Ala’i, Padideh. ‘From the Periphery to the Center? The Evolving WTO Jurisprudence on Transparency and Good Governance’. Journal of International Economic Law 11, no. 4 (2008): 779–802.Google Scholar

Ala’i, Padideh. ‘From the Periphery to the Center? The Evolving WTO Jurisprudence on Transparency and Good Governance’. Contributions to Books, 6 February 2010. http://works.bepress.com/padideh_alai/3.Google Scholar

Alemanno, Alberto. ‘The Regulatory Cooperation Chapter of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Institutional Structures and Democratic Consequences’. SSRN Scholarly Paper, 27 August 2015. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2651091.Google Scholar

Barrios Villareal, Andrea. International Standardization and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish N. Protectionism. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, and Peters, Anne, eds. Transparency in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blonigen, Bruce A., and Bown, Chad P.. ‘Antidumping and Retaliation Threats’. NBER Working Paper No. 8576, November 2001. www.nber.org/papers/w8576.Google Scholar

Bollyky, Thomas, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. ‘Trade, Social Preferences and Regulatory Cooperation’. RSCAS Research Paper No. 2016/47, 2 December 2016. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2879329.Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P. Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P. ‘Trade Disputes and the Implementation of Protection under the GATT: An Empirical Assessment’. Journal of International Economics 62, no. 2 (2004): 263–94.Google Scholar

Bown, Chad P., and Hoekman, Bernard M.. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector’. Journal of International Economic Law 8, no. 4 (2005): 861–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgi049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boza, Sofia, and Fernández, Felipe. ‘Development Level and WTO Member Participation in Specific Trade Concerns (STCs) and Disputes on SPS/TBT’. SECO/WTI Working Paper No. 2014/17, 16 June 2014. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2618535.Google Scholar

Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric. ‘Three’s a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement’. World Politics 58, no. 3 (2006): 446–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric and Shaffer, Gregory. ‘Does Legal Capacity Matter? A Survey of WTO Members’. World Trade Review 8, no. 4 (2009): 559–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745609990085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappelletti, Mauro, and Garth, Bryant. ‘Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective’. Buffalo Law Review 27, no. 2 (1978): 181–292.Google Scholar

Chen, Sijie. ‘China’s Compliance with WTO Systemic Obligations: Institution-Related Impediments to Effective Implementation of GATT Article X’. Amsterdam Law Forum 4, no. 4 (2012): 26–50.Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary. ‘The Transparency President? The Obama Administration and Open Government’. Governance 22, no. 4 (2009): 529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coglianese, Cary, and Sapir, André. ‘Risk and Regulatory Calibration: WTO Compliance Review of the US Dolphin–Safe Tuna Labeling Regime’. World Trade Review 16, no. 2 (2017): 327–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745616000562.Google Scholar

Correia de Brito, Anabela, Kauffmann, Céline and Pelkmans, Jacques. ‘The Contribution of Mutual Recognition to International Regulatory Co-operation’. OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers No. 2, 31 August 2016. www.oecd.org/regreform/WP2_Contribution-of-mutual-recognition-to-IRC.pdf.Google Scholar

Crowley, Meredith, and Howse, Robert. ‘Tuna–Dolphin II: A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Appellate Body Report’. World Trade Review 13, no. 2 (2014): 321–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Christina L. Why Adjudicate? Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Davis, Christina L., and Blodgett Bermeo, Sarah. ‘Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication’. The Journal of Politics 71, no. 3 (2009): 1033–49.Google Scholar

De Bièvre, Dirk, ‘Governance in International Trade: Judicialisation and Positive Integration in the WTO’. MPI Preprints No. 2004/7, 28 July 2004. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=566501.Google Scholar

De Bièvre, Dirk, Poletti, Arlo and Yildirim, Aydin. ‘About the Melting of Icebergs: Political and Economic Determinants of Dispute Initiation and Resolution in the WTO’. In Assessing the World Trade Organization: Fit For Purpose?, edited by Elsig, Manfred, Hoekman, Bernard and Pauwelyn, Joost, 120–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis. ‘Institutional Transparency in the WTO’. In Transparency in International Law, edited by Bianchi, Andrea and Peters, Anne, 112–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Evenett, Simon J. ‘Global Trade Alert: Motivation and Launch’. World Trade Review 8, no. 4 (2009): 607–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745609990061.Google Scholar

Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L. and Sarat, Austin. ‘Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …’. Law & Society Review 15, no. 3/4 (1980–81): 631–54.Google Scholar

Francois, Joseph, Horn, Henrik and Kaunitz, Niklas. ‘Trading Profiles and Developing Country Participation in the WTO Dispute Settlement System’. IFN Working Paper No. 730, 12 January 2010. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1534766.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon. Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. ‘Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change’. Law and Society Review 9, no. 1 (1974): 95–160.Google Scholar

Ghosh, Arunabha. ‘Developing Countries in the WTO Trade Policy Review Mechanism’. World Trade Review 9, no. 3 (2010): 419–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745610000261.Google Scholar

Global Affairs Canada. ‘Improving the Deliberative Function of WTO Bodies’. 24 January 2019. www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2019/01/improving-the-deliberative-function-of-wto-bodies.html.Google Scholar

Gruszczynski, Lukasz. ‘The REACH Regulation and the TBT Agreement: The Role of the TBT Committee in Regulatory Processes’. In Research Handbook on the WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade, edited by Epps, Tracey and Trebilcock, M. J., 424–53. Research Handbooks on the WTO. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T., and Simmons, Beth A.. ‘Power Plays and Capacity Constraints: The Selection of Defendants in World Trade Organization Disputes’. The Journal of Legal Studies 34, no. 2 (2005): 557–98.Google Scholar

Hart, Henry Melvin, Martin Sacks, Albert, Eskridge, William N. and Frickey, Philip P.. The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law. Westbury, CT: Foundation Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M. ‘“Behind-the-Border” Regulatory Policies and Trade Agreements’. East Asian Economic Review 22, no. 3 (2018): 243–73.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M., and Kostecki, Michel M.. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M., and Mavroidis, Petros C.. ‘Enforcing Multilateral Commitments: Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries’. Working Paper, 14 September 1999. www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Enforcing_Multilateral_Commitments_Dispute_Set.htm.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M., and Mavroidis, Petros C.. ‘The Dark Side of the Moon: “Completing” the WTO Contract through Adjudication’. November 2012. http://globalgovernanceprogramme.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Hoekman-Mavroidis-MESSERLIN-FEST_FIN.pdf.Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M., and Mavroidis, Petros C.. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance’. World Economy 23, no. 4 (2000): 527–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00288.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Johannesson, Louise and Mavroidis, Petros C.. ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2010: Some Descriptive Statistics’. IFN Working Paper No. 891, 16 November 2011. www.ifn.se/wfiles/wp/wp891.pdf.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Johannesson, Louise and Mavroidis, Petros C.. ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement System 1995–2010: Some Descriptive Statistics’. Journal of World Trade 45, no. 6 (2011): 1107–38.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Nordström, Håkan. ‘Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?’. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2340, December 1999. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=2340.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Nordström, Håkan. ‘Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?’. In The WTO and International Trade Law/Dispute Settlement, edited by Mavroidis, Petros C. and Sykes, Alan O., 454–86. Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2005.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Sapir, André. ‘Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’. The World Economy 33, no. 11 (2010): 1565–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01273.x.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Wijkström, Erik N.. ‘In the Shadow of the DSU: Addressing Specific Trade Concerns in the WTO SPS and TBT Committees – Entwined’. Journal of World Trade 47, no. 4 (2013): 729–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert. ‘A New Device for Creating International Legal Normativity: The WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and “International Standards”’. In Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation, edited by Christian Joerges and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, 383–96. Studies in International Trade and Investment Law. Oxford: Hart, 2006.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert. ‘Democracy, Science, and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization’. Michigan Law Review 98, no. 7 (1999): 2329–57.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert. ‘The Tuna/Dolphin Appellate Body 21.5 Ruling: A Decision That Could Threaten the Integrity and Efficiency of WTO Dispute Settlement’. International Economic Law and Policy Blog (blog), 2015. https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2015/11/the-tunadolphin-appellate-body-215-ruling-a-decision-that-could-threaten-the-integrity-and-efficiency-of-wto-dispute-settl.html.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, and Henrik, Horn. ‘European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products’. World Trade Review 8, no. 1 (2009): 49–83.Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert E. The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy. Salem, NH: Butterworth Legal, 1990.Google Scholar

Karttunen, Marianna, and McDaniels, Devin. ‘Trade, Testing and Toasters: Conformity Assessment Procedures and the TBT Committee’. Journal of World Trade 50, no. 5 (2016): 755–92.Google Scholar

