Bibliography

Michael P. Fix; Benjamin J. Kassow

doi:10.1017/9781108891141.009

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 August 2020

Michael P. Fix and

Benjamin J. Kassow

Show author details

Michael P. Fix: Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Benjamin J. Kassow: Affiliation:
University of North Dakota

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts , pp. 169 - 178

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891141.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Matthew D. 2001. “State Sovereignty and the Anti-commandeering Cases.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 574(1): 158–172.Google Scholar

Almand, Bond. 1943. “The Supreme Court of Georgia: An Account of Its Delayed Birth.” Georgia Bar Journal 6: 95.Google Scholar

Alvarez, R Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 56–96.Google Scholar

Banks, Christopher P. 1991. “The Supreme Court and Precedent: An Analysis of Natural Courts and Reversal Trends.” Judicature 75(5): 262–268.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 1978. “Lower-Court Response to Supreme Court Decisions: Reconsidering a Negative Picture.” Justice System Journal 3(3): 208–219.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 2009. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Beatty, Jerry K. 1971. “State Court Evasion of United States Supreme Court Mandates during the Last Decade of the Warren Court.” Valparaiso University Law Review 6(3): 260–285.Google Scholar

Benesh, Sara C, and Martinek, Wendy L. 2002. “State Supreme Court Decision Making in Confession Cases.” Justice System Journal 23(1): 109–133.Google Scholar

Benesh, Sara C, and Reddick, Malia. 2002. “Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent.” Journal of Politics 64(2): 534–550.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berry, William D, Ringquist, Evan J, Fording, Richard C, and Hanson, Russell L. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science 23(1): 327–348.Google Scholar

Berry, William D, Fording, Richard C, Ringquist, Evan J, Hanson, Russell L, and Klamer, Carl E. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10(2): 117–135.Google Scholar

Bierce, Ambrose. [1911] 2015. The Devil’s Dictionary. Project Gutenberg eBook. www.gutenberg.org/files/972/972-h/972-h.htm Google Scholar

Black, Ryan C, and Spriggs, James F. 2013. “The Citation and Depreciation of US Supreme Court Precedent.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10(2): 325–358.Google Scholar

Black, Ryan C, Owens, Ryan J, Wedeking, Justin, and Wohlfarth, Patrick C. 2016. US Supreme Court Opinions and Their Audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blume, John H, Johnson, Sheri Lynn, Marcus, Paul, and Paavola, Emily. 2014. “A Tale of Two (and Possibly Three) Atkins: Intellectual Disability and Capital Punishment Twelve Years after the Supreme Court’s Creation of a Categorical Bar.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 23(2): 393–414.Google Scholar

Bonneau, Chris W, and Cann, Damon M. 2015. Voters’ Verdicts: Citizens, Campaigns, and Institutions in State Supreme Court Elections. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Bonneau, Chris W, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2003. “Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections: Context and the Politics of Institutional Design.” Political Research Quarterly 56(3): 337–349.Google Scholar

Bonneau, Chris W, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Boyd, Christina L, and Spriggs, James F. 2009. “An Examination of Strategic Anticipation of Appellate Court Preferences by Federal District Court Judges.” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 29(1): 37–82.Google Scholar

Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 360–372.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1990. “Neo-institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 52(1): 54–70.Google Scholar

Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1993. “Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent.” Journal of Politics 55(4): 914–935.Google Scholar

Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1995. “Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 48(1): 5–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brace, Paul R, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 59(4): 1206–1231.Google Scholar

Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “‘Haves’ versus ‘Have Nots’ in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric Cases.” Law & Society Review 35(2): 393–417.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” Journal of Politics 59(4): 387–413.Google Scholar

Braman, Eileen. 2009. Law, Politics, and Perception: How Policy Preferences Influence Legal Reasoning. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Braman, Eileen. 2012. “Embracing Complexity in Law Courts: A Psychological Approach.” Law & Courts Newsletter 22(3): 18–23.Google Scholar

Jr, Brennan, William, J. 1977. “State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights.” Harvard Law Review 90(3): 489–504.Google Scholar

Brunner, Heinrich. 1907. “The Sources of English Law.” In Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 2, ed. Committee of the Association of American Law Schools, 7–52. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan, and Stephenson, Matthew. 2002. “Informative Precedent and Intrajudicial Communication.” American Political Science Review 96(4): 755–766.Google Scholar

