

Adult patients with urine testing performed during hospital admission. In total, 1,494 unique isolated urine-culture orders were included in the analysis.

On November 12, 2019, the laboratory order interface was changed to require the ordering provider to select an indication for isolated urine culture.

Isolated urine-culture rates did not significantly change after the intervention (11.2–7.8 cultures per 1,000 patient days; P = .17) nor did culture positivity (26.9% vs 26.8%). Most ordering providers left the indication for testing blank, and of those charts reviewed, 67% did not have a documented condition for which isolated urine culture was the most appropriate initial test.

The addition of an order-specification requirement for isolated urine-culture testing did not significantly affect ordering practices. The test remains overused as the initial diagnostic evaluation for a suspected urinary tract infection. Further provider education and continued changes in provider workflow are needed to achieve lasting change in practice.

To develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of a unique centralized surveillance infection prevention (CSIP) program.

Observational quality improvement project.

An integrated academic healthcare system.

The CSIP program comprises senior infection preventionists who are responsible for healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance and reporting, allowing local infection preventionists (LIPs) a greater portion of their time to non-surveillance patient safety activities. Four CSIP team members accrued HAI responsibilities at 8 facilities.

We evaluated the effectiveness of the CSIP program using 4 measures: recovery of LIP time, efficiency of surveillance activities by LIPs and CSIP staff, surveys characterizing LIP perception of their effectiveness in HAI reduction, and nursing leaders’ perception of LIP effectiveness.

The amount of time spent by LIP teams on HAI surveillance was highly variable, while CSIP time commitment and efficiency was steady. Post-CSIP implementation, 76.9% of LIPs agreed that they spend adequate time on inpatient units, compared to 15.4% pre-CSIP; LIPs also reported more time to allot to non-surveillance activities. Nursing leaders reported greater satisfaction with LIP involvement with HAI reduction practices.

CSIP programs are a little-reported strategy to ease burden on LIPs with reallocation of HAI surveillance. The analyses presented here will aid health systems in anticipating the benefit of CSIP programs.

There is limited data on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and multidrug-resistant VAP (MDR VAP) among COVID-19 patients.

A retrospective study in a single, tertiary, private hospital in the Philippines was conducted comparing the incidence, profile, and patient outcomes of MDR VAP during the pre-COVID-19 (2018–2019) and COVID-19 (2020–2021) periods.

In total, 80/362 (22%) patients developed VAP, 27/204 (33.75%) from pre-COVID-19 and 53/158 (66.25%) from the COVID-19 period, respectively. The majority were male [20/27 (74%) vs 34/53 (64%)], with a median age of 66 (range 35–90) and 67 (range 32–92) years in each period, respectively. Comorbidities were similar, except cardiovascular disease (14/27 vs 11/53 patients, p-value 0.005) and chronic lung disease (14/27 vs 9/53 patients, p-value 0.0012). VAP incidence density was 19.3/1000 and 27.8/1000 ventilator days (p-value 0.9819)]; median length of stay before VAP for pre- and COVID-19 periods was 17 and 10 days, respectively (p-value <0.0001). Extended-spectrum β lactamase (ESBL)-producing resistance increased significantly [1/27 (3.7%) pre-COVID-19 vs 15/53 (28.3%)] during COVID-19, while Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae resistance was higher in the pre-COVID-19 period (15/27 [56%] vs 10/53 [19%]). Mortality was high in both periods at 93% and 83%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, only female gender was associated with MDR VAP in the COVID-19 period (OR =3.47, [CI 1.019, 11.824], p-value < 0.047).

The frequency of VAP and MDR VAP increased during the COVID-19 period, despite a shorter duration of hospital stay. The mortality of VAP was extremely high. Factors associated with increased risk of VAP and COVID-19 need to be studied further, and preventive measures should be prioritized.

To establish an antimicrobial stewardship program in the outpatient setting.

Prescribers of antimicrobials were asked to complete a survey regarding antimicrobial stewardship. We also monitored their compliance with appropriate prescribing practices, which were shared in monthly quality improvement reports.

The study was performed at Loyola University Health System, an academic teaching healthcare system in a metropolitan suburban environment.

Prescribers of antimicrobials across 19 primary care and 3 immediate- and urgent-care clinics.

The voluntary survey was developed using SurveyMonkeyand was distributed via e-mail. Data were collected anonymously. Rates of compliance with appropriate prescribing practices were abstracted from electronic health records and assessed by 3 metrics: (1) avoidance of antibiotics in adult acute bronchitis and appropriate antibiotic treatment in (2) patients tested for pharyngitis and (3) children with upper respiratory tract infections.

Prescribers were highly knowledgeable about what constitutes appropriate prescribing; verified compliance rates were highly concordant with self-reported rates. Nearly all prescribers were concerned about resistance, but fewer than half believed antibiotics were overprescribed in their office. Among respondents, 74% reported intense pressure from patients to prescribe antimicrobials inappropriately. Immediate- and urgent-care prescribers had higher rates of compliance than primary-care prescribers, and the latter group responded well to monthly reports and online educational resources.

Intense pressure from patients to prescribe antimicrobials when they are not indicated leads to overprescribing, an effect compounded by the importance of patient satisfaction scores. Compliance reporting improved the number of appropriate antibiotics prescribed in the primary care setting.