Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T19:40:53.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Public and Nonprofit Administration

New Public Governance as a Hybrid

A Critical Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2024

Laura Cataldi
Laura Cataldi
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro

Summary

This Element focuses on New Public Governance as one of the major administrative narratives of our times. It offers a critical interpretation of NPG as a hybrid tool for management, governance, and reform, arguing that NPG coexists with and is likely to gradually merge into New Public Management. Several arguments support the 'continuity and hybridization' hypothesis, whereby the transition from NPM to NPG occurred through the retention of key elements and a layering and sedimentation process. These arguments challenge the “linear substitution” hypothesis, accounting for NPM's persistence and dominance. The Element develops a new interpretation of NPG and discusses the challenges that NPG poses. Finally, it shows that exploring hybridity is critical for evaluating the potential of NPG in terms of a shift in public administration and understanding governance trajectories and reform scenarios.
Get access

Keywords

new public governancenew public managementhybridizationnarrativesstate
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Public and Nonprofit Administration
Online ISBN: 9781009418904
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 29 February 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agranoff, Robert. 2006. Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers. Public Administration Review 66(S1): 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agranoff, Robert, and McGuire, Michael. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1988. The Return to the State. The American Political Science Review 82(3): 853–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andresani, Gianluca, and Ferlie, Ewan. 2006. Studying Governance within the British Public Sector and without. Public Management Review 8(3): 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Chris, and Gash, Alison. 2008. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4): 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Christopher, Sørensen, Eva, and Torfing, Jacob. 2021. The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Game Changer for Public Administration and Leadership? The Need for Robust Governance Responses to Turbulent Problems. Public Management Review 23(7): 949–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Christopher, and Torfing, Jacob. 2021. A New Public Governance Based on Co-creation. In Public Governance as Co-creation: A Strategy for Revitalizing the Public Sector and Rejuvenating Democracy, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristovnik, Aleksander, Murko, Eva, and Ravšelj, Dejan. 2022. From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government. Administrative Sciences 12(1): 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aucoin, Peter. 1990. Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums. Governance 3(2): 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Chester I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bakvis, Herman, and Juillet, Luc. 2004. The Horizontal Challenge: Line Departments, Central Agencies and Leadership. Ottawa: Canada School of Public Services.Google Scholar
Bass, Bernard M. 1985. Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Battilana, Julie, Besharov, Marya, and Mitzinneck, Bjoern. 2017. On Hybrids and Hybrid Organizing: A Review and Roadmap for Future Research. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism 2nd ed., eds., Greenwood, Royston, Oliver, Christine, Lawrence, Thomas B., and Meyer, Renate E., 128–162. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benington, John. 2011. From Private Choice to Public Value. In Public Value Theory and Practice, eds., Benington, John and Moore, Mark, 31–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar
Benington, John, and Hartley, Jean. 2009. Whole Systems Go! Improving Leadership across the Whole Public Service System: Propositions to Stimulate Discussion and Reform. Sunningdale: National School of Government Report.Google Scholar
Benn, Stanley I., and Gaus, Gerald F.. 1983. Public and Private in Social Life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark, and Rhodes, Roderick A. W.. 2003. Interpreting British Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark, and Rhodes, Roderick A. W.. 2006. Governance Stories. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, Mark, and Rhodes, Roderick A. W.. 2022. All You Need Is … a Network: The Rise of Interpretive Public Administration. Public Administration 100(1): 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Carmine, Nasi, Greta, and Rivenbark, William. 2021. Implementing Collaborative Governance: Models, Experiences, and Challenges. Public Management Review 23(11): 1581–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. 2005. Joined-Up Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojang, Malang B. S. 2020. Beyond New Public Management Paradigm: The Public Value Paradigm and Its Implications for Public Sector Managers. Global Journal of Management and Business Research 20(12): 1–7.Google Scholar
Bono, Joice E., Shen, Winny, and Snyder, Mark. 2010. Fostering Integrative Community Leadership. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(2): 324–335.Google Scholar
