Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:03:53.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Compliance: multilateral achievements and predominant powers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Peter-Tobias Stoll
Affiliation:
Professor and Managing Director University of Göttingen
Michael Byers
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Georg Nolte
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Get access

Summary

Compliance signifies conduct which is in accordance with international law. It includes refraining from acts not in accordance with international law, it may also require positive action to live up to certain international law obligations, and it is thus linked to the issue of implementation. International law provides for a number of means, mechanisms, and procedures to persuade those addressed by it to live up to their commitments. These are generally referred to as enforcement measures, and include dispute settlement and sanctions. However, a number of other means, such as verification, monitoring, and assessment measures, have also been developed. Furthermore, criminal sanctions, state responsibility and liability, while primarily aiming at doing justice and compensating in cases of a violation of the law, may, to some extent, also foster compliance.

In the absence of a uniform lawmaking and enforcement authority that is supreme in legitimation and power, the international legal system relies on States, which are equal in their sovereignty, to create and enforce its rules. Thus, States are at the same time creators of and subject to international law. In order to ensure compliance and thus to safeguard effectiveness, such a system may rely on institutions or individual States. The international legal system contains a number of institutions and procedures which address the task of settling disputes and in some cases may even authorize sanctions or enforcement action against individual States or groups of States.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×