Kende, Mathias. The Trade Policy Review Mechanism: A Critical Analysis. International Economic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Koebele, Michael. ‘Article X TBT’. In WTO: Technical Barriers and SPS Measures, edited by Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Seibert-Fohr, Anja, 307–14. Leiden/Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar

Laird, Sam. ‘The WTO’s Trade Policy Review Mechanism: From Through the Looking Glass’. The World Economy 22, no. 6 (2003): 741–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00230.Google Scholar

Lejárraga, Iza. ‘Multilateralising Regionalism: Strengthening Transparency Disciplines in Trade’. OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 152, 26 June 2013. doi:10.1787/5k44t7k99xzq-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle, and Trachtman, Joel P.. ‘A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’. Journal of World Trade 48, no. 2 (2014): 351–432.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. ‘Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Mind over Matter’. RSCAS Working Paper No. 2015/34, 2015. http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/35980/RSCAS_2015_34.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. ‘Driftin’ Too Far from Shore: Why the Test for Compliance with the TBT Agreement Developed by the WTO Appellate Body Is Wrong, and What Should the AB Have Done Instead’. World Trade Review 12, no. 3 (2013): 509–31. doi:10.1017/S1474745613000013.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. ‘Last Mile for Tuna (to a Safe Harbour): What Is the TBT Agreement All About?’. European Journal of International Law 30, no. 1 (2019): 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz002.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. ‘Regulatory Cooperation: Lessons from the WTO and the World Trade Regime’. E15 Initiative Policy Options Paper, 22 January 2016. www3.weforum.org/docs/E15/WEF_Regulatory_Cooperation_Lessons_WTO_WTR_report_2015_1401.pdf.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. ‘Surveillance Schemes: The GATT’s New Trade Policy Review Mechanism’. Michigan Journal of International Law 13, no. 2 (1991): 374–414.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Commentary. Oxford Commentaries on International Law. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. The Law of the World Trade Organization (WTO): Documents, Cases & Analysis, 2nd edn. American Casebook Series. St. Paul, MN: West, 2013.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. The Regulation of International Trade, Vol. 1 : GATT. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. Trade in Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., and Sapir, André. ‘Dial PTAs for Peace: The Influence of Preferential Trade Agreements on Litigation between Trading Partners’. Journal of World Trade 49, no. 3 (2015): 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., and Wijkström, Erik N.. ‘Moving out of the Shadows: Bringing Transparency to Standards and Regulations in the WTO’s TBT Committee’. In Research Handbook on the WTO, edited by Epps, Tracey and Trebilcock, Michael J., 204–37. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., and Wolfe, Robert. ‘From Sunshine to a Common Agent: The Evolving Understanding of Transparency in the WTO’. RSCAS Research Paper No. PP 2015/01/Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-461, 25 April 2015. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2569178.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C., and Wolfe, Robert. ‘Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More’. RSCAS Research Paper No. 2016/17, 2016. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/40384/RSCAS_2016_17.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar

Melillo, Margherita. ‘Informal Dispute Resolution in Preferential Trade Agreements’. Journal of World Trade 53, no. 1 (2019): 95–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Richard E., and Sarat, Austin. ‘Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture’. Law & Society Review 15, no. 3/4 (1980): 525–66. doi:10.2307/3053502.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew, and Sheargold, Elizabeth. ‘Regulatory Coherence in Future Free Trade Agreements and the Idea of the Embedded Liberalism Compromise’. In Future International Economic Integration: Embedded Liberalism Compromise Revisited, edited by Moon, Gillian and Toohey, Lisa, 137–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Moïsé, Evdokia. ‘Transparency Mechanisms and Non-tariff Measures’. OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 111, 1 April 2011. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/5kgf0rzzwfq3-en.Google Scholar

Nadakavukaren Schefer, Krista. ‘Corruption and the WTO Legal System’. Journal of World Trade 43, no. 4 (2009): 737–70.Google Scholar

Neubauer, David W., and Meinhold, Stephen S.. Judicial Process: Law, Courts, and Politics in the United States. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2012.Google Scholar

OECD. ‘Draft Best Practice Principles on Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy’. 2017. www.oecd.org/governance/regulatory-policy/public-consultation-best-practice-principles-on-stakeholder-engagement.htm.Google Scholar

OECD. International Regulatory Co-operation. Paris: OECD, 2013. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/international-regulatory-co-operation_9789264200463-en.Google Scholar

