Book contents
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s View
- Part II The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking
- Part III The Use of Economics in International Investment Disputes: Liability and Damages
- Conclusion
- Appendix to the Conclusion
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction
The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: Complex, Contentious but Oh-So-Important for the Sustainability of Trade and Investment Treaties
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
Book contents
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s View
- Part II The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking
- Part III The Use of Economics in International Investment Disputes: Liability and Damages
- Conclusion
- Appendix to the Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (2010) The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Won-Mog, Choi (2003) “Like Products” in International Trade Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaukrodger, D. and Gordon, K. (2012) “Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A Scoping Paper for the Investment Policy Community”, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2012/03, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k46b1r85j6f-en.Google Scholar
Melischek, Christian A. (2013) The Relevant Market in International Economic Law: A Comparative Antitrus and GATT Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2013) “The Use, Non-use and Abuse of Economics” in Stirnimann, Franz X., Romanetti, Antoine and Huerta-Goldman, Jorge A. (Eds.), WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2014) “The Re-Convergence of International Trade and Investment Law: Causes, Questions, and Reform” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), Vol. 108 (April 2014), pp. 255–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietje, Christian, Baetens, Freya, Valkanou, Theodora N. and Ecorys, (2014), “The Impact of Investor-State-Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership”, a study prepared for the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Netherlands.Google Scholar