Book contents
- Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity
- Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Ovid Recalled in the Poetic Correspondence of Ausonius and Paulinus of Nola
- Chapter 2 Ovid and the Transformation of the Late Roman World of Rutilius Namatianus
- Chapter 3 The Poet and the Vandal Prince
- Chapter 4 The Remedies of Elegy in Ovid, Boethius and Maximianus
- Chapter 5 The Ovidian Heroine of Venantius Fortunatus, Appendix 1
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2017
Book contents
- Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity
- Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Ovid Recalled in the Poetic Correspondence of Ausonius and Paulinus of Nola
- Chapter 2 Ovid and the Transformation of the Late Roman World of Rutilius Namatianus
- Chapter 3 The Poet and the Vandal Prince
- Chapter 4 The Remedies of Elegy in Ovid, Boethius and Maximianus
- Chapter 5 The Ovidian Heroine of Venantius Fortunatus, Appendix 1
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity , pp. 215 - 244Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alexakis, A. 2008. ‘Two verses of Ovid liberally translated by Agathias of Myrina (Metamorphoses 8.877–78 and Historiae 2.3.7)’, ByzZ 101.2: 609–16.Google Scholar
Alfonsi, L. 1960. ‘Ovidio nelle Divinae Institutiones di Lattanzio’, VChr 14.3: 170–6.Google Scholar
Amherdt, D. 2004a. ‘La fonction de la poésie et le rôle du poète chez Ausone et Paulin de Nole’, MH 61.2: 72–82.Google Scholar
Amherdt, D. 2006. ‘Ausone: rhétorique et christianisme’, in Amato, E. (ed.), Approches de la troisième sophistique: hommages à Jacques Schamp, 378–88. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Anderson, W.S. 1982. ‘The Orpheus of Virgil and Ovid: flebile nescio quid’, in Warden, J. (ed.), Orpheus: the metamorphoses of a myth, 25–50. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, W.S. 1995b. ‘Introduction: Ovid, the poet for all time’, in Anderson, (ed.) ix–xxxiii.Google Scholar
Arevalo, F. (ed.) 1791. Dracontii poetae christiani seculi V Carmina. Rome: Antonio Fulgoni.Google Scholar
Arweiler, A. 2007. ‘Interpreting cultural change: semiotics and exegesis in Dracontius’ De laudibus Dei’, in Otten, and Pollmann, (eds.) 147–72.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1990. ‘Commodus the good poet and good emperor: explaining the inexplicable’, Gymnasium 97: 224–31.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (ed.) 1992. P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum 1–3. Florence: Felice le Monnier.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1993. ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, HSPh 95: 333–65.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1997. The poet and the prince: Ovid and Augustan discourse. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2001a. Speaking volumes: narrative and intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets, ed. and trans. Fox, M. and Marchesi, S.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2001b. ‘The Crossing’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Texts, ideas, and the Classics: scholarship, theory, and Classical literature, 142–63. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. 2009. ‘The first emperor: the view of late antiquity’, in Griffin, M. T. (ed.), A companion to Julius Caesar, 277–87. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barnish, S. J. B. 1990. ‘Maximian, Cassiodorus, Boethius, Theodahad: literature, philosophy and politics in Ostrogothic Italy’, NMS 34: 16–32.Google Scholar
Bartalucci, A., Castorina, E., Cecchini, E., Lana, I. and Tandoi, V. 1975. ‘Il nuovo Rutilio Namaziano’, Maia 27.1: 3–26.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the audience: theatricality and doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2006. The mirror of the self: sexuality, self-knowledge, and the gaze in the early Roman Empire. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bellanova, A. 2004. ‘La lezione nostalgica di Ovidio negli amori senili di Massimiano’, AFLS 25: 99–124.Google Scholar
Bergman, J. (ed.) 1926. Aurelii Prudentii Clementis carmina (CSEL 61). Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Bieler, L. (ed.) 1984. Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii Philosophiae consolatio (CCL 94), 2nd edn. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Blockley, R. C. 1998. ‘The dynasty of Theodosius’, in Cameron, Averil and Garnsey, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 13: The late empire, AD 337–425, 111–37. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. 1969. P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar, vol. i. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. 1986. P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar, vol. vii. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Booth, J. 2011. ‘Negotiating with the epigram in Latin love elegy’, in Keith, A. M. (ed.), Latin elegy and Hellenistic epigram, 51–65. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bouquet, J. 1995. ‘Imitation of Ovid in the works of Dracontius’, in Anderson, (ed.) 11–22.Google Scholar
Bowman, A. K. and Thomas, J. D. (eds.) 1994. The Vindolanda writing tablets (tabulae Vindolandenses II). London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, S. (ed.) 1890. L. Caeli Firmiani Lactanti Opera omnia, vol. i (CSEL 19). Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
Brazouski, A. 2000. ‘The elegiac components of the De consolatione Philosophiae of Boethius’, C&M 51: 237–50.Google Scholar
Brennan, B. 1985b. ‘St Radegund and the early development of her cult at Poitiers’, JRH 13.4: 340–54.Google Scholar
Brennan, B. 1996a. ‘The disputed authorship of Fortunatus’ Byzantine poems’, Byzantion 66.2: 335–45.Google Scholar
Brennan, B. 1996b. ‘Deathless marriage and spiritual fecundity in Venantius Fortunatus’s De virginitate’, Traditio 51: 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocca, N. 2003. ‘A che genere letterario appartiene il De reditu di Rutilio Namaziano?’, in Consolino, (ed.), 231–55.Google Scholar
Brocca, N. 2005. ‘Il “proditor Stilicho” e la distruzione dei “Libri Sibyllini”’, in Gualandri, I., Conca, F. and Passarella, R. (eds.), Nuovo e antico nella cultura greco-latina di IV–VI secolo, 137–84. Milan: Cisalpino.Google Scholar
Brouwer, C. (ed.) 1603. Venantii Honorii Clementiani Fortunati, carminum, epistolarum & expositionum libri XI. Mainz: Balthasar Lipp.Google Scholar
Brown, P.R.L. 1971. The world of late antiquity: from Marcus Aurelius to Muhammad. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Brown, P.R.L. 1988. The body and society: men, women, and sexual renunciation in early Christianity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bruggisser, P. 2011. ‘Rutilius Namatianus et le Génie du Sénat de Rome: le verdict d’une inscription de la Ville de Rome (CIL VI 41378)’, Hermes 139.4: 494–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugnoli, G. 2006. ‘La curia di Rutilio Namaziano (Rutil. 1, 1–18)’, RCCM 48.1: 79–85.Google Scholar
Bulst, W. 1963. ‘Radegundis an Amalafred’, in Joost, S. (ed.), Bibliotheca docet (FS Carl Wehmer), 369–80. Amsterdam: Verlag der Erasmus-Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1972. Generic composition in Greek and Roman poetry. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan 1967. ‘Rutilius Namatianus, St Augustine and the date of the De reditu’, JRS 57.1/2: 31–9.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan 1970. Claudian: poetry and propaganda at the court of Honorius. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan 2004a. ‘Poetry and literary culture in late antiquity’, in Swain, S. C. R. and Edwards, M. J. (eds.), Approaching late antiquity: the transformation from early to late empire, 327–54. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan 2004b. Greek Mythography in the Roman world. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Averil (ed.) 1976a. In laudem Iustini Augusti minoris libri IV. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil 1976b. ‘The early religious policies of Justin II’, in Baker, D. (ed.), The orthodox Churches and the West, 51–67. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil (ed.) 1989a. History as Text: the writing of ancient history. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil 1989b. ‘Virginity as metaphor: women and the rhetoric of early Christianity’, in Cameron, Averil (ed.), 181–205.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil 1991. Christianity and the rhetoric of empire: the development of Christian discourse. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil 1998. ‘The perception of crisis’, in Morfologie sociali e culturali in Europa fra tarda antichità e alto Medioevo, 9–31. Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto Medioevo.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil 2001. ‘Vandal and Byzantine Africa’, in Cameron, Averil, Ward-Perkins, B. and Whitby, L. M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 14: late antiquity: empire and successors, AD 425–600, 552–69. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil 2002. ‘The “long” late antiquity: a late twentieth-century model’, in Wiseman, T. P. (ed.), Classics in progress: essays on ancient Greece and Rome, 165–91. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campanale, M. I. 1980. ‘Il De virginitate di Venanzio Fortunato (carm. 8,3 Leo), un epitalamio mistico’, InvLuc 2: 75–128.Google Scholar
Campanale, M.I. 1995. ‘L’Ovidio “eroico” di Venanzio Fortunato’, in Gallo, and Nicastri, (eds.) 133–52.Google Scholar
Carcopino, J. 1928. ‘Chronologie et histoire litteraire. À propos du poème de Rutilius Namatianus’, REL 6: 180–200.Google Scholar
