Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:43:06.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Transformations of the Western Institutional Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gunther Hellmann
Affiliation:
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main
Benjamin Herborth
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Uses of 'the West'
Security and the Politics of Order
, pp. 229 - 300
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Belgian Modernisation Plan (1999) ‘The Modernisation Plan 2000–2015 of the Belgian Armed Forces’, available at http://www.stratobs.eu/docs/data/documents/files/15.pdf_ (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
BonnettAlastair (2004) The Idea of the West. Culture, Politics and History (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
BuzanBarry (2004) The United States and the Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
BuzanBarry and Hansen, Lene (2009) The Evolution of International Security Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BuzanBarry, Wæver, Ole and de Wilde, Jaap (1998) Security: A New Framework of Analysis (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
ChelottiNicola (2015) ‘A “Diplomatic Republic of Europe”? Explaining Role Conceptions in EU Foreign Policy’, Cooperation and Conflict 50, 2, pp. 190210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czech Republic Military Strategy 2004 available at http://www.army.cz/assets/files/5819/czrms2004.doc, (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
Der Streit der Ideologien und die gemeinsame Sicherheit 1987: Gemeinsames Papier der Grundwertekommission der SPD und der Akademie für Gesellschaftswissenschaften beim ZK der SED, 27. August 1987, available at http://library.fes.de/library/netzquelle/ddr/politik/pdf/verfemte_4.pdf (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
DeutschKarl W., et al. (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area (New York: Greenwood Press).Google Scholar
DobbinsJames et al. (2008) Europe's Role in Nation-Building: From the Balkans to the Congo (Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation).Google Scholar
EU (2008) Presidency Conclusions following the extraordinary European Council meeting, 1 September 2008, Brussels No 12594/2/08 REV2, available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/102545.pdf (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
EU (2010) Press Release following the 3055th and 3056th Meetings of the Council of the European Union, Brussels, 9 December 2010, available at http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/10/st17/st17745.en10.pdf (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer (2014a) ‘Future of Europe’ (Special Eurobarometer Survey No. 413, March 2014), available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_413_en.pdf (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer (2014b) ‘Public Opinion in the European Union’ (Standard Eurobarometer Survey No. 82, Autumn 2014), available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb82/eb82_publ_en.pdf (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
European Security Strategy (2003) ‘A Secure Europe in a Better World’, Brussels: Council of the European Union, 12 December 2003, available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
EvangelistaMatthew (1999) Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
FrankeUlrich (2010) Die NATO nach 1989: Das Rätsel ihres Fortbestandes (Wiesbaden: VS Verlagsgesellschaft).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fund, German Marshall (2008) ‘Transatlantic Trends 2008. Key Findings’, available at http://trends.gmfus.org/files/archived/doc/2008_english_key.pdf (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
GressDavid (1998) From Plato to NATO: The Idea of the West and Its Opponents (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
HellmannGunther (2008) ‘Inevitable Decline versus Predestined Stability: Disciplinary Explanations of the Evolving Transatlantic Order’, in Anderson, Jeffrey, Ikenberry, John G., and Risse, Thomas, eds., The End of the West? Crisis and Change in the Atlantic Order (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 2852.Google Scholar
HerringE. Pendleton (1936) Public Administration and the Public Interest (New York: McGraw-Hill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HoworthJolyon (2014) Security and Defence Policy in the European Union (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HuntingtonSamuel P. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
The Independent Commission (1982) Common Security: A Blueprint for Survival. Report by the Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
JacksonPatrick Th. (2006) Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JahnEgbert, Lemaitre, Pierre, and Wæver, Ole, eds. (1987) European Security: Problems of Research on Non-military Aspects (Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen: Centre of Peace and Conflict Research).Google Scholar
KleinBradley S. (1994) Strategic Studies and World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KingAnthony (2005) ‘Towards a Transnational Europe: The Case of the Armed Forces’, European Journal of Social Theory 8, 3, pp. 321340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KupchanCharles A. (2003) ‘The Rise of Europe, America's Changing Internationalism, and the End of U.S. Primacy’, Political Science Quarterly 118, 2, pp. 205231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MannersIan (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40, 2, pp. 235258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MannersIan (2013) ‘Assessing the Decennial, Reassessing the Global: Understanding European Union Normative Power in Global Politics’, Cooperation and Conflict 48, 2, pp. 304329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MaurerAndreas and Schild, Joachim, eds. (2003) Der Konvent über die Zukunft der Europäischen Union. Synoptische Darstellungen zur Konventsdebatte (7 volumes) (Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik), available at www.swp-berlin.org (29 August 2009).Google Scholar