OECD. ‘International Regulatory Co-operation and Trade: Understanding the Trade Costs of Regulatory Divergence and the Remedies’. 24 May 2017. www.oecd.org/gov/international-regulatory-co-operation-and-trade-9789264275942-en.htm.Google Scholar

OECD. International Regulatory Co-operation: The Role of International Organisations. Paris: OECD, 2016.Google Scholar

OECD. OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD, 2015.Google Scholar

OECD. OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2018. Paris: OECD, 2018. www.oecd.org/governance/oecd-regulatory-policy-outlook-2018-9789264303072-en.htm.Google Scholar

OECD. ‘Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and Governance’. 2012. www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/49990817.pdf.Google Scholar

OECD. Review of International Regulatory Co-operation of Mexico. Paris: OECD, 2018. www.oecd.org/publications/review-of-international-regulatory-co-operation-of-mexico-9789264305748-en.htm.Google Scholar

OECD. ‘Synthesis Report on Trade and International Regulatory Cooperation’. COM/GOV/TAD(2016)1, 2016.Google Scholar

OECD/WTO. Facilitating Trade through Regulatory Co-operation: The Case of the WTO’s TBT/SPS Agreements and Committees. Paris: OECD, 2019. www.oecd.org/gov/facilitating-trade-through-regulatory-co-operation-ad3c655f-en.htm.Google Scholar

Ostry, Sylvia. ‘China and the WTO Transparency Issue’. UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 3, no. 1 (1998): 1–22.Google Scholar

Pagani, Fabrizio. ‘Peer Review: A Tool for Co-operation and Change’. OECD SG/LEG(2002)1, 11 September 2002. www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/1955285.pdf.Google Scholar

Palmeter, David, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Park, Nohyoung, and Chung, Myung-Hyun. ‘Analysis of a New Mediation Procedure under the WTO SPS Agreement’. Journal of World Trade 50, no. 1 (2016): 93–115.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. ‘Minority Rules: Precedent and Participation before the WTO Appellate Body’. In Establishing Judicial Authority in International Economic Law, edited by Nielsen, Laura and Olsen, Henrik Palmer, 141–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, and Zhang, Weiwei. ‘Busier than Ever? A Data-Driven Assessment and Forecast of WTO Caseload’. Journal of International Economic Law 21, no. 3 (2018): 461–87. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgy035.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne. ‘Towards Transparency as a Global Norm’. In Transparency in International Law, edited by Bianchi, Andrea and Peters, Anne, 534–607. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A., and Shaffer, Gregory C.. When Cooperation Fails. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Prévost, Marie Denise. Balancing Trade and Health in the SPS Agreement: The Development Dimension. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal, 2009.Google Scholar

Prévost, Marie Denise. ‘Transparency Obligations under the TBT Agreement’. In Research Handbook on the WTO and Technical Barriers to Trade, edited by Epps, Tracey and Trebilcock, Michael J., 120–63. Research Handbooks on the WTO. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.Google Scholar

Qureshi, Asif H. ‘The New GATT Trade Policy Review Mechanism: An Exercise in Transparency or “Enforcement”?’. Journal of World Trade 24, no. 3 (1990): 142–60.Google Scholar

Rigod, Boris. Optimal Regulation and the Law of International Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Scott, Joanne. ‘Cooperative Regulation in the WTO: The SPS Committee’. NYU Global Law Working Paper 03/06, 2006.Google Scholar

Scott, Joanne. The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Commentary. Oxford Commentaries on the GATT/WTO Agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory C. Defending Interests: Public–Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Angus, ed. Oxford Dictionary of English. 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Tamiotti, Ludivine. ‘Article 2 TBT Agreement’. In WTO – Technical Barriers and SPS Measures, Vol. III, edited by Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Seibert-Fohr, Anja, 210–34. Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law. Leiden/Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar

Tongeren, Frank van, Bastien, Véronique and Lampe, Martin von. ‘International Regulatory Cooperation, a Trade-Facilitating Mechanism’. 15 December 2015. http://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/E15-Regulatory-Coherence-van-Tongeren-Bastien-von-Lampe-Final.pdf.Google Scholar

Trebilcock, Michael J., Howse, Robert and Eliason, Antonia. The Regulation of International Trade, 4th edn. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter, and Zdouc, Werner. The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H., and Horn, Henrik. ‘EC – Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and Its Discontent’. In The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case Law: Legal and Economic Analysis, edited by Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., 551–78. American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Wijkström, Erik N. ‘The Third Pillar: Behind the Scenes, WTO Committee Work Delivers’. E15 Initiative, 15 December 2015.Google Scholar