Casali, S. 1997. ‘Quaerenti plura legendum: on the necessity of “reading more” in Ovid’s exile poetry’, in Williams, and Walker, (eds.) 80–112.Google Scholar
Casali, S. 1997–8. ‘Apollo, Ovid, and the foreknowledge of criticism (Ars 2.493–512)’, CJ 93.1: 19–27.Google Scholar
Caston, R. R. 2006. ‘Love as illness: poets and philosophers on romantic love’, CJ 101.3: 271–98.Google Scholar
Catanzaro, G. and Santucci, F. (eds.) 1989. Tredici secoli di elegia Latina. Assisi: Accademia Properziana del Subasio.Google Scholar
Catanzaro, G. and Santucci, F. (eds.) 1993. La poesia cristiana latina in distici elegiaci. Assisi: Accademia Properziana del Subasio.Google Scholar
Charlet, J. L. 1988. ‘Aesthetic trends in late Latin poetry (325–410)’, Philologus 132: 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chastagnol, A. 1960. La préfecture urbaine à Rome sous le Bas-Empire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cherewatuk, K. 1993. ‘Radegund and the epistolary tradition’, in Cherewatuk, K. and Wiethaus, U. (eds.), Dear sister: medieval women and the epistolary genre, 20–45. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Chevallier, R. (ed.) 1982. Colloque présence d’Ovide (Caesarodunum; 17 bis). Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Claassen, J. M. 1999. Displaced persons: the literature of exile from Cicero to Boethius. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Claassen, J.M. 2007. ‘Literary anamnesis: Boethius remembers Ovid’, Helios 34.1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. G. 1993. Women in late antiquity: pagan and Christian lifestyles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G., Coulson, F. T. and McKinley, K. L. (eds.) 2011b. Ovid in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. 2014. ‘The struggle for control of the landscape in Book 1 of Rutilius Namatianus’, Arethusa 47.1: 89–107.Google Scholar
Clover, F. M. 1982. ‘Emperor worship in Vandal Africa’, in Heinrichs, J., Schwarte, K. H. and Wirth, G. (eds.), Romanitas-Christianitas: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte und Literatur der römischen Kaiserzeit (FS J. Straub), 661–74. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clover, F.M. 1990. ‘The symbiosis of Romans and Vandals in Africa’, in Chrysos, E. K. and Schwarcz, A. (eds.), Das Reich und die Barbaren, 57–73. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Coates, S. 1998. ‘Regendering Radegund? Fortunatus, Baudonivia, and the problem of female sanctity in Merovingian Gaul’, in Swanson, R. N. (ed.), Gender and Christian religion (Studies in Church History 34), 37–50. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Conant, J. 2012. Staying Roman: conquest and identity in Africa and the Mediterranean, 439–700. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2000. ‘Asymptotes of pleasure: thoughts on the nature of Roman erotic elegy’, Arethusa 33.1: 71–98.Google Scholar
Consolino, F. E. 1977. ‘Amor spiritualis e linguaggio elegiaco nei Carmina di Venanzio Fortunato’, ASNP 7: 1351–68.Google Scholar
Consolino, F.E. 1993. ‘L’elegia amorosa nel “De excidio Thoringiae” di Venanzio Fortunato’, in Catanzaro, and Santucci, , 241–54.Google Scholar
Consolino, F.E. 1997. ‘Massimiano e le sorti dell’elegia latina’, in Silvestre, and Squillante, (eds.), 363–400.Google Scholar
Consolino, F.E. 2000. ‘Poesia e propaganda da Valentiniano III ai regni romanobarbarici (secc. V–VI)’, in Consolino, F. E. (ed.), Letteratura e propaganda nell’occidente latino da Augusto ai regni romanobarbarici, 181–227. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Consolino, F.E. (ed.) 2003a. Forme letterarie nella produzione latina di IV–V secolo. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Consolino, F.E. 2003b. ‘Metri, temi e forme letterarie nella poesia di Ausonio’, in Consolino, (ed.), 147–94.Google Scholar
Consolino, F.E. 2004. ‘Poetry and politics in Claudian’s Carmina Minora 22 and 50’, in Ehlers, W. W., Felgentreu, F. and Wheeler, S. M. (eds.), Aetas Claudianea, 142–74. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Consolino, F.E. 2008. ‘Le scelte metriche di Paolino. Affinità con Ausonio?’, in Filosini, (ed.) 261–84.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1986. The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poets, trans. Segal, C.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. 1994. Latin Literature: a history, trans. Solodow, J. B., rev. Fowler, D. P. and Most, G. W.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Conybeare, C. 2002. Paulinus noster: self and symbols in the letters of Paulinus of Nola. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corsaro, F. 1961. Problemi storico-letterari del cristianesimo africano nel Vo secolo: studi su Draconzio. Catania: Centro di studi sull’antico cristianesimo, Università di Catania.Google Scholar
Coşkun, A. 2003. ‘Die Programmgedichte des Prudentius: praefatio und epilogus’, ZAC 7.2: 212–36.Google Scholar
Costanza, S. 1983. ‘Rapporti letterari tra Paolino e Prudenzio’, in Atti del convegno XXXI cinquanternario della morte di S. Paolino da Nola (431–1981), 25–65. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Coulson, F. T. and Roy, B. 2000–9. Incipitarium Ovidianum: a finding guide for texts in Latin related to the study of Ovid in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, 3 vols. (Publications of the Journal of Medieval Latin 3, 12, 19). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P. P. 1964. Histoire littéraire des grandes invasions Germaniques, 3rd edn. Paris: Etudes augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P.P. 1967. La consolation de philosophie dans la tradition littéraire: antécédents et postérité de Boèce. Paris: Etudes augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P.P. 1976. ‘Les lecteurs de l’Énéide devant les grandes invasions germaniques’, RomBarb 1: 25–56.Google Scholar
Crabbe, A. 1981a. ‘Literary design in the De consolatione philosophiae’, in Gibson, M. (ed.), Boethius: his life, thought and influence, 237–74. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crabbe, A. 1981b. ‘Anamnesis and mythology in De consolatione philosophiae’, in Obertello, (ed.) 311–26.Google Scholar
Curley, T. F. 1987. ‘The Consolation of Philosophy as a work of literature’, AJPh 108.2: 343–67.Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. 1953. European literature and the Latin Middle Ages, trans. Trask, W. R.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Das, A. R. and Fielding, I. D. 2016. ‘Maximianus medicus: Greek medical theory and the Greek Girl’s “grauior morbus” (El. 5.108)’, Philologus 160.1: 151–62.Google Scholar
Daur, K. D. and Green, W. M. (eds.) 1970. Sancti Aurelii Augustini Contra academicos; De beata uita; De ordine; De magistro; De libero arbitrio (CCL 29). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Davis, G. 1967. ‘Ad sidera notus: strategies of lament and consolation in Fortunatus’ De Gelesuintha’, Agon 1: 118–34.Google Scholar
Davisson, M. H. T. 1983. ‘Sed sum quam medico notior ipse mihi: Ovid’s use of some conventions in the exile epistles’, ClAnt 2.2: 171–82.Google Scholar
Desmond, M. 1993. ‘When Dido reads Vergil: gender and intertextuality in Ovid’s Heroides 7’, Helios 20.1: 56–68.Google Scholar
Díaz de Bustamente, J. M. 1978. Draconcio y sus carmina profana: estudio biográfico, introducción y edición crítica. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago, Secretariado de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Di Berardino, A., Pilara, G. and Spera, L. (eds.) 2012. Roma e il sacco del 410: realtà, interpretazione, mito. Rome: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum.Google Scholar
Doblhofer, E. (ed.) 1977. Rutilius Claudius Namatianus, De reditu suo siue Iter Gallicum, vol. 2. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Doignon, J. 1990. ‘Oracles, prophéties, “on-dit” sur la chute de Rome (395–410): les réactions de Jérôme et d’Augustin’, REAug 36: 120–46.Google Scholar
Dombart, B. and Kalb, A. (eds.) 1955. Sancti Aurelii Augustini De ciuitate Dei, 2 vols. (CCL 47–8). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Donato, A. 2013. Boethius’ Consolation of Philosophy as a product of Late Antiquity. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1968. Der heroische Brief; Bestandsaufnahme, Geschichte, Kritik einer humanistisch-barocken Literaturgattung. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dowling, M. B. 2006. Clemency and cruelty in the Roman world. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dräger, P. (ed.) 2002. D. Magnus Ausonius: Mosella, Bissula, Briefwechsel mit Paulinus Nolanus. Düsseldorf: Artemis and Winkler.Google Scholar
Drijvers, J. W. 1992. Helena Augusta: the mother of Constantine the Great and the legend of her finding of the true cross. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dronke, P. 1984. Women writers of the Middle Ages: a critical study of texts from Perpetua (d. 203) to Marguerite Porete (d. 1310). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dufourcq, A. 1905. ‘Rutilius Namatianus contre saint Augustin’, Revue d’histoire et de litt. relig. 10: 488–92.Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. 1984. ‘Horace and Maecenas: the propaganda value of Sermones 1’, in Woodman, A. J. and West, D. (eds.), Poetry and politics in the age of Augustus, 19–58. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duval, Y. M. 1968. ‘Bellérophon et les ascètes chrétiens. Melancholia ou otium?’, Caesarodunum 2: 183–90.Google Scholar
