Article contents
The Just and the Advantageous in Thucydides: The Case of the Mytilenaian Debate
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2014
Abstract
As no passage in Thucydides is more important, so none is more dramatic than the Mytilenaian Debate. Having resolved to punish harshly a rebel city, the Athenians repent and reconsider. Exhorted by Kleon to maintain their original decision and by Diototos to abandon it, the Athenians must scrutinize the relationship between justice and expediency. Diodotos, who professes to argue from interest only, narrowly prevails in the debate. There is, however, much more to his speech than meets the eye. For it proves misleading to say that he is arguing merely from interest—and then, on a deeper level, to say that he is arguing from justice. In fact no passage in Thucydides, including the Melian Dialogue, raises starker questions about the status of political justice.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984
References
- 11
- Cited by
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.