Caldarone, Richard P, Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Clark, Tom S. 2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” Journal of Politics 71(2): 560–573.Google Scholar

Caminker, Evan H. 1994. “Why Must Inferior Courts Obey Superior Court Precedents?” Stanford Law Review 46(4): 817–873.CrossRef Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Clark, Tom S, and Kelly, Jason P. 2014. “Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions.” American Political Science Review 108(1): 23–39.Google Scholar

Canon, Bradley C. 1973. “Reactions of State Supreme Courts to a US Supreme Court Civil Liberties Decision.” Law & Society Review 8(1): 109–134.CrossRef Google Scholar

Canon, Bradley C, and Johnson, Charles A. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Canon, Bradley C, and Kolson, Kenneth. 1970. “Rural Compliance with Gault: Kentucky, a Case Study.” Journal of Family Law 10(3): 300–326.Google Scholar

Choper, Jesse H. 2002. “The Endorsement Test: Its Status and Desirability.” Journal of Law & Politics 18(2): 499–536.Google Scholar

Collins, Todd A, and Cooper, Christopher A. 2012. “Case Salience and Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decisions: Toward a New Measure.” Political Research Quarterly 65(2): 396–407.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collins, Todd A, and Cooper, Christopher A. 2016. “The Case Salience Index, Public Opinion, and Decision Making on the US Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 37(3): 232–245.Google Scholar

Comparato, Scott A, and McClurg, Scott D. 2007. “A Neo-institutional Explanation of State Supreme Court Responses in Search and Seizure Cases.” American Politics Research 35(5): 726–754.Google Scholar

Corley, Pamela C. 2009. “Uncertain Precedent: Circuit Court Responses to Supreme Court Plurality Opinions.” American Politics Research 37(1): 30–49.Google Scholar

Corwin, Edward S. 1949. “The Supreme Court as National School Board.” Law & Contemporary Problems 14(1): 3–22.Google Scholar

Curry, Todd A, and Fix, Michael P. 2019. “May It Please the Twitterverse: The Use of Twitter by State High Court Judges.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 16(4): 379–393.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6(2): 279–297.Google Scholar

Dear, Jake, and Jessen, Edward W.. 2007. “‘Followed Rates’ and Leading State Cases, 1940–2005.” UC Davis Law Review 41: 683–711.Google Scholar

Dow, Jay K, and Endersby, James W. 2004. “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research.” Electoral Studies 23(1): 107–122.Google Scholar

Drakeman, Donald L. 2004. “Reynolds v. United States: The Historical Construction of Constitutional Reality.” Constitutional Commentary 21(3): 697–726.Google Scholar

Lee, Epstein, and Segal, Jeffrey A. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 66–83.Google Scholar

Ewing, James. 1805. A Treatise on the Office and Duty of a Justice of the Peace, Sheriff, Coroner, Constable, and of Executors, Administrators, and Guardians: In which Is Particularly Laid Down, the Rules for Conducting an Action in the Court for the Trial of Small Causes. Printed, for the author, by James Oram.Google Scholar

Feeley, Malcolm M. 1992. “Hollow Hopes, Flypaper, and Metaphors.” Law & Social Inquiry 17(4): 745–760.Google Scholar

Feldman, Noah. 2002. “The Intellectual Origins of the Establishment Clause.” New York University Law Review 77(2): 346–428.Google Scholar

Fix, Michael P. 2014. “Does Deference Depend on Distinction? Issue Salience and Judicial Decision-Making in Administrative Law Cases.” Justice System Journal 35(2): 122–138.Google Scholar

Fix, Michael P. 2016a. “The Evolution of Obscenity Standards in the Common Law World.” Journal of Comparative Law 11(2): 75–99.Google Scholar

Fix, Michael P. 2016b. “A Universal Standard for Obscenity? The Importance of Context and Other Considerations.” Justice System Journal 37(1): 72–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fix, Michael P. 2018. “Understanding the Mechanisms Driving the Evolution of Obscenity Law in Five Common Law Countries.” Journal of Comparative Law 13(2): 147–163.Google Scholar