Duval, Y. M. (ed.) 1985. Jérôme, Commentaire sur Jonas (SC 323). Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Ebbeler, J. V. 2007. ‘Mixed messages: the play of epistolary codes in two late antique Latin correspondences’, in Morello, R. and Robinson, A. D. (eds.), Ancient letters: classical and late antique epistolography, 301–23. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the reading of Roman poetry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The politics of immorality in ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. 1996. Writing Rome: textual approaches to the city. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 2004. ‘Dracontius the African and the fate of Rome’, Latomus 63.1: 151–60.Google Scholar
Ehlen, O. 2011. Venantius-Interpretationen: rhetorische und generische Transgressionen beim ‘neuen Orpheus’. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1996. ‘Naturalism and the erotics of the gaze: intimations of Narcissus’, in Kampen, N. B. et al. (eds.), Sexuality in ancient art: Near East, Egypt, Greece, and Italy, 247–61. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Étienne, R. 1966. ‘Ausone et l’Espagne’, in Mélanges d’archéologie, d’épigraphie et d’histoire offerts à Jérôme Carcopino, 319–32. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Evenepoel, W. 1982. ‘La présence d’Ovide dans l’oeuvre de Prudence’, in Chevallier, (ed.), 165–76.Google Scholar
Evenepoel, W. 1993. ‘The place of poetry in Latin Christianity’, in Den Boeft, J. and Hilhorst, A. (eds.), Early Christian poetry: a collection of essays (Supplements to VChr, vol. xxii), 35–60. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenepoel, W. 1995. ‘Dracontius, De laudibus Dei 1,329–458: Adam and Eve before the Fall’, in Wacht, M. (ed.), Panchaia (FS Klaus Thraede), 91–101. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Fantham, R. E. 1986. ‘Ovid, Germanicus, and the composition of the Fasti’, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5, 243–81. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Fantham, R. E. 2001. ‘Roman elegy: problems of self-definition and redirection’, in Schwindt, J. P. (ed.), L’histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 47) 183–211. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1999. ‘The Ovidian corpus: poetic body and poetic text’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds, (eds.), 127–41.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2001. Latin language and Latin culture from ancient to modern times. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2003. ‘Classical genre in theory and practice’, New Literary History 34.3: 383–408.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2004–5. ‘Precincts of Venus: towards a prehistory of Ovidian genre’, Hermathena 177–8: 27–69.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2012. ‘Calling out the Greeks: dynamics of the elegiac canon’, in Gold, (ed.), 11–24.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1991. The gods in epic: poets and critics of the classical tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1992. ‘Si licet et fas est: Ovid’s Fasti and the problem of free speech under the Principate’, in Powell, (ed.), 1–25.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and religion at Rome: cultures, contexts, and beliefs. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1999. ‘Mea tempora: patterning of time in the Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds, (eds.), 13–30.Google Scholar
Fielding, I. D. 2014a. ‘A poet between two worlds: Ovid in late antiquity’, in Miller, and Newlands, (eds.), 100–13.Google Scholar
Fielding, I. D. 2014b. ‘Elegiac memorial and the martyr as medium in Prudentius’ Peristephanon’, CQ 64.2: 808–20.Google Scholar
Fielding, I. D. 2014c. ‘Physical ruin and spiritual perfection in fifth-century Gaul: Orientius and his contemporaries on the “landscape of the soul”’, JECS 22.4: 569–85.Google Scholar
Fielding, I. D. 2016. ‘A Greek source for Maximianus’ Greek Girl: late Latin love elegy and the Greek Anthology’, in McGill, and Pucci, (eds.), 323–39.Google Scholar
Fish, J. 2004. ‘“Physician, heal thyself”: the intertextuality of Ovid’s exile poetry and the Remedia amoris’, Latomus 63.4: 864–72.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. A. 2011. ‘Ovid’s metempsychosis: the Greek East’, in Clark, Coulson and McKinley, (eds.) 26–47.Google Scholar
Fo, A. 1986. ‘Il problema della struttura della raccolta elegiaca di Massimiano’, BStudLat 16: 9–21.Google Scholar
Fo, A. 1987. ‘Significato, tecniche e valore della raccolta elegiaca di Massimiano’, Hermes 115: 348–71.Google Scholar
Fo, A. (ed.) 1999. ‘Il cosiddetto Epigramma Paulini attribuito a Paolino di Béziers: testo criticamente riveduto, traduzione e studio introduttivo’, Romanobarbarica 16: 97–167.Google Scholar
Fo, A. 2002. ‘Da una breve distanza: Rutilio fra Roma e il suo lido’, in Lelli, E. (ed.), ‘Arma virumque’: studi di poesia e storiografia in onore di Luca Canali, 163–88. Pisa: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. 1977. ‘Unité et diversité du mélange des genres et des tons chez quelques écrivains latins de la fin du Ves., Ausone, Ambroise, Ammien’, in Cameron, Alan and Fuhrmann, M. (eds.), Christianisme et formes littéraires de l’antiquité tardive en Occident (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 23), 425–82. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. 1981. Naissance de la poésie dans l’occident chrétien: esquisse d’une histoire de la poésie latine chrétienne du IIIe au VIe siècle. Paris: Etudes augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Forbis, E. P. 1997. ‘Voice and voicelessness in Ovid’s exile poetry’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin literature and Roman history 8, 245–67. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. 2007. ‘Towards an aesthetic paradigm of late antiquity’, AntTard 15: 277–84.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. 2010. ‘Late antiquity, new departures’, in Townsend, D. and Hexter, R. J. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of medieval Latin literature, 509–34. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. 2014. ‘Reading Décadence: reception and the subaltern late antiquity’, in Formisano, M. and Führer, T. (eds.), Décadence: ‘decline and fall’ or ‘other antiquity’?, 7–16. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 2000. Roman constructions: readings in postmodern Latin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. F. 1945. Ovid: a poet between two worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fredouille, J. C. (ed.) 1980. Tertullien: Contre les Valentiniens, vol. i (SC 280). Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Frend, W. H. C. 1974. ‘The two worlds of Paulinus of Nola’, in Binns, J. W. (ed.), Latin literature of the fourth century, 100–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2005. The Ovidian heroine as author: reading, writing, and community in the Heroides. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2012. ‘Sad Ovid, angry Augustus’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin literature and Roman history 16, 339–66. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2013. No regrets: remorse in classical antiquity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. (ed.) 2007. Writing exile: the discourse of displacement in Greco-Roman antiquity and beyond (Supplements to Mnemosyne, vol. cclxxxiii). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, D. 1972. Aspetti della poesia latina tardoantica: linee evolutive e culturali dell’ultima poesia pagana dai novelli a R. Namaziano. Palermo: Palumbo.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1999. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Augustan cultural thematics’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds, (eds.) 103–11.Google Scholar
Galli Milić, L. (ed.) 2008. Blossii Aemilii Dracontii Romulea VI–VII. Florence: Felice Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Galli Milić, L. 2009. ‘Stratégies argumentatives dans la Satisfactio de Dracontius’, in Harich-Schwarzbauer, and Schierl, (eds.) 245–66.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. and Nicastri, L. (eds.) (1995) Aetates Ovidianae: lettori di Ovidio dall’antichità al Rinascimento. Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Gärtner, T. 2004. ‘Der letzte klassische Elegiker? Zur Deutung der erotischen Dichtungen Maximians’, GFA 7: 119–61.Google Scholar
George, J. W. 1992. Venantius Fortunatus: a Latin poet in Merovingian Gaul. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
George, J. W. 2006. ‘Venantius Fortunatus: aspects of gender in Merovingian Gaul’, in Ulf, C. and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Frauen und Geschlechter, vol. ii, 227–43. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. J. 1999. ‘Ovid on reading: reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid, Tristia II’, JRS 89: 19–37.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K., Green, S. J. and Sharrock, A. R. (eds.) 2006. The art of love: bimillennial essays on Ovid’s Ars amatoria and Remedia amoris. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glendinning, R. 1986. ‘Pyramus and Thisbe in the medieval classroom’, Speculum 61.1: 51–78.Google Scholar
Glorie, F. (ed.) 1958. S. Hieronymi presbyteri opera exegetica, vol. iv (CCL 75). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Glorie, F. (ed.) 1964. S. Hieronymi presbyteri opera exegetica, vol. v (CCL 75A). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. 1993. ‘“But Ariadne was never there in the first place”: finding the female in Roman poetry’, in Rabinowitz, N. S. and Richlin, A. (eds.), Feminist theory and the classics, 75–101. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldlust, B. 2015. ‘La persona de Dracontius dans la Satisfactio: quelques réflexions sur la posture discursive du poète’, in Wolff, (ed.), 243–56.Google Scholar
González García, A. 2012. ‘Hunerico y Draconcio: la imperialización del reino Vándalo y la represión de la disidencia’, Herakleion 5: 71–83.Google Scholar
