Tacit citing: the scarcity of judicial dialogue between the global and the regional human rights mechanisms in freedom of expression cases

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316018552.015

14 - Tacit citing: the scarcity of judicial dialogue between the global and the regional human rights mechanisms in freedom of expression cases

from Part II - Selected thematic focuses

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015

Antoine Buyse

Edited by

Tarlach McGonagle and

Yvonne Donders

Show author details

Tarlach McGonagle: Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Yvonne Donders: Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information
Critical Perspectives
, pp. 443 - 465

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316018552.015 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Balsytė-Lideikienė v. Lithuania (Appl. No. 72596/01), Judgment, 4 November 2008.Google Scholar

Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway (Appl. No. 21980/93), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 20 May 1999.Google Scholar

De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium (Appl. No. 19983/92), Judgment, 24 February 1997.Google Scholar

Ergin v. Turkey (No. 6) (Appl. No. 47533/99), Judgment, 4 May 2006.Google Scholar

Féret v. Belgium (Appl. No. 15615/07), Judgment, 16 July 2009.Google Scholar

Glasenapp v. Germany, (Appl. No. 9228/80), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 28 August 1986.Google Scholar

Grigoriades v. Greece (Appl. No. 24348/94), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 25 November 1997.Google Scholar

Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 10890/84), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 28 March 1990.Google Scholar

Gündüz v. Turkey (Appl. No. 35071/97), Judgment (Chamber), 4 December 2003.Google Scholar

Handyside v. the United Kingdom (Appl. No. 5493/72), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 7 December 1978.Google Scholar

Jersild v. Denmark (Appl. No. 15890/89), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 23 September 1994.Google Scholar

Kosiek v. Germany (Appl. No. 9704/82), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 28 August 1986.Google Scholar

Lepojić v. Serbia (Appl. No. 13909/05), Judgment, 6 November 2007.Google Scholar

Lingens v. Austria (Appl. No. 9815/82), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 8 July 1986.Google Scholar

Loizidou v. Turkey (Appl. No. 15318/89), Judgment, 18 December 1996.Google Scholar

Müller and Others v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 10737/84), Judgment, 24 May 1988.Google Scholar

Oberschlick v. Austria (Appl. No. 11662/85), Judgment, 23 May 1991.Google Scholar

Perinçek v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 27510/08), Judgment, 17 December 2013.Google Scholar

Schwabe v. Austria (Appl. No. 13704/88), Judgment, 28 August 1992.Google Scholar

Stoll v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 69698/01), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 10 December 2007.Google Scholar

Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (No. 1) (Appl. No. 6538/74), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 26 April 1979.Google Scholar

Tønsbergs Blad AS and Haukom v. Norway (Appl. No. 510/04), Judgment, 1 March 2007.Google Scholar

Vogt v. Germany (Appl. No. 17851/91), Judgment (Grand Chamber), 26 September 1995.Google Scholar

Yıldırım v. Turkey (Appl. No. 3111/10), Judgment, 18 December 2012.Google Scholar

Youth Initiative for Human Rights v. Serbia (Appl. No. 48135/06), Judgment, 25 June 2013.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aduayom and Others v. Togo, Nos. 422/1990 a.o., 12 July 1996.Google Scholar

Anthony Michael Immanuel Fernando v. Sri Lanka, No. 1189/2003, 31 March 2005.Google Scholar

Avon Lovell v. Australia, No. 920/2000, 24 March 2004.Google Scholar

Dobroslav Paraga v. Croatia, No. 727/1996, 4 April 2001.Google Scholar

Gauthier v. Canada, No. 633/1995, 5 May 1999.Google Scholar

J. Ballantyne, E. Davidson and G. McIntyre v. Canada, Nos. 359/1989 and 385/1989, 5 May 1993.Google Scholar

Jacobus Gerardus Strik v. the Netherlands, No. 1001/2001, 1 November 2002.Google Scholar

Malcolm Ross v. Canada, No. 736/1997, 18 October 2000.Google Scholar

Robert Faurisson v. France, No. 550/1993, 8 November 1996.Google Scholar

Zeljko Bodrozic v. Serbia and Montenegro, No. 1180/2003, 31 October 2005.Google Scholar

Caesar v. Trinidad and Tobago, Series C No. 123, 11 March 2005.Google Scholar

Heliodoro Portugal v. Panama, Series C No.186, 12 August 2008.Google Scholar

Herrera-Ulloa v. Costa Rica, Series C No. 107, 2 July 2004.Google Scholar

Olmedo-Bustos and Others v. Chile, Series C No. 73, 5 February 2001.Google Scholar

Ricardo Canese v. Paraguay, Series C No. 111, 31 August 2004.Google Scholar

Ríos and Others v. Venezuela, Series C No. 194, 28 January 2009.Google Scholar