Fix, Michael P, Kingsland, Justin T, and Montgomery, Matthew D. 2017. “The Complexities of State Court Compliance with US Supreme Court Precedent.” Justice System Journal 38(2): 149–163.Google Scholar

Fountaine, Cynthia L. 1998. “Article III and the Adequate and Independent State Grounds Doctrine.” American University Law Review 48(5): 1053–1100.Google Scholar

Frank, Jerome. 1945. “The Cult of the Robe.” Saturday Review of Literature 28: 12–13.Google Scholar

Frost, Amanda. 2015. “Inferiority Complex: Should State Courts Follow Lower Federal Court Precedent on the Meaning of Federal Law.” Vanderbilt Law Review 68(1): 53–103.Google Scholar

Gerhardt, Michael J. 2005. “Super Precedent.” Minnesota Law Review 90(5): 1204–1231.Google Scholar

Gerhardt, Michael J. 2011. The Power of Precedent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gey, Steven G. 2006. “Reconciling the Supreme Court’s Four Establishment Clauses.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 8(4): 725–800.Google Scholar

Gibson, James L, and Nelson, Michael J. 2017. “Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles Do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping US Supreme Court Legitimacy?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14(3): 592–617.Google Scholar

Gillman, Howard, and Clayton, Cornell W. 1999. “Beyond Judicial Attitudes: Institutional Approaches to Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Cornell W Clayton and Howard Gillman, 1–12. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goelzhauser, Greg. 2016. Choosing State Supreme Court Justices: Merit Selection and the Consequences of Institutional Reform. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Goodhart, Arthur L. 1930. “Case Law in England and America.” Cornell Law Quarterly 15(2): 173–193.Google Scholar

Hall, Matthew EK. 2010. The Nature of Supreme Court Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Matthew EK. 2014. “The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the US Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 352–366.Google Scholar

Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” Journal of Politics 49(4): 1117–1124.Google Scholar

Hall, Melinda Gann. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly 23(4): 485–503.Google Scholar

Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95(2): 315–330.Google Scholar

Hall, Melinda Gann. 2014. “Representation in State Supreme Courts: Evidence from the Terminal Term.” Political Research Quarterly 67(2): 335–346.Google Scholar

Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1989. “Order in the Courts: A Neo-institutional Approach to Judicial Consensus.” Western Political Quarterly 42(3): 391–407.Google Scholar

Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1992. “Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly 20(2): 147–168.Google Scholar

Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1994. “The Vicissitudes of Death by Decree: Forces Influencing Capital Punishment Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly 75(1): 136–155.Google Scholar

Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1996. “Justices’ Responses to Case Facts: An Interactive Model.” American Politics Quarterly 24(2): 237–261.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Charles V. 1973. The Bench and the Ballot: Southern Federal Judges and Black Voters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hansford, Thomas G, and Spriggs, James F. 2006. The Politics of Precedent on the US Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hansford, Thomas G, Spriggs, James F, and Stenger, Anthony A. 2013. “The Information Dynamics of Vertical Stare Decisis.” Journal of Politics 75(4): 894–906.Google Scholar

Healy, Thomas. 2001. “Stare Decisis as a Constitutional Requirement.” West Virginia Law Review 104(1): 43–121.Google Scholar

Hildreth, Richard. 1854. Despotism in America: An Inquiry into the Nature, Results, and Legal Basis of the Slave-Holding System. Boston, MA: J. P. Jewett.Google Scholar

Hinkle, Rachael K. 2015. “Legal Constraint in the US Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Politics 77(3): 721–735.Google Scholar

Hinkle, Rachael K, and Nelson, Michael J. 2016. “The Transmission of Legal Precedent among State Supreme Courts in the Twenty-First Century.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16(4): 391–410.Google Scholar

Hitt, Matthew P. 2016. “Measuring Precedent in a Judicial Hierarchy.” Law & Society Review 50(1): 57–81.Google Scholar

Hitt, Matthew P. 2019. Inconsistency and Indecision in the United States Supreme Court. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Valerie. 2005. “Competing Constraints: State Court Responses to Supreme Court Decisions and Legislation on Wages and Hours.” Political Research Quarterly 58(2): 317–328.Google Scholar