Green, R. P. H. 2013. ‘Latin love elegy in late antiquity: Maximianus’, in Thorsen, (ed.) 257–70.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. 1978. Kommentar zu Boethius, De consolatione Philosophiae. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guardalben, D. (ed.) 1993. Massimiano: Elegie della vecchiaia. Florence: Ponte alle Grazie.Google Scholar
Guérard, B. 1831. ‘Notice d’un manuscrit latin de la bibliothèque du roi’, in Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la bibliothèque du roi et autres bibliothèques, vol. xii, 75–111. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. 1998. The politics of Latin literature: writing, identity, and empire in ancient Rome. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. 1958. Latin Fathers and the classics: a study on the Apologists, Jerome and other Christian writers. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. 1967. Augustine and the Latin classics. 2 vols. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Halm, K. (ed.) 1879. Victoris Vitensis Historia persecutionis africanae prouinciae sub Geiserico et Hunrico regibus Wandalorum (MGH: AA 3.1). Berlin: Weimann.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1992. ‘Augustan poets and the mutability of Rome’, in Powell, (ed.) 59–82.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1993. The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1997. ‘Questions of authority: the invention of tradition in Ovid Metamorphoses 15’, in Habinek, T. N. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman cultural revolution, 182–98. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2000. Ovid: a poet of transition? Sydney: Department of Classics, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (ed.) 2002a. The Cambridge companion to Ovid. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2006. ‘Lethaeus Amor: the art of forgetting’, in Gibson, , Green, and Sharrock, (eds.) 166–90.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R., Barchiesi, A. and Hinds, S. E. (eds.) 1999. Ovidian transformations: essays on the Metamorphoses and its reception (Supplements to PCPhS, vol. xxiii). Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Harich-Schwarzbauer, H. and Pollmann, K. (eds.) 2013. Der Fall Roms und seine Wiederauferstehungen in Antike und Mittelalter. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harich-Schwarzbauer, H. and Schierl, P. (eds.) 2009. Lateinische Poesie der Spätantike. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Harries, B. 1990. ‘The spinner and the poet: Arachne in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, PCPhS 36: 64–82.Google Scholar
Harrison, C. 2000. Augustine: Christian truth and fractured humanity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1990. ‘Cicero’s “De temporibus suis”: the evidence reconsidered’, Hermes 118: 455–63.Google Scholar
Hartel, W. (ed.) 1999. Sancti Pontii Meropii Paulini Nolani opera (CSEL 29–30), 2 vols., 2nd edn. Vienna: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2011. ‘Women’s work: female transmission of mythical narrative’, TAPhA 141.1: 69–104.Google Scholar
Heather, P. J. 2007. ‘Christianity and the Vandals in the reign of Geiseric’, in Drinkwater, J. F. and Salway, B. (eds.), Wolf Liebeschuetz reflected (Supplements to BICS, vol. xci), 137–46.Google Scholar
Helm, R. (ed.) 1984. Die Chronik des Hieronymus = Hieronymi Chronicon, 3rd edn. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Helzle, M. 1989 . Publii Ovidii Nasonis Epistularum ex Ponto liber IV: a commentary on poems 1 to 7 and 16. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1997. ‘Not wavering but frowning: Ovid as Isopleth (Tristia 1 through 10)’, in Williams, and Walker, (eds.) 138–71.Google Scholar
Herren, M. W. 2016. ‘Dracontius, the pagan gods, and Stoicism’, in McGill, and Pucci, (eds.) 297–322.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. 1986. Ovid and medieval schooling: studies in medieval school commentaries on Ovid’s Ars amatoria, Epistulae ex Ponto, and Epistulae Heroidum. Munich: Bei der Arbeo-Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. 1999. ‘Ovid’s body’, in Porter, J. I. (ed.), The construction of the classical body, 327–54. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. 2002. ‘Ovid in the Middle Ages: exile, mythographer, and lover’, in Boyd, (ed.) 413–42.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. 2006a. ‘Literary history as a provocation to reception studies’, in Martindale, C. and Thomas, R. F. (eds.), Classics and the uses of reception, 23–31. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. 2006b. ‘Sex education: Ovidian erotodidactic in the classroom’, in Gibson, , Green, and Sharrock, (eds.) 298–317.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. 2007. ‘Ovid and the medieval exilic imaginary’, in Gaertner, (ed.) 209–36.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. 2011. ‘Shades of Ovid: pseudo- (and para-) Ovidiana in the Middle Ages’, in Clark, Coulson and McKinley, (eds.) 284–309.Google Scholar
Hilberg, I. (ed.) 1996. Hieronymus: Epistulae (CSEL 54–6), 4 vols., 2nd edn. Vienna: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 1987a. The metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the self-conscious Muse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 1992a. ‘Arma in Ovid’s Fasti part 1: genre and mannerism’, Arethusa 25.1: 81–112.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 1992b. ‘Arma in Ovid’s Fasti part 2: genre, Romulean Rome and Augustan ideology’, Arethusa 25.1: 113–53.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 1998. Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 2007a. ‘Ovid among the conspiracy theorists’, in Heyworth, S. J., Fowler, P. G. and Harrison, S. J. (eds.), Classical constructions: papers in memory of Don Fowler, classicist and epicurean, 194–220. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 2011. ‘Black-sea Latin, Du Bellay, and the Barbarian Turn’, in Ingleheart, (ed.) 59–83.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, D. 1987. ‘The meaning of monastic cloister for women according to Caesarius of Arles’, in Noble, T. F. X. and Contreni, J. J. (eds.), Religion, culture, and society in the early Middle Ages (FS R. E. Sullivan), 27–40. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. 1996. ‘Traces of ancient commentaries on Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Cairns, F. and Heath, M. (eds.), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 9, 159–74. Leeds: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2002. The ancient fable: an introduction, trans. Jackson-Holzberg, C.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, M. K. 1961. ‘Social mobility in the later Roman Empire: the evidence of Ausonius’, CQ 11.2: 239–49.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. 2007. ‘The drowned and the saved: shipwrecks and the cursus of Latin love elegy’, CCJ 53: 161–79.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, E. J. 2013. ‘Praise and self-promotion in Ausonius’ Epistula 18’, JLA 6.2: 308–24.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (ed.) 2006. Propertius: Elegies Book IV. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglebert, H. 2012. ‘Introduction: late antique conceptions of late antiquity’, in Johnson, S. F. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of late antiquity, 3–28. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. 2008. ‘Et mea sunt populo saltata poemata saepe (Tristia 2.519): Ovid and the pantomime’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.), New directions in ancient pantomime, 198–217. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (ed.) 2011. Two thousand years of solitude: exile after Ovid. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. 2012. ‘Ovid’s scripta puella: Perilla as poetic and political fiction in Tristia 3.7’, CQ 62.1: 227–41.Google Scholar
James, E. 2008. ‘The rise and function of the concept “Late Antiquity”’, JLA 1.1: 20–30.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. J. 2008. Ovid before exile: art and punishment in the Metamorphoses. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kaesser, C. 2008. ‘Narrating disiecta corpora: the rhetoric of bodily dismemberment in Prudentius, Peristephanon 11’, in Liveley, G. and Salzman-Mitchell, P. (eds.), Latin elegy and narratology: fragments of story, 223–40. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. 1994. ‘Corpus eroticum: elegiac poetics and elegiac puellae in Ovid’s Amores’, CW 88.1: 27–40.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. 1999. ‘Slender verse: Roman elegy and ancient rhetorical theory’, Mnemosyne 52.1: 41–62.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. 2011. ‘Lycoris Galli/Volumnia Cytheris: a Greek courtesan in Rome’, EuGeSta 1: 23–53.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 1984. ‘The epistolary mode and the first of Ovid’s Heroides’, CQ 34.2: 413–22.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 1993. The arts of love: five studies in the discourse of Roman love elegy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitchen, J. 1998. Saints’ lives and the rhetoric of gender: male and female in Merovingian hagiography. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, G. R. 2005. ‘Friendship and erotics in the late antique verse-epistle: Ausonius to Paulinus revisited’, RhM 148.3–4: 361–403.Google Scholar
Knight, G. R. 2006. ‘The parameters of epistolarity: mapping the verse-epistle in Venantius Fortunatus’, RPL 9: 21–45.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. 1986. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the traditions of Augustan poetry (Supplements to PCPhS, vol. xi). Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. 2011. ‘A modest emendation in an immodest imitation of Ovid (Maxim. 5,30)’, RhM 154.3/4: 411–12.Google Scholar
