Book contents
- Working Relationally In and Across Practices
- Working Relationally in and across Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Revealing Relational Work
- Part One Working Relationally in the Professions
- Part Two Working Relationally in Networks
- Part Three Working Relationally in Research
- 13 Research as Relational Agency: Expert Ethnographers and the Cultural Force of Technologies
- 14 When Daycare Professionals’ Values for Transition to School Do Not Align with the Educational Demands from Society and School: A Practice Developing Research Project for Daycare Professionals’ Support to Children’s Transition to School
- 15 Relational Approaches to Knowledge Exchange in Social Science Research
- 16 Designing the Epistemic Architecture for Galaxy Zoo: The Case Study of Relational Expertise in Citizen Science
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
16 - Designing the Epistemic Architecture for Galaxy Zoo: The Case Study of Relational Expertise in Citizen Science
from Part Three - Working Relationally in Research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Working Relationally In and Across Practices
- Working Relationally in and across Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Revealing Relational Work
- Part One Working Relationally in the Professions
- Part Two Working Relationally in Networks
- Part Three Working Relationally in Research
- 13 Research as Relational Agency: Expert Ethnographers and the Cultural Force of Technologies
- 14 When Daycare Professionals’ Values for Transition to School Do Not Align with the Educational Demands from Society and School: A Practice Developing Research Project for Daycare Professionals’ Support to Children’s Transition to School
- 15 Relational Approaches to Knowledge Exchange in Social Science Research
- 16 Designing the Epistemic Architecture for Galaxy Zoo: The Case Study of Relational Expertise in Citizen Science
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Working Relationally in and across PracticesA Cultural-Historical Approach to Collaboration, pp. 283 - 296Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Beaulieu, A. (2010). Research note: From co-location to co-presence: shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40(3), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, A., ,Scharnhorst, A. & Wouters, P. (2007) Not another case study: a middle-range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of e-science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32, 672–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. (2009). Foreword. In Hey, T., Tansley, S. & Tolle, K. (Eds.), The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery (pp. ix–xv). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32( 2), 235–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Peripheral vision expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5), 779–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatano, G. (1982). Cognitive consequences of practice in culture specific procedural skills. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 15–18.Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2007). Multi-sited ethnography as a middle range methodology for contemporary STS. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32(6), 652–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In Reisnick, L. B., Levine, & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintott, C. & Land, K. (2008). Eyeballing the universe. Physics World, 21, 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Salomon, G. (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions – Psychological and Educational Considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Way, M. J., Scargle, J. D., Ali, K. M. & Srivastava, A. N. (Eds.). (2012). Advances in Machine Learning and Data Mining for Astronomy. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zooniverse. (2013). How the Zooniverse Works: The Domain Model. Available online at blog.zooniverse.org/2013/06/20/how-the-zooniverse-works-the-domain-model/Google Scholar