Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. American Journal of International Law
  4. Volume 11
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 11 - October 1917

Contents

Page 3 of 10

Other

Research Article

  • The Destruction of Neutral Property on Enemy Vessels

  • Quincy Wright
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 May 2017, pp. 358-379

  • In 1785 Prussia ratified a treaty with the United States providing in its twenty-third article 1 that in case of war between the contracting powers:

    All merchant and trading vessels employed in exchanging the products of different places, and thereby rendering the necessaries, conveniences, and comforts of human life more fiasy to be obtained, and more general, shall be allowed to pass free and unmolested; and neither of the contracting Powers shall grant or issue any commission to any private armed vessels, empowering them to take or destroy such trading vessels or interrupt such commerce.

  • The American Attitude Toward Capture at Sea

  • Harold Scott Quigley
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 May 2017, pp. 820-838

  • The United States, fighting a war for independence from the greatest of maritime Powers at a time when the belligerent and neutral worlds were united against England because of her maintenance of the ancient rules of maritime warfare, naturally incorporated into its first treaty, the commercial agreement of 1778 with France, the "twin maxims" of Utrecht: free ships, free goods, enemy ships, enemy goods. The greater freedom which the first of these principles expressed agreed with the interests and the temper of the new republic, since in but one of its subsequent treaties has it included the opposing regulations upheld by the mother country. Treaties of 1782 with the United Provinces, 1783 with Sweden, and 1800 with France stipulated that free ships should make free goods and enemy ships, enemy goods.

Other

Editorial Comment

  • The Journal Entering Upon a Second Decade

  • James Brown Scott
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 May 2017, pp. 131-132
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Other

Research Article

Other

Editorial Comment

  • The Rights of the Civil Population in Territory Occupied by a Belligerent

  • David J. Hill
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 May 2017, pp. 133-137
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • The United States at War with the Imperial German Government

  • James Brown Scott
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 May 2017, pp. 617-627
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • The Cessation of Diplomatic Relations with Germany

  • David J. Hill
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 May 2017, pp. 380-384
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Other

Editorial Comment

  • The International Relations of Japan, China, and the United States

  • James Brown Scott
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 May 2017, pp. 839-843
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 3 of 10