Koebner, R. 1915. Venantius Fortunatus: seine Persönlichkeit und seine Stellung in der geistigen Kultur des Merowingerreiches. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. 2007. ‘Rehearsing the other sex: impersonation of women in ancient classroom ethopoeia’, in Fernández Delgado, J. A., Pordomingo, F. and Stramaglia, A. (eds.), Escuela y literatura en Grecia antigua, 455–68. Università degli studi di Cassino.Google Scholar
Krusch, B. (ed.) 1885. Venanti Honori Clementiani Fortunati presbyteri Italici opera pedestra (MGH: AA 4.2). Berlin: Weimann.Google Scholar
Krusch, B. (ed.) 1888. Fredegarii et aliorum chronica; Vitae sanctorum (MGH: Script. rer. Merov. 2). Hanover: Hahn.Google Scholar
Krusch, B. and Levison, W. (eds.) 1965. Gregorii Episcopi Turonensis Libri historiarum X (MGH: Script. rer. Merov. 1.1). Hanover: Hahn.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1987. ‘Elegia triste ed elegia lieta: un caso di riconversione letteraria’, MD 19: 91–129.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1991. ‘Città morte, città future: un tema della poesia Augustea’, Maia 43: 167–84.Google Scholar
Lachmann, K. 1876. ‘De Ovidi epistulis’, in Vahlen, J. (ed.), Kleinere Schriften zur classischen Philologie, vol. ii, 56–61. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Lagioia, A. 2014. ‘Le verdi chiome di Roma: nota a Rut. Nam. 1.115–116’, Maia 66.1: 146–56.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 1999. Powers of expression, expressions of power: speech presentation and Latin literature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lana, I. 1961. Rutilio Namaziano. Turin: Università di Torino, Facoltà di lettere e filosofia, Fondazione Parini-Chirio.Google Scholar
Lana, I. 1987. ‘Originalità e significato dell’inno a Roma di Rutilio Namaziano’, in La coscienza religiosa del letterato pagano, 101–23. Genoa: Università di Genova, Facoltà di lettere, Dipartimento di archeologia, filologia classica e loro tradizioni.Google Scholar
Langslow, D. R. 1999. ‘The language of poetry and the language of science: the Latin poets and “medical Latin”’, in Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. (eds.), Aspects of the language of Latin poetry (PBA 93), 183–225. Oxford University Press for the British Academy.Google Scholar
Lanham, R. A. 1976. The motives of eloquence: literary rhetoric in the Renaissance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lapidge, M. 1980. ‘A Stoic metaphor in late Latin poetry: the binding of the cosmos’, Latomus 39.4: 817–37.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1998. Handbook of literary rhetoric: a foundation for literary study, ed. Orton, D. E. and Anderson, R. D., 472–3. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1974. ‘Ekphrasis and the theme of artistic failure in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Ramus 3: 102–42.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 2012. The lives of the Greek poets, 2nd edn. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (ed.) 1881. Venanti Honori Clementiani Fortunati presbyteri Italici opera poetica (MGH: AA 4.1). Berlin: Weimann.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2001. ‘Late antiquity and the concept of decline’, NMS 45: 1–11.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2002. ‘Gens into regnum: the Vandals’, in Goetz, H. W., Jarnut, J. and Pohl, W. (eds.), Regna and gentes: the relationship between late antique and early medieval peoples and kingdoms in the transformation of the Roman world, 55–83. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ligneri, A. 1989. ‘Il tema della morte della città in Rutilio Namaziano’, in Catanzaro, and Santucci, (eds.) 311–30.Google Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. 2003. Mail and female: epistolary narrative in desire in Ovid’s Heroides. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lipps, J., Machado, C. and von Rummel, P. (eds.) (2013) The sack of Rome in 410 AD: the event, its context and its impact. Wiesbaden: Dr Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Loyen, A. (ed.) 1960. Sidoine Apollinaire: œuvres, vol. I: Poèmes. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Luceri, A. (ed.) 2007. Gli epitalami di Blossio Emilio Draconzio: Rom. 6 e 7. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Luceri, A. 2015. ‘“Notus et ignotus desunt”: Draconzio e i suoi (presunti) amici’, in Wolff, (ed.) 275–86.Google Scholar
Lühken, M. 2002. Christianorum Maro et Flaccus: zur Vergil- und Horazrezeption des Prudentius. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Maas, M. 1992. John Lydus and the Roman past: antiquarianism and politics in the age of Justinian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. 1998. The shadows of poetry: Vergil in the mind of Augustine. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Machado, C. 2013. ‘The Roman aristocracy and the imperial court, before and after the sack’, in Lipps, Machado and von Rummel, (eds.), 49–76.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. A. 2016. Rutilius Namatianus’ Going home: De reditu suo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marrou, H. I. 1956. A history of education in antiquity, trans. Lamb, G.. New York, NY: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Martin, R. 2004. ‘Les lettres d’Ausone à Paulin de Nole’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E. (eds.), Epistulae Antiquae III, 385–95. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 1993. Redeeming the text: Latin poetry and the hermeneutics of reception. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 2005. Latin poetry and the judgement of taste: an essay in aesthetics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mastandrea, P. 2005. ‘Per la cronologia di Massimiano Elegiaco: elementi interni ed esterni al testo’, in y Díaz, M. C. Díaz and de Bustamente, J. M. Díaz (eds.), Poesía latina medieval (siglos V–XV), 151–79. Florence: SISMEL.Google Scholar
Mastrangelo, M. 2009. ‘The decline of poetry in the fourth-century West’, IJCT 16.3: 311–29.Google Scholar
Matthews, J. F. 1975. Western aristocracies and imperial court, AD 364–425. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mazzini, I. 1990. ‘Il folle da amore’, in Alfonso, S. (ed.), Il poeta elegiaco e il viaggio d’amore: dall’innamoramento alla crisi, 39–83. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Mazzoli, G. 2008. ‘Memoria dei poeti in Ven. Fort. carm. VII 12’, Incontri triestini di filologia classica 7: 71–82.Google Scholar
McCormick, M. 1986. Eternal victory: triumphal rulership in Late Antiquity, Byzantium and the early medieval West. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGill, S. and Pucci, J. M. (eds.) (2016) Classics renewed: reception and innovation in the Latin poetry of late antiquity. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
McGowan, M. M. 2009. Ovid in exile: power and poetic redress in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto (Supplements to Mnemosyne, vol. cccix). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (ed.) 1987. Ovid: Amores, text, prolegomena, and commentary, vol. 1: Text and prolegomena. Leeds: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (ed.) 1989. Ovid: Amores, text, prolegomena, and commentary, vol. 2: A commentary on book one. Leeds: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (ed.) 1998. Ovid: Amores, text, prolegomena, and commentary, vol. 3: A commentary on book two. Leeds: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
McKim, R. 1985. ‘Myth against philosophy in Ovid’s account of creation’, CJ 80.2: 97–108.Google Scholar
Merrills, A. H. (ed.) 2004a. Vandals, Romans and Berbers: new perspectives on late antique North Africa. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Merrills, A. H. 2004b. ‘The perils of panegyric: the lost poem of Dracontius and its consequences’, in Merrills, (ed.) 145–62.Google Scholar
Merrills, A. H. 2010. ‘The secret of my succession: dynasty and crisis in Vandal North Africa’, EME 18.2: 135–59.Google Scholar
Meyer, W. 1901. Der Gelegenheitsdichter Venantius Fortunatus. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Miles, R. 2005. ‘The Anthologia Latina and the creation of secular space in Vandal Carthage’, AntTard 13: 305–20.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1982. ‘Callimachus and the Augustan aetiological elegy’, ANRW 30.1: 371–417.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 2013. ‘Breaking the rules: elegy, matrons and mime’, in Thorsen, (ed.) 239–53.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. E. (eds.) 2014. A handbook to the reception of Ovid. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2004. Subjecting verses: Latin love elegy and the emergence of the real. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Modéran, Y. 2002. ‘L’établissement territorial des Vandales en Afrique’, AntTard 10: 87–122.Google Scholar
Modéran, Y. 2003. ‘Une guerre de religion: les deux églises d’Afrique à l’époque Vandale’, AntTard 11: 21–44.Google Scholar
Moreira, I. 1993. ‘Provisatrix optima: St Radegund of Poitiers’ relic petitions to the East’, JMH 19: 285–305.Google Scholar
