Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T23:28:47.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strategies for Preferred Orientation Corrections in Xray Powder Diffraction Using Line Intensity Ratios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

B.H. O'Connor
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics/Centre for Materials Technology Ciirtin University of Technology Perth, WA, Australia
D.Y. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics/Centre for Materials Technology Ciirtin University of Technology Perth, WA, Australia
H. Sitepu
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics/Centre for Materials Technology Ciirtin University of Technology Perth, WA, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Li et al (1990) reported experiments with gibbsite powder specimens on the use of Rietveld pattern-fitting, involving the March preferred orientation model, to characterise preferred orientation according to the March r parameter. It was shown that intensity corrections may be applied with the March r parameter derived from Rietveld analysis or with the related line intensity ratio MR which is sensitive to preferred orientation. The present paper reports an analytic expression involving r and MR which has proved highly reliable for the correction of preferred orientation bias in quantitative phase analysis of gibbsite. Similar expressions may be readily derived for other materials for which the March model is appropriate. Therefore the line ratio approach has considerable potential for rapid correction of intensities for preferred orientation.

Type
VIII. Qualitative and Quantiative Phase Analysis by XRD
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cullity, B. D., 1978. “Elements of x-ray diffraction”. 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, pp 502503.Google Scholar
Dollase, W. A., 1986. “Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model.” J. Appl Cryst., 19:267272.Google Scholar
Li, D. Y., B. H., O'Connor, Roach, G. I. D. and Cornell, J. B., 1990. “Use of x-ray powder diffraction patternfitting for characterising preferred orientation gibbsites.” Powd. Diff., 5: 7985.Google Scholar
March, A., 1932. “Mathcmatische theorie der regelung nach der korngestalt bei affiner deformation.” Z., Kristallogr., Kristallgeom., Kristallphys., Kristailchem., 81:285297.Google Scholar