McCainJohn (2015) ‘Remarks by Senator John McCain to Munich Security Conference’, 8 February 2015, available at http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2015/2/remarks-by-senator-john-mccain-to-munich-security-conference (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
McCallaRobert B. (1996) ‘Nato’s Persistence after the Cold War’, International Organization 50, 3, pp. 445475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MearsheimerJohn J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
MérandFrédéric (2008) European Defence Policy: Beyond the Nation State (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MogheriniFederica (2015a) ‘Remarks at “Call to Europe V: Islam in Europe” Conference’, 24 June 2015, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/statements-eeas/docs/150624islamfepsdeliv.pdf (20 July 2015).Google Scholar
MogheriniFederica (2015b) The European Union in a Changing Global Environment. A More Connected, Contested and Complex World, Brussels, 30 June 2015, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/2015/150627_eu_global_strategy_en.htm (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
MüllerAlbrecht von (1987) ‘Das Konzept der strukturellen Nichtangriffsfähigkeit’, in Binter, Josef and Graf, Wilfried, eds., Modelle alternativer Verteidigung und Sicherheit in Europa (Stadtschlaining: Österreichisches Institut für Friedensforschung und Friedenserziehung), pp. 53100.Google Scholar
NeocleousMark (2006) ‘From Social to National Security: On the Fabrication of Economic Order’, Security Dialogue 37, 3, pp. 363384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netherlands Framework Memorandum (2000) ‘Framework Memorandum for the 2000 Defense White Paper’.Google Scholar
Norheim-MartinsenPer M. (2013) The European Union and Military Force. Governance and Strategy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
NovákyNiklas I. M. (2015) ‘Why So Soft? The European Union in Ukraine’, Contemporary Security Policy, 36, 2, pp. 244266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polish National Security Strategy (2007) ‘National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland’, Warsaw, available at https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/156796/Poland-2007-eng.pdf, (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
PosenBarry (2006) ‘European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity’, Security Studies 15, 2, pp. 149186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RisseThomas (1995) Cooperation among Democracies. The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RisseThomas (1996) ‘Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO’, in Katzenstein, Peter J., ed., The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 357399.Google Scholar
SchimmelfennigFrank (1998) ‘NATO-Enlargement: A Constructivist Explanation’, Security Studies 8, 2–3, pp. 198234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
StuartDouglas T. (2008) Creating the National Security State: A History of the Law That Transformed America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
TojeAsle (2008) America, the EU and Strategic Culture: Renegotiating the Transatlantic Bargain (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK National Security Strategy (2008) ‘The National Security Strategy of the United Kingdom. Security in an Interdependent World’, London: The Stationery Office, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228539/7291.pdf, (19 July 2016).Google Scholar
US National Security Strategy (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
US National Security Strategy (2006) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
US National Security Strategy (2015) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
WæverOle (1995) ‘Securitization and Desecuritization’, in Lipschutz, Ronnie D., ed., On Security (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 4686.Google Scholar
WæverOle (1998) ‘Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European Non-war Community’, in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 69118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WæverOle (2002) ‘Security: A Conceptual History for International Relations’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association in New Orleans, 24–27 March 2002.Google Scholar
WallanderCeleste A. (2000) ‘Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War’, International Organization 54, 4, pp. 705736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WallanderCeleste A. and Keohane, Robert O. (1999) ‘Risk, Threat, and Security Institutions’, in Haftendorn, Helga, Keohane, Robert O., Wallander, Celeste A., eds., Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WaltStephen M. (1990) The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
WaltStephen M. (1997) ‘Why Alliances Endure or Collapse’, Survival 39, 1, pp. 156179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WaltzKenneth N. (1990) Statement, U.S. Congress, Senate, Relations in a Multipolar World, Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, 102nd Congress, 1st Session, 26, 28, and 30 November 1990 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991), pp. 208224.Google Scholar