Holdsworth, William Searle. 1907. “The Year Books.” In Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 2, ed. Committee of the Association of American Law Schools, 96–122. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Hughes, David A. 2020 “Does Local Journalism Stimulate Voter Participation in State Supreme Court Elections?” Journal of Law and Courts 8(1): 95–126.Google Scholar

Jacobi, Tonja, and Tiller, Emerson H. 2007. “Legal Doctrine and Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23(2): 326–345.Google Scholar

Johnson, Charles A. 1979. “Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions: A Quantitative Examination.” American Journal of Political Science 23(4): 792–804.CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, Charles A. 1987. “Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making: Lower Federal Court Uses of Supreme Court Decisions.” Law & Society Review 21(2): 325–340.Google Scholar

Joyce, Craig. 1985. “The Rise of the Supreme Court Reporter: An Institutional Perspective on Marshall Court Ascendancy.” Michigan Law Review 83(5): 1291–1391.Google Scholar

Kassow, Benjamin, Songer, Donald R, and Fix, Michael P. 2012. “The Influence of Precedent on State Supreme Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 65(2): 372–384.Google Scholar

Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2018. “How Courts Structure State-Level Representation.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 18(1): 27–60.Google Scholar

Kempin, Frederick G. 1959. “Precedent and Stare Decisis: The Critical Years, 1800 to 1850.” American Journal of Legal History 3(1): 28–54.Google Scholar

Klein, David E. 2002. Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kropko, Jonathan. 2007. “Choosing between Multinomial Logit and Multinomial Probit Models for Analysis of Unordered Choice Data.” PhD diss. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Kurland, Philip B. 1979. “The Irrelevance of the Constitution: The Religion Clauses of the First Amendment and the Supreme Court.” Villanova Law Review 24(1): 3–27.Google Scholar

Kurland, Philip B. 1985. “The Origins of the Religion Clauses of the Constitution.” William and Mary Law Review 27(5): 839–862.Google Scholar

Landes, William M, and Posner, Richard A. 1976. “Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Law and Economics 19(2): 249–307.CrossRef Google Scholar

Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Leach, W Barton. 1967. “Revisionism in the House of Lords: The Bastion of Rigid Stare Decisis Falls.” Harvard Law Review 80(4): 797–803.Google Scholar

Lee, Thomas R. 1999. “Stare Decisis in Historical Perspective: From the Founding Era to the Rehnquist Court.” Vanderbilt Law Review 52(3): 645–735.Google Scholar

Leonard, Meghan E. 2016. “State Legislatures, State High Courts, and Judicial Independence: An Examination of Court-Curbing Legislation in the States.” Justice System Journal 37(1): 53–62.Google Scholar

Levy, Leonard W. 2017. The Establishment Clause: Religion and the First Amendment. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, James M, and Vild, Michael L. 1989. “Controversial Twist of Lemon: The Endorsement Test as the New Establishment Clause Standard.” Notre Dame Law Review 65(4): 671–698.Google Scholar

Lewis, T Ellis. 1930a. “The History of Judicial Precedent I.” Law Quarterly Review 46(2): 207–224.Google Scholar

Lewis, T Ellis. 1930b. “The History of Judicial Precedent II.” Law Quarterly Review 46(3): 341–360.Google Scholar

Lewis, T Ellis. 1931. “The History of Judicial Precedent III.” Law Quarterly Review 47(3): 411–427.Google Scholar

Lewis, T Ellis. 1932. “The History of Judicial Precedent IV.” Law Quarterly Review 48(2): 230–246.Google Scholar

Maitland, Frederic William. 1907. “Materials for the History of English Law.” In Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 2, ed. Committee of the Association of American Law Schools, 53–96. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Mangels, Aurelie T. 2017. “Should Individuals with Severe Mental Illness Continue to be Eligible for the Death Penalty?” Criminal Justice 32(3): 9–14.Google Scholar

Manwaring, David R. 1968. “The Impact of Mapp v. Ohio.” In The Supreme Court as a Policy Maker, ed. David Everson. Carbondale, IL: Public Affairs Bureau of Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar

Martin, Francois Xavier. 1792. A Collection of Statutes of the Parliament of England in Force in the State of North Carolina. New Bern: Editor’s Press.Google Scholar

Masood, Ali S, and Lineberger, Monica E. in press. “United Kingdom, United Courts? Hierarchical Interactions and Attention to Precedent in the British Judiciary.” Political Research Quarterly: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919853368.Google Scholar