Morelli, A. M. 2008. ‘“Epigramma longum”: in cerca di una “básanos” per il genere epigrammatico’, in Morelli, A. M. (ed.), ‘Epigramma longum’: da Marziale alla tarda antichità, vol. i, 17–51. Cassino: Ed. dell’Università degli Studi di Cassino.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 2010. Musa pedestris: metre and meaning in Roman verse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moroni, B. 2010. ‘I Tristia di Ausonio: pater ad filium (Auson. 7 Green)’, Acme 63.1: 75–96.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 2000. ‘Die Erziehung des Lesers am Anfang von Boethius’ Consolatio philosophiae’, in Haltenhoff, A. and Mutschler, F. H. (eds.), Hortus litterarum antiquarum (FS H. A. Gärtner), 351–67. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Moussy, C. and Camus, C. (eds.) 1985. Dracontius: œuvres, vol. 1: Louanges de Dieu, livres I et II. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Moussy, C. (eds.) 1988. Dracontius: œuvres, vol. 2: Louanges de Dieu, livre III; Réparation. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Moussy, C., Camus, C., Bouquet, J. and Wolff, É. (eds.) 1985–96. Dracontius: œuvres, 4 vols. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Mratschek, S. H. 2002. Der Briefwechsel des Paulinus von Nola: Kommunikation und soziale Kontakte zwischen christlichen Intellektuellen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Mulligan, B. 2005. ‘An allusion to Ovid in Claudian’s Carmina Minora 22.56’, CPh 100.3: 277–80.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. 2004–5. ‘Italian myth in Metamorphoses 14: themes and patterns’, Hermathena 177–8: 91–112.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. 2014a. ‘Ovid’s self-reception in his exile poetry’, in Miller, and Newlands, (eds.) 8–21.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. 2014b. ‘Ovid, Epistulae ex Ponto 4.8, Germanicus, and the Fasti’, CQ 64.2: 725–34.Google Scholar
Nagle, B. R. 1980. The poetics of exile: program and polemic in the Tristia and Epistulae Ex Ponto of Ovid. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Nazzaro, A. V. 1993. ‘Intertestualità biblicopatristica e classica in testi poetici di Venanzio Fortunato’, in Venanzio Fortunatuo tra Italia e Francia, 99–135. Provincia di Treviso.Google Scholar
Neuberger, M. 1947. ‘The Latin poet Maximianus on the miseries of old age’, BHM 21: 113–19.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 1995. Playing with time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 2013. ‘Impersonating Hypsipyle: Statius’ Thebaid and medieval lament’, Dictynna 10: not paginated.Google Scholar
Nisard, C. 1888. ‘Des poésies de Sainte Radegonde attribuées jusqu’ici à Fortunat’, RH 37.1: 49–57.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. 1978. A commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. 1989. ‘Ausonius’ “late antique” poetics and “post-modern” literary theory’, Ramus 19.1: 26–50.Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. 1990. ‘Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, 239–57. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O’Daly, G. J. P. 2011. ‘Choosing to be a Christian poet: Prudentius, Praefatio and Cathemerinon 2.37–56’, in Heil, A., Korn, M. and Sauer, J. (eds.), Noctes Sinenses (FS F. H. Mutschler), 373–8. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. 2014. ‘Lovers in arms: Empedoclean love and strife in Lucretius and the elegists’, Dictynna 11: not paginated.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1997. ‘Return to sender: the rhetoric of nomina in Ovid’s Tristia’, in Williams, and Walker, (eds.) 172–93.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 2004. ‘The power of image-makers: representation and revenge in Ovid Metamorphoses 6 and Tristia 4’, ClAnt 23.2: 285–321.Google Scholar
Otten, W. and Pollmann, K. (eds.) 2007. Poetry and exegesis in pre-modern Latin Christianity: the encounter between classical and Christian strategies of interpretation (Supplements to VChr, vol. lxxxvii). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Owen, S. G. (ed.) 1915. P. Ovidi Nasonis Tristium libri quinque; Ibis; Ex Ponto libri quattuor; Halieutica; fragmenta. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2013. ‘Caesar’s comet, the Julian star, and the invention of Augustus’, TAPhA 143.2: 405–49.Google Scholar
Papencordt, F. 1837. Geschichte der vandalischen Herrschaft in Afrika. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Paschoud, F. 1967. Roma aeterna: études sur le patriotisme romain dans l’Occident latin à l’époque des grandes invasions. Rome: Institut suisse.Google Scholar
Paschoud, F. 1979. ‘A quel genre littéraire le poème de Rutilius Namatianus appartient-il?’, REL 57: 315–22.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. 2012. The rhetoric of the Roman fake: Latin pseudepigrapha in context. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. 2013. ‘Non subripiendi causa sed palam mutuandi: intertextuality and literary deviancy between law, rhetoric, and literature in Roman imperial culture’, AJPh 134.1: 83–100.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. 2014. The space that remains: reading Latin poetry in late antiquity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pichlmayr, F. (ed.) 1911. Sexti Aurelii Victoris Liber de Caesaribus. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Pinotti, P. 1995. ‘Gli elegiaci. L’epica ovidiana’, in Mattioli, U. (ed.), Senectus: la vecchiaia nel mondo classico, vol. 2: Roma, 137–82. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Piredda, A. M. 1997. ‘La figura femminile nella poesia di Venanzio Fortunato’, Sandalion 20: 141–53.Google Scholar
Pisacane, M. 1997. ‘Il De excidio Thoringiae di Venanzio Fortunato’, GIF 49.2: 177–208.Google Scholar
Pisacane, M. 2002. ‘Il carme Ad Iustinum et Sophiam Augustos di Venanzio Fortunato’, VetChr 39.2: 303–42.Google Scholar
Pizzimenti, F. 2003. ‘Est mihi cura tui, sit tibi cura mei: un’eco ovidiana in Venanzio Fortunato De uirginitate (carm. VIII 3, 248)’, Maia 55.3: 545–8.Google Scholar
Plautnauer, M. 1951. Latin elegiac verse: a study of the metrical usages of Tibullus, Propertius, and Ovid. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pollmann, K. 2013. ‘The emblematic city: images of Rome before AD 410’, in Harich-Schwarzbauer, and Pollmann, (eds.), 12–36.Google Scholar
Powell, A. (ed.) 1992. Roman poetry and propaganda in the age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Pucci, J. M. 1991. ‘Prudentius’ readings of Horace in the Cathemerinon’, Latomus 50.3: 677–90.Google Scholar
Pucci, J. M. 1998. The full-knowing reader: allusion and the power of the reader in the western literary tradition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pucci, J. M. 2000. ‘Ausonius the centaur: a reading of the First Preface’, NECJ 27.3: 121–30.Google Scholar
Pucci, J. M. 2014. Augustine’s Virgilian retreat: reading the auctores at Cassiciacum. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and empire: politics and generic form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramírez de Verger, A. 1984. ‘Parodia de un lamento ritual en Maximiano (El. V 87–104)’, Habis 15: 149–56.Google Scholar
Ramsby, T. R. 2007. Textual permanence: Roman elegists and the epigraphic tradition. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ratkowitsch, C. 1986. Maximianus amat: zu Datierung und Interpretation des Elegikers Maximian. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Ratkowitsch, C. 1990. ‘Weitere Argumente zur Datierung und Interpretation Maximians: (zu vorliegenden Rezensionen)’, WS 103: 207–39.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. C. 1990. ‘Old comedy, Menippean satire, and Philosophy’s tattered robes in Boethius’ Consolation’, ICS 15.1: 183–94.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. C. 2007. The Prisoner’s Philosophy: life and death in Boethius’ Consolation. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Reydellet, M. (ed.) 1994. Venance Fortunat: poèmes, vol. 1: Livres I–IV. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Reydellet, M. (ed.) 1998. Venance Fortunat: poèmes, vol. 2: Livres V–VIII. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Reydellet, M. (ed.) 2004. Venance Fortunat: poèmes, vol. 3: Livres IX–XI, Appendice. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ricci, M. L. 1998. ‘Il carme minore 22 di Claudiano e l’Ovidio dell’esilio’, InvLuc 20: 221–8.Google Scholar
Riese, A. (ed.) 1894–1906. Anthologia Latina, siue, Poesis Latinae supplementum, 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 1999. ‘Epistolary fictions: authorial identity in Heroides 15’, PCPhS 45: 109–35.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2006. Ovid’s lovers: desire, difference and the poetic imagination. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robathan, D. M. 1973. ‘Ovid in the Middle Ages’, in Binns, J. W. (ed.), Ovid, 191–209. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. 1985. ‘Paulinus poem 11, Virgil’s first Eclogue, and the limits of amicitia’, TAPhA 115: 271–82.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. 1988. ‘The treatment of narrative in late antique literature: Ammianus Marcellinus (16.10), Rutilius Namatianus and Paulinus of Pella’, Philologus 132: 181–95.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. 1989. The jeweled style: poetry and poetics in late antiquity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. 1992. ‘Barbarians in Gaul: the response of the poets’, in Drinkwater, J. F. and Elton, H. (eds.), Fifth-century Gaul: a crisis of identity?, 97–106. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. 2001a. ‘Rome personified, Rome epitomized: representations of Rome in the poetry of the early fifth century’, AJPh 122.4: 533–65.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. 2001b. ‘Venantius Fortunatus’ elegy on the death of Galswintha (Carm. 6.5)’, in Mathisen, R. W. and Shanzer, D. R. (eds.), Society and culture in late antique Gaul: revisiting the sources, 298–312. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. 2002. ‘Creation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Latin poets of late antiquity’, in Tissol, and Wheeler, (eds.), 403–15.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. J. 2009. The humblest sparrow: the poetry of Venantius Fortunatus. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. 2004. ‘Dead Boethius: sixth-century accounts of a future martyr’, Viator 35: 1–20.Google Scholar
