Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of acronyms
- Acknowledgements
- One Introduction: ‘Looking for trouble’
- Two The ‘long and undistinguished pedigree’
- Three The opening of a policy window
- Four The evolution of the Troubled Families Programme
- Five ‘The responsibility deficit’
- Six ‘This thing called family intervention …’
- Seven Street-level perspectives
- Eight Research: ‘help or hindrance’?
- Nine ‘Nothing to hide’: the structural duplicity of the Troubled Families Programme
- References
- Index
One - Introduction: ‘Looking for trouble’
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2022
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of acronyms
- Acknowledgements
- One Introduction: ‘Looking for trouble’
- Two The ‘long and undistinguished pedigree’
- Three The opening of a policy window
- Four The evolution of the Troubled Families Programme
- Five ‘The responsibility deficit’
- Six ‘This thing called family intervention …’
- Seven Street-level perspectives
- Eight Research: ‘help or hindrance’?
- Nine ‘Nothing to hide’: the structural duplicity of the Troubled Families Programme
- References
- Index
Summary
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it wrongly, and applying unsuitable remedies. (Sir Ernest Benn)
In August 2011, riots took place in towns and cities across England, sparked by the police shooting and killing of Mark Duggan on 4 August. An already tense situation erupted when members of a peaceful protest march on 6 August, involving Duggan's friends and family, became disillusioned with police responses to their requests for senior officers to provide them with information about what happened during the shooting. Those requests fell on deaf ears. Rioting and looting took place in Tottenham that evening and then spread to other parts of London in the following days and other towns and cities after that. By 15 August, more than 3000 people had been arrested, with more than 1000 criminal charges issued in relation to the riots.
Many prominent politicians and media commentators were quick to highlight that structural causes such as poverty, unemployment and racism were not to blame in any way for the riots. The then Home Secretary Theresa May highlighted the ‘violent gang culture [that] exists in so many of our towns and cities’ and argued that ‘the only cause of a crime is a criminal’ (May, 2011). The Justice Secretary Ken Clarke (2011) stated in a column for the Guardian that what he ‘found most disturbing was the sense that the hardcore of rioters came from a feral underclass, cut off from the mainstream in everything but its materialism’. The Daily Mail columnist Melanie Phillips (2011) argued that not only were the children feral, but so were their parents. The prime minister at the time, David Cameron (2011a), in a ‘fightback speech’ following the end of the riots, pre-empted the findings of any future inquiries, stating:
So as we begin the necessary processes of inquiry, investigation, listening and learning: let's be clear. These riots were not about race: the perpetrators and the victims were white, black and Asian. These riots were not about government cuts: they were directed at high street stores, not Parliament. And these riots were not about poverty: that insults the millions of people who, whatever the hardship, would never dream of making others suffer like this.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- TroublemakersThe Construction of ‘Troubled Families’ as a Social Problem, pp. 1 - 20Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2018