Masood, Ali S, Kassow, Benjamin J, and Songer, Donald R. 2017. “Supreme Court Precedent in a Judicial Hierarchy.” American Politics Research 45(3): 403–434.Google Scholar

McCann, Michael W. 1992. “Reform Litigation on Trial.” Law & Social Inquiry 17(4): 715–743.Google Scholar

McConnell, Michael W. 1992. “Religious Participation in Public Programs – Religious Freedom at a Crossroads.” University of Chicago Law Review 59(1): 115–194.Google Scholar

McConnell, Michael W. 1997. “Stuck with a Lemon.” ABA Journal 83(2): 46–47.Google Scholar

McKenzie, Mark Jonathan, and Unger, Michael A. 2011. “‘New Style’ Campaigning, Citizen Knowledge, and Sources of Legitimacy for State Courts: A Case Study in Texas.” Politics & Policy 39(5): 813–834.Google Scholar

Merryman, John Henry. 1953. “The Authority of Authority: What the California Supreme Court Cited in 1950.” Stanford Law Review 6(4): 613–673.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. 1959. “Lower Court Checks on Supreme Court Power.” American Political Science Review 53(4): 1017–1031.Google Scholar

Nelson, Caleb. 2001. “Stare Decisis and Demonstrably Erroneous Precedents.” Virginia Law Review 87(1): 1–84.Google Scholar

Jr, Pacelle, Richard, L, and Baum, Lawrence. 1992. “Supreme Court Authority in the Judiciary: A Study of Remands.” American Politics Quarterly 20(2): 169–191.Google Scholar

Parker, Tom. 2006. “Alabama Justices Surrender to Judicial Activism.” Birmingham News, January 1.Google Scholar

Paulsen, Michael A. 1986. “Religion, Equality, and the Constitution: An Equal Protection Approach to Establishment Clause Adjudication.” Notre Dame Law Review 61(3): 311–371.Google Scholar

Paulsen, Michael Stokes. 1992. “Lemon Is Dead.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 43(3): 795–864.Google Scholar

Paulsen, Michael Stokes. 2007. “Does the Supreme Court’s Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis Require Adherence to the Supreme Court’s Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis.” North Carolina Law Review 86(5): 1165–1212.Google Scholar

Peltason, Jack Walter. 1971. Fifty-Eight Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Plouffe, William C., Jr. 2000. “‘A Federal Court Holds the Second Amendment Is an Fundamental Right: Jeffersonian Utopia or Apocalypse Now.” University of Memphis Law Review 30(1): 55–130.Google Scholar

Plucknett, Theodore Frank Thomas. 1929. A Concise History of the Common Law. Rochester, NY: Lawyers’ Cooperative Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Plucknett, Theodore Frank Thomas. 1932. “The Place of the Legal Professions in the History of English Law.” Law Quarterly Review 48(3): 328–340.Google Scholar

Pongrace, Paul Earl III. 1993. “Justice Kennedy and the Establishment Clause: The Supreme Court Tries the Coercion Test.” University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy 6(2): 217–230.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2008. “How Judges Think.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Marilyn, and Norris, Donna M. 2008. “National Instant Criminal Background Check Improvement Act: Implications for Persons with Mental Illness.” Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 36(1): 123–130.Google Scholar

Reinsch, Paul Samuel. 1907. “The English Common Law in the Early American Colonies.” In Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 1, ed. Committee of the Association of American Law Schools, 367–415. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Richardson, Henry Gerald. 1922. “Year Books and Plea Rolls as Sources of Historical Information.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 5: 28–70.Google Scholar

Robinson, Rob. 2013. “Punctuated Equilibrium and the Supreme Court.” Policy Studies Journal 41(4): 654–681.Google Scholar

Romano, Michael K, and Curry, Todd A. 2019. Creating the Law: State Supreme Court Opinions and the Effect of Audiences. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Romans, Neil T. 1974. “The Role of State Supreme Courts in Judicial Policy Making: Escobedo, Miranda and the Use of Judicial Impact Analysis.” Western Political Quarterly 27(1): 38–59.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ruben, Eric M., and Cornell, Saul. 2015. “Firearm Regionalism and Public Carry: Placing Southern Antebellum Case Law in Context.” Yale Law Journal Forum 125: 121–135.Google Scholar