WaltzKenneth N. (2000) ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security, 25, 1, pp. 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissbuch, (1994) Weißbuch zur Sicherheit der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und zur Lage und Zukunft der Bundeswehr (Bonn: Bundesministerium für Verteidigung).Google Scholar
WendtAlexander (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZielonkaJan (2008) ‘Europe as a Global Actor: Empire by Example?’, International Affairs 84, 3, pp. 471484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ash, Jim (2008) ‘Obama Faces High Hopes but Skeptical Electorate,’ Ithaca Journal (Gannett News Service), 13 November.Google Scholar
BreslauerGeorge W. and Ned Lebow, Richard (2004) ‘Leadership and the End of the Cold War: A Counterfactual Thought Experiment’, in Hermann, Richard K. and Ned Lebow, Richard, eds., Ending the Cold War: Interpretations, Causation, and the Study of International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 161188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BuzanBarry, Wæver, Ole and de Wilde, Jaap (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
ChernoffFred (1991), ‘Ending the Cold War: The Impact of the US Military Buildup on the Soviet Retreat’, International Affairs 67, 1, pp. 111126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welle, Deutsche news analysis (2008) ‘Georgian Army May Be Tough Nut for Russia to Crack’, 8 September.Google Scholar
EnglishRobert D. (2000) Russia and the Idea of the West: Gorbachev, Intellectuals, and the End of the Cold War (New York: Columbia University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ErlangerSteven (2009) ‘The Legacy of 1989 Is Still Up for Debate’, New York Times, 8 November.Google Scholar
EvangelistaMatthew (1993) ‘Internal and External Constraints on Grand Strategy: The Soviet Case’, in Rosecrance, Richard and Stein, Arthur, eds., The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993), pp. 154178.Google Scholar
EvangelistaMatthew (1995) ‘Why Russia Opposes Expansion: NATO Stay Away from My Door’, The Nation, 5 June.Google Scholar
EvangelistaMatthew (1999) Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
EvangelistaMatthew (2008) ‘The Chechen Conflict at 18: Historical and International Perspectives’, in Quaderni di Relazioni Internazionali, no. 8, October.Google Scholar
EvangelistaMatthew (2015a) ‘Explaining the Cold War's End: Process Tracing All the Way Down?’, in Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T., eds., Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
EvangelistaMatthew (2015b) ‘Crisi Ucraina, tra cause e possibili soluzioni’ (The Ukrainian Crisis, between Causes and Possible Solutions), Vita e Pensiero (Milan), no. 1, January-February.Google Scholar
FriedDaniel (2008) ‘Georgia, the US, and the Balance of Power: An Exchange’, New York Review of Books, 23 October 7.Google Scholar
FriedmanGeorge (2008) ‘Georgia and the Balance of Power’, New York Review of Books, 25 September.Google Scholar
GiustiSerena (2009) ‘La sicurezza dall'Atlantico agli Urali secondo la Russia’, ISPI – Policy Brief n. 114, January, http://www.ispionline.it/it/documents/PB_114_2009.pdf.Google Scholar
GoldgeierJames (1999) Not Whether but When: The U.S. Decision to Enlarge NATO (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).Google Scholar
HerrmannRichard K. and Ned Lebow, Richard, eds. (2004) Ending the Cold War: Interpretations, Causation, and the Study of International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HopfTed (2000) Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
ITAR-TASS (2009) ‘Russian Foreign Minister Sums Up Vienna Talks on European Security Pact’, 23 June.Google Scholar
JervisRobert (1995) ‘Legacies of the Cold War’, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 2, 2, pp. 2128.Google Scholar
JervisRobert (2005) American Foreign Policy in a New Era (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
KaiserRobert G. (2004) ‘Gorbachev: “We All Lost Cold War”’, Washington Post, 11 June.Google Scholar
KaplanFred (2008) Daydream Believers: How a Few Grand Ideas Wrecked American Power (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons).Google Scholar
KnopfJeffrey W. (2004) ‘Did Reagan Win the Cold War?’, Strategic Insights, 3, 8 (August).Google Scholar
KoslowskiRey and Kratochwil, Friedrich V (1994) ‘Understanding Change in International Politics: The Soviet Empire's Demise and the International System’, International Organization, 48, 2, pp. 215247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KozyrevAndrei (1993) ‘The New Russia and the Atlantic Alliance,’ NATO Review, no. 1 (February 1993), pp. 36, http://www.nato.int/docu/review/1993/9301-1.htm.Google Scholar
KramerAndrew and Shanker, Thom (2007) ‘Russia Steps Back from Key Arms Treaty’, New York Times, 14 July.Google Scholar
KramerMark (2009) ‘The Myth of a No-NATO-Enlargement Pledge to Russia’, Washington Quarterly, 32, 2, pp. 3961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KuznetsovaEkaterina (2009) ‘Russia No Match for NATO’, Moscow Times, 9 July.Google Scholar
LebowRichard Ned and Gross Stein, Janice (1994) We All Lost the Cold War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
LefflerMelvyn and Legro, Jeffrey, eds. (2008) To Lead the World: American Strategy after the Bush Doctrine (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LewisGeorge N. and Postol, Theodore A. (2007) ‘European Missile Defense: The Technological Basis of Russian Concerns’, Arms Control Today, October.Google Scholar