Bouckaert, Geert. 2017. Taking Stock of “Governance”: A Predominantly European Perspective. Governance 30: 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Geert. 2022. The Neo-Weberian State: From Ideal Type Model to Reality?. Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2022–10), UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2022-10.Google Scholar
Bovaird, Tony. 2007. Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review 67(5): 846–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovaird, Tony, and Löffler, Elke. 2003. Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences 69(3): 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, Mark, Schillemans, Thomas, and Hart, Paul ’T. 2008. Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool. Public Administration 86(1): 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, Richard C., Marshall, Gary S., Reed, B. J., and Reed, Christine M.. 2001. New Public Management and Substantive Democracy. Public Administration Review 61(5): 608–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne George, A., Farrell, Catherine, Law, Jennifer, Powell, Martin, and Walker, Richard. 2003. Evaluating Public Management Reforms. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Barry. 1993. Theory, ‘Wisdom’, and the Character of Knowledge in Public Management. In Public Management, ed., Bozeman, Barry, 27–39. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Brandsen, Taco. 2010. Hybridity/Hybridization. In International Encyclopedia of Civil Society, eds., Anheier, Helmut K., and Toepler, Stefan, 839–842. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Brandsen, Taco, van de Donk, Wim, and Putters, Kim. 2005. Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a Permanent and Inevitable Characteristic of the Third Sector. International Journal of Public Administration 28: 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudney, Jeffrey L., and England, Robert E.. 1983. Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept. Public Administration Review 43(1): 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, John M., Crosby, Barbara C., and Middleton Stone, Melissa. 2006. The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaboration: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review 66(S1): 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, James McGregor. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Caiden, Gerald E. 1969. Administrative Reform. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Cairney, Paul, and Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2016. Multiple Streams Approach: A Flexible Metaphor Presents an Opportunity to Operationalize Agenda Setting Processes. In Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting, ed., Zahariadis, Nikolaos, 87–105. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Capano, Giliberto. 1992. Improbabile riforma. Le politiche di riforma amministrativa nell’Italia repubblicana. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Capano, Giliberto. 2003. Administrative Traditions and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform during the 1990s. Public Administration 81: 781–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, Giliberto, Howlett, Michael, and Ramesh, M.. 2015. Re-Thinking Governance in Public Policy: Dynamics, Strategy and Capacities. In Varieties of Governance, eds., Capano, Giliberto, Howlett, Michael, and Ramesh, M., 1–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cataldi, Laura. 2015. Coproduzione: Uno strumento di riforma in tempi di austerity? Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 1: 59–86.Google Scholar
Cataldi, Laura. 2017. I “nuovi” servizi sociali: vecchio managerialismo e moderna burocratizzazione. In Logica professionale e logica manageriale. Una ricerca sulle professioni sociali, eds., Tousijn, Willem, and Dellavalle, Marilena, 41–94. Il Mulino: Bologna.Google Scholar
Cataldi, Laura, and Tomatis, Francesca. 2022. Gender and Professionalism: Still a Black Box. A Call for Research, Debate and Action. Suggestions from and beyond the Pandemic Crisis. Organization 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221115835.Google Scholar
Cataldi, Laura, and Cappellato, Valeria. 2020. New Welfare Narratives in Italy: Risks and Supposed Virtues. The Tocqueville Review/ La Revue Tocqueville 41(1): 207–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cataldi, Laura, and Tousijn, Willem. 2015. Quale managerialismo nei servizi sociali? Considerazioni critiche. Polis 2: 157–190.Google Scholar
Cataldi, Laura, Tomatis, Francesca, and Costa, Giuliana. 2021. Even More in the Pandemic and Social Emergency: For an Individual Welfare beyond the Family and the Community. Community, Work & Family. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.1911936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tom. 2012. Post-NPM and Changing Public Governance. Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics 1: 1–11.Google Scholar
Christensen, Tom, and Lægreid, Per. 2006. The Whole-of-Government Approach – Regulation, Performance, and Public-Sector Reform. Working Paper 6, Stein Rokkan Centre For Social Studies, August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tom, and Lægreid, Per. 2007a. The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform. Public Administration Review 67(6): 1059–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tom, and Lægreid, Per. 2007b. Trascending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christensen, Tom, and Lægreid, Per. 2011a. Democracy and Administrative Policy: Contrasting Elements of New Public Management (NPM) and Post-NPM. European Political Science Review (3)1: 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tom, and Lægreid, Per. 2011b. Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration: Theoretical and Empirical Challenges. Public Organization Review 11(4): 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tom, and Fan, Yongmao. 2016. Post-New Public Management: A New Administrative Paradigm for China? International Review of Administrative Sciences 84(2): 1–16.Google Scholar