Rodgers, B. S. 1986. ‘Divine insinuation in the Panegyrici Latini’, Historia 35.1: 69–104.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J. L. R. 1991. ‘Décimo Magno Ausonio: referencias hispanas de manipulación erudita y utilitarismo geográfico’, SHHA 9: 129–37.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1983. Narciso e Pigmalione: illusione e spettacolo nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio. Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (ed.) 1996. P. Ovidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistulae XVIII–XIX: Leander Heroni, Hero Leandro. Florence: Felice le Monnier.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1999. ‘Form in motion: weaving the text in the Metamorphoses’, in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds, (eds.), 241–53.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 2005. ‘Elegy after the elegists: from opposition to assent’, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 12, 133–50. Cambridge: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 2006. ‘The art of Remedia Amoris: unlearning to love?’, in Gibson, , Green, and Sharrock, (eds.), 143–65.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 2012. ‘Il poeta e il principe del futuro: Ovidio e Germanico su poesia e potere’, in Citroni, M. (ed.), Letteratura e ‘civitas’: transizioni dalla Repubblica all’Impero, 295–311. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. and Farrell, J. 1986. ‘Acontius, Milanion, and Gallus: Vergil, Ecl. 10.52–61’, TAPhA 116: 241–54.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 1996. ‘Love letters in Callimachus, Ovid and Aristaenetus or the sad fate of a mailorder bride’, MD 36: 9–31.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. 1997. ‘Ovid’s Heroides and Tristia: voices from exile’, in Williams, and Walker, (eds.), 29–56.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. G. 1985. ‘Ancient literary genres: a mirage?’, Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature 34: 74–84.Google Scholar
Rücker, N. 2009. ‘“Ausonio possis considere portu” (Verg. Aen. 3.378): Ausonius, Paulinus, Ovid und Vergil: spätantike Briefdichtung neu gelesen’, in Harich-Schwarzbauer, and Schierl, (eds.), 83–108.Google Scholar
Rücker, N. 2012. Ausonius an Paulinus von Nola: Textgeschichte und literarische Form der Briefgedichte 21 und 22 des Decimus Magnus Ausonius. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Rücker, N. 2013. ‘Bukolische Szenen bei Ausonius und Lukrez im Vergleich’, in Zimmerl-Panagl, (ed.), 11–31.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1979. ‘De imitatione’, in West, D. A. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Creative imitation and Latin literature, 1–16. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santalucia, B. 1998. Diritto e processo penale nell’antica Roma, 2nd edn. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Santini, G. 2006. Inter iura poeta: ricerche sul lessico giuridico in Draconzio. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Schanz, M. 1920. Geschichte der römischen Litteratur bis zum Gesetzgebungswerk des Kaisers Justinian, vol. 4.2. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Scheible, H. 1972. Die Gedichte in der Consolatio philosophiae des Boethius. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Schierl, P. 2013a. ‘Tityrus’ Heimkehr: zur Bukolikrezeption in Rutilius Namatianus, De reditu suo’, in Zimmerl-Panagl, (ed.), 131–49.Google Scholar
Schierl, P. 2013b. ‘… quod sine fine placet: Roma renascens bei Rutilius Namatianus und Prudentius’, in Harich-Schwarzbauer, and Pollmann, (eds.), 233–63.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2002. ‘Ovid and the professional discourses of scholarship, religion, rhetoric’, in Hardie, (ed.), 62–75.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. 1956. ‘Philosophisches und Medizinisches in der Consolatio des Boethius’, in Festschrift Bruno Snell, 113–44. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. 1959. ‘Ein Christlicher Heroidenbrief des Sechsten Jahrhunderts: zur spätantiken Traditionsgeschichte elegischer Motive und Junkturen (Venantius Fortunatus carm. 8, 3, 219 ff.)’, in Dahlmann, H. and Merkelbach, R. (eds.), Studien zur Textgeschichte und Textkritik (FS G. Jachmann), 253–63. Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. C. 2001. ‘Definition of genre by falsification: the false attribution of the Maximianus verses to Cornelius Gallus by Pomponius Gauricus and the “definition” of their genre and structure’, RFIC 129: 445–64.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. C. (ed.) 2003. Die elegischen Verse von Maximian: Eine letzte Widerrede gegen die neue christliche Zeit. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, H. 1983. ‘The “Panegyricus Messallae”: date and relation with Catalepton 9’, ANRW 30.3: 1681–1707.Google Scholar
Schubert, W. (ed.) 1999. Ovid: Werk und Wirkung (FS M. von Albrecht), 2 vols. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1969. ‘Myth and philosophy in the Metamorphoses: Ovid’s Augustanism and the Augustan conclusion of Book XV’, AJPh 90.3: 257–92.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. R. 1983. ‘Ennodius, Boethius, and the date and interpretation of Maximianus’ Elegia III’, RFIC 111: 183–95.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. R. 1984. ‘The death of Boethius and the “Consolation of Philosophy”’, Hermes 112.3: 352–66.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. R. 1986. A philosophical and literary commentary on Martianus Capella’s De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii, Book 1. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. R. 1989. ‘The date and composition of Prudentius’s Contra Orationem Symmachi Libri’, RFIC 117: 442–62.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. R. 1991. ‘“Arcanum Varronis iter”: Licentius’ verse epistle to Augustine’, REAug 37: 110–43.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. R. 2004. ‘Intentions and audiences: history, hagiography, martyrdom, and confession in Victor of Vita’s Historia persecutionis’, in Merrills, (ed.), 271–90.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. R. 2009. ‘Literature, history, periodization, and the pleasures of the Latin literary history of late antiquity’, History Compass 7.3 (2009) 917–54.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. 1995. ‘The drooping rose: elegiac failure in Amores 3.7’, Ramus 24: 152–80.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. 2002. ‘An a-Musing tale: gender, genre, and Ovid’s battles with inspiration in the Metamorphoses’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse: struggles for power and inspiration in classical literature, 207–27. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 1995. ‘The Epicurean philosopher as Hellenistic poet’, in Obbink, D. (ed.), Philodemus and poetry: poetic theory and practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, 42–57. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (ed.) 1997. The epigrams of Philodemos: introduction, text, and commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silk, E. T. 1939. ‘Boethius’s Consolatio philosophiae as a sequel to Augustine’s Dialogues and Soliloquia’, HThR 32.1: 19–39.Google Scholar
Silvestre, M. L. and Squillante, M. (eds.) 1997. Mutatio rerum: letteratura, filosofia, scienza tra tardo antico e altomedioevo. Naples: Città del sole.Google Scholar
Simons, R. 2005. Dracontius und der Mythos: christliche Weltsicht und pagane Kultur in der ausgehenden Spätantike. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Sivan, H. S. 1986. ‘Rutilius Namatianus, Constantius III and the return to Gaul in light of new evidence’, MS 48: 522–32.Google Scholar
Sklenár, R. 2005. ‘Ausonius’ elegiac wife: Epigram 20 and the traditions of Latin love poetry’, CJ 101.1: 51–62.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. M. 2000. ‘Did women have a transformation of the Roman world?’, Gender and History 12.3: 552–71.Google Scholar
Smolak, K. 1972. ‘Die Stellung der Hexamerondichtung des Dracontius (laud. dei 1,118–426) innerhalb der lateinischen Genesispoesie’, in Hanslik, R., Lesky, A. and Schwabl, H. (eds.) Antidosis (FS W. Kraus) (Supplements to WS, vol. v), 381–97. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Smolak, K. 1993. ‘§557: Aviénus (Postumius Rufius Festus Avienus)’ in Herzog, R. and Divjak, J. (eds.), Restauration et renouveau: la littérature latine de 284 à 374 après J.C., 367–74. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Smolak, K. 1999–2000. ‘Zwischen Bukolik und Satire: das sogenannte Sancti Paulini Epigramma’, IJCT 6.1: 3–20.Google Scholar
Soler, J. 2006. ‘Le poème de Rutilius Namatianus et la tradition du récit de voyage antique: à propos du “genre” du De reditu suo’, VL 174: 104–13.Google Scholar
Spaltenstein, F. 1983. Commentaire des élégies de Maximien. Rome: Institut suisse de Rome.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. 2003. Readers and writers in Ovid’s Heroides: transgressions of genre and gender. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Squillante, M. 1997. ‘Il mito nella poesia di Boezio’, in Silvestre, and Squillante, (eds.), 347–62.Google Scholar
Squillante, M. 2005. Il viaggio, la memoria, il ritorno: Rutilio Namaziano e le trasformazioni del tema odeporico. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar
Steinmann, K. 1975. Die Gelesuintha-Elegie des Venantius Fortunatus (Carm. VI 5): Text, Übersetzung, Interpretationen. Zurich: Juris Verlag.Google Scholar
Stella, F. 1988. ‘Fra retorica e innografia: sul genere letterario delle Laudes Dei di Draconzio’, Philologus 132: 258–74.Google Scholar
Stevens, B. 2009. ‘“Per gestum res est significanda mihi”: Ovid and language in exile’, CPh 104.2: 162–83.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. 2005. Women Latin poets: language, gender, and authority, from antiquity to the eighteenth century. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stinton, T. C. W. 1976. ‘“Si credere dignum est”: some expressions of disbelief in Euripides and others’, PCPhS 22: 60–89.Google Scholar
St Margaret, M. (ed.) 1936. Dracontii Satisfactio: with introduction, text, translation and commentary. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Stoehr-Monjou, A. 2015. ‘Le rôle du poète dans la Carthage vandale d’après les épithalames de Dracontius (Romulea 7–6)’, in Wolff, (ed.), 259–74.Google Scholar
Tardi, D. 1927. Fortunat: étude sur un dernier représentant de la poésie latine dans la Gaule mérovingienne. Paris: Bolvin.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 1983. ‘Ovid’, in Reynolds, L. D. (ed.), Texts and transmission: a survey of the Latin classics, 257–84. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 1995a. ‘The Narrationes of “Lactantius” and the transmission of Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M. D. (eds.), Formative stages of classical traditions: Latin texts from antiquity to the Renaissance, 83–115. Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 1995b. ‘Ovid and the failure of rhetoric’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. M. and Pelling, C. B. R. (eds.), Ethics and rhetoric: classical essays for Donald Russell on his seventy-fifth birthday, 63–74. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 2016. Texts, editors, and readers: methods and problems in Latin textual criticism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thibault, J. C. 1964. The mystery of Ovid’s exile. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thorsen, T. S. (ed.) 2013a. The Cambridge companion to Latin love elegy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. 1997. The face of nature: wit, narrative, and cosmic origins in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. 2002. ‘Ovid and the exilic journey of Rutilius Namatianus’, in Tissol, and Wheeler, (eds.), 435–46.Google Scholar
Tissol, G. and Wheeler, S. M. (eds.) 2002. The reception of Ovid in antiquity (Arethusa 35.3). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tizzoni, M. L. 2014. ‘Dracontius and the wider world: cultural and intellectual interconnectedness in late fifth-century Vandal Africa’, Networks and Neighbours 2.1: 96–117.Google Scholar
Todini, U. 1995. ‘Ovidio “lascivo” in Quintiliano’, in Gallo, and Nicastri, (eds.), 77–119.Google Scholar
Tomassi, C. O. 2013. ‘Imperium sine fine after 410: the attempt at an impossible accomplishment in some Latin poetical sources’, in Harich-Schwarzbauer, and Pollmann, (eds.), 265–91.Google Scholar
Traina, G. 2001. ‘Lycoris the mime’, in Fraschetti, A. (ed.), Roman women, trans. Lappin, L., 82–99. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trout, D. E. 1999. Paulinus of Nola: life, letters, and poems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Uden, J. and Fielding, I. D. 2010. ‘Latin elegy in the old age of the world: the elegiac corpus of Maximianus’, Arethusa 43.3: 439–60.Google Scholar
Usener, H. 1877. Anecdoton Holderi: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte Roms in ostgothischer Zeit. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Van Dam, R. 1985. Leadership and community in late antique Gaul. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, R. 1993. Saints and their miracles in late antique Gaul. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Verbaal, W. 2006. ‘A man and his gods: religion in the De reditu suo of Rutilius Claudius Namatianus’, WS 119: 157–71.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. 1999. ‘The defeat of love’, in Morton Braund, S. and Mayer, R. (eds.), Amor: Roma: love and Latin literature (Supplements to PCPhS, vol. xxii 22) (FS E. J. Kenney), 158–74. Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Vollmer, F. (ed.) 1905. Fl. Merobaudis reliquiae: Blossii Aemilii Dracontii carmina, Eugenii Toletani episcopi carmina et epistulae (MGH: AA 14). Berlin: Weimann.Google Scholar
von Albrecht, M. 1997. A history of Roman Literature. From Livius Andronicus to Boethius, rev. G. Schmeling, 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1982. ‘The golden age and sin in Augustan ideology’, P&P 95: 19–36.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. 1970. ‘Paulinus of Nola and the conflict of ideologies in the fourth century’, in Granfield, P. and Jungmann, J. A. (eds.), Kyriakon (FS J. Quaesten), 565–71. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Walz, D. 2001. ‘“Tu mihi solus eras”: Venantius Fortunatus, Appendix carminum I’, in Körkel, B., Licht, T. and Wiendlocha, J. (eds.) Mentis amore ligati: lateinische Freundschaftsdichtung und Dichterfreundschaft in Mittelalter und Neuzeit (FS R. Düchting), 521–40. Heidelberg: Mattes.Google Scholar
Ware, C. 2004. ‘Claudian, Vergil and the two battles of Frigidus’, in Rees, (ed.) 155–71. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Wasyl, A. M. 2011. Genres rediscovered: studies in Latin miniature epic, love elegy, and epigram of the Romano-Barbaric age. Krakow: Jagiellonian University Press.Google Scholar
Wasyl, A. M. 2015. ‘An aggrieved heroine in Merovingian Gaul: Venantius Fortunatus, Radegund’s lament on the destruction of Thuringia, and echoing Ovid’s Heroides’, BStudLat 45.1: 64–75.Google Scholar
Watts, E. J. 2015. The final pagan generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2008. Demons and dancers: performance in late antiquity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weisweiler, J. 2015. ‘Domesticating the senatorial elite: universal monarchy and transregional aristocracy in the fourth century’, in Wienand, J. (ed.), Contested monarchy: integrating the Roman Empire in the fourth century AD, 17–41. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wemple, S. F. 1981. Women in Frankish society: marriage and the cloister, 500 to 900. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Westra, H. J. 2007. ‘Augustine and poetic exegesis’, in Otten, and Pollmann, (eds.), 11–28.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 1995. ‘Imago mundi: another view of the creation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, AJPh 116.1: 95–121.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 2002. ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses and Universal History’, in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Clio and the poets: Augustan poetry and the traditions of ancient historiography (Supplements to Mnemosyne, vol. ccxxiv), 163–89. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 2004–5. ‘Before the aetas Ovidiana: mapping the early reception of Ovidian elegy’, Hermathena 177–8: 9–26.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. 2008. ‘Into new bodies: the incipit of Ovid’s Metamorphoses as intertext in imperial Latin literature’, MD 61: 146–60.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1994. Banished voices: readings in Ovid’s exile poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1996. The curse of exile: a study of Ovid’s Ibis (Supplements to PCPhS, vol. xix). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. and Walker, A. D. (eds.) 1997. Ovid in exile, 2 vols. (Ramus 26.1–2). Berwick, Australia: Aureal Publications.Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. 1978. Change and decline: Roman literature in the early empire. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, M. S. 2010. ‘“sine numine nomina”: Ausonius and the Oulipo’, in Kelly, C., Flower, R. and Williams, M. S. (eds.), Unclassical traditions, vol. 1: Alternative to the classical past in late antiquity, 90–105. Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Wimmel, W. 1960. Kallimachos in Rom: die Nachfolge seines apologetischen Dichtens in der Augusteerzeit (Hermes: Einzelschriften, vol. xvi). Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Witke, C. 1971. Numen litterarum: the old and the new in Latin poetry from Constantine to Gregory the Great. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wolff, É. 1998. ‘Dracontius revisité: retour sur quelques problèmes de sa vie et de son oeuvre’, in Bureau, B. and Nicolas, C. (eds.), Moussyllanea: mélanges de linguistique et de littérature anciennes offerts à Claude Moussy, 379–86. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Wolff, É. 2004. ‘Poeta inclusus: le cas de Dracontius’, in Bertrand-Dagenbach, C., Chauvot, A., Salamito, J. M. and Vaillancourt, D. (eds.) Carcer II: prison et privation de liberté dans l’Empire romain et l’Occident médiéval, 123–8. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Wolff, É. (ed.) 2015. Littérature, politique et religion en Afrique Vandale. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Wolff, É. (ed.), Lancel, S. and Soler, J. 2007. Rutilius Namatianus: Sur son retour. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 1989. ‘Reading female flesh: Ovid Amores 3.1’, in Cameron, Averil (ed.), 111–43.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 1994. ‘Taking the woman’s part: engendering Roman love elegy’, Ramus 23: 110–28.Google Scholar
Zarini, V. 1999. ‘Un “Orphée aux Enfers” néoplatonicien: à propos d’un poème de Boèce’, BAGB 2: 230–48.Google Scholar
Zelzer, M. (ed.) 1990. Sancti Ambrosi opera, pars 10: Epistulae et acta, vol. iii (CSEL 82). Vienna: Tempsky.Google Scholar
Zimmerl-Panagl, V. (ed.) 2013. Dulce melos II: Lateinische und griechische Dichtung in Spätantike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit (Smolak, FS K.). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar