Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:43:30.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Commissions: deliberate deception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Lawrence J. Schneiderman
Affiliation:
University of California
Jeffrey H. Burack
Affiliation:
University of California
Ben Rich
Affiliation:
University of California
Thomasine K. Kushner
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
David C. Thomasma
Affiliation:
Neiswanger Institute of Bioethics and Health Policy, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

CASE

“The chief resident ‘lied’”

In rounds I began to notice that the chief resident occasionally misstated information in order to avoid criticism from the attending. On one occasion I believed patient care and safety were possibly jeopardized when the chief resident “lied” by saying he was unaware of a serious abnormality, even though I knew personally that he had had the knowledge for more than 6 hours. Should I have corrected my superior in rounds? Talked to my superior separately? Talked to other staff? Let it go?

CASE

“A false report”

It was in the morning and my good friend and I were in our third-year clerkship. He very much wanted an honors grade in surgery. He had been busy xeroxing articles related to his preceptor's research project so, as he explained to me, he had not yet checked on his patients. The chief resident arrived and asked my friend if a patient whose temperature had spiked the previous evening was still febrile.

He responded, “No, 99.2.” – a false report and I knew it.

COMMENTARY

“The chief resident ‘lied’”

When I was a medical student, a resident achieved a much-admired reputation for one-upmanship. He simply carried a test tube of blood around in the breast pocket of his white jacket. The hospital was world-renowned for research that made nearly every issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ward Ethics
Dilemmas for Medical Students and Doctors in Training
, pp. 88 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×