Clark, David (1996). Open Government in Britain: Discourse and Practice. Public Money & Management 16(1): 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, John H. 1996. After Social Work. In Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work, ed., Parton, Nigel, 36–60. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mark, Considine, and Lewis, Jennifer M. L.. 2003. Bureaucracy, Network or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review 63(2): 131–140.Google Scholar
Crosby, Barbara C., and Bryson John, M. 2005. A Leadership Framework for Cross-Sector Collaboration. Public Management Review 7(2): 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, Barbara C., and Bryson, John M.. 2010. Integrative Leadership and the Creation and Maintenance of Cross-Sector Collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(2): 211–230.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalingwater, Louise. 2014. Post-new Public Management (NPM) and the Reconfiguration of Health Services in England. Observatoire de la Société Britannique 16: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Jonathan S., and Chorianopoulos, Ioannis. 2018. Governance: Mature Paradigm or Chicken Soup for European Public Management? Critical Policy Studies 12(3): 360–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Hanna, Tummers, Lars, and Bekkers, Victor. 2018. The Diffusion and Adoption of Public Sector Innovations: A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1(3): 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Jouke. 2010. Is New Public Management Really Dead? OECD Journal on Budgeting 10(1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-10-5km8xx3mp60n.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denhardt, Robert B., and Denhardt, Janet V.. 2000. The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review 60(6): 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Jean-Louis, Langley, Ann, and Sergi, Viviane. 2012. Leadership in the Plural. The Academy of Management Annals 6(1): 211–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Jean-Louis, Ferlie, Ewan, and Van Gestel, Nicolette. 2015. Understanding Hybridity in Public Organizations. Public Administration 93: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Helen. 2016. From New Public Management to New Public Governance: The Implications for a “New Public Service”. In The Three Sector Solution: Delivering Public Policy in Collaboration with No-for-Profits and Business, eds., Butcher, John R., and Gilchrist, David J., 41–60. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick, and Hood, Christopher. 1994. From Old Public Administration to New Public Management. Public Money & Management 14(3): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon, and Tinkler, Jane. 2006. New Public Management is Dead – Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(3): 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, William. 1981. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. David. 1998. Managerial Influences in Public Administration. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior 1(4): 553–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Kirk, Nabatchi, Tina, and Balogh, Stephen. 2012. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engwall, Lars. 1992. Mercury Meets Minerva: Business Studies and Higher Education: The Swedish Case. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Entwistle, Tom, and Martin, Steve. 2005. From Competition to Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: A New Agenda for Research. Public Administration 83(1): 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eymeri-Douzans, Jean-Michel. 2013. Administrative Reforms: Is France within the World Movement? In La France et ses administrations. Un état des savoirs/ France and Its Public Administrations: A State of the Art, eds., Eymeri-Douzans, Jean-Michel, and Bouckaert, Geert, 497–519. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Fattore, Giovanni, Dubois, Hans F. W, and Lapenta, Antonio. 2012. Measuring New Public Management and Governance in Political Debate. Public Administration Review 72(2): 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewan, Ferlie, Musselin, Christine, and Andresani, Gianluca. 2009. The Governance of Higher Education Systems: A Public Management Perspective. In University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspective, eds., Paradeise, Catherine, Reale, Emanuela, Bleiklie, Ivar, and Ferlie, Ewan, 1–19. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan A. 2015. Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say? World Development 72: 346–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getha-Taylor, Heater. 2009. Managing the ‘‘New Normalcy’’ with Values-Based Leadership: Lessons from Admiral James Loy. Public Administration Review 69(2): 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, Silvia, and Jacobsson, Bengt. 2000. Managerialese as the Latin of Our Times: Reforming Italian Public Sector Organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management 16: 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1998. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Girotti, Fiorenzo. 2007. Amministrazioni pubbliche. Una introduzione. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Glynn, Mary Ann, Hood, Elisabeth A., and Innis, Benjamin D.. 2020. Taking Hybridity for Granted: Institutionalization and Hybrid Identification. In Organizational Hybridity: Perspectives, Processes, Promises (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 69), eds., Besharov, Marya L., and Mitzinneck, Bjoern C., 53–72. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfinch, Shaun and Wallis, Joe. 2010. Two Myths of Convergence in Public Management Reform. Public Administration 88: 1099–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2003. Democratic Accountability: The Distinctiveness of the Third Sector. European Journal of Sociology 44(3): 359–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrick, Elizabeth, and Reay, Trish. 2011. Constellations of Institutional Logics: Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists. Work and Occupations 38(3): 372–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1955. Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy. The American Political Science Review 49(2): 496–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Robert. 2003. All the King’s Horses and All the King’s Men: Putting New Zealand’s Public Sector Back Together Again. International Public Management Review 4(2): 41–58.Google Scholar
Hajnal, György, and Rosta, Miklos. 2015. NPM and Post-NPM in the View of European Administrative Elites: Towards Understanding the Relationship of Public Management Reform Doctrines. IRSPM Conference Paper, March 30–April 1, Birmingham.Google Scholar
Halligan, John (2006). The Reassertion of the Centre in a First Generation NPM System. In Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State, ed., Christensen, Tom, and Lægreid, Per, 162–180, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halligan, John. 2007. Reintegrating Government in Third-Generation Reforms of Australia and New Zealand. Public Policy and Administration 22(2): 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076707075899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halligan, John. 2010. Post-NPM Responses to Disaggregation through Coordinating Horizontally and Integrating Governance. In Governance of Public Sector Organizations: Governance and Public Management, eds., Lægreid, Per, and Verhoest, Koen, 235–254. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerschmid, Gerhard, Van de Walle, Steven, Andrews, Rhys, and Mostafa, Ahmed M. S.. 2019. New Public Management Reforms in Europe and Their Effects: Findings from a 20-Country Top Executive Survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences 85(3): 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Yousueng, and Demircioglu, Mehemet A.. 2016. Accountability, Politics, and Power. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, ed. Farazmand, A. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2453-2.Google Scholar
Hart, Paul T., and Uhr, John. 2008. Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2004. Ideas, Interests and Institutions in the Comparative Political Economy of Great Transformations. Review of International Political Economy 11(1): 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, Philip. 2003. Managing Complexity in the Public Services. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Head, Brian W., and Alford, John. 2015. Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration & Society 47(6): 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Sam, and King, Sophie. 2016. Understanding Social Accountability: Politics, Power and Building New Social Contracts. The Journal of Development Studies 52: 1225–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benny, Hjern, and Porter, David O.. 1981. Implementation Structures: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis. Organization Studies 2(3): 211–227.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher. 1991. A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration 69: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher, and Peters, Guy. 2004. The Middle Ageing of New Public Management: Into an Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(3): 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher, and Dixon, Ruth. 2015a. A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher, and Dixon, Ruth. 2015b. What We Have to Show for 30 Years of New Public Management: Higher Costs, More Complaints. Governance 28(3): 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyndman, Noel, and Lapsley, Irvine. 2016. New Public Management: The Story Continues. Financial Accountability & Management 32(4): 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyndman, Noel, and Liguori, Mariannunziata. 2016. Public Sector Reforms: Changing Contours on an NPM Landscape. Financial Accountability and Management 32(1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingrams, Alex, Piotrowski, Suzanne, and Berliner, Daniel. 2020. Learning from Our Mistakes: Public Management Reform and the Hope of Open Government. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3(4): 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jann, Werner W. 2003. State, Administration and Governance in Germany: Competing Traditions and Dominant Narratives. Public Administration 81: 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Robert. 2002. Governance, Governance Failure, Meta-governance. In Participatory Governance in Multi-Level Context: Concepts and Experience, ed., Heinelt, Hubert, 33–58. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candace, Jones, Hesterly, William S., and Borgatti, Stephen P.. 1997. A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review 22(4): 911–945.Google Scholar
