Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Classical ideology and the pre-history of singing
- Chapter 2 The medieval period: religion, literacy and control
- Chapter 3 The Italian baroque revolution
- Chapter 4 The development of the modern voice
- Chapter 5 Concerts, choirs and music halls
- Chapter 6 Armstrong to Sinatra: swing and sub–text
- Chapter 7 Early music and the avant-garde: twentieth-century fragmentation
- Chapter 8 Elvis Presley to rap: moments of change since the forties
- Chapter 9 Singing and social processes
- Chapter 10 Towards a theory of vocal style
- Notes
- List of references
- Index
Chapter 10 - Towards a theory of vocal style
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Classical ideology and the pre-history of singing
- Chapter 2 The medieval period: religion, literacy and control
- Chapter 3 The Italian baroque revolution
- Chapter 4 The development of the modern voice
- Chapter 5 Concerts, choirs and music halls
- Chapter 6 Armstrong to Sinatra: swing and sub–text
- Chapter 7 Early music and the avant-garde: twentieth-century fragmentation
- Chapter 8 Elvis Presley to rap: moments of change since the forties
- Chapter 9 Singing and social processes
- Chapter 10 Towards a theory of vocal style
- Notes
- List of references
- Index
Summary
I have hinted that it might be possible to derive a theory of vocal style from the analyses of the previous chapters: various patterns of development have emerged in the history of both classical and pop singing, and similar underlying forces seem to be at work in both fields. A theory would need to take account of how a high-status singing variety relates to those that it dominates, as well as how styles evolve within varieties.
I have occasionally used the term ‘hegemony’ in a very broad way to indicate the authority that one style has over another. Hegemony as formulated by the Italian theorist Antonio Gramsci is a concept which means more than simply ‘dominance’. In his Prison Notebooks he often uses direzione and egemonia interchangeably, the former term being derived from dirigere meaning to direct, lead or rule. Gramsci's use of these terms embraces two central ideas, those of leading and dominating:
a class is dominant in two ways, i.e. ‘leading’ and ‘dominant’. It leads the classes which are its allies, and dominates those which are its enemies. Therefore, even before attaining power a class can (and must) ‘lead’; when it is in power it becomes ‘dominant’, but continues to ‘lead’ as well … there can and must be a ‘political hegemony’ even before the attainment of governmental power, and one should not count solely on the power and material force which such a position gives in order to exercise political leadership or hegemony.
(Gramsci, 1986, p. 107n)- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Vocal AuthoritySinging Style and Ideology, pp. 190 - 199Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1998