Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 ‘Christ is not Divided’: Theologies of Toleration and the Depiction of the Catholic
- Chapter 2 ‘Serve The Lord With Fear And Rejoice With Trembling’: Gothic Theologies Of The Sublime
- Chapter 3 ‘For Satan Himself is Transformed into an Angel of Light’: The Aesthetics of Demonic Depiction
- Chapter 4 ‘Your Sons and Your Daughters Shall Prophesie’: Gothic Dreams
- Chapter 5 ‘Test the Spirits’: Ghosts and Apparitions of the Gothic
- Chapter 6 ‘If Ye Live After the Flesh, Ye Shall Die’: Embodied Immortality
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 ‘Christ is not Divided’: Theologies of Toleration and the Depiction of the Catholic
- Chapter 2 ‘Serve The Lord With Fear And Rejoice With Trembling’: Gothic Theologies Of The Sublime
- Chapter 3 ‘For Satan Himself is Transformed into an Angel of Light’: The Aesthetics of Demonic Depiction
- Chapter 4 ‘Your Sons and Your Daughters Shall Prophesie’: Gothic Dreams
- Chapter 5 ‘Test the Spirits’: Ghosts and Apparitions of the Gothic
- Chapter 6 ‘If Ye Live After the Flesh, Ye Shall Die’: Embodied Immortality
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
At the centre of Charles Lucas’ Gothic novel The Castle of St Donats; or, The History of Jack Smith (1798), there are two enigmas: the identity of the eponymous hero and the mysterious spectre of the castle well. In typical Gothic fashion, the two mysteries are, of course, related. Jack Smith is none other than the son of a French Duke, the legitimate owner of the Castle of St Donats, who has been living at the bottom of the castle well for twenty years, pretending to be a ghost (as you do). The last thing you expect in the middle of this climactic scene is a long theological disquisition, but that is exactly what we get with the Duke declaring:
I abhor all separating names of sectaries and distinction; I am neither of Paul of Apollos or of Cephas, but of Christ. Luther or Calvin, Wesley or Priestley, Papist, Protestant, or Dissenter are nothing to me; that pure Gospel which Christ first taught, is the sole rule of my conduct.
(1798, III, 148)The clergyman Freeman, standing by, vigorously agrees with the sentiment and ‘not a little inflamed with the rapture of the subject’, cries ‘this is the pure spirit of Christianity’ before conscientiously adding:
I fear my zeal has carried me too far, and that I myself shall be liable to that censure I was about to bestow upon others. While my weak frame, my imperfect thoughts, my confused senses, all tell me I am dependant on a Superior Being, shall I pretend to determine what he ought to do, or what he can do?
(149)Shall he, in other words, institute the boundaries of God's Church or his work in the world. It is a striking discourse, situated, as it is, at the denouement of the tale's multiple mysteries. A discussion of the virtues of theological tolerance and theo-political toleration interrupts the revelation, tinted with a fear of arbitrary and fanatical definitions of ‘true Christianity’, mindful of usurping the place of the ineffable mysteries of Divinity through an overreliance on human reason, and placed within a context of Divine providence and omniscience. The centrality of these discussions to the apotheosis of the novel suggests their broader centrality to the work.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2023