Wijkström, Erik N., and McDaniels, Devin. ‘Improving Regulatory Governance: International Standards and the WTO TBT Agreement’. Journal of World Trade 47, no. 5 (2013): 1013–46.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Robert. ‘How Can We Know (More) about the Trade Effects of Regulation?’ E15 Initiative/ICTSD/WEF, 25 August 2015. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2800641.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Robert. ‘Letting the Sun Shine in at the WTO: How Transparency Brings the Trading System to Life’. Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2013-03, 22 November 2013.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?abstractid=2229741.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Robert. ‘Protectionism and Multilateral Accountability during the Great Recession: Drawing Inferences from Dogs not Barking’. Journal of World Trade 46, no. 4 (2012): 777–814.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Robert, and Collins-Williams, Terry. ‘Transparency as a Trade Policy Tool: The WTO’s Cloudy Windows’. World Trade Review 9, no. 4 (2010): 551–81.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘A Compilation and Summary of the Responses Received to the Questionnaire for a Survey to Assist Developing Country Members to Identify and Prioritise Their Specific Needs in the TBT Field’. G/TBT/W/186, 14 October 2002.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Actions Regarding SPS-Related Private Standards’. G/SPS/55, 6 April 2011.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Ad Hoc Consultations and Resolution of Trade Concerns’. G/SPS/GEN/781, 2007.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘An Analysis of the Priorities Identified by Developing Country Members in Their Responses to the Questionnaire for a “Survey to Assist Developing Country Members to Identify and Prioritise Their Specific Needs in the TBT Field” ’. G/TBT/W/193, 2003.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Analysis of the Replies to the Questionnaire on Transparency under the SPS Agreement’. G/SPS/GEN/1402, 20 March 2015.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Australia – Measures Affecting the Importation of Salmonids: Notification of Mutually Agreed Solution’. WT/DS21/10, 1 November 2000.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Communication from Mexico’. G/TBT/GEN/Add.22, 2016.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Decisions and Recommendations Adopted by the Technical Barriers to Trade Committee since 1 January 1995’. G/TBT/1/Rev.8, 2002.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Decisions and Recommendations Adopted by the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade since 1995’. G/TBT/1/Rev.10, 2011.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Decisions and Recommendations Adopted by the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade since 1995’. G/TBT/1/Rev.12, 2015.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Eighth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4’. G/TBT/41, 19 November 2018.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Fifth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4’. G/TBT/26, 2009.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Fourth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4’. G/TBT/19, 14 November 2006.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Goods Council Considers Revised Transparency Proposal to “Reinvigorate” the WTO’. November 2018. www.wto.org/english/news_e/news18_e/good_12nov18_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Guidelines to Further the Practical Implementation of Article 5.5’. G/SPS/15, 2000.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘How to Apply the Transparency Provisions of the SPS Agreement: A Handbook Prepared by the WTO Secretariat’. September 2002. www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spshand_e.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns’. Doha WTO Ministerial 2001: Ministerial Declarations and Decisions, CN – WT/MIN(01)/17, 2001.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Joint Communiqué of the Ottawa Ministerial on WTO Reform’. 25 October 2018. www.wto.org/english/news_e/news18_e/dgra_26oct18_e.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Notification Template’ (G/SPS/N, undated). www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/transparency_toolkit_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Notification Template’ (G/TBT/N, undated). www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tbt_e/tbt_notifications_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Overview Regarding the Level of Implementation of the Transparency Provisions of the SPS Agreement’. G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.7, 6 October 2014.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Overview Regarding the Level of Implementation of the Transparency Provisions of the SPS Agreement’. G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.11, 11 October 2018.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Overview Regarding the Level of Implementation of the Transparency Provisions of the SPS Agreement’. G/SPS/GEN/804/Rev.12, 17 October 2019.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Procedure to Encourage and Facilitate the Resolution of Specific Sanitary or Phytosanitary Issues among Members in Accordance with Article 12.2, Decision Adopted by the Committee on 9 July 2014’. G/SPS/61, 2014.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Procedure to Enhance Transparency of Special and Differential Treatment in Favour of Developing Country Members’. G/SPS/33, 2004.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Procedure to Monitor the Process of International Harmonization’. G/SPS/11, 1997.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Procedure to Monitor the Use of International Standards: Proposal by Argentina’. G/SPS/W/255, 2010.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Procedures to Enhance Transparency and Strengthen Notification Requirements under WTO Agreements’. JOB/GC/204/Rev.1, 2019.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Questionnaire on Transparency under the SPS Agreement’. G/SPS/GEN/1382, 2 February 2015.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Recommendation on Coherent Use of Notification Formats’. G/TBT/35, 2014.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Recommended Procedures for Implementing the Transparency Obligations of the SPS Agreement (Article 7)’. G/SPS/7/Rev.3, 2008.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Regulatory Cooperation between Members: Background Note by Secretariat’. G/TBT/W/340, 2011.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Review of the Operation and Implementation of the SPS Agreement’. G/SPS/53, 3 May 2010.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Revision of the Procedure to Monitor the Process of International Harmonization, Decision of the Committee’. G/SPS/11/Rev.1, 2004.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: E-Learning’. February 2014.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Second Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade’. G/TBT/9, 13 November 2000.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Seventh Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4’. G/TBT/37, 2015.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Sixth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4’. G/TBT/32, 2012.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Strengthening the Deliberative Function of the WTO’. JOB/GC/211, 14 December 2018.Google Scholar

WTO. Technical Barriers to Trade. The WTO Agreements Series. Geneva: WTO, 2014.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Thematic Session of the TBT Committee on Transparency: Moderator’s Report’. G/TBT/GEN/167, 17 June 2014.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Third Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade’. G/TBT/13, 2003.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Twentieth Annual Review of the Implementation and Operation of the TBT Agreement’. G/TBT/36, 23 February 2015.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Twenty-First Annual Review of the Implementation and Operation of the TBT Agreement’. G/TBT/38, 2016.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Twenty-Fourth Annual Review of the Implementation and Operation of the TBT Agreement’. G/TBT/42, 25 February 2019.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Twenty-Third Annual Review of the Implementation and Operation of the TBT Agreement’. G/TBT/40, 12 March 2018.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Updating the Decisions and Recommendations Taken by the Tokyo Round Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Regarding Procedures for Notification and Information Exchange’. G/TBT/W/2/Rev.1, 21 June 1995.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Updating the Listing of Notification Obligations and the Compliance Therewith as Set Out in Annex III of the Report of the Working Group on Notification Obligations and Procedures’. G/L/223/Rev.26, 13 March 2019.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘Working Procedures of the Committee, Adopted by the Committee Meeting at Its Meeting of 19–30 March 1995’. G/SPS/1, 1995.Google Scholar

WTO. ‘WTO TBT Enquiry Point Guide: Making Transparency Work’. June 2018. www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tbt_e/tbt_enquiry_point_guide_e.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO SPS Committee. ‘Summary of the Meeting Held on 26–27 June 1995’. G/SPS/R/2, 18 July 1995.Google Scholar

WTO SPS Committee. ‘Summary of the Meeting Held on 8–9 October 1996’. G/SPS/R/6, 14 November 1996.Google Scholar

WTO SPS Committee. ‘Summary of the Meeting of 19–20 March 1997’. G/SPS/R/7, 29 April 1997.Google Scholar

WTO SPS Committee. ‘Summary of the Meeting Held on 15–16 October 1997’. G/SPS/R/9, 15 December 1997.Google Scholar

WTO SPS Committee. ‘Summary of the Meeting of 30 June–1 July 2011’. G/SPS/R/63, 12 September 2011.Google Scholar

WTO TBT Committee. ‘Attachments to TBT Notifications’. G/TBT/GEN/65, 14 December 2007.Google Scholar

WTO TBT Committee. ‘Minutes of the Meeting Held on 21 April 1995’. G/TBT/M/1, 28 June 1995.Google Scholar

WTO TBT Committee. ‘Minutes of the Meeting of 29 June 2001’. G/TBT/M/24, 14 August 2001.Google Scholar

WTO TBT Committee. ‘Minutes of the Meeting of 23 March 2004’. G/TBT/M/32, 19 April 2004.Google Scholar

WTO TBT Committee. ‘Minutes of the Meeting of 30–31 October 2013’. G/TBT/M/61, 5 February 2014.Google Scholar

WTO TBT Committee. ‘Minutes of the Meeting of 5–6 November 2014’. G/TBT/M/64, 5 November 2014.Google Scholar