Karataş, Adnan. 2019. Post-New Public Management Paradigm and Its Effects on Public Administration. Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal 5(26): 1796–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keast, Robyn, Mandell, Myrna, and Brown, Kerry. 2006. Mixing State, Market, and Network Governance Modes: The Role of Government in “Crowded” Policy Domains. International Journal of Organizational Theory and Behaviour 9(1): 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keast, Robyn, Brown, Kerry, and Mandell, Myrna. 2007. Getting the Right Mix: Unpacking Integration Meanings and Strategies. International Public Management Journal 10(1): 9–33. doi:10.1080/10967490601185716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 1993. Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 2006. Managing Boundaries in American Administration. Public Administration Review 66: 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kickert, Walter. 2011. Distinctiveness of Administrative Reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Common Characteristics of Context, Administrations and Reforms. Public Administration 89: 801–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kickert, Walter J. M., Klijn, Erik-Hans, and Koppenjan, Joop F.M.. 1997. Managing Complex Networks. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Kinder, Tony. 2012. Learning, Innovating and Performance in Post-new Public Management of Locally Delivered Public Services. Public Management Review 14(3): 403–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Klenk, Tanja, and Reiter, Renate. 2019. Post-New Public Management: Reform Ideas and Their Application in the Field of Social Services. International Review of Administrative Sciences 85(1): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, Erik-Hans, and Koppenjan, Joop F. M.. 2000. Public Management and Policy Networks. Public Management 2(2): 135–158.Google Scholar
Klijn, Erik-Hans., and Koppenjan, Joop F. M.. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klijn, Erik-Hans, and Koppenjan, Joop F. M.. 2014. Accountable Networks. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, eds., Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert, and Schillemans, Thomas, 242–257. Oxford: Oxford Academic.Google Scholar
Koliba, Christopher J., Meek, Jack W., and Zia, Asim. 2010. Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Kooiman, Jan. 1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
Kooiman, Jan. 2003. Governing as Governance. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppell, Jonathan G. S. 2005. Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder.” Public Administration Review 65(1): 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppenjan, Joop. 2012. The New Public Governance in Public Service Delivery. The Hague: Eleven.Google Scholar
Joop, Koppenjan, and Koliba, Christopher J.. 2013. Transformations towards New Public Governance: Can the New Paradigm Handle Complexity? International Review of Public Administration 2(18): 1–8.Google Scholar
Krlev, Gorgi, and Anheier, Helmut K.. 2020. Hybridity. Origins and Effects. In The Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Management, eds. Anheier, Helmut K. and Toepler, Stefan. Abingdon: Routledge, Routledge Handbooks Online. See: www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315181011-40.Google Scholar
Krogh, Andreas Hagedorn, Agger, Annika, and Triantafillou, Peter. 2022. Public Governance in Denmark: Meeting the Global Mega-Challenges of the 21st Century? Bingley: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapuente, Victor, and Van de Walle, Steven. 2020. The Effects of New Public Management on the Quality of Public Services. Governance 33: 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seulki, and Ospina, Sonia M.. 2022. A Framework for Assessing Accountability in Collaborative Governance: A Process-Based Approach. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 5(1): 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Roger. 2010. New Public Management: End of an Era? Public Policy and Administration 25(2): 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddle, Joyce. 2018. Public Value Management and New Public Governance: Key Traits, Issues and Developments. In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, eds., Ongaro, Edoardo, and Van Thiel, Sandra, 967–990. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, Evert. 2009. Waiting for the Next Wave: Trajectories, Narratives and Conveying the State of Public Sector Reform. Policy Quarterly 5(1): 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Yihong, and Christensen, Tom. 2022. The Long-Term Development of Crisis Management in China: Continuity, Institutional Punctuations and Reforms. Review of Policy Research 39(3): 282–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. 2008. What is a Neo-Weberian State? Reflections on a Concept and Its Implications. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1(2): 17–30.Google Scholar
Magalhães, António, and Veiga, Amélia. 2018. Narrative of Governance. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, ed., Farazmand, Ali, 1–5. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3136-1.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
March, James, and Olsen, Johan P.. 1996. Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions. Governance 9(3): 247–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1996.tb00242.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Helen, and Dunleavy, Patrick. 2013. The Second Wave of Digital-Era Governance: A Quasi-Paradigm for Government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 371: 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382.Google ScholarPubMed
