Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Contents
- Authors’ note
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Who are universities for?
- 1 Towards a university for everyone: some proposals
- 2 Invisible crises: the state of universities in the UK
- 3 ‘It’s not for me’: outsiders in the system
- 4 Education and the shape of a life
- 5 False negatives: on admissions
- 6 The women in Plato’s Academy
- 7 Where do the questions come from?
- Conclusion: The university-without-walls
- Appendix
- Notes
- References
- Index
1 - Towards a university for everyone: some proposals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2023
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Contents
- Authors’ note
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Who are universities for?
- 1 Towards a university for everyone: some proposals
- 2 Invisible crises: the state of universities in the UK
- 3 ‘It’s not for me’: outsiders in the system
- 4 Education and the shape of a life
- 5 False negatives: on admissions
- 6 The women in Plato’s Academy
- 7 Where do the questions come from?
- Conclusion: The university-without-walls
- Appendix
- Notes
- References
- Index
Summary
In her essay ‘Towards a woman-centred university’, Adrienne Rich (1979) notes that she is concerned ‘not with an ideal future, but with some paths towards it’ (p 147). In this chapter, we summarise our proposals, which are made in the same spirit. Most of these suggestions are explored at greater length in the chapters that follow. We say more about funding in this chapter, because it is so central to debates about higher education in the UK at present, but also because it can obscure equally important issues. Our hope, having addressed a funding model here, is to create space for other questions.
There have been a number of attempts recently to think about how we can ‘ensure higher education leaves nobody behind’, as it was articulated in a recent report by UNESCO (2017). Indeed, Penny Jane Burke’s idea of a ‘right’ to higher education (2012) is increasingly becoming a reality:
Ecuador and Greece are constitutionally bound to provide free post-secondary education to all citizens, while Tunisia guarantees free public higher education through a law rather than the constitution (Law No. 19-2008). The constitutions of Brazil, Finland, the Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation guarantee access to higher education based on ability. (UNESCO, 2017, p 4)
UNESCO’s report concludes (p 10) with six proposals for all university systems:
• clear equity targets;
• a legal framework;
• steering and monitoring agencies to enforce regulation;
• a level playing field for admission;
• tuition fees combined with means-tested loans and grants;
• limited student repayments.
Our suggestions draw on this framework, especially in the desire to rethink admissions and limit students’ financial contribution. However, our proposals go beyond UNESCO’s, in order to address challenges that we think will determine the future of higher education over the coming decades, including very rapid changes in the uses of technology and the nature of professional life, as well as growing inequalities. We argue that there should be a redistribution of higher education, in different proportions and at different stages of people’s lives, across the whole adult population. Our hope is thus to think beyond a regulatory framework for ‘access’, since this continues to imply some policing of the borders of the university. In our system, equity would become a central pillar of the pedagogy and practice of institutions, a starting point rather than an afterthought.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Who Are Universities For?Re-Making Higher Education, pp. 21 - 34Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2018