LieberKeir A. and Alexander, Gerard (2005) ‘Waiting for Balancing: Why the World Is Not Pushing Back’, International Security, 30, 1, pp. 109139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MakarychevAndrey S. (2009) ‘Russia and Its “New Security Architecture” in Europe: A Critical Examination of the Concept’, Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS Working Document No. 310, Brussels, February 2009.Google Scholar
MarkedonovSergey (2009) The Big Caucasus: Consequences of the ‘Five Day War’, Threats, and Political Prospects, Xenophon Paper No, 7, International Centre for Black Sea Studies, Athens, Greece, May.Google Scholar
MarkusJonathan (2014) ‘Ukraine Crisis: Transcript of Leaked Nuland-Pyatt Call’. BBC Europe, 7 February.Google Scholar
MatlockJack F. (2014) ‘Who Is the Bully? The U.S. Has Treated Russia Like a Loser since the End of the Cold War,’ Washington Post, 14 March.Google Scholar
MearsheimerJohn J. (1990) ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, 15, 4, pp. 556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MearsheimerJohn J. (2014) ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West's Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin’, Foreign Affairs (September--October).Google Scholar
MedvedevDmitrii (2008) ‘Vystuplenie na Konferentsii po mirovoi politike’ (Speech to the World Policy Conference), 8 October, Evian, France, http://archive.kremlin.ru/text/appears/2008/10/207422.shtml.Google Scholar
PapeRobert A. (2005) ‘Soft Balancing against the United States’, International Security, 30, 1, pp. 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (2009) ‘US, Georgia Report Progress in First Talks of Strategic Partnership’, 23 June, http://www.rferl.org/content/US_Georgia_Report_Progress_In_First_Talks_Of_Strategic_Partnership/1760513.html.Google Scholar
ReaganRonald (1990) An American Life (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
SafireWilliam (1992) ‘Kozyrev's Wake-up Slap’, New York Times, 17 December.Google Scholar
SchwirtzMichael (2009) ‘Russia Begins War Games Near Georgia’, New York Times, 30 June.Google Scholar
ShankerThom (2009) ‘US to Resume Training Georgian Troops’, New York Times, 13 August.Google Scholar
SnyderJack (1989) ‘International Leverage on Soviet Domestic Change’, World Politics, 42, pp. 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SolovievVladimir (2009) ‘New Security System Having Problems in the OSCE’, Kommersant, 24 June.Google Scholar
SpiegelPeter (2009) ‘Biden Says Weakened Russia Will Bend to US’, Wall Street Journal, 29 July.Google Scholar
TironRoxanna (2009) ‘Missile Defense Shift Redirects Billions in Government Contracts’, The Hill, 20 September.Google Scholar
WaltStephen M. (2015) ‘Why Arming Ukraine Is a Really, Really Bad Idea’, Foreign Policy, 9 February.Google Scholar
WedelJanine (2001) Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

References

BrinkCornelia (2006) ‘Secular Icons: Looking at Photographs from Nazi Concentration Camps’, History & Memory 12, 1, pp. 135150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CampbellDavid (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
CampbellDavid (2002) ‘Atrocity, Memory, Photography: Imagining the Concentration Camps of Bosnia – the Case of ITN versus Living Marxism, Part 1’, Journal of Human Rights 1, 1, pp. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Constantd'Estournelles (1914) ‘Introduction’, in Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment), pp. 119.Google Scholar
EnloeCynthia (2004) ‘Wielding Masculinity Inside Abu Ghraib: Making Feminist Sense of an American Military Scandal’, Asian Journal of Women's Studies 10, 3, pp. 89102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FebvreLucien (1930) ‘Civilisation: Evolution of a Word and a Group of Ideas’, reprinted in Burke, Peter, ed., A New Kind of History: From the Writings of Febvre, (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), pp. 219–57.Google Scholar
HansenLene (2011) ‘Theorizing the Image for Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis’, European Journal of International Relations 17, 1, pp. 5174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HuntingtonSamuel P. (1993) ‘The Clash of Civilizations?’, Foreign Affairs 72, 3, pp. 2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HuntingtonSamuel P. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
HuntingtonSamuel P. (2004) Who Are We? (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
KleinBradley S. (1994) Strategic Studies and World Order: The Global Politics of Deterrence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KleinBradley S.How The West Was One: Representational Politics of NATO’, International Studies Quarterly 34, 3, pp. 311325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MöllerFrank (2007) ‘Photographic Interventions in Post-9/11 Security Policy’, Security Dialogue 38, 2, pp. 179196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TicknerJ. Ann (2002) ‘Feminist Perspectives on 9/11,International Studies Perspectives 3, 4, pp. 333350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TodorovTzvetan (1982) The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other (New York: Harper Perennial).Google Scholar
WalkerR. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. and Neumann, Iver B. (2000) ‘From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia, and the Power of Identity’, Millennium 29, 2, pp. 357387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×