Massey, Andrew. 2019. Persistent Public Management Reform: An Egregore of Liberal Authoritarianism? Public Money & Management 39(1): 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathias, H., Nielsen, , and Andersen, Niklas. 2022. From Coping to Co-Construction. A New Approach to Studying How Public Officials Shape Hybrid Forms of Governance. ESPAnet Conference Paper, Vienna, September 14–16.Google Scholar
Maynard-Moody, Steven, and Musheno, Michael. 2000. State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 329–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, Renate, and Scharpf, Fritz W. 1975. Policy-Making in the German Federal Bureaucracy. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D. 1999. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, Michael. 2006. Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It. Public Administration Review 66(s1): 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Madeleine. 2012. Starting to Untangle the Web of Cooperation, Coordination, and Collaboration: A Framework for Public Managers. International Journal of Public Administration 35 (6): 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John, and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, David Ernest, Bradley, Lisa, and Keast, Robyn. 2021. NPG and Stewardship Theory: Remedies for NPM Privatization Prescriptions. Public Management Review 23(4): 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, H. Brinton, Jensen, Laura, Roberts, Alasdair et al. 2016. Is Public Management Neglecting the State? Governance 29(3): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and O’Connor, Ruby. 2020. The Importance of Policy Narrative: Effective Government Responses to Covid-19. Policy Design and Practice 3(3): 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Mark H. 1995. Creating Public Value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morse, Ricardo. 2007. Developing Public Leaders in an Age of Collaborative Governance. Leading the Future of the Public Sector Conference Paper, University of Delaware, Newark, May 31–June 2.Google Scholar
Morse, Ricardo S. 2010. Integrative Public Leadership: Catalyzing Collaboration to Create Public Value. The Leadership Quarterly 21(2): 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, Stephanie. 2009. Putting together the Publicness Puzzle: A Framework for Realized Publicness. Public Administration Review 69(5): 889–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Geoff. 2005. Joined-Up Government: Past, Present, and Future. In Joined-Up Government, ed., Bogdanor, Vernon, 175–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard. 2000. “Accountability”: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Public Administration 78(3): 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Catherine. 2015. Public Administration. In The Handbook of Interpretive Political Science, eds., Bevir, Mark and Rhodes, Roderick, 338–351. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newman, Janet E. 2001. Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Flynn, Janine. 2007. From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration 66(3): 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Flynn, Janine. 2009. The Cult of Collaboration in Public Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 68(1): 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongaro, Edoardo. 2009. Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, David, and Gaebler, Ted. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Addison‐Wesley.Google Scholar
Osborne, Stephen P. 2006. The New Public Governance. Public Management Review 8(3): 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Stephen P. 2010. New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Stephen P., and Strokosch, Kirsty. 2022. Participation: Add-on or Core Component of Public Service Delivery? Australian Journal of Public Administration 81: 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ospina, Sonia, and Foldy, Enrica. 2010. Building Bridges from the Margins: The Work of Leadership in Social Change Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(2): 292–307.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1996. Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy and Development. World Development 24(6): 1073–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1972. Polycentricity. Workshop Working Paper Series, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 5–9.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent, and Ostrom, Elinor. 1965. A Behavioral Approach to the Study of Intergovernmental Relations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 359(1): 135–146.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent, and Ostrom, Elinor. 1971. Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration. Public Administration Review 31(2): 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent, and Ostrom, Elinor. 1977. Public goods and public choices. In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance, ed. Savas, Emanuel S., 7–49. Westview Special Studies in Public Systems Management. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent, and Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. Public Goods and Public Choices. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 75–79.Google Scholar
Vincent, Ostrom, Tiebout, Charles M., and Warren, Robert. 1961. The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry. American Political Science Review 55(4): 831–842.Google Scholar
Page, Stephen B. 2010. Integrative Leadership for Collaborative Governance: Civic Engagement in Seattle. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(2): 248–263.Google Scholar
Parks, Roger B., Baker, Paula C., Kiser, Larry et al. 1981. Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal 9(7): 1001–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, 6, Leat, Diana, Seltzer, Kimberly, and Stoker, Gerry. 2002. Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. 2017. What Is So Wicked about Wicked Problems? A Conceptual Analysis and a Research Program. Policy and Society 36(3): 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. Guy., Pierre, Jon, Sørensen, Eva, and Torfing, Jacob. 2022. Bringing Political Science Back into Public Administration Research. Governance Online Version: 1–22.Google Scholar
Pestoff, Victor. 2006. Citizens and Co-production of Welfare Services. Public Management Review 8(4): 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pestoff, Victor. 2012. New Public Governance, Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Crowding in and Crowding Out. In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, eds., Pestoff, Victor, Brandsen, Taco, and Verschuere, Bram, 13–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jon, Pierre, and Guy Peters, B.. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2001. Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies. In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed., Pierson, Paul, 410–456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 1990. Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 1995. Justification by Works or by Faith? Evaluating the New Public Management. Evaluation 1(2): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2003. Joined-up Government: A Survey. Political Studies Review 1: 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, and Bouckaert, Geert. 2004. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, and Bouckaert, Geert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo–Weberian State. 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polzer, Tobias, Meyer, Renate E., Höllerer, Markus A., and Seiwald, Johann. 2016. Institutional Hybridity in Public Sector Reform. In How Institutions Matter! eds., Gehman, Joel, Lounsbury, Michael, and Greenwood, Royston, 69–99, Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Martin, Greener, Ian, Szmigin, Isabelle, Doheny, Shane, and Mills, Nick. 2010. Broadening the Focus of Public Service Consumerism. Public Management Review 12(3): 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Walter W. 1990. Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295–336.Google Scholar
Randma-Liiv, Tiina, and Drechsler, Wolfgang. 2017. Three Decades, Four Phases: Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989–2017. International Journal of Public Sector Management 30(6/7): 595–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinholde, Iveta, Guogis, Arvydas, Smalskys, Vainius, Žičkienė, Skaidrė, and Klimovsky, Daniel. 2020. Considering New Public Governance Possibilities in Central and Eastern Europe. Tiltai 2: 1–15.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Roderick A. W. 2000. The Governance Narrative: Key Findings and Lessons from the Erc’s Whitehall Programme. Public Administration 78(2): 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Roderick A. W. 2019. Public Administration, the Interpretive Turn and Storytelling. In A Research Agenda for Public Administration, ed., Massey, Andrew, 12–27. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Roberts, Alasdair. 2018. The Aims of Public Administration: Reviving the Classical View. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1(1): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Mark. 2015. From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service: Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Singapore: UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M. 2001. The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction. Fordham Journal of Urban Law XXVIII(5): 1611–1674.Google Scholar
Sardoni, Claudio. 2015. Opening the “Black Box” of the State. 19th FMM Conference, Berlin October 22–24.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misinformation and Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 64: 1033–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1973. What Is “Politics.” Political Theory 1(1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1994. Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(1): 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, Florian. 2013. Fighting Corruption with Social Accountability: A Comparative Analysis of Social Accountability Mechanisms’ Potential to Reduce Corruption in Public Administration. Public Administration and Development 33: 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2010. Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth “New Institutionalism.” European Political Science Review 2(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1947. The Study of Entrepreneurship. In Joseph A. The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, ed., Swedberg, Richard, 406–428. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in Sociology of Formal Organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skelcher, Chris. 2012. What Do We Mean When We Talk about “Hybrids” and “Hybridity” in Public Management and Governance? Working Paper, Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Eva. 2006. Metagovernance: The Changing Role of Politicians in Processes of Democratic Governance. The American Review of Public Administration 36(1): 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Eva, and Torfing, Jacob. 2009. Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic through Metagovernance. Public Administration 87: 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Eva, and Torfing, Jacob. 2015. Enhancing Public Innovation through Collaboration, Leadership and New Public Governance. In New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, eds., Nicholls, Alex, Simon, Julie, Gabriel, Madeleine, 145–169. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Eva, and Torfing, Jacob. 2018. Governance on a Bumpy Road from Enfant Terrible to Mature Paradigm. Critical Policy Studies 12(3): 350–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Eva, and Torfing, Jacob. 2021a. Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance? Administrative Sciences 11(4): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Eva, and Torfing, Jacob. 2021b. Radical and Disruptive Answers to Downstream Problems in Collaborative Governance? Public Management Review 23(11): 1590–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddalena, Sorrentino, Sicilia, Mariafrancesca, and Howlett, Michael. 2018. Understanding Co-production as a New Public Governance Tool. Policy and Society 37(3): 277–293.Google Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2006. Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration 36(41): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfagang, and Thelen, Katheleen. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Svara, James H. 1994. Facilitative Leadership in Local Government: Lessons from Successful Mayors and Chairpersons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Thomson, Ann Marie, and Perry, James L.. 2006. Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review 66(s1): 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob, Peters, B. Guy, Pierre, Jon, and Sørensen, Eva. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob, and Ansell, Christopher. 2017. Strengthening Political Leadership and Policy Innovation through the Expansion of Collaborative Forms of Governance. Public Management Review 19: 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob, and Triantafillou, Peter. 2013. What’s in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance as a Political-Administrative System. International Review of Public Administration 18(2): 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob, Bøgh Andersen, Lotte, Greve, Carsten, and Kaudi Klausen, Kurt. 2020. Public Governance Paradigms: Competing and Co-existing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, Ming-Sum, and Cheung, Fernando C. H.. 2004. Gone with the Wind: The Impacts of Managerialism on Human Services. British Journal of Social Work 34: 437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, Steven, and Hammerschmid, Gerhard. 2011. The Impact of the New Public Management: Challenges for Coordination and Cohesion in European Public Sectors. Halduskultuur–Administrative Culture 12(2): 190–209.Google Scholar
van Gestel, Nicolette, Denis, Jean-Louis, Ferlie, Ewan, and McDermott, Aoife M.. 2018. Explaining the Policy Process Underpinning Public Sector Reform: The Role of Ideas, Institutions, and Timing. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1(2): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wart, Montgomery. 2003. Public‐Sector Leadership Theory: An Assessment. Public Administration Review 63(2): 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wart, Montgomery. 2013. Administrative Leadership Theory: A Reassessment after 10 Years. Public Administration 91(3): 521–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenaar, Hendrik. 2011. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E., Sutcliffe, Kathleen M., and Obstfeld, David. 2005. Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science 16(4): 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Jens. 2020. The Evolution of Reform Narratives: A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of German NPM Reforms. Critical Policy Studies 14(1): 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Mark. 2003. In the Shadow of Hierarchy: Meta-Governance, Policy, Reform and Urban Regeneration in the West Midlands. Area 35(1): 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesel, Fredrika, and Modell, Sven. 2014. From New Public Management to New Public Governance? Hybridization and Implications for Public Sector Consumerism. Financial Accountability & Management 30(2): 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, Charles R. 2010. Organizations of the Future: Greater Hybridization Coming. Public Administration Review 70-supplement: 164–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Sarah L., Wiley, Kimberly K., and Searing, Elizabeth A. M.. 2020. “Squandered in Real Time”: How Public Management Theory Underestimated the Public Administration–Politics Dichotomy. The American Review of Public Administration 50(6–7): 480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zouridis, Stavros, and Leijtens, Vera. 2021. Bringing the Law Back in: The Law-Government Nexus in an Era of Network Governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 4(2): 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

New Public Governance as a Hybrid
  • Laura Cataldi, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro
  • Online ISBN: 9781009418904
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

New Public Governance as a Hybrid
  • Laura Cataldi, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro
  • Online ISBN: 9781009418904
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

New Public Governance as a Hybrid
  • Laura Cataldi, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro
  • Online ISBN: 9781009418904
Available formats
×