Book contents
- Working Relationally In and Across Practices
- Working Relationally in and across Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Revealing Relational Work
- Part One Working Relationally in the Professions
- Part Two Working Relationally in Networks
- Part Three Working Relationally in Research
- 13 Research as Relational Agency: Expert Ethnographers and the Cultural Force of Technologies
- 14 When Daycare Professionals’ Values for Transition to School Do Not Align with the Educational Demands from Society and School: A Practice Developing Research Project for Daycare Professionals’ Support to Children’s Transition to School
- 15 Relational Approaches to Knowledge Exchange in Social Science Research
- 16 Designing the Epistemic Architecture for Galaxy Zoo: The Case Study of Relational Expertise in Citizen Science
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
13 - Research as Relational Agency: Expert Ethnographers and the Cultural Force of Technologies
from Part Three - Working Relationally in Research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Working Relationally In and Across Practices
- Working Relationally in and across Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Revealing Relational Work
- Part One Working Relationally in the Professions
- Part Two Working Relationally in Networks
- Part Three Working Relationally in Research
- 13 Research as Relational Agency: Expert Ethnographers and the Cultural Force of Technologies
- 14 When Daycare Professionals’ Values for Transition to School Do Not Align with the Educational Demands from Society and School: A Practice Developing Research Project for Daycare Professionals’ Support to Children’s Transition to School
- 15 Relational Approaches to Knowledge Exchange in Social Science Research
- 16 Designing the Epistemic Architecture for Galaxy Zoo: The Case Study of Relational Expertise in Citizen Science
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Working Relationally in and across PracticesA Cultural-Historical Approach to Collaboration, pp. 229 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Borgmann, A. (2006). Technology as a cultural force: for Alena and Griffin. I: The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 31(3), 351–360.Google Scholar
Chiong, C., Ree, J. & Takeuchi, L. (2012). Print versus e-books. Joan Ganz Cooney quick report. New York: Joan Ganz Cooney Center. Available online at www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/publication/quickreport-print-books-vs-e-books/Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, C. A. (1999). Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derry, J. (2013). Vygotsky, Philosophy and Education. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A, (2005). Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J. & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving Inter-Professional Collaborations: Multi-Agency Working for Children’s Wellbeing. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1999). Communication, discourse and activity. Communication Review, 3, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting activity theory to work: the change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleer, M. (2014). The demands and motives afforded through digital play in early childhood activity settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(2), 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flewitt, R., Messer, D. & Kucirkova, N. (2014). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: the iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy (0), 1–22. Available online at eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3365/1/Flewitt_Messer_Kucirkova_2014_new_directions_for_early_literacy_the_iPad.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hasse, C. (2013). Artefacts that talk: mediating technologies as multistable signs and tools. Subjectivity, 6, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasse, C. & Brok, L. S. (Eds.) (2015). TEKU modellen - Teknologiforståelse i professioner [The TECS-Model – technological liteacy in professional work]. Copenhagen: U Press.Google Scholar
Hedegaard, M. (2009). A cultural-historical theory of children’s development. In Hedegaard, M. & Fleer, M. (Eds.), Studying Children: A Cultural-Historical Approach (pp. 10–29). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Kucirkova, N. (2013). Children’s interactions with iPad books. Frontiers in Psychology (4), 995. Available online at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3871707/Google Scholar
Kuss, D. J. & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Internet gaming addiction: a systematic review of empirical research. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10, 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective types of activity. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 12(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2014). Transformative activist stance for education: inventing the future in moving beyond the status quo. In Corcoran, T. (Ed.), Psychology in Education: Critical Theory~Practice (pp. 181–198). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2005). Computer games as evocative objects: from projective screens to relational artefacts. In Raessens, J. & Goldstein, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Computer Game Studies (pp. 267–279). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency and Design. State College: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (Eds. Cole, M. et al.) (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Tool and sign in the development of the child. In Rieber, R. W. (Ed.), Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky (Scientific Legacy, Volume 6) (pp. 1–68). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. & Hasse, C. (2014). Situating technological literacy in the workplace. In Dakers, J. R. (Ed.), Defining Technological Literacy, 2nd ed. (pp 153–164). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by