Aberson, M. 2009. “Le statut des dépôts d’offrandes dans l’Italie du V^e au I^er siècle av. J.-C.”. In Bonnardin, S., Hamon, C., Lauwers, M., and Quilliec, B., eds., Du matériel au spirituel: Réalités archéologiques et historiques des «dépôts» de la Préhistoire à nos jours, Antibes: APDCA. 373–80.Google Scholar

Abrahams, R. 1972. “The Literary Study of the Riddle”. Texas Studies in Literature and Language 14: 177–97.Google Scholar

Accame, M. 2008. Pomponio Leto: Vita e insegnamento. Tivoli: Tored.Google Scholar

Accame, M. 2011. “Note scite nei commenti di Pomponio Leto”. In Modigliani, A. et al., eds., Pomponio Leto tra identità locale e cultura internazionale, Rome: Roma nel Rinascimento. 39–56.Google Scholar

Accardi, A. 2015. Teoria e prassi del beneficium da Cicerone a Seneca. Palermo: Palumbo.Google Scholar

Accardi, A. and Cola, M.. 2010. “Guerra e partnership: Una riflessione sull’ambivalenza di hostis”. I Quaderni del Ramo d’Oro on-line 3: 228–38.Google Scholar

Ackerman, R. 1987. J. G. Frazer: His Life and Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Agar, M. 1994. Language Shock. New York, NY: Morrow.Google Scholar

Agar, M. 2011. “Making Sense of One Other for Another: Ethnography as Translation”. Language & Communication 31: 38–47.Google Scholar

Agustoni, A. 2007. “Perché ai sociologi interessa lo spazio”. In Agustoni, A., Giuntarelli, P., and Veraldi, R., eds., Sociologia dello spazio, dell’ambiente e del territorio, Milan: FrancoAngeli. 22–5.Google Scholar

Aime, M. and Cossetta, A.. 2010. Il dono al tempo di Internet. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Albert-Llorca, M. 1991. L’ordre des choses: Les récits d’origine des animaux et des plantes en Europe. Paris: Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques.Google Scholar

Alcorn, J. 1995. “The Scopes and Aims of Ethnobotany in a Developing World”. In Schultes, R. and von Reis, S., eds., Ethnobotany: Evolution of a Discipline, Portland: Dioscorides. 23–39.Google Scholar

Alexiou, M. 2002. After Antiquity: Greek Language, Myth, and Metaphor. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A. 1964. Early Rome and the Latins. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Allen, J. 2001. Inference from Signs. Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Allen, T. 1912. Homeri Opera. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Amoroso, A. and Barbina, P.. 2003. “L’istituzione delle tribù Claudia e Clustumina nel Latium Vetus: Un esempio di gestione del territorio da parte di Roma nel V secolo a.C.”. Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 104: 19–36.Google Scholar

Ampolo, C. 1980. “Le condizioni materiali della produzione: Agricoltura e paesaggio agrario”. Dialoghi di Archeologia n. s. 2 (1): 15–46.Google Scholar

Ampolo, C. 1984. “Il lusso funerario e la città arcaica”. AION. Sezione di archeologia e storia antica 6: 71–102.Google Scholar

André, J. 1949. Étude sur les termes de couleur dans la langue latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

André, J. 1967. Les noms des oiseaux en Latin. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

André, J. 1985. Les noms de plantes dans la Rome antique. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. 1997. Patrimoines, échanges et prêts d’argent: L’économie romaine. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. 1998. “Cens, évaluation et monnaie dans l’antiquité romaine”. In Aglietta, M. and Orléan, A., eds., La monnaie souveraine, Paris: Odile Jacob. 213–50.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. 1999. Banking and Business in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. 2002. “Twenty Years after Moses I. Finley’s The Ancient Economy”. In Scheidel, W. and von Reden, S., eds., The Ancient Economy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 33–49.Google Scholar

Andreau, J. 2011. “Le III^e s. apr. J.-C.: une époque de transition?” Topoi: Orient-Occident 17 (1): 148–55.Google Scholar

Andrews, K. 2008. “Animal Cognition”. In Zalta, E., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/cognition-animal/.Google Scholar

Antongini, G. and Spini, T.. 1989. “Reiterazione di spazi e segni come conferma del potere: Il regno di Dahomey”. In Cardona, G., ed., La trasmissione del sapere: Aspetti linguistici e antropologici, Rome: Bagatto. 17–34.Google Scholar

Anzidei, A., Sestieri, A. Bietti, and De Santis, A. 1985. Roma e il Lazio dall’età della pietra alla formazione della città: I dati archeologici. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar

Appadurai, A. 1986. “Commodities and the Politics of Value”. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3–63.Google Scholar

Archetti, M. 2002. Lo Spazio ritrovato: Antropologia della contemporaneità. Rome: Meltemi.Google Scholar

Aria, M. and Dei, F., eds. 2008. Culture del dono. Rome: Meltemi.Google Scholar

Arias Abellán, C. 1994. Estructura semántica de los adjectivos de color en los tratadistas latinos de agricultura y parte de la “Enciclopedia” de Plinio. Seville: Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. 2007. Birds in the Ancient World from A to Z. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. 1984. Esiodo: Teogonia. Milan: BUR.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. 1991. “Eoikóta tékna goneûsi: Etica eroica e continuità genealogica nell’epos greco”. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 9: 133–47.Google Scholar

Arthaber, A. 1986. Dizionario comparato di proverbi e modi proverbiali in sette lingue. Milan: Hoepli.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. 1996. “Epicurean Semiotics”. In Manetti, G., ed., Knowledge through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices, Turnhout: Brepols. 155–85.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. 1992. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. and Sices, D.. 1996. Machiavelli and His Friends. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Atran, S. 1985. “Pretheoretical Aspects of Aristotelian Definition and Classification of Animals”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16: 113–63.Google Scholar

Atran, S. 1993. Cognitive Foundations of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Augé, M. 1988. Le dieu objet. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Augé, M. 1992. Non lieux: Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Augé, M. 1995. Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Augé, M. 1998. A Sense for the Other: The Timeliness and Relevance of Anthropology. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augé, M. 1999. An Anthropology for Contemporaneous Worlds. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Augé, M. 2007. Tra i confini: Città, luoghi, integrazioni. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar

Austin, J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Balbo, M. 2010. “La lex Licinia de modo agrorum: Riconsiderazione di un modello storiografico”. Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 138 (3–4): 265–311.Google Scholar

Baldini-Moscadi, L. 1976. “Osservazioni sull’episodio magico del vi libro della ‘Farsaglia’ di Lucano”. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 48 (1/2): 140–99.Google Scholar

Bang, P.F. 2008. The Roman Bazaar. A Comparative Study of Trade and Markets in a Tributary Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baran, N. 1983. “Les caractéristiques essentielles du vocabulaire chromatique latin (aspect général, étapes de développement, sens figurés, valeur stylistique, circulation)”. In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, ii, 29, 1, Berlin: De Gruyter. 321–411.Google Scholar

Baratay, É. 2012. Le point de vue animal: Une autre version de l’histoire. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Barberi, P. 2010. È successo qualcosa alla città: Manuale di antropologia urbana. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar

Barbina, P. et al. 2009. “Il territorio di Fidenae tra v e ii secolo a.C.”. In Jolivet, V., Pavolini, C., Tomei, M. and Volpe, R., eds., Suburbium ii: Il suburbio di Roma dalla fine dell’età monarchica alla nascita del sistema delle ville (v–ii secolo a.C.), Rome: École Française de Rome. 324–45.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 1997. The Poet and the Prince. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A., ed. 2005. Ovidio, Metamorfosi. Milan: Lorenzo Valla.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1988. “Epicurean Signs”. In Annas, J. and Grimm, R., eds., Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 91–134.Google Scholar

Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M., and Schofield, M., eds. 1982. Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barringer, J. 2001. The Hunt in Ancient Greece. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. 1983. “Ad-Hoc Categories”. Memory & Cognition 11: 211–27.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. 1985. “Ideals, Central Tendency, and Frequency of Instantiation as Determinants of Graded Structure in Categories”. Journal of Experimental Psychology 11: 629–54.Google ScholarPubMed

Barth, F. 2002. “An Anthropology of Knowledge”. Current Anthropology 43 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. 1984. “La mort de l’Auteur”. In Le bruissement de la langue, Paris: Seuil. 61–7.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. and Marty, E.. 1980. “Orale/scritto”. In Enciclopedia Einaudi, 8, Turin: Einaudi. 60–86.Google Scholar

Bartolomei, L. 2009. Luoghi del costruire: Qualità ambientale e architettura. Florence: Alinea.Google Scholar

Bartoloni, G., Nizzo, V. and Taloni, M., 2009. “Dall’esibizione al rigore: Analisi dei sepolcreti laziali tra vii e vi sec. a.C.”. In Bonaudo, R., Cerchiai, L., and Pellegrino, C., eds., Tra Etruria, Lazio e Magna Grecia: Indagini sulle necropoli, Paestum: Pandemos. 65–86.Google Scholar

Basso, K. 1976. “‘Wise Words’ of the Western Apache: Metaphor and Semantic Theory”. In K. Basso and N. Selby, eds., Meaning in Anthropology, Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press. 93–121.Google Scholar

Bastide, R. 1973. “Simmetria e sacralità”. In Agazzi, E., ed., La simmetria, Bologna: Il Mulino. 251–65.Google Scholar

Bastien, J.-L. 2007. Le triomphe romain et son utilisation politique à Rome aux trois derniers siècles de la République. Rome: Ecole Française de Rome.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Battaglia, S. 1961. Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar

Bäumerich, H. J. 1964. Über die Bedeutung der Genealogie in der römischen Literatur, Doctoral dissertation, Universität Köln.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, A. I., ed. 2002. Sacrifice in Religious Experience. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bayet, J. 1957. Histoire politique et psychologique de la religion romaine. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Bayet, J. 1971. Croyances et rites dans la Rome antique. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. 2013. “Otium, opulentia and opsis: Setting, Performance and Reception within the Mise-en-scène of the Roman House”. In Harrison, W. and Liapis, V., eds., Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre, Leiden: Brill. 361–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beals, R. and Hoijer, H.. 1965. An Introduction to Anthropology. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Beard, M. 2000. “Gli spazi degli dei, le feste”. In Giardina, A., ed., Storia di Roma dall’antichità a oggi, Bari: Laterza. 35–56.Google Scholar

Beard, M. 2007. The Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beavis, I. C. 1988. Insects and other Invertebrates in Classical Antiquity. Exeter: University of Exeter.Google Scholar

Beccaria, G. 2000. I nomi del mondo: Santi, demoni, folletti e le parole perduti. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Beccaria, G. 2007. Tra le pieghe delle parole. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Belayche, N. 2001. “Partager la table des dieux: L’empereur Julien et les sacrifices”. Revue de l’Histoire des Religions 218 (4): 455–86.Google Scholar

Belayche, N. 2002. “Sacrifice and Theory of Sacrifice during the ‘Pagan Reaction’: Julian the Emperor”. In Baumgarten, A. I, ed., Sacrifice in Religious Experience, Leiden: Brill. 101–26.Google Scholar

Bell, E. 2004. Spectacular Power in the Greek and Roman City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellincioni, M. 1970. Struttura e pensiero del Laelius ciceroniano. Brescia: Paideia.Google Scholar

Beltrami, L. 1997. “I doveri alimentari ‘erga parentes’”. In Raffaelli, R., Danese, R., and Lanciotti, S., eds., Pietas e allattamento filiale: La vicenda l’exemplum l’iconografia, Urbino: Quattro Venti. 73–101.Google Scholar

Beltrami, L. 1998. Il sangue degli antenati: Stirpe, adulterio e figli senza padre nella cultura romana. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar

Beltrami, L. 2008. “Il De clementia di Seneca: Un contributo per l’analisi antropologica del valore della clementia”. In Picone, G., ed., Clementia Caesaris: Modelli etici, parenesi e retorica dell’esilio, Palermo: Palumbo. 11–38.Google Scholar

Benda, J. 1928. Properce ou les amants de Tibur. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar

Benedict, R. 1934. Patterns of Culture. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Benveniste, É. 1948. “Don et échange dans le vocabulaire indo-européen”. Année Sociologique 3 (3): 7–20.Google Scholar

Benveniste, É. 1973. Indo-European Language and Society. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar

Bergamin, M. 2005. Aenigmata Symposii: La fondazione dell’enigmistica come genere poetico. Florence: Galluzzo.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 1995. “Greek Masterpieces and Roman Recreative Fictions”. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 79–120.Google Scholar

Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, B. and Kay, P.. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Berlin, B., Breedlove, D., and Raven, P.. 1973. “General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology”. American Anthropologist 75 (1): 214–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, A. 1991. La traduction et la lettre, ou, L’auberge du lointain. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bermani, C. 2008. Volare al sabba: Una ricerca sulla stregoneria popolare. Rome: DeriveApprodi.Google Scholar

Bernal, M. 1987. Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Berry, C. J. 1994. The Idea of Luxury. A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berthelet, Y. 2015. Gouverner avec les dieux: Autorité, auspices et pouvoir, sous la République romaine et sous Auguste. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Berthiaume, G. 2005. “L’aile ou les mêria: Sur la nourriture carnée des dieux grecs”. In Georgoudi, S., Piettre, R., and Schmidt, F., eds., La cuisine et l’autel: Les sacrifices en questions dans les sociétés de la Méditerranée ancienne, Turnhout: Brepols. 241–50.Google Scholar

Beta, S. 2013. “Jouer avec les mots et les lettres: Les devinettes grecques et latines sur l’écriture”. In Suárez Pascual, M. P., ed., Homo Ludens, Homo Loquens: Le jeu et la parole au Moyen Âge, Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. 323–31.Google Scholar

Beta, S. 2013a. “Oracles and Riddles ambo fratres: Cultural (and Family) Relations between oracula and aenigmata”. In Garcia, J. V. and Ruiz, A., eds., Poetic Language and Religion in Greece and Rome, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 199–206.Google Scholar

Beta, S. 2014. “‘You possess me, you bring me with you, I am a part of you’: A New Byzantine Riddle in the Pal. Gr. 116”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift 107: 37–50.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 1988. “Il divieto fino al sesto grado incluso nel matrimonio romano”. Athenaeum n. s. 66: 69–98.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 1991a. Anthropology and Roman Culture. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 1991b. Verso un’antropologia dell’intreccio e altri studi su Plauto. Urbino: QuattroVenti.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 1996. “A proposito di argumentum”. In Manetti, G., ed., Knowledge through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices, Turnhout: Brepols. 275–94.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 1999a. The Portrait of the Lover. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 1999b. “Le contraddizioni della nudità”. In Fossi, G., ed., Il nudo: Eros, natura, artificio, Florence: Giunti. 9–21.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2005. “Venus venusta: Il corpo femminile fra piacere, filtri amorosi e voglia di perdonare”. In Neri, V., ed., Il corpo e lo sguardo: Tredici studi sulla visualità e la bellezza del corpo nella cultura antica, Bologna: Pàtron. 107–16.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2006. “Un antichissimo presente”. Studi Germanici 44: 303–20.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2007. “Lar familiaris: Un dio semplice”. Lares 73: 533–51.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2008a. Voci: Antropologia sonora del mondo antico. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2008b. “Il mito fra autorità e discredito”. L’immagine riflessa 17: 27–64.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2008c. “Weighty Words, Suspect Speech: Fari in Roman Culture”. Arethusa 41 (2): 313–75.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2009a. Affari di famiglia, la parentela nella letteratura e nella cultura antica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2009b: “Comparare i Romani: Per un’antropologia del mondo antico”. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 103: 1–47.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2010. “Anthropology”. In Barchiesi, M. and Scheidel, W., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 266–80.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2011a. “La ‘volonté de comprendre’”. In Brun, J.-P. and Schnapp, A., eds., L’histoire comme impératif ou la ‘volonté de comprendre’, Naples: Centre Jean Berard. 129–44.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2011b. “Missing Cosmogonies: The Roman Case?” Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 13: 69–92.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2011c. The Ears of Hermes: Communication, Images, and Identity in the Classical World. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2012. Contro le radici: Tradizione, identità, memoria. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2013. Women and Weasels: Mythologies of Birth in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. and Borghini, A.. 1983. “La guerra e lo scambio”. In di Lecce, Gruppo, ed., Linguistica e antropologia, Rome: Bulzoni. 303–12.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. and Franco, C.. 2010. Il mito di Circe. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. and Guidorizzi, G.. 2004. Il mito di Edipo: Immagini e racconti dalla Grecia a oggi. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. and Ricottilli, L.. 1987. “Elogio dell’indiscrezione”. Studi Urbinati 60: 11–27.Google Scholar

Bietenholz, P. G. 1994. Historia and Fabula: Myths and Legends in Historical Thought from Antiquity to the Modern Age. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bird-David, N. 1992a. “Beyond the ‘Original Affluent Society’”. Current Anthropology 33 (1): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird-David, N. 1992b. “Beyond ‘The Hunting and Gathering Mode of Subsistence’: Culture-Sensitive Observations on the Nayaka and Other Modern Hunters-Gatherers”. Man n. s. 27 (1): 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blasi, M. 2007–8. “Il caso controverso degli onori funebri per Publio Valerio Publicola”. Scienze dell’Antichità 14 (2): 1048–66.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. 2002. Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds. New York, NY: Warner Books.Google Scholar

Boas, F. 1929. The Mind of Primitive Man. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Boden, M. 2006. Man as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bodson, L. 1978. Hiera Zôia: Contribution à l’étude de la place de l’animal dans la religion grecque ancienne. Brussels: Académie royale de Belgique.Google Scholar

Bodson, L. 1984. La zoologie antique: Choix de textes grecs et latins. Supplément to Bulletin de l’ARELAB, 21.Google Scholar

Boggioni, V. and Massobrio, L.. 2004. Dizionario dei proverbi: I proverbi italiani organizzati per temi. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar

Boldizzoni, F. 2011. The Poverty of Clio: Resurrecting the Economic History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. 1965. Forms of English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bollack, J. and Judet de la Combe, P.. 1981. L’Agamemnon d’Eschyle: Le texte et ses interprétations. Lille: Publications de l’Université de Lille.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. 1957–8. P. Ovidius Naso, Die Fasten: Kommentar. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. 1969. P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphosen: Kommentar. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Bomgardner, D. 1992. “The Trade in Wild Beasts for Roman Spectacles: A Green Perspective”. Anthropozoologica 16: 161–6.Google Scholar

Bonfante, L. 1989. “Nudity as a Costume in Classical Art”. American Journal of Archaeology 93 (4): 543–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonfantini, M., ed. 2006. Machiavelli: Opere. Milan: Ricciardi.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. 1977. Education in Ancient Rome: From Cato the Elder to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bonnet, C. and Pirenne-Delforge, V.. 2014. “Les dieux et la cité: Représentations des divinités tutélaires entre Grèce et Phénicie”. In Zenzen, N., Hölscher, T., and Trampedach, K., eds., Aneignung und Abgrenzung: Wechselnde Perspektiven auf die Antithese von ‘Ost’ und ‘West’ in der griechischen Antike, Heidelberg: Verlag Antike. 201–18.Google Scholar

Bonomo, G. 1959. Caccia alle streghe: La credenza nelle streghe dal secolo XIII al XIX con particolare riferimento all’Italia. Palermo: Palumbo.Google Scholar

Borgeaud, P. 1994. “Le couple sacré/profane: Genèse et fortune d’un concept ‘opératoire’ en histoire des religions”. Revue de l’histoire des religions 211 (4): 387–418.Google Scholar

Borghini, A. 1990. “Caepa cirrata (Petr. Satyr. lviii 1): una segnalazione”. Aufidus 10: 69–73.Google Scholar

Borghini, A. 1991. “Le sardelle di Numa: Un parallelo ed alcune considerazioni”. Aufidus 13: 45–53.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. 2000. “Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphor”. Cognition 75: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boscherini, S. 2007. “L’erbario di Apuleio e i precetti dei profeti”. Galenos 1: 114–18.Google Scholar

Bottéro, J. 1974. “Symptômes, signes, écritures en Mésopotamie ancienne”. In Vernant, J.-P., ed., Divination et rationalité, Paris: Seuil. 70–197.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 2000. Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique précédé de trois études d’ethnologie kabyle. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bowditch, P. L. 2001. Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, A. and Wilson, A.. 2009. “Quantifying the Roman Economy: Integration, Growth, Decline?” In Bowman, A. and Wilson, A. eds., Quantifying the Roman Economy: Methods and Problems, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3–84.Google Scholar

Bradley, G. 1911. Aids to Writing Latin Prose. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar

Bradley, M. 2009. Colour and Meaning in Ancient Rome. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Breda, N. 1997. “Figure sociali dei saperi naturali: Un percorso fra testi e rappresentazioni dall’etnoscienza all’antropologia dei saperi”. La Ricerca Folklorica 36: 111–31.Google Scholar

Brelich, A. 2007. Il politeismo. Edited by Massenzio, M. and Alessandri, A.. Rome: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. 1998. “‘Religion’, ‘Ritual’ and the Opposition ‘Sacred vs. Profane’. Notes towards a Terminological ‘Genealogy’”. In Graf, F., ed., Ansichten griechischer Rituale, Leipzig: Teubner. 9–32.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. and Erskine, A., eds. 2010. The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. and Horsfall, N. M.. 1987. Roman Myth and Mythography. London: University of London, Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar

Brescia, G. 2012. Anna soror e le altre: Coppie di sorelle nella letteratura latina. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar

Brilliant, R. 1984. Visual Narratives: Storytelling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Brink, C. 2011. Horace On Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Briquel, D. 1992. “Les femmes gladiateurs: Examen du dossier”. Ktéma 17: 47–53.Google Scholar

Briquel, D. 2000. “La leggenda di Romolo e il rituale di fondazione della città”. In Carandini, A. and Cappelli, R., eds., Roma, Romolo, Remo e la fondazione della città, Rome: Quasar. 39–44.Google Scholar

Briquel, D. 2008. “L’espace consacré chez les Etrusques: Réflexions sur le rituel étrusco-romain des fondations de cité”. In Dupré i Raventós, X., Ribichini, S. and Verger, S., eds., Saturnia Tellus: Definizioni dello spazio consacrato in ambiente etrusco, italico, fenicio-punico, iberico e celtico, Rome: Consiglio nazionale delle Ricerche. 27–47.Google Scholar

Brucale, L. and Mocciaro, E.. 2011. “Continuity and Discontinuity in the Semantics of the Latin Preposition Per: A Cognitive Hypothesis”. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung: Language Typology and Universals 64 (2): 148–69.Google Scholar

Brugman, C. 1988. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar

Brugman, C. and Lakoff, G.. 1988. “Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks”. In Cottrell, G., Small, S., and Tanenhaus, M., eds., Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman. 477–508.Google Scholar

Bruneau, P. 1970. Recherches sur les cultes de Délos à l’époque hellénistique et à l’époque impériale. Paris: Boccard.Google Scholar

Brunot, F. 1967. Histoire de la langue française de l’origine à nos jours. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. 1988. “Amicitia in the Late Roman Republic”. In The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 351–81.Google Scholar

Bryson, N., Holly, M., and Moxey, K., eds. 1994. Visual Culture: Images and Interpretation, Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Buccheri, A. 2016. “The Metaphorical Structuring of Kinship in Latin”. In Short, W. M., ed., Embodiment in Latin Semantics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 141–75.Google Scholar

Bücher, K. 1893. Die Entstehung der Volkswirtschaft. Tübingen: Laupp’sche.Google Scholar

Buck, C. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Burke, K. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, K. 1974. The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Burke, P. 1997. “History as Social Memory”. In Varieties of Cultural History, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 43–59.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1993. “Mythos: Begriff, Struktur, Funktion”. In Graf, F., ed., Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: Das Paradigma Roms, Leipzig: Teubner. 9–24.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. 1982. “The Origins of Non-Deductive Inference”. In Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M., and Schofield, M., eds., Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 193–238.Google Scholar

Burton, P. J. 2011. Friendship and Empire: Roman Diplomacy and Imperialism in the Middle Republic (353–146 bc). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caillé, A. 1988. Critique de la raison utilitaire. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Caillé, A. 1994. Don, intérêt, désintéressement. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Caillé, A. 1998. Le tiers paradigme: Anthropologie philosophique du don. Paris: Desclée.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. 2008. “Look Both Ways: Studying Emotion in Ancient Greek”. Critical Quarterly 50 (4): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, D. 2009. “Weeping and Veiling: Grief, Display, and Concealment in Ancient Greek Culture”. In Fögen, T., ed., Tears in the Greco-Roman World, Berlin: De Gruyter. 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, D. 2013. “A Short History of Shudders”. In Chaniotis, A. and Ducrey, P., eds., Unveiling Emotions, vol. 2, Emotions in Greece and Rome: Texts, Images, Material Culture, Stuttgart: Steiner. 85–107.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. 2015. “The Horror and the Pity”. Pyschoanalytical Inquiry 35: 75–94.Google Scholar

Calame, C. 1996. Mythe et histoire dans l’antiquité grecque. Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar

Calame, C. 2000. Poétique des mythes dans la Grèce antique. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Calame, C. 2006. “L’histoire comparée des religions”. In Burger, M. and Calame, C., eds., Comparer les comparatismes, Paris: Edidit. 209–35.Google Scholar

Calame, C. and Lincoln, B.. 2012. Comparer en histoire des religions antiques. Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège.Google Scholar

Caldarini, C. et al. 2009. “Le sepolture repubblicane a Roma: Un tentativo d’interpretazione attraverso l’analisi antropologica”. In Jolivet, V., Pavolini, C., Tomei, M. A. and Volpe, R.., eds., Suburbium, vol. 2, Il suburbio di Roma dalla fine dell’età monarchica alla nascita del sistema delle ville (V–II secolo a.C.), Rome: École Française de Rome. 653–8.Google Scholar

Caldelli, M. 2001. “Amicus/-a nelle iscrizioni di Roma: L’apporto dell’epigrafia al chiarimento di un sentimento sociale”. In Peachin, M., ed., Aspects of Friendship in the Graeco-Roman World, Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology. 21–9.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. L., ed. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cantarella, E. 2003. “Fathers and Sons in Rome”. Classical Weekly 96 (3): 281–98.Google Scholar

Capogrossi Colognesi, L. 1988. “La città e la sua terra”. In Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A., eds., Storia di Roma, vol. 1, Turin: Einaudi. 263–89.Google Scholar

Capogrossi Colognesi, L. 1999. “Spazio privato e spazio pubblico”. In Quilici Gigli, S., ed., La forma della città e del territorio: Esperienze metodologiche e risultati a confronto, Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider. 17–41.Google Scholar

Capogrossi Colognesi, L. 2006. “Curie, centurie ed ‘heredia’”. In Silvestrini, M., Spagnuolo Vigorita, T., and Volpe, G., eds., Studi in onore di Francesco Grelle, Bari: Edipuglia. 41–9.Google Scholar

Capogrossi Colognesi, L. 2011. “Le servitù prediali: Interessi contrastanti e cooperazione tra vicini”. Bullettino dell’Istituto di Diritto Romano ‘Vittorio Scialoja’ 105: 409–19.Google Scholar

Capogrossi Colognesi, L. 2012. Padroni e contadini nell’Italia repubblicana. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar

Capponi, F. 1979. Ornithologia latina. Genua: Istituto di Filologia Classica e Medioevale.Google Scholar

Capponi, F. 1981. “Avifauna e magia”. Latomus 40 (1): 292–301.Google Scholar

Carafa, P. 2000. “Una nuova analisi archeologica per il settore settentrionale del Suburbio di Roma”. Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 101: 186–95.Google Scholar

Carafa, P. 2006. “La fondazione della città”. In Carandini, A., ed., La leggenda di Roma, vol. 1, Milan: Lorenzo Valla. 373–452.Google Scholar

Carandini, A. 2000. “Auspici, auguri e le Rome quadrate”. In Carandini, A. and Cappelli, R., eds., Roma, Romolo, Remo e la fondazione della città, Rome: Quasar. 119–33.Google Scholar

Carandini, A. 2002. Archeologia del mito. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Carandini, A. 2006a. La leggenda di Roma. Milan: Lorenzo Valla.Google Scholar

Carandini, A. 2006b. Remo e Romolo: Dai rioni dei Quiriti alla città dei Romani (775/750 – 700/675 a. C.). Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Carandini, A. 2006c. “La villa dell’Auditorium interpretata”. In Carandini, A., D’Alessio, M. T., and Di Giuseppe, H., eds., La fattoria e la villa dell’Auditorium nel quartiere Flaminio di Roma, Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider. 559–610.Google Scholar

Carandini, A. 2009. “I paesaggi del suburbio”. In Jolivet, V., Pavolini, C., Tomei, M. A. and Volpe, R., eds., Suburbium, vol. 2, Il suburbio di Roma dalla fine dell’età monarchica alla nascita del sistema delle ville (V–II secolo a.C.), Rome: École Française de Rome. 295–310.Google Scholar

Carandini, A., ed. 2012. Atlante di Roma antica. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar

Carandini, A., D’Alessio, M. T., and Di Giuseppe, H., eds. 2006. La fattoria e la villa dell’Auditorium nel quartiere Flaminio di Roma. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar

Carandini, A. and Carafa, P.. 1995. “Palatium e Sacra Via, i”. Bollettino di Archeologia 31–3. Rome: Istituto poligrafico dello Stato.Google Scholar

Carey, J. 1989. Communication as Culture. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carlà, F. and Gori, M., eds. 2014. Gift Giving and the ‘Embedded’ Economy in the Ancient World. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Cartry, M. 1979. “Du village à la brousse ou le retour de la question”. In Izard, M., Smith, P., and Lévi Strauss, C., eds., La fonction symbolique: Essais d’anthropologie, Paris: Gallimard. 265–88.Google Scholar

Casella, M. 2004. “Complessità antropologica della nozione di confine”. In Khanoussi, M., Ruggieri, P., and Vismara, C., eds., L’Africa romana: Ai confini dell’Impero: Contatti, scambi, conflitti, Rome: Carocci. 211–38.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. 1923. Substance and Function; and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. 1925. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, vol. 2: Das mythische Denken. Berlin: B. Cassirer.Google Scholar

Cassola, F. 2000. “Problemi della tradizione orale”. Index 28: 1–34.Google Scholar

Casson, R., ed. 1981. Language, Culture, and Cognition: Anthropological Perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Castetter, E. 1944. “The Domain of Ethnobiology”. The American Naturalist 78: 158–70.Google Scholar

Catalano, P. 1978. “Aspetti spaziali del sistema giuridico romano”. In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, ii, 16, 1, Berlin: De Gruyter. 440–553.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. 1968. Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. 2000. Livy’s Exemplary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaumartin, F.-R. 1985. Le De beneficiis de Sénèque, sa signification philosophique, politique et sociale. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Cherry, D. 2004. “Art History Visual Culture”. Art History 27 (4): 479–93.Google Scholar

Cherubini, L. 2009. “Scilicet illum tetigerat mala manus: Inganni e disinganni delle streghe in Petr. 63”. I Quaderni del Ramo d’Oro on-line 2: 143–55.Google Scholar

Cherubini, L. 2010. Strix: La strega nella cultura romana. Turin: Utet.Google Scholar

Chiabà, M. 2011. Roma e le priscae Latinae coloniae. Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste.Google Scholar

Choay, F. 2006. Pour une anthropologie de l’espace. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Choay, F. 2017. “Cicerone alla ricerca dell’amicizia: dalla domus alla res publica”. In G. Galimberti Biffino, E. Malaspina, G. Vogt-Spira, eds. Was ist ein amicus? Überlegungen zu Konzept und Praxis der amicitia bei Cicero/Che cosa è un amico? Riflessioni sugli aspetti teorici e pratici dell’amicitia in Cicerone. Marburg, 18–19 Mai 2017, Ciceroniana Online, n.s. 1.2. 235–60.Google Scholar

Cifani, G. 2008. Architettura romana arcaica: Edilizia e società tra monarchia e repubblica. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar

Cifani, G. 2009. “Indicazioni sulla proprietà agraria nella Roma arcaica in base all’evidenza archeologica”. In Jolivet, V., Pavolini, C., Tomei, M. A. and Volpe, R., eds., Suburbium, vol. 2, Il suburbio di Roma dalla fine dell’età monarchica alla nascita del sistema delle ville (V–II secolo a.C.), Rome: École Française de Rome. 311–24.Google Scholar

Cifani, G. 2010. “Architettura e paesaggi rurali di età arcaica in area medio tirrenica”. Bollettino di Archeologia on-line 1, vol. spec. A/A1/3: 10–16.Google Scholar

Cipolla, C. 1988. Introduzione allo studio della storia economica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Citroni Marchetti, S. 1991. Plinio il Vecchio e la tradizione del moralismo romano. Pisa: Giardini.Google Scholar

Citroni Marchetti, S. 2004. “I Could Not Love Caesar More: Roman Friendship and the Beginning of the Principate”. CJ 99: 281–99.Google Scholar

Clark, A. 2007. Divine Qualities: Cult and Community in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, J. 2006. Art in the Lives of Ordinary Romans: Visual Representation and Non-Elite Viewers in Italy, 100 b.c.–a.d. 315. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Clément, F. and Kaufmann, L.. 2007. “Paths towards a Naturalistic Approach of Culture”. Intellectica 46 (2): 7–24.Google Scholar

Clemente, G. 1981. “Le leggi sul lusso e la società romana tra III e II secolo a.C.”. In Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A., eds., Società romanae produzione schiavistica, vol. 3, Modelli etici, diritto e trasformazioni sociali, Bari: Laterza. 1–14.Google Scholar

Clemente, P., ed. 1984. I frutti del ramo d’oro: J. G. Frazer e le eredità dell’antropologia. Brescia: Grafo.Google Scholar

Clemente, P., Dei, F., and Simonicca, A.. 2008. “‘I frutti del ramo d’oro’ venticinque anni dopo”. I Quaderni del ramo d’oro on-line 1: 1–12.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, J. 2007. “How Domestic Animals Have Shaped the Development of Human Societies”. In Kalof, L., ed., A Cultural History of Animals in Antiquity, Oxford: Berg. 71–96.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. 1989. “La casa dell’aristocrazia romana secondo Vitruvio”. In Geertman, H. and De Jong, J., eds., Munus non Ingratum, Leiden: Peeters. 178–87.Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost”. Journal of Law & Economics 3: 1–44.Google Scholar

Coccia, M. 1973. Le interpolazioni in Petronio. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar

Cohen, H. and Lefebvre, C.. 2005. Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Colby, B. 1975. “Culture Grammars”. Science 187: 913–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Colby, B. 1996. “Cognitive Anthropology”. In Levinson, D. and Ember, M., eds., Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology, New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co. 209–14.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. 1996. “Ptolemy Philadelphus and the Roman Amphitheater”. In Slater, W., ed., Roman Theatre and Society, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 49–68.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. 2006. Martial: Liber spectaculorum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Colli, G. 1977. La sapienza greca. Milan: Adelphi.Google Scholar

Collins, D. 2003. “Nature, Cause, and Agency in Greek Magic”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 133: 17–49.Google Scholar

Collins, J. 1989. Uncommon Cultures: Popular Culture and Postmodernism. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Colonna, G., ed. 1976. Civiltà del Lazio primitivo. Rome: Multigrafica.Google Scholar

Colonna, G. 1977. “Un aspetto oscuro del Lazio antico. Le tombe del VI–V secolo a.C.”. Parola del Passato 32: 131–65.Google Scholar

Colonna, G. 1988. “I Latini e gli altri popoli del Lazio”. In Italia Omnium Terrarum Alumna, Milan: Scheiwiller-Garzanti. 409–528.Google Scholar

Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, E. 2001. “The Figure of Enigma: Rhetoric, History, Poetry”. Rhetorica 19: 349–78.Google Scholar

Cook, E. 2006. Enigmas and Riddles in Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbino, A. 1994. Il formalismo negoziale nell’esperienza romana. Turin: Giappichelli.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. 1986. “The Value of the Literary Tradition Concerning Archaic Rome”. In Raaflaub, K., ed., Social Struggles in Archaic Rome: New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 52–76.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 b.c.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. 2003. “Coriolanus: Myth, History and Performance”. In Braund, D. and Gill, C., eds., Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome, Exeter: University of Exeter Press. 73–97.Google Scholar

Corsano, M. 1988. Themis: La norma e l’oracolo nella Grecia antica. Lecce: Congedo.Google Scholar

Couloubaritsis, L. 1990. “L’art divinatoire et la question de la verité”. Kernos 3: 113–22.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. 1980. A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal. London: Athlone.Google Scholar

Crahay, R. 1956. La littérature oraculaire chez Hérodote. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Crapis, C. 1988. “Théorie des indices dans la rhétorique latine”. Versus 50/51: 175–97.Google Scholar

Crapis, C. 1990. “Momenti del paradigma semiotico nella cultura latina: Indizio giudiziario e segno divinatorio”. Aufidus 11/12: 141–87.Google Scholar

Crapis, C. 1991. “Momenti del paradigma semiotico nella cultura latina: Segno meteorologico, medico e fisiognomico”. Aufidus 13/14: 55–89.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. 1985. Coinage and Money under the Roman Republic: Italy and the Mediterranean Economy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Cristofani, M., ed. 1990. La grande Roma dei Tarquini. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar

Crocker, J. 1985. Vital Souls: Bororo Cosmology, Natural Symbolism, and Shamanism. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Crook, Z. 2013. “Fictive Giftship and Fictive Friendship in Graeco-Roman Society”. In Satlow, M., ed., The Gift in Antiquity, Oxford: Wiley. 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csapo, E. 1993. “Deep Ambivalence: Notes on a Greek Cockfight”. Phoenix 47: 1–28, 115–24.Google Scholar

Cuomo di Caprio, N. 2007. Ceramica in Archeologia, vol. 2. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar

Curtius, E. 1953. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

D’Alessio, M. T. 2006. “La prima villa e il quartiere servile: Fasi 1–3: La ricostruzione”. In Carandini, A., D’Alessio, M. T., and Di Giuseppe, H., eds., La fattoria e la villa dell’Auditorium nel quartiere Flaminio di Roma, Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider. 141–58.Google Scholar

D’Andrade, R. 1990. “Some Propositions about Relations between Culture and Cognition”. In Stigler, J., Shweder, R., and Herdt, G., eds., Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 65–129.Google Scholar

D’Andrade, R. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

D’Andrade, R. and Strauss, C., eds. 1992. Human Motives and Cultural Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Da Col, G. 2012. “The Poisoner and the Parasite: Cosmoeconomics, Fear, and Hospitality among Dechen Tibetans”. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18 (1): 175–95.Google Scholar

Damon, C., Takács, S. and Potter, D.. 1999. “The Senatus Consultum de Cn. Pisone patre: Text, Translation, Discussion”. American Journal of Philology 120: 1–162.Google Scholar

Danese, R. 1992. “L’anticosmo di Eritto e il capovolgimento dell’inferno virgiliano (Lucano, Phars. 6.333 sgg.)”. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 9 (3): 193–263.Google Scholar

Danesi, M. and Perron, P.. 1999. Analyzing Culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, P. 1993. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Daston, L. and Park, K.. 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar

David, J.-M., ed. 1998. Valeurs et mémoire à Rome: Valère Maxime ou la vertu recomposée. Paris: Boccard.Google Scholar

Davies, M. and Kathirithamby, J.. 1986. Greek Insects. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Davies, P. 1997. “The Politics of Perpetuation: Trajan’s Column and the Art of Commemoration”. American Journal of Archaeology 101 (1): 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, R. 2008. The Modern Invention of Information. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

De Albentiis, E. 1990. La casa dei Romani. Milan: Longanesi.Google Scholar

De Callataÿ, F. 2014. “Long-term Quantification in Ancient History: A Historical Perspective”. In F. De Callataÿ, ed., Quantifying the Greco-Roman Economy and Beyond, Bari: 13–26.Google Scholar

De Fontenay, E. 1998. Le silence des bêtes. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

De Franchis, M. 2008. “Pratiques romaines de l’amitié à la lumière du De amicitia: Laelius et Scipion, Blossius de Cumes et Tiberius Gracchus”. In Galand-Hallyn, P., Laigneau, S., Lévy, C., and Verbaal, W., eds., La société des amis à Rome et dans la littérature médiévale et humaniste: Etudes réunies, Turnhout: Brepols. 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Lacy, E. A. 1938. “Meaning and Methodology in Hellenistic Philosophy”. The Philosophical Review 47: 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Lacy, P. H. and De Lacy, E. A.. 1978. Philodemus: On Method of Inference. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

De Martino, E. 1951. “Angoscia territoriale e riscatto culturale nel mondo Achilpa delle origini”. In Il mondo magico, Turin: Boringhieri. 225–39.Google Scholar

De Martino, E. 1983. Omero quotidiano. Venosa: Osanna.Google Scholar

De Martino, F. 1979. Storia economica di Roma antica, vol. 1. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar

De Martino, F. 1984. “Ancora sulla produzione di cereali in Roma arcaica”. La Parola del Passato 218: 241–63.Google Scholar

De Meo, C. 1983. Lingue tecniche del latino. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar

de Montaigne, M. 1588. Essais. Paris: Abel l’Angelier.Google Scholar

De Passillé, R. 1921. “L’anthropologie economique”. Revue Anthropologique 31: 489–90.Google Scholar

De Sanctis, G. 2007. “Solco, muro, pomerio”. Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome 119 (2): 503–26.Google Scholar

De Sanctis, G. 2012a. La religione a Roma: Luoghi, culti, sacerdoti, dèi. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar

De Sanctis, G. 2012b. “‘Urbigonia’: Sulle tracce di Romolo e del suo aratro”. I Quaderni del Ramo d’Oro on-line Numero Speciale: 105–35.Google Scholar

De Sanctis, G. 2015. La logica del confine: Per un’antropologia dello spazio nel mondo romano. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar

De Saussure, F. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

De Souza, M. 2004. La question de la tripartition des catégories du droit divin dans l’antiquité romaine. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne.Google Scholar

De Tocqueville, A. 1991. Oeuvres, vol. 1, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

De Vaan, M. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. 2003. “The Cultural Construct of the Female Body in Classical Greek Science”. In Golden, M. and Toohey, P., eds., Sex and Difference in Ancient Greece and Rome, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dei, F. 1998. La discesa agli Inferi: James G. Frazer e la cultura del novecento. Lecce: Argo.Google Scholar

DeJohn Anderson, V. 2002. Creatures of Empire: How Domesticated Animals Transformed Early America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Delfino, A. 2014. Forum Iulium. L’area del Foro di Cesare alla luce delle campagne di scavo 2005–2008. Oxford.Google Scholar

Delort, R. 1984. Les animaux ont une histoire. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

DeMello, M. 2012. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human–Animal Studies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Descat, R. and Andreau, J.. 2002. “Histoire économique de l’antiquité”. Historiens & Géographes 378: 129–40.Google Scholar

Descola, P. 2005. Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Destro, A. et al. 2001. Il sacrificio nel giudaismo e nel cristianesimo. Annali di Storia dell’Esegesi 18/1. Bologna: Dehoniane.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. 1981. L’invention de la mythologie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. 1986. “Du polythéisme en général”. Classical Philology 81 (1): 47–55.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. 1989. L’écriture d’Orphée. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. 1990. “Qu’est-ce qu’un site?” In Tracés de fondation, Louvain: Peeters. 1–16.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. 1997. “Expérimenter dans le champ des polythéismes”. Kernos 10: 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detienne, M. 2007. The Greeks and Us. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. 2008. Comparing the Incomparable. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. 2010. L’identité nationale, une énigme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P., eds. 1979. La cuisine du sacrifice en pays grec. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P., eds. 1989. The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P.. 1991. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P.. 2009. Les ruses de l’intelligence: La mètis chez les Grecs. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Devoto, G. 1974. Il linguaggio d’Italia: Storia e strutture linguistiche dalla preistoria ai nostri giorni. Milan: Rizzoli.Google Scholar

Di Donato, R. 2003. “Un mondo mitico”. In Mito e religione in Grecia antica, Rome: Donzelli. 79–97.Google Scholar

Di Fazio, M. 2008. “La trasgressione del survival: Charles G. Leland e l’antica religione etrusca”. In Vencato, M., ed., Ordine e trasgressione: Un’ipotesi interpretativa tra storia e cultura, Rome: Viella. 125–45.Google Scholar

Di Gennaro, F. 1990. “Tomba femminile da Fidenae”. In Cristofani, M., ed., La grande Roma dei Tarquini, Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider. 260–2.Google Scholar

Di Piazza, S. 2011. Congetture e approssimazioni: Forme del sapere in Aristotele. Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar

Diels, H. and Kranz, W.. 1935. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Dikovitskaya, M. 2005. Visual Culture: The Study of the Visual after the Cultural Turn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Diliberto, O. 1984. Studi sulle origini della ‘cura furiosi’. Naples: Jovene.Google Scholar

Diller, H. 1932. “Opsis adelon ta phainomena”. Hermes 67: 14–42.Google Scholar

Dirven, R., Frank, R., and Ilie, C., eds. 2001. Language and Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dixon, S. 1988. The Roman Mother. Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Dobrovol’skiĭ, D. and Piirainen, E.. 2005. Figurative Language: Cross-Cultural and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Dockès, P. 1998. “La nouvelle économie ‘institutionnelle’, l’évolutionnisme et l’historie”. Revue Européenne de Sciences Sociales 36 (110): 77–96.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Dolanski, F. 2008. “Togam virilem sumere: Coming of Age in the Roman World”. In Edmondson, J. and Keith, A., eds., Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 47–70.Google Scholar

Dondin-Payre, M. 2004. “La prise de décision économique privée d’après les biographies”. In Andreau, J., France, J., and Pittia, S., eds., Mentalités et choix économiques des Romains. Bordeaux: Ausonius. 45–70.Google Scholar

Donohue, A. 1997. “The Greek Images of the Gods: Considerations on Terminology and Methodology”. Hephaistos 15: 31–45.Google Scholar

Dorothea, M. 1948. “Cicero and Saint Ambrose on Friendship”. Classical Journal 43 (4): 219–22.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Routledge: London.Google Scholar

Drerup, H. 1980. “Totenmaske und Ahnenbild bei den Römern”. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 87: 81–129.Google Scholar

Drummond, A. 1989. “Rome in the Fifth Century i: The Social and Economic Framework”. In The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., vol. 7, part 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 113–71.Google Scholar

Dubourdieu, A. 1989. Les origines et le développement de culte de Pénates à Rome. Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar

Dubourdieu, A. 2008. “Les référents romains d’autorité dans le Laelius”. In Galand-Hallyn, P., Laigneau, S., Lévy, C., and Verbaal, W., eds., La société des amis à Rome et dans la littérature médiévale et humaniste: Etudes réunies, Turnhout: Brepols. 27–41.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. 1952. The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dufallo, B. 2005. “Words Born and Made: Horace’s Defense of Neologisms and the Cultural Poetics of Latin”. Arethusa 38 (1): 89–101.Google Scholar

Dumézil, G. 1952. Les dieux des Indo-Européens. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Dumézil, G. 1996. Archaic Roman Religion. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Dumont, L. 1983. “Préface”. In K. Polanyi, La grande transformation, Paris: Gallimard. i–xix.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. 1974. The Economy of the Roman Empire: Quantitative Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. 1994. Daily Life in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. 1997. “Recitatio and the Reorganization of the Space of Public Discourse”. In Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A., eds., The Roman Cultural Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 44–59.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. 2000. L’orateur sans visage. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupont, F. 2011. Rome, la ville sans origine. Paris: Le Promeneur.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. and Auvray-Assayas, C., eds. 1998. Images romaines. Paris: Presses de l’École Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. and Vallette-Cagnac, E.. 2005. Façons de parler grec à Rome. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. 1915. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. and Mauss, M.. 1902. “De quelques formes primitives de classification”. Année sociologique 6: 1–72.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. 2000. The Idea of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Easthope, A. 1991. Literary into Cultural Studies. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ebbott, M. 2003. Imagining Illegitimacy in Classical Greek Literature. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1975. Trattato di semiotica generale. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1979. Lector in fabula: La cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1984. Semiotica e filosofia del linguaggio. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1989. “Semiosi naturale e parola nei Promessi sposi”. In Manetti, G., ed., Leggere i promessi sposi, Milan: Bompiani. 1–16.Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1994. Sei passeggiate nei boschi narrativi. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Eden, P. 1963. “Venus and the Cabbage”. Hermes 91 (4): 448–59.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. 1985. Oedipus: The Ancient Legend and Its Latter Analogues. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. 2006. Oedipus. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eidinow, E. 2010. “Patterns of Persecution: ‘Witchcraft’ Trials in Classical Athens”. Past and Present 208 (1): 9–35.Google Scholar

Ekroth, G. 2007. “The Importance of Sacrifice: New Approaches to Old Methods”. Kernos 20: 387–99.Google Scholar

Eliade, M. 1968. Traité d’histoire des religions. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Elkins, J. 1996. “The Cognitive Geometry of Nature: A Contextual Approach”. In Descola, P. and Pálsson, G., eds., Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives, London: Routledge. 103–23.Google Scholar

Elkins, J. 2003. Visual Studies: A Skeptical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Elkins, J., ed. 2010. Visual Cultures. Chicago, IL: Intellect.Google Scholar

Ellen, R. 1979. “Omniscience and Ignorance: Variation in Nuaulu Knowledge, Identification, and Classification of Animals”. Language in Society 8 (2/3): 337–59.Google Scholar

Ellen, R. 1996. “The Cognitive Geometry of Nature: A Contextual Approach”. In Ph. Descola and G. Pálsson, eds., Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives, London: Routledge. 103–23.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 1996. “Image and Ritual: Reflections on the Religious Appreciation of Classical Art”. Classical Quarterly 46 (2): 513–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elsner, J. 2003. “Iconoclasm and the Preservation of Memory”. In Nelson, R. and Olin, M., eds., Monuments and Memory, Made and Unmade, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 209–31.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. and Huskinson, J., eds. 2011. Life, Death and Representation: Some New Work on Roman Sarcophagi. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Empson, R. 2012. “The Dangers of Excess: Accumulating and Dispersing Fortune in Mongolia”. Social Analysis 56 (1): 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. 2000. “On Linguocentrism”. In Pütz, M. and Verspoor, M., eds., Explorations in Linguistic Relativity, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 125–57.Google Scholar

Enright, K. 2012. The Maximum of Wilderness: The Jungle in the American Imagination. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Ernout, A., ed. 1923. Pétrone: Le Satiricon. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Esposito Vulgo Gigante, G. 1996. Vite di Omero. Naples: Giannini.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. 1936. Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. 1965. The Position of Women in Primitive Society and Other Essays in Social Anthropology. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. 1973. “Some Reminiscences and Reflections on Fieldwork”. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 4 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar

Fabbrini, F. 1968. “Res divini iuris”. Novissimo Digesto Italiano 15: 510–65.Google Scholar

Fabietti, U. 2004. Elementi di antropologia culturale. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar

Fabietti, U. 2005. “La costruzione dei confini in antropologia: Pratiche e rappresentazioni”. In Salvatici, S., ed., Confini: Costruzioni, attraversamenti, rappresentazioni, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino. 177–86.Google Scholar

Fabre, D. 1985. “Savoirs naturalistes populaires et projet anthropologique”. In Les savoirs naturalistes populaires, Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme. 15–27.Google Scholar

Fabricius, C. 1972. Galens Exzerpte aus älteren Pharmakologen. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. 1996. Roman Literary Culture. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. 1997. “The Contexts and Occasions of Roman Public Rhetoric”. In Dominik, W., ed., Roman Eloquence, London: Routledge. 111–28.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. 2001. “A Collection of Curses against Kilns”. In Yarbro Collins, A. and Mitchell, M., eds., Antiquity and Humanity: Essays on Ancient Religion and Philosophy, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. 435–49.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. and Naiden, F., eds. 2012. Greek and Roman Animal Sacrifice: Ancient Victims, Modern Observers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farnell, L. 1921. Greek Hero Cults and Ideas of Immortality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fausti, D. 2002. “Malattia e normalità: Il medico ippocratico e l’inferenza dei segni non verbali”. In Thivel, A. and Zucker, A., eds., Le normal et le pathologique dans la Collection hippocratique, Nice: Faculté des Lettres, Arts et Sciences Humaines de Nice-Sophia Atipolis. 229–44.Google Scholar

Fausti, D. 2008. “Il segno e la prognosi nel Corpus Hippocraticum”. I Quaderni del Ramo d’Oro on-line 1: 258–78.Google Scholar

Favro, D. and Johanson, C.. 2010. “Death in Motion: Funeral Processions in the Roman Forum”. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 69 (1): 12–37.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. and Dimundo, R.. 2000. I racconti del Satyricon. Rome: Salerno Editrice.Google Scholar

Fedriani, C. 2014. Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts and Beliefs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. 2010. “Fathers and Sons: The Manlii Torquati and Family Continuity in Catullus and Horace”. In Kraus, C. S, Marincola, J., and Pelling, C., eds., Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 205–23.Google Scholar

Feldman, J. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fernandez, J. 1977. “The Performance of Ritual Metaphor”. In Sapir, J. and Crocker, J., eds., The Social Use of Metaphor, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. 100–31.Google Scholar

Fernandez, J. 1986. Persuasions and Performances: The Play of Tropes in Culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. 2002. Figures of Speech: Men and Maidens in Ancient Greece. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ferro, L. 2006. Intorno a fabula: Ricerca sull’efficacia di una parola screditata, Doctoral dissertation, Università degli Studi di Siena.Google Scholar

Ferro, L. and Monteleone, M.. 2010. Miti romani. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Ferrucci, S. 2011. “Matrimoni, figli, parentela nel mondo greco”. In Eco, U., ed., La grande storia: L’antichità, Milan: Encyclomedia. 263–9.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. 1971. “Verbs of Judging: An Exercise in Semantic Description”. In Fillmore, C. and Langendoen, T., eds., Studies in Linguistic Semantics, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 273–90.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. 1982. “Frame Semantics”. In Linguistic Society of Korea, ed., Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Seoul: Hanshin. 111–38.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding”. Quaderni di Semantica 6 (2): 222–54.Google Scholar

Finley, , , M. I. 1954. The World of Odysseus. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar

Finley, , , M. I. 1973. The Ancient Economy. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I., ed. 1979. The Bücher-Meyer Controversy. New York, NY: Arno Press.Google Scholar

Finnegan, R. 1988. Literacy and Orality: Studies in the Technology of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fiori, R. 1996. Homo sacer: Dinamica politico-costituzionale di una sanzione giuridico-religiosa. Naples: Jovene.Google Scholar

Fiore, B. 1997. “The Theory and Practice of Friendship in Cicero”. In J. Fitzgerald, ed., Greco-Roman Perspectives on Friendship, Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press. 59–76.Google Scholar

Flower, H. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flower, H. 1998. “Rethinking damnatio memoriae: The Case of Cn. Calpurnius Piso Pater in a.d. 20”. Classical Antiquity 17: 155–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fogel, J. 2009. “Can Girls Be Friends? Talking about Gender in Cicero’s de Amicitia”. Classical World 103 (1): 77–87.Google Scholar

Fontenrose, J. 1978. The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forcellini, E. 1965. Lexicon totius Latinitatis. Bologna: Forni.Google Scholar

Fornaro, S., ed. 2004a. C. G. Heyne: Greci barbari. Lecce: Argo.Google Scholar

Fornaro, S. 2004b. I Greci senza lumi. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Forsythe, G. 1999. Livy and Early Rome: A Study in Historical Method and Judgment. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Foss, T. 2012. “Roman Ideas in the Late Republic about Animals: Pervasive Cruelty as Indicated and Propagated in the Bellum Catilinae of Sallust and Interrelating Narrative”. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 102 (3): 95–121.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1966. Les mots et le choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foxhall, L. 1998. “Cargoes of the Heart’s Desire: The Character of Trade in the Archaic Mediterranean World”. In Fisher, N. and van Wees, H., eds., Archaic Greece: New Approaches and New Evidence, London: Duckworth. 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foxhall, L. and Forbes, H.. 1982: “Σιτομετρεία: The Role of Grain as a Staple Food in Classical Antiquity”. Chiron 12: 41–90.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. 1950. Aeschylus: Agamemnon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Frake, C. 1962. “The Ethnographic Study of Cognitive Systems”. In Gladwin, T. and Sturtevant, W. C, eds., Anthropology and Human Behavior, Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington. 72–93.Google Scholar

Franco, C. 2006. “Il verro e il cinghiale: Immagini di caccia e virilità nel mondo greco”. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 4 (1): 5–31.Google Scholar

Franco, C. 2008. “Circe e le belve spettacolari: Nota a Virgilio, Eneide vii. 8–24”. Annali online dell’Università di Ferrara Lettere 3 (2): 54–73.Google Scholar

Franco, C. 2010. “Il mito di Circe”. In Bettini, M. and Franco, C., Il mito di Circe, Turin: Einaudi. 25–380.Google Scholar

Franco, C., ed. 2012. Circe: Variazioni sul mito. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar

Franco, C. 2013. “Circe abbandonata: Filtri romani e dinamiche di genere nell’ellenismo di H.D.”. In Spera, L., ed., Percorsi d’altro genere: Per una riflessione sui canoni storico-letterari, Pisa: Pacini. 45–63.Google Scholar

Franco, C. 2014. Shameless: The Canine and the Feminine in Ancient Greece. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franco, C. 2015. “L’argomento convincente: Gli animali come allievi di physis e come vox naturae nella tradizione greca e romana”. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 13 (2): 185–212.Google Scholar

Franklin, B. 1758. The Way to Wealth. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin & Hall.Google Scholar

Frazer, J. 1906–15. The Golden Bough. 12 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Frazer, J. 1911. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion, part 2: Taboo and the Perils of the Soul. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Frazer, J. 1931. Garnered Sheaves. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1910. Über Psychoanalyse: Fünf Vorlesungen. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar

Friedrich, P. 1989. “Language, Ideology, and Political Economy”. American Anthropologist 91 (2): 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedrich, P. 1991. “Polytropy”. In Fernandez, J., ed., Beyond Metaphor, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 17–55.Google Scholar

Frisk, H. 1960–72. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 1995. Du masque au visage: Aspects de l’identité en Grèce ancienne. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Frye, N. 1963. The Educated Imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Frye, N. 1990. Myth and Metaphor: Selected Essays, 1974–1988. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Fugier, H. 1963. Recherches sur l’expression du sacré dans la langue latine. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Fullerton, M. 1997. “Imitation and Intertextuality in Roman Art”. Journal of Roman Archaeology 10: 427–40.Google Scholar

Fulminante, F. 2014. The Urbanisation of Rome and Latium Vetus: From the Bronze Age to the Archaic Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fustel de Coulanges, N. 1901. The Ancient City. Boston, MA: Lothrop, Lee & Shepard Co.Google Scholar

Galand-Hallyn, P., Laigneau, S., Lévy, C., and Verbaal, W., eds. 2008. La société des amis à Rome et dans la littérature médiévale et humaniste. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, G. 1967. “The Cipus Episode in Ovid’s Metamorphoses”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 98: 181–91.Google Scholar

Garbugino, G. 2004. Enigmi della Historia Apollonii regis Tyrii. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar

García-Jurado, F. 2000. “Las metáforas de la vida cotidiana en latín”. Proceedings of the Congreso internacional de semántica 2: 1571–84.Google Scholar