Schmidhauser, John R. 1961. “Judicial Behavior and the Sectional Crisis of 1837–1860.” Journal of Politics 23(4): 615–640.Google Scholar

Scott, Joseph E, Eitle, David J, and Skovron, Sandra Evans. 1990. “Obscenity and the Law.” Law and Human Behavior 14(2): 139–150.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey A, and Spaeth, Harold J. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Segall, Eric J. 2012. Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar

Songer, Donald R. 1988. “Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Impact: Miranda in Five State Courts.” American Politics Quarterly 16(4): 425–444.Google Scholar

Songer, Donald R, and Sheehan, Reginald S. 1990. “Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Western Political Quarterly 43(2): 297–316.Google Scholar

Songer, Donald R, Segal, Jeffrey A, and Cameron, Charles M.. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 673–696.Google Scholar

Spriggs, James F, and Hansford, Thomas G. 2000. “Measuring Legal Change: The Reliability and Validity of Shepard’s Citations.” Political Research Quarterly 53(2): 327–341.Google Scholar

Spriggs, James F, and Hansford, Thomas G. 2002. “The US Supreme Court’s Incorporation and Interpretation of Precedent.” Law & Society Review 36(1): 139–160.Google Scholar

Steinman, Adam N. 2008. “What Is the Erie Doctrine? (And What Does It Mean for the Contemporary Politics of Judicial Federalism).” Notre Dame Law Review 84(1): 245–330.Google Scholar

Tarr, G Alan. 1977. Judicial Impact and State Supreme Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Tarr, G Alan. 2012. Without Fear or Favor: Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability in the States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Unah, Isaac, and Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2006. “US Supreme Court Decision Making, Case Salience, and the Attitudinal Model.” Law & Policy 28(3): 295–320.Google Scholar

Veeder, Van Vechten. 1907a. “A Century of English Judicature, 1800–1900.” In Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 1, ed. Committee of the Association of American Law Schools, 730–837. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Veeder, Van Vechten. 1907b. “The English Reports, 1537–1865.” In Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 2, ed. Committee of the Association of American Law Schools, 123–155. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Jr, Vining, Richard, L, and Wilhelm, Teena. 2011. “Measuring Case Salience in State Courts of Last Resort.” Political Research Quarterly 64(3): 559–572.Google Scholar

Wallace, J Clifford. 2001. “The Framers’ Establishment Clause: How High the Wall.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2001(2): 755–772.Google Scholar

Wellford, Shea Sisk. 1994. “Tort Actions against Churches – What Protections Does the First Amendment Provide.” University of Memphis Law Review 25(1): 193–234.Google Scholar

Westerland, Chad, Segal, Jeffrey A, Epstein, Lee, Cameron, Charles M, and Comparato, Scott. 2010. “Strategic Defiance and Compliance in the US Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 891–905.Google Scholar

Jr, Wilkes, Donald, E. 1973. “The New Federalism in Criminal Procedure: State Court Evasion of the Burger Court.” Kentucky Law Journal 62(2): 421–451.Google Scholar

Williams, EK. 1926. “Stare Decisis.” Canadian Bar Review 4(5): 289–301.Google Scholar

Windett, Jason H, Harden, Jeffrey J, and Halsl, Matthew EK. 2015. “Estimating Dynamic Ideal Points for State Supreme Courts.” Political Analysis 23(3): 461–469.Google Scholar

Wise, Edward M. 1974. “The Doctrine of Stare Decisis.” Wayne Law Review 21(4): 1043–1060.Google Scholar

Wofford, Claire B. 2015. “Assessing the Anecdotes: Amicus Curiae, Legal Rules, and the US Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 36(3): 274–294.Google Scholar

Wofford, Claire B. 2018. “Says Who? Case Participants and Legal Doctrine in the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Political Science 46: 35–65.Google Scholar

Wofford, Claire B. 2019. “The Structure of Legal Doctrine in a Judicial Hierarchy.” Journal of Law and Courts 7(2): 263–280.Google Scholar

Zane, John Maxcy. 1907. “The Five Ages of the Bench and Bar in England.” In Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 1, ed. Committee of the Association of American Law Schools, 625–739. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive