Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-sp8b6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:17:52.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and carcass characteristics of three lamb genotypes finished on the same level of feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

L. O. W. McClintont  and
A. F. Carson
L. O. W. McClintont*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
A. F. Carson*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
*
†Present address: Supply Chain Development Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Dundonald House, Upper Newtonards Road, Belfast BT4 3SB.
‡Also member of staff of the Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and The Queen’s University of Belfast. To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access

Abstract

This study investigated the efficiency of growth and the carcass characteristics of 24 Greyface (Border Leicester × Scottish Blackface), 24 Texel (12 purebred and 12 Texel × Texel-Greyface) and 24 Rouge (12 purebred and 12 Rouge × Rouge-Greyface) lambs finished on the same level of feeding. The efficiency of live-weight gain (kg/MJ) was higher in Greyface compared with Texel lambs (P < 0·01). The efficiency of empty body-weight gain (kg/MJ) was higher in Greyface (P < 0·01) and Rouge (P < 0·05) compared with Texel lambs. The efficiency of carcass gains (kg/MJ) tended to be higher in Greyface and Rouge compared with Texel lambs (P = 0·07). The efficiency of non-carcass component gains (kg/MJ) was also higher in Greyface compared with Texel lambs (P 0·05). Carcass water, protein, lipid and ash gains did not vary significantly between the genotypes, however carcass energy gain tended to be higher in Greyface and Rouge compared with Texel lambs (P = 0·08). The relative proportions of water, protein, lipid and ash in carcass gains did not vary significantly between the genotypes. At the end of the experiment carcass water content was higher in Texel compared with Greyface lambs (P < 0·05) and carcass ash content was lower in Texel compared with Greyface (P < 0·01) and Rouge (P < 0·05) lambs. The concentration of saturated fatty acids was higher in Greyface compared with Rouge lambs (P < 0·001) and higher in Rouge compared with Texel lambs (P < 0·05). Monounsaturated fatty acid concentrations were higher in Rouge compared with Greyface lambs (P < 0·05) and higher in Texel compared with Rouge lambs (P < 0·001). Polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrations were higher in Rouge and Texel compared with Greyface lambs (P < 0·01). The ratio of n-6:n-3 fatty acids was lower in Rouge compared with Greyface lambs (P < 0·05).

The efficiency of empty body gain was higher in male compared with female lambs (P < 0·05). Carcass water (P < 0·01) and protein (P < 0·05) gains were higher in male lambs. At the end of the experiment male carcasses contained a higher content of water (P < 0·05), protein (P < 0·01) and ash (P = 0·07), and a lower lipid (P < 0·05) and energy (P < 0·001) content. Carcass lipids from male lambs contained a higher concentration of polyunsaturated fatty acids (P < 0·001) and tended to contain a lower concentration of saturated fatty acids (P = 0·06).

Keywords

breedscarcass compositionefficiencygrowthlambs
Type
Growth, development and meat science
Information
Animal Science , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 51 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bligh, E.G. and Dyer, W. J. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37: 911 –917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boylan, W. J., Berger, Y. M. and Allen, C. E. 1976. Fatty acid composition of Finn sheep crossbred lamb carcasses. Journal of Animal Science 42: 1421–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1979. Sheep carcass evaluation-measurement of composition using a standardised butchery method. Memorandum no. 36, Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. 1970. The physical regulation of voluntary intake. In Physiology of digestion and metabolism in the ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 226–234. Oriel Press, Newcastle Upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Carson, A.E, McClinton, L. W. and Steen, R. W. J. 1999a. Effects of Texel or Rouge de l’Ouest genes in lowland ewes and rams on ewe prolificacy, lamb viability and weaned lamb output. Animal Science 68: 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, A.E, Moss, B. W., Steen, R. W. J. and Kilpatrick, D.J. 1999b. Effects of the percentage of Texel or Rouge de l’Ouest genes in lambs on carcass characteristics and meat quality. Animal Science 69: 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chestnutt, D. M.B. 1994. Effect of lamb growth rate and growth pattern on carcass fat levels. Animal Production 58: 77–85.Google Scholar
Ellis, M., Webster, G. M., Merrell, B. G. and Brown, I. 1997. The influence of terminal sire breed on carcass composition and eating quality of crossbred lambs. Animal Science 64: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enser, M., Hallett, K., Hewitt, B., Fursey, G. A. J. and Wood, J. D. 1996. Fatty acid content and composition of English beef, lamb and pork at retail. Meat Science 42: 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidanza, A. and Keys, A. 1970. Coronary heart disease in seven countries. Circulation 1: 162–173.Google Scholar
Field, R. A. 1971. Effects of castration on meat quality and quantity, journal of Animal Science 32: 849–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisch, J. E. and Vercoe, J. E. 1991. Factors affecting the utilization of nutrients by grazing beef cattle in northern Australia. Proceedings of grazing livestock nutrition conference, OK Agricultural Experimental Station, MP 133, p. 198.Google Scholar
GENSTAT 5 Committee. 1993. GENSTAT 5 release 3, reference manual. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Porter, M. G., Mayne, C. S., Unsworth, E. F. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1995. Effect of forage digestibility and type of concentrate on nutrient utilisation by lactating dairy cattle, journal of Dairy Research 62: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanrahan, J. P. 1979. Feed intake and carcass composition of lambs sired by Texel, Suffolk, Lleyn and Galway rams. Animal Production 28: 457A (abstr.).Google Scholar
Jeffrey, N. M., Newsholme, E. A. and Calder, P.C. 1996. The effect of varying the п-в: n-3 fatty acid ratio of the diet upon blood lipid concentrations in the rat. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 55: 166A (abstr.).Google Scholar
Johnston, S. D. 1995. The effects of genotype and nutrition on lamb production. Ph.D. thesis, The Queen’s University, Belfast. Google Scholar
Jones, S. D. M., Burgess, T. D., Dupchak, K. and Pollock, E. 1984. The growth performance and carcass composition of ram and ewe lambs fed on pasture or confinement and slaughtered at similar fatness. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64: 631–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J. 1983. Carcass quality and its measurement in sheep. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 59–74. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Croston, D. and Jones, D. W. 1987. Tissue growth and development in crossbred lambs sired by ten breeds. Livestock Production Science 16: 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Clarke, J. N. and Hickey, S. M. 1982. A comparison of the composition and carcass quality of Kelly and Russian castrate, ram, wether and ewe lambs. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 42: 117–118.Google Scholar
Latif, M. G. A. and Owen, E. 1980. A note on the growth performance and carcass composition of Texel- and Suffolk-sired lambs in an intensive feeding system. Animal Production 30: 311–314.Google Scholar
L’Estrange, J. L. and Hanrahan, J.P 1980. Some breed effects on the melting point and fatty acid composition of carcass fat in lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leymaster, K. A. and Jenkins, T. G. 1993. Comparison of Texel- and Suffolk-sired crossbred lambs for survival, growth and compositional traits. Journal of Animal Science 71: 859–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, L. D. and Schmitz, A. A. 1961. Rapid preparation of fatty acid esters from lipids for gas Chromatographie analysis. Analytical Chemistry 33: 363–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
More O’Ferrall, G. J. and Timon, V. M. 1977. A comparison of eight sire breeds for lamb production. 2. Lamb carcass composition. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 16: 277–284.Google Scholar
Morris, J. G. and Moir, K. W. 1964. Methods of determining the chemical composition of dead animals. In Carcase composition and appraisal of meat animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.), pp. 21–22. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, East Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Porter, M. G. 1992. Comparison of sample preparation methods for the determination of the gross energy concentration of fresh silage. Animal Peed Science and Technology 37: 202–218.Google Scholar
Solomon, M.B., Lynch, G. P, Ono, K. and Paroczay, E. 1990. Lipid composition of muscle and adipose tissue from crossbred ram, wether and cryptorchid lambs. Journal of Animal Science 68: 137–142 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steen, R. W. J. 1984. A comparison of two-cut and three-cut systems of silage making for beef cattle using two cultivars of perennial ryegrass. Animal Production 38: 171–179.Google Scholar
Wachira, A. M., Sinclair, L. A., Wilkinson, R. G., Hewett, B., Enser, M. and Wood, J. D. 1998. The effects of fat source and breed on fatty acid composition of lamb muscle. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1998, p. 38 (abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, B.T., Smith, C. and Sales, D. I. 1980. Growth and carcass composition in the crossbred progeny of six terminal sire breeds of sheep. Animal Production 31: 307–313.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. R. G., Chestnutt, D. M. B. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1997. Growth and carcass characteristics of heavy slaughter weight lambs: effects of sire breed and sex of lamb and relationships to serum metabolites and IGF-1